#HaberPA12555 Biscayne Boulevard, # 893North Miami, FL, 33181United States (305) 381-8686 (305) 798-2220
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Hernando, Thank you so very much for your kind words and for authoring #HaberPA's 210th Client Review on AVVO. The number of people who come to me with 100% legitimate complaints about their lawyers never ceases to amaze me, and while I'd prefer to be the guy who gets the job done right in the first instance I'm also always happy to come in and clean up some other sub-standard lawyer's mess. I am also particularly grateful to you for explaining to the folks how you met me (to wit: by watching one of #HaberPA's VideoFAQs on our YouTube channel "MichaelHaberLaw" - in this instance # 281 - How can I get my Gun back from the Police? @ https://youtu.be/sRP_PLegJCo ). #HaberPA's VideoFAQ started as an experiment but has evolved into a significant source of information and business, with all of our 375 short, creative and informative Criminal Defense, Criminal Law & Criminal Procedure, DUI, BUI, Domestic Violence, Crime Victim's Rights, Evidence and Seal & Expunge Webisodes being available through my AVVO attorney profile (of course I welcome anyone to view them via AVVO's platform but I will be especially grateful for a subscription to: www.youtube.com/c/michaelhaberlaw ). That said, it took 2 weeks from the day that you and I first spoke for me to secure (in hand) a certified Court Order requiring the HPD to return your firearm to you, but I also secured and provided you with the protocol from HPD (including HPD's "Firearm's Claim Form", without which you could not regain possession of your gun) and connected you with the Record's Custodian who was CC'd with all documents (the Motion, the Notice of Hearing and the Court Order) in real time. It matters not whether I am tasked with a filing a procedural motion such as yours or a jury trial or anything in between, as no matter what the objective #HaberPA will always pay attention to the client and the client's needs, field your questions, ease your concerns and otherwise keep you in the loop until such time as we have provided the precise service for which we were retained. It is only by serving our clients in this boutique fashion that we can hope to earn your positive client review at the conclusion of your case. I am thrilled that you are happy and that "My experience with Haber PA are fantastic" and more I could not possibly ask. Take care, be safe and well and welcome to the #HaberPA family. Gratefully, MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Katelin, Wow, just wow! I reply to every client review but in contemplating this one I actually had to reread your fervent words - thrice. They are so echoing in my mind that I am almost ("almost") speechless. Apart from offering you my heartfelt gratitude the thing that I most want to say to you is that your review has filled me with joy, pride and hope (as while most folks whom I represent enjoy their lives after it is precious few who get to the place where you are now from where you were when we first met). In order to give the folks who read this some context, this review was me hearing from a client who, when we first met, was at rock bottom and who, years later, has managed to build a fantastic life. When I called to thank you for this unsolicited review (#HaberPA's 209th Client Review on AVVO) you advised me that since the charges were dismissed you've managed to secure professional licensing from the State, establish a new family business (which is thriving - even during CoVid) and have had 3 children. Taking nothing away from your account of and praise for the role which I played in your prosperity, I am well-aware that mine was merely a small part of your exceptional tale. While I'm proud - elated even - to know that I served you well (according to you perhaps even exceptionally well... thank you again for that) and perhaps paved the beginnings of a new path for you to follow, there can be no arguing the fact that it was you and your spouse who actually walked the walk... just as there can be no doubt that I could neither be any prouder nor happier of you both for your own personal accomplishments. Again, I thank you so very much for reaching out and sharing your success story with the folks and I hope that your narrative serves as an inspiration to others that with dedication, effort, persistence and perseverance most anything is achievable. Wishing your family continued happiness, health, joy, prosperity and continued success. Earnestly, MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Ashley, Thank you so very much for your kind words and for authoring #HaberPA's 208th Client Review on AVVO! Being easily accessible (by phone, email or on the internet) and always engaging in open, honest, direct and frequent communication with the client are some of the key hallmarks which makes #HaberPA a "boutique" criminal defense law firm and which we absolutely cherish, and so your praise in this regard is most gratifying. But we also treasure our initial and heartfelt desire to come to understand the Client and her/his situation, to adopt the Client's interests as our own, to identify and secure realistic litigation objectives and to quote and honor reasonable fees (in writing), which we also accomplished in your case. As no one knows who you are and so as to add some context so that the folks understand the "what" of your case, you were charged with Grand Theft of $29,353.64 in the form of accepting a variety of overpayments from FL-DCF. You were cash strapped and apart from a financial inability to repay that sum you also disagreed with the dollar amount claimed by the State. Understanding your inability to defend yourself against an opponent with unlimited resources (e.g. you could not afford to hire a forensic accountant, much less to finance a trial) and your stated desire to negotiate a quick plea which did not involve jail, we committed ourselves to work together at vetting the 1,000 or so pages of discovery that the State provided in an effort to chisel the amount down as much as possible and secure - at worst - a term of probation with a withhold of adjudication (no conviction). But, as it turned out, our "rapid investigation" turned into an almost year long email and telephone battle with DCF which resulted in an admission by the State that you had been over-billed by $20,900.92 and that your actual debt was $8,452.72. During this year you were able to ferret away a few bucks and I was able to convince the State to permit you to prepay $3,500.00, thus dropping your debt to $4,952.72, an amount which was under the $5,000.00 threshold for diversion. You are now enrolled in diversion with the only ("only") conditions being repayment of the $4,952.72 in no less than 6 months time (i.e. once the $4,952.72 is repayed then the State will dismiss the case and you can expunge it from your record, although this cannot be done is less than 6 months time), with no community service hours, no classes, no other strings attached. Even though it took both more time and effort than we agreed I did not hesitate in honoring the original fee that was quoted, and in your instance (i.e. knowing something about you, your family and your situation) I am especially happy to have been able to go the extra miles. I am thrilled for you in terms of your case status, I am most gratified by your sharing such kind words with the folks and I look forward to expunging your case sometime in the next 6-12 months. Wishing you and yours all the best! MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Anonymous, Thank you so very much, both for your kind words and for sharing them with the folks (in the form of #HaberPA's 221st Client Review on AVVO). My earnest gratitude established, you are so truly anonymous that even I have no idea of either who you are or of precisely how or what I did to merit your praise... still, I'll (humbly) take it, and I'll do so with the following observations.
There are about 100,000 lawyers in FL, more than 10,000 of which are in the Miami area and of those many practice (albeit some far more effectively and ethically than others) criminal defense litigation. That observed, #HaberPA has made it a top priority for us to separate ourselves from all others by operating (not merely claiming to be but actually performing as) what we refer to as a "boutique" criminal defense law firm (in this instance "boutique" means "a small company that offers highly specialized services" - please refer to definition #2 of "boutique" @ http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boutique ). As a boutique criminal defense litigation practice #HaberPA strives to maintain the highest standards of excellence and to provide comprehensive and personalized care, and we do so from the very first consultation. Should we be retained then #HaberPA will employ our 30+ years of criminal defense litigation experience to relentlessly challenge all State's evidence and to pursue any relevant defense evidence. We will strategically wield the Rules of Evidence and the Rules of Criminal Procedure in an effort to find factual, legal, procedural or substantive means and mechanisms to beat or to mitigate the case, and we're not definitely above taking advantage of any available loophole or technicality in our relentless effort at achieving established goals and securing acquittals. We are adamant about being both available and accountable to our clients (in fact we both boast and then back-up our commitment to "having your 6:00, 24-7-365, 360°"), whom we make it a point to care more about than we do ourselves. With no history of professional discipline whatsoever, literally hundreds of 5-Star Client Reviews, being easily reachable by phone, email or on the internet, consistently engaging in open, honest, direct and frequent communication, coming to understand the Client and her/his situation, adopting the Client's interests as our own, identifying and securing realistic litigation objectives, quoting and honoring reasonable fees (in writing), rapidly investigating and preparing cases and not engaging in delay, groveling, kowtowing, stipulation or surrender we constantly effort at proving ourselves to be "boutique". With all of this said it seems to me that as far as you are concerned (whomever you may be and whenever it was that I apparently accomplished whatever it was on your behalf), apparently ours is another successfully accomplished mission. I hope that you have the opportunity to read this and that if you do then you will reach out and say "hi" so that I can thank you more personally, but in any event I reiterate my appreciation for your kind time and for sharing your words with the folks. Gratefully, MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Don, Thank you for your succinct and sincere Client Review (#HaberPA's 220th on AVVO). Yours was an incredible and unique case and as you have not identified yourself I am going to share it with the folks. A third party called 911 and said he was with a stabbing victim who was bleeding badly. The police and Fire Rescue promptly arrived, the victim was transported to the hospital, the third party was debriefed, shortly thereafter you were located just a few blocks away and were taken into custody. Although the third party put you and the victim in the same location prior to the stabbing he did not witness the incident and accordingly he could not offer any explanation as to the "what, why or how" of it. Police responded to the hospital but could not speak to the victim as he was in surgery; meantime you wisely invoked and made no statements. Inexplicably, the police left, never returned to the hospital and therefore they never took a statement from the victim, even more insanely no one from the State Attorney's Office ever ("ever") spoke to the victim and, if it were not so serious then it'd be comical that 3 weeks later the State had the temerity to charge you with attempted murder and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. After his discharge from the hospital the victim left town to convalesce with family. We know that as my investigator located him in the Orlando area, reached out, with permission he drove up and secured a sworn statement which was exculpatory in nature. Again, astonishingly, this was not done by anyone from either the MDPD or the SAO; in fact the only correspondence / contact that the alleged victim ever had with the State was our filing of his affidavit, yet they continued to announce "ready" for trial, as did we, and why not? The State had no victim contact, they knew it, we knew it and even if they did locate him he had all but exonerated you, yet, again, an Assistant State Attorney stood in front of a Circuit Court Judge and announced "ready". Well we called their bluff and on the day of trial (after the Judge had finally tired of granting State continuances and finally opened his eyes and ears to the facts that I've stated herein and which were proffered to the Court on multiple occasions) the State dropped the charges. In 30+ years this was the worst example of prosecutorial malfeasance that I have ever seen. You were literally facing life in prison and the government literally had neither any evidence of your guilt (much less proof beyond a reasonable doubt) nor even a witness, much less a victim. This was simply atrocious. Yes it worked out, and yes we were on top of it but when something this outrageous happens the words "nolle pros" offer some but no where near enough comfort. Meantime, I can't even imagine being you through that, and to you, how you comported yourself, I tip my hat. You listened, you maintained your cool, you you followed instructions and you asked appropriate questions... in short (and particularly in light of the charges) you were a model client. I have no explanation for the unprecedented acts by the police and the prosecution in your case but I am glad that you took the leap of faith by literally entrusting me with your life. I also appreciate your having taken the time to share your experience with #HaberPA with the folks. Hopefully we won't meet again professionally, but, as is the case with most former clients you are now part of the #HaberPA family and as such my hope is that we'll enjoy an adult beverage together one day soon. With my fondest regards. MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Susy,
Thank you very much for sharing your experience with #HaberPA with the folks. Yours is the second time in recent history that the spouse of a client has taken the time to author and submit a review (in your case #HaberPA's 219th Client Review) so I must be doing something exceptionally correct.
That observed, I am well-aware of just how daunting the criminal justice system can be, especially for the uninitiated, and so it's an important part of my job to explain the mechanics to those who need to know, your husband's case being an excellent example.
In those initial moments at your home, when your husband was first detained then "cuffed and stuffed", the hands-down most critical thing that you possibly could have done was to call me (a lawyer).
You were able to provide me with real time information which I was able to parlay into both a greater understanding of the situation (not only for myself but also so as to be able to explain things to you) as well as into effective, persuasive argument for our impending bond hearing.
Your husband had multiple issues. He had picked up a new violent domestic felony, which, on it's own is a significant problem, but, dovetailing it with the fact that he was serving felony probation at the time, the situation was dire.
First, anyone on felony probation in FL who gets arrested for a new case is subject to a "No Bond" hold on the prior probation case. While Judges have the discretion to authorize bond for such folks (either at the prosecutor's request or sua sponte) they often deny the same for a variety of reasons (e.g. to sweat the probationer, to make a later plea more likely, to send a message to other probationers, etc.). Still, and although one can theoretically sit in jail for months on end while awaiting a PVH the Judge may, should s/he wish, grant a "Probation Bond".
But, when, as was the case with your husband, one is designated as a "VFOSC" (a Violent Felony Offender of Special Concern - which happened in your husband's case simply because he was charged with a felony crime of violence while serving felony probation) then the Judge has no discretion, s/he is statutorily prohibited from granting a bond on the new case and that renders a probation bond meaningless.
Fortunately you and I were able to speak and enjoyed free communication over the next 36 hours. My investigative team was able to secure surveillance footage of the actual incident (which was something that the cops either neglected to do or intentionally chose to avoid), you were able to provide me with significant historical context as well as incredible documentary evidence which plainly demonstrated malicious intent on behalf of the "alleged victim" and while your husband had to spend two (2) evenings in jail we were able to convince the Judge to deny VFOSC status and ROR (release on recognizance) your husband. After that the rest was relatively smooth sailing.
Even though the prosecutor bought the complaining witness' BS story and filed the bogus new felony domestic charge we had an experienced Judge who gave us the courtesy of a quick "Stand Your Ground" Hearing and within about 6 weeks time your husband was granted statutory immunity, the new case was dismissed and your husband was reinstated to probation.
Please believe me when I say to you that I could not possibly have accomplished my job without your generous effort and assistance. In truth your husband has you to thank every nit as much as myself, and I too must thank you (both for your generous client review and for helping me to help your family).
Wising you and yours all the best this holiday season and beyond.
Earnestly,
MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear S. Rose, Thank you very much for sharing your experience with #HaberPA and for obviously and intentionally employing such incredibly kind words when publishing what is now our 218th Client Review on AVVO! I'm a firm believer in the idea that open, honest and frequent communication are essential elements to any functional and meaningful relationship, most definitely including attorney-client. That said I'm going to expound on your assessment just a little bit, as yours is a classic example which can benefit other folks. You reside on FL's central west coast and received notice of a criminal prosecution (for a criminal traffic offense) in the NE section of the State. Because you had no connection to that area you had a solid alibi and, because it was a patent error, the police officer requested and the State agreed to dismiss the case; however, you still had an unwarranted criminal record which you wanted to expunge. You found me on the internet. Even though I'm in SE Florida you reached out to and hired me to handle the matter remotely. (One of the few "CoVid Silver Linings" is the ability for lawyers to easily handle their cases in a remote fashion. While not functional for most litigation - and surely tapering off as restrictions are relaxes - when it comes to sealing and expungement, these days lawyers can accomplish the same throughout Florida's 65,758 square miles no matter where we happen to be physically located.) That observed, I was as forthright with you as I am with everyone, explaining that while expungement is not "rocket science" it is a technical process full of potential tripwires and boobytraps, and as it turned out your case is a textbook example of the application of Murphy's Law to "the law". I secured the necessary documents, prepared the mandatory paperwork, emailed it to you with detailed instructions and when I had everything compiled I started the process. The first blunder occurred when the State "misplaced" your application. The second came when the Assistant State Attorney mis-executed the replaced original. An Assistant State Attorney signed it, authorizing FDLE to process the expungement application without objection, but - giving them the benefit of the doubt - they negligently wrote in an incorrect identifier, causing FDLE to reject the application. This led to the third complication, in that the whole process needed a reboot with micromanagement. There's no reason for me to believe that you (or any other "civilian" for that matter) could not have maneuvered through these missteps, but I am absolutely confident in my ability to do so quicker, smoother and with a sum net of zero aggravation to your life, most especially for someone like you, who has "extremely busy career that often requires work late into the evening". Naturally I kept you in the loop, to your credit you were consistently understanding and helpful and, while it took longer than expected, your case was expunged. Apart from my gratitude for your Client review I want to thank you for your assistance and patience, and to wish you all the best in luck and success. Earnestly, MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Anonymous, Thank you for taking the time to share your second experience with #HaberPA with the folks. When it comes to repeat clients I always have mixed feelings, to wit: On the one hand I'm always honored and proud (kinda like being asked out on a second date) but, conversely, I never want to see someone who's been through the system have to repeat, and your case is an excellent abject lesson as to why. Without delving too far into the potential pitfalls of probation suffice it to say that the last thing a probationer wants or needs thrust upon her/him is a new arrest. (For more info on probation you can read #HaberPA's AVVO Legal Guide on Probation in Florida: "What it is and how to survive it?" @ http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/probation-in-florida--what-it-is-and-how-to-survive-it and you can watch my November 1, 2021 podcast, "At Your Service with Haber & Martinez", # 19, "Probation: Palpability, Practicality, Pitfalls & Pro-Tips" @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06ZzUwYJ_ao ) While any probationer who picks up a new substantive case while being supervised is subject to a possible "no Bond" hold (pending resolution of the VOP) in your particular case, because you were arrested for an enumerated violent offense while on felony probation you were automatically classified as a "VFOSC" (a Violent Felony Offender of Special Concern), which comes with a mandatory "No Bond" provision. But for the convergence of luck, skill and timing (plus a little extra luck and skill), and had the prosecutor gotten her way, then that's precisely where you would have been, e.g. in jail, held without bond, likely for several months. Luck: Fortunately for you the entire incident - audio and video - was caught on surveillance cameras. Skill: We knew enough to look for, locate and secure the footage. Timing: Because of the combination of luck and skill we were also able to introduce the footage in your defense at your bond hearing. More luck and skill: The footage showed that you stood in your doorway, using a kitchen knife to defend yourself, your family and your property from a known and unwelcomed trespassing would-be assailant, making a "conditional threat" (e.g. leave or else) to a complaining witness who was aggressive in both behavior and speech and who was on your property, threatening you not withstanding your brandishing a defensive weapon and demanding that he leave. This was a textbook case of Stand Your Ground (so much so that the cops even admitted that had they seen the video footage at the time then they would not have arrested), and that is why after an evidentiary hearing your Judge granted you statutory immunity, the case was dismissed and you were restored to probation. The last thing that I'll mention about your case is that, while the cops get a pass on this one (again, they were not privy to the digital footage at the time of your arrest) the State Attorney's Office does not... not in my book anyhow. When I provided the State with the video files and coupled it with my argument (which included 154 text messages from their alleged "victim" containing unequivocal threats of violence toward you) they doubled down like little prosecutorial robots, absolutely refusing to see anything beyond skewed tunnel-vision toward guilt, and that is inexcusable (and pathetic). That said, I am more than pleased at the outcome of your case, I am appreciative of your praise and I am hopeful that you will conclude the balance of you probationary sentence without incident. Thanking you again and wishing you all the best. Gratefully, MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Anonymous, Apart from a general and heartfelt "thank you so very much" for your incredibly kind and detailed Client Review (#216 for #HaberPA on AVVO) I want to take a moment to comment upon what I consider to be the most salient things that you mentioned. First, you hired me only after having already been thoroughly disappointed by a prior privately retained attorney, and for that I am both sorry (sorry for you in that you wasted time and money, you expended unnecessary worry and incurred needless stress for yourself and your family) and grateful (grateful that after such a horrific experience - with an otherwise and seeming competent lawyer - you took a leap of faith in choosing to retain #HaberPA to competently clean up the mess). Sadly, about 40% of my caseload includes clients such as you, to wit: Victims of what can most aptly be described as "p*ss poor lawyering". Second (although most importantly to my mind), you found and chose to speak with me because of other Client Reviews (Client Reviews which are not unlike this one / yours), which is a tribute not only to my competence, dedication and proven abilities but also to those literally hundreds of folks who, like you, so generously offered their time to express their experience and satisfaction with #HaberPA's legal services. Just as is the case with all who came before you, I am humbled, grateful and indebted to you for doing so here and now. Third, you retained me based upon our detailed discussions which culminated in a realistic, achievable and affordable plan of action, but this did not come to be either flippantly or free. Rather, it came from both a deep and detailed dive into the facts and circumstances of your case (e.g. an exhaustive review of all police reports, victim statements, nearly 2 hours of body-cam footage, your version of events and your supporting documents, including medical records, discussions with supporting and potential defense witnesses, etcetera), which culminated in our agreed strategy and which necessarily included tactics designed to undo the damage that your prior lawyer had inflicted upon your cause (be it intentionally or negligently, it was bad). Fourth, I truly appreciate your acknowledgement of my consistency with regard to availability and communication in general, but even more so as regards both my steadfast commitment to and my unwavering belief in achieving our agreed litigation objective (noting that if I do not believe then how are you to do so, much less how are we to expect either the State, the Judge or a Jury to believe?). Finally, while it is always ("always") crucial for to me to both be entirely honest and transparent with my clients (be it in regard to identifying realistic and achievable litigation objectives or otherwise), I also always ("always") remain attentive to the Client's wishes. In your case you wanted diversion. Period. You made this clear to both your first attorney and to myself. While I can't speak to discussions between you and your initial attorney in my case you maintained your desire for admission into diversion (which was something that the State absolutely refused to offer to you) despite my earnest belief that we would secure an acquittal at trial. Not withstanding our difference of opinion as to the best resolution, you were the client, you wanted what you wanted, it was neither illegal nor unethical and so I steeled myself with determination to make your wish a reality. All of this observed I want to take a moment to remind you of the Golden Rules of diversion (e.g. Do what you are supposed to do, when and how you are expected to do so and do not do anything that you are not supposed to do) and to say that I'm eager to expunge it for you. Thank you again for your most sincere and illustrative client review, congratulations on the successful resolution of your case and please accept my best wishes you and your family all of the best in happiness, health, luck and success. Fondly, MAH/Esq
Michael Adam Haber's response: Dear Andrea, After 30 years in the criminal defense industry I don't get to experience too manty "firsts", but this (#HaberPA's 215th Client Review on AVVO) is one of those rare, precious moments. You were a crime victim (whom I did not represent in my capacity as a victim's rights advocate; to the contrary I represented your malefactor) who went out of her way to effectively thank me for representing her wrongdoer. If you hadn't so eloquently explained the "why" of this then anyone reading your review (myself included) would likely be perplexed, but you did and for that (and for the review itself) I am grateful. I call #HaberPA a "boutique" law firm because I recognize that each client is an individual, I pay great attention to the details that matter to the client and then I tailor a strategy which I believe to be best suited to accomplishing the client's objective. Sometimes it is purely a "litigation objective" but oftentimes, and surely in this instance, it's more of a global approach, litigation being but one of many components. I do not need to tell you how determined your husband was to preserve his family (to say "at all costs" wouldn't do his passion justice), and, knowing something of him I put my experience to work, called in a support staff, laid out a multi-tiered plan, tasked everyone with their chores and set to work, micromanaging a proverbial ensemble. Sparing you (and the readers) the details, suffice it to say that without your husband's unwavering commitment, dogged determination and time-proven effort all of that would have been a waste of time, money and brain power. I guess what I'm trying to say is that while I will take credit for being "the man with the plan", in the end I was really "the guy behind the guy", as it was your husband who did all of the heavy lifting. That said, while I can tell you how grateful I am for your having taken the time to share your thoughts and feelings with the folks I can't express to you just how happy I am that your family is intact and that your daughter has the best of both worlds under one roof. Thanking you again for your most generous public appraisal. Earnestly, MAH/Esq.
Michael Adam Haber
also known as #HaberPA, Michael A. Haber, P.A.
Avvo Rating10
- North Miami, FL
- Licensed for 30 years
About Michael
Practice areas
- Criminal defense: 40%
Michael A. Haber, Esq. has litigated criminal defense cases ranging from misdemeanors to murder since being licensed in both state court (1991) and in federal court (1993).
31 years
- DUI and DWI: 40%
Michael A. Haber, Esq. has represented over 1,000 criminal traffic cases, including misdemeanor and felony DUI charges, including DUI manslaughter and vehicular homicide cases.
31 years
- Domestic violence: 10%
Michael A. Haber, Esq. has represented both the criminally accused and has also regularly served as a victim's rights' advocate in domestic violence cases since 1991.
31 years
- Expungement: 10%
Michael A. Haber, Esq. regularly assists folks in sealing and expungment cases, oftentimes for out-of-State clients who never need to appear in court. This process can be done remotely.
31 years
Languages spoken
English, Spanish
Photos and videos
Contact
#HaberPA
12555 Biscayne Boulevard, # 893
North Miami, FL, 33181
- Office (305) 381-8686
- Mobile (305) 798-2220
Website
Resume
License
| State | Status | Acquired | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| FL | Member in Good Standing | 1991 | 02/23/2022 |
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
Avvo Contributions
| Legal answers | 36604 |
| Legal guides | 32 |
Returning Property (firearm) from POLICE
5.0 stars
Posted by Hernando
April 19, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneytruly one of a kind!
5.0 stars
Posted by katelin
April 16, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyOutstanding Job!!
5.0 stars
Posted by Ashley
April 15, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyShark
5.0 stars
Posted by anonymous
April 27, 2022
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyWhen you need a fighter
5.0 stars
Posted by Don
April 13, 2022
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyBest lawyer I have ever worked with!
5.0 stars
Posted by Susy
December 1, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyBeyond grateful!
5.0 stars
Posted by S. Rose
November 16, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyI have the best lawyer
5.0 stars
Posted by anonymous
November 8, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyOutstanding Attorney
5.0 stars
Posted by anonymous
October 6, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyDomestic violence case
5.0 stars
Posted by Andrea
September 9, 2021
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyAttorney endorsements
(110)Aseal Morghem, Criminal defense Attorney on Aug 20, 2013
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
I've known Mr. Haber for over 10 years. I was a prosecutor on a few of his cases. I have seen him fight for his clients like a bulldog and at the same time very professional with his colleagues. When Mr. Haber speaks, everyone listens. He knows the law and if there is a winning argument, Mr. Haber will find it. His clients are in very good and dedicated hands.
James Stanton, Criminal defense Attorney on Aug 11, 2015
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
I endorse this lawyer. Many lawyers donate their time and energy in assisting or directing others with answers to general questions on these Avvo Boards. Mr. Haber, however, has taken this assistance and general direction to a level of an art form. I have often found that Mr. Haber's responds to the questions asked and address peoples questions competently. While not always giving the answers the asker likes to hear, he shoots it to them straight and points people in the right direction on where to go next. Between his detailed answers, most of which I have found myself agreeing with either through the I Agree function or in my own answers provided. Through his quality legal guides on Avvo, he is truly providing a valued benefit to those who need some basic answers or responses about the system in general to people needing some basic understanding of the terms which they face in their current situation.
