We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
PRO
also known as #HaberPA, Michael A. Haber, P.A.
Virtual Consultation Available
At #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. "it's all about reasonable doubt"!
Whether in State or Federal Courts, Michael A. Haber, P.A. strives to ensure that his client's rights are respected and that his clients receive top-tier legal representation and counsel.
For 3+ decades I have striven to make #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. a business that custom tailors its services to meet the needs of the client. This incorporates such things as (but is not limited to) doing my best to meet clients at their convenience (as opposed to mine), in locations and at times which are mutually convenient (sometimes at their homes, places of business, independent ground - having free wifi and excellent coffee any Dunkin Donuts always works for me - and occasionally even at odd hours), structuring fees to reasonably accommodate the client, making myself personally available to the client as close to 24/7 as is possible and, perhaps most importantly, giving careful and comprehensive consideration to both micro and macro issues in a given case so as to be able to agree upon and effort toward a viable litigation objective. This is why I refer to #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. proudly providing "boutique" criminal defense litigation services ("boutique" meaning "a small company that offers highly specialized services"), and this is a large part of #HaberPA's / Michael A. Haber, P.A.'s mission statement.
Accordingly, #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. has provided personalized and boutique legal services to both individuals and entities, primarily in the South Florida area, since 1991. With no history of professional discipline whatsoever, Michael A. Haber, Esq. zealously advocates his client's interests and custom tailors his services to meet each client's particular situation, needs and desires.
Toward that end Michael A. Haber, Esq. makes himself directly available to his clients whether in person, over the phone or Toll Free, by cell, verbally or text), by e-mail, on Facebook, on Twittter, on AOL/IM, and also why I consistently add information to the public on both HaberPA's Criminal and DUI Defense Litigation Blog, and more importantly with #HaberPA's "Webisode" series on YouTube ("MichaelHaberLaw"), whcih currently features 401 short, educational, entertaining and informative VideoFAQ's on a variety of Criminal Defense, DUI, BUI, Domestic Violence, Victim's Rights Advocacy and Seal and Expunge related topics.
When you hire #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. you get Michael A. Haber, Esq.!
And remember, at HaberPA, "It's all about Reasonable Doubt"!
4
Practice Areas
35 years
35 years
35 years
35 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
State: Florida
Acquired: 1991
No misconduct found
Mobile
12555 Biscayne Boulevard, # 893, North Miami, FL, 33181
criminallaw.com/lawyer/michael-a-haber
Other places you can find Michael online.
271 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 5 of 57 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge
Posted by anonymous | November 21, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
Reliable, Supportive, and Always There When You Need Him
I was charged with misdemeanor domestic battery after a false accusation during an argument with my child’s mother. I had never been involved in the criminal system before, and I was overwhelmed and unsure of what to expect. After bonding out of jail, mutual friends referred me to this attorney, and ...
Dear Anonymous, Thank you for your thoughtful words in the form of #HaberPA's 270th AVVO Client Review. As you didn't identify yourself I can safely expand on your situation & in so doing hopefully help the folks who read this to better understand both your situation & how I approached it. In fact I'll start with my approach as, while it's unique in every case & custom tailored for each client in practice my protocol is ironically identical for all situations. I approach each case by first reviewing the Police version of events, scouring the Probable Cause Affidavit for any patent factual, legal, procedural or substantive screw-up, loophole or technicality upon which I can capitalize. Once I have an understanding of the client's worst case scenario I go through it with the client, listening to her/his account, asking questions & getting a more complete picture of the facts & circumstances of the case. Once I have that more complete picture I then turn to client specific matters that the State is unlikely to know (not from the client's perspective anyhow) & which can be game changers for the case. Key among them, especially in Domestic Violence cases like this, is my client's history with the complaining witness (aside alert: just as the Prosecutor is certain to refer to my client as "the Defendant" I intentionally use the term "complaining witness" instead of, as the Assistant State Attorney will say, the "victim", & I do so with the intent to dehumanize what is usually the State's most important witness while I concurrently humanize my own client, e.g. "Billy" or "Susie", upon who's shoulder I consistently place my hand), & in this case the history was brutal. Neither you nor your ex wife are U.S. citizens but your child was born here & so he has dual citizenship. When he was 3 years old your wife took him to her home country, refused to return to the States & for 3 years (your son was 6 at the time of the alleged incident) she kept him from you, allowing telephonic visitation as it suited her & allowing you to visit your son in her home country (which is also yours) albeit under the supervision of her & her family. For whatever reasons she came Stateside with your son, agreed to meet you &, unsurprisingly, an argument ensued (aside alert: her rendition to the Police did not comport with yours) leading to her calling the Cops & claiming that you had shoved & slapped her (aside alert: Law Enforcement noted that there were no visible injuries). We scoured the Body Worn Camera footage, went though every Police Report with a fine tooth comb but in the end there was no magic motion work to be performed in your case. With no physical evidence to support her claim yours was an actual "he said she said" case, albeit one in which the State refused to question the integrity of it's complaining witness, adopted the position that if she was lying then it was up to a Jury to decide & thus left you with a binary choice of going to Trial and risking a Jail sentence or accepting a plea & guaranteeing no Jail time (although suffering "collateral consequences", which suck, just not as badly as a cage). Even though this was your first foray into the system & you were otherwise eligible, because your child's mother refused to approve it Diversion wasn't offered, again leaving you with the same binary choice. I became a Trial Lawyer to take cases to Trial (aside alert: as I know that most folks in your situation won't risk losing at Trial I bifurcate my fees, charging a flat pretrial fee & then a per diem / daily Trial fee only if my client allows me to pick a Jury) so on a personal level I never like throwing in the towel (& on a business level it literally costs me money not to go to Trial) but my job is to offer advise so that you, the client, can make the best, most informed decision in your interests. I'm glad that you're happy with your choice & thrilled that you shared your feelings about me with the folks. Gratefully, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by Lisa | April 24, 2025 | Debt Collection
What every attorney should be!
I had the absolute pleasure of speaking with attorney Michael Haber this evening about a civil demand letter I received from Macy's Department Store. Although this was not a call I was looking forward to having, Mr. Haber immediately put me at ease. Mr. Haber is incredibly intelligent, non-judgmental...
Dear Lisa, Thank you so much for taking the time & expending the effort to submit your 5-Star Client Review (#HaberPA's 265th on AVVO) after our recent conversations. As no one can possibly identify you I'm quite comfortable in providing detail as to "the how, what & why" of our contact / consultation. You recently experienced an issue at a retail establishment where you were stopped by a Loss Prevention Officer, detained & then accused of having committed Retail Theft. You were taken into a "back room" where, upon "interrogation" you stated that you hadn't stolen anything, in fact that you were still inside of the store (i.e. you had not "tak[en] possession of or carr[ied] away [any] merchandise, property, money, or negotiable documents; alter[ed] or remov[ed] a label, universal product code, or price tag; transferr[ed] merchandise from one container to another; or remov[ed] a shopping cart, with intent to deprive the merchant of possession, use, benefit, or full retail value"), had not passed any "last point of payment" & therefore had been irresponsibly & unlawfully accused & detained. Management responded, pulled & reviewed the surveillance footage which, unlike most folks in this situation, substantiated your claim, resulting in both an apology & your immediate release. Fast forward a few weeks & you received a "Civil Demand Letter" in the mail from a Law Firm representing the retailer & demanding payment of $200.00 for your Civil Theft. (Aside alert: Per F. S. 772.11 Florida retailers are statutorily entitled to seek monetary relief from folks for acts Civil Theft; but, so as to get the penalty either you have to succumb to their demand - i.e. voluntarily pay them - or the retailer has to file a Civil Lawsuit which will cost them hundreds to file, then hundreds or thousands more to prosecute a claim that must ultimately be proven in Court by "Clear and Convincing Evidence" of their injury from your Theft; thus the "Demand Letter" is nothing more than an offer to settle a lawsuit which has not yet & which may never be filed.) You ignored the letter (as many folks do) & shortly thereafter received another, ergo bumping the settlement amount higher & then a 3rd letter (now up to about $600.00) after which you did some research into the subject leading you to #HaberPA on AVVO. You didn't follow the traditional path of asking a public question; rather you opted to contact me directly via email, in which you advised me of the following 2 aggravating factors: First, you had 2 prior Arrests & Prosecutions for Petit Theft, both of which were ultimately dismissed & second that you hold various professional licenses from the State of Florida, none of which were aware of the prior dismissed Misdemeanors. I received & replied in a timely fashion, inviting you to call me as your situation was more complicated than "the usual" / "par" Civil Theft (i.e. I felt that an actual conversation would be quicker & more prudent than what would likely be a prolonged email dialogue) & so it came to pass that we spoke. You initially wanted to retain me to handle this for you but I suggested an alternative tactic designed to both save you money & increase the odds of a swift, acceptable resolution, to wit: That you contact the Law Firm directly, apologize for not responding sooner (perhaps conjuring an excuse like a terminal family member) & humbly & with contrition asking for an accommodation on dollars so that you could pay with haste & close the matter. You followed my advise, got a 20% discount (which is better than nothing), paid it immediately & the matter's now behind you, with your State Licensing Agencies remaining in the dark as to any theft allegations (note that this was key for me as had this somehow been reported, had The State become aware of 3 Theft allegations, then you likely would have lost your licenses). In the end I'm glad I was able to help you & appreciate your kind, unsolicited Client Review. Fondly, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by Alex | April 17, 2025 | Hired Attorney | DUI & DWI
THANK YOU
Mr. Haber is the best attorney I have dealt with in my life. I say that as this was my 4th DUI arrest, 3rd conviction (along with some other minor disorderly conducts) that have spanned over the past 20 years of my life. Mr. Haber received my call immediately and spent a good couple of hours talkin...
Dear Alex, Thank you for authoring #HaberPA's 264th 5-Star Client Review on AVVO! As "Alex" is a popular name & no one but I knows whether that's your name or an alias I have no problem discussing "the why" of your Client Review. You came to me after your 4th DUI arrest involving a singe car accident, 1 of your prior DUIs was "broken-down" so for charging purposes this was a 3rd & for DMV purposes this was a 4th. (Aside alert: DUI is a "bifurcated offense" which must concurrently be defended in Court & at DMV, either of which can be "won" or "lost" without effecting the other & for both of which I was responsible.) Armed with nothing more than your Probable Cause Affidavit & your recollection of events I suggested that you enter a residential treatment facility for 90 (not 30) days, & I did so as the State was likely to seek incarceration, you were facing up to a year in jail, completion of in-patient treatment can be substituted for jail time & also having fully vetted your personal life with you & your wife, irrespective of Court I believed that in-patient treatment would benefit you & your family. You advised that in-patient was impossible so I suggested "Intensive Outpatient Treatment" at a bona fide facility, coupled with multiple AA/NA meetings per week, private therapy with a Clinical Psychologist whom I referred & also that you retain my Forensic Psychologist. You agreed with all of my suggestions but more importantly you followed through will all requests, spending the next 7 or so months in meaningful treatment which (as I suspected) assisted you personally & ultimately both of us professionally. Because you were ineligible for a "Business Purposes Only License" I set & conducted a Formal Review Hearing at DMV. Through an admitted stroke of luck (albeit meticulously following of the many FLHSMV protocols) I got your Administrative Driver License Suspension for Refusal to Blow set-aside after which you were able to drive restriction-free (i.e. not subject to BPO License restrictions) during the pendency of your case. I also gathered & reviewed all Discovery materials (i.e. Police Reports, required DUI forms - e.g. Miranda Rights Form, Implied Consent Form, etc., & most importantly the Body Worn Camera footage from your arrest). We initially agreed that your primary goal was to avoid a sentence that involved even 1 day in Jail yet the State (predictably) began with an offer of 180 days incarceration (ergo my initial suggestion for in-patient treatment), Jail was therefore a very real possibility & this was even truer after you & I (& others - both someone on my end & another on yours, i.e. 2 independent "sets of eyes") reviewed the BWC footage. Despite there being no Field Sobriety Tests / FSTs & your refusal to blow into a Breathalyzer / Intoxilyzer your extreme level of intoxication was patent from the approximate 8 hours of BWC footage which from multiple angles captured your appearance, demeanor, speech & behavior. After that I simply stalled your case long enough for you to present an undeniable treatment regiment to our forensic expert which he then ethically parleyed into compelling mitigation for your Prosecutor, who ultimately agreed to a non-Jail plea offer which you jumped on. We arranged an in person appearance to take the plea at your convenience, on a day where you'd have both someone to drive you & the time to go from the Courthouse to Probation for registration. While we didn't "beat" your case (i.e. we neither got a breakdown nor an acquittal) anyone who viewed the BWC would agree that you were absolutely smashed, lucky that no one was injured or killed in your Traffic Crash & with this being your 4th DUI Arrest avoiding Jail under these circumstances is a "win" (more importantly you view it as such). Reaching your goal was as much on you as on me & you doing your job allowed me to do mine. I congratulate you on your sobriety & hope that it's permanent. Wishing you the best! Fondly, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by anonymous | March 19, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
I Know the Difference Between the Right and Wrong Lawyer—Because I Hired Both.
The first attorney I hired barely looked at my case. He said nothing could be done, that I had to turn myself in and hope for the best. Had I listened, I might still be in jail. I was wrongfully accused of a serious felony, one that was typically non-bondable. I could have spent weeks in jail, una...
Dear Anonymous, Thank you for your amazing 5-Star Client Review (#HaberPA's 262nd on AVVO). I'm elated that you didn't ID yourself so I can freely discuss your case (although sadly the 4k characters allowed for my response can't capture the gravity of your situation). During the course of more than a year of vicious Family Court litigation your wife sought to remove your twin 6 y/o boys to a distant country. Your wife was a citizen of that country & your boys were dual citizens, having been (shout out to Bruce Springsteen "Born in the USA") although they only had U.S. Passports & she employed all sorts of unethical & even illegal methods of accomplishing her objective. From day 1 she tried to remove the kids to her home country (e.g. she tried to secure foreign passports from her country's Consulate, she secured an Ex Parte Domestic Violence Restraining Order which was later dissolved by the Court and petitioned both Family and DV Judges for permission to relocate) but you were able to parry all such efforts & secure an Injunction preventing her from removing the children from the Court's jurisdiction. She railroaded you with regard to support, custody, visitation, etc. to the point that you were homeless for close to a year, literally crashing on friend's couches. You ultimately got your support obligation cut by almost 85% (from $6k to $1k / month) at which time things radically changed for your wife. Within 3 months she was formally evicted, you secured an apartment outfitted for your kids 1 block from the home that their mother was ordered to vacate & your wife got desperate enough to conjure a bogus, unsubstantiated Criminal Complaint against you for which your then-lawyer agreed to serve you up to the Police (more on that at the end). Fortunately your Divorce Lawyer referred you to me. Via intensive, immediate discussions with you, your lawyer & reviewing the family case Clerk's online docket within a few hours I had a good enough understanding to reach out to the Detective. While I couldn't stave off an arrest I was able to proffer facts sufficient to raise doubt as to your wife's 1-sided statement & thus to radically effect the booking charge (i.e. I convinced the Detective to reduce "Burglary with a Battery", a Felony Punishable by Life in Prison to 2 misdemeanors, i.e. DV-Battery and Trespass). I arranged a prompt surrender, for bond to be posted & when you were released we got to work on piecing together a cogent history of the facts leading to your Arrest, as well as identifying an undeniably provable pattern & practice by your wife which clearly established her motive & tactics (including illegal / unethical acts by her family lawyers). Armed with facts & proof I went to work on the Prosecutor who agreed to "No Action" / dismiss the Trespass charge at Arraignment. Over the course of the next 2 week you & I worked together on specifics, gathering the necessary paper trail & equipping me to prepare a highly detailed proffer to the State Attorney intended to secure a dismissal. (In the interim I "coached" your family lawyer as to strategy that could be employed to both help me to help you in Criminal Court as well as inure to your benefit in Family Court.). It took about 3 weeks to convince the State that your wife (their alleged victim) was entirely lacking in credibility, that they couldn't ethically put her on the Witness Stand & as such the remaining misdemeanor was dismissed. It was about 60 days from your voluntarily surrender to a misinformed Detective for a "PBL Felony" to being booked & released on 2 Misdemeanors to having all charges dismissed & being en route to expungement, not to fail to mention you securing Primary Residential Custody of your boys. I wish I had more time to explain to the folks how badly your 1st Criminal Defense Lawyer almost f*cked you but I must stop here. I'm thrilled for you & your sons, am proud of myself (this was 1 in a million) & we're now family. With pride, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by Juan | March 12, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
Thanks for the victory
Dear Michael, First of all, I want to thank you for all your help and support during this process and for the peace you gave me when I arrived at the court, as my face of fear and worry was inevitable. Your experience over the years and the great work you do made this a victory in reducing the cha...
Dear Juan, Thank you for authoring #HaberPA's 261st 5-Star Client Review on AVVO! Because "Juan" is the 116th most popular given name in the US (estimated at 532,558, or 167.02 "Juans" per 100,000 Americans) I have no compunction about discussing "the why" of your Client Review, albeit with a briefer recap of the facts & circumstances & far more emphasis on our last (& your only) appearance in Criminal Court. You were arrested for a 2nd DUI (outside of 5 years so there was no "minimum mandatory" jail time) involving a traffic crash with no injuries & for which you were at fault. When the Cops arrived you were already outside of your car so the Police couldn't place you "behind the wheel" / in "Actual Physical Control", but the driver of the other vehicle did, & responding Police Officers did observe an "Open Container" inside of your car. You performed Field Sobriety Tests / Roadside Sobriety Tests, refused to provide a Breath Sample & everything was captured on Body Worn Camera (e.g. the open beer can & spilled liquid inside of your car & your very obvious failure of FSTs). You were ineligible for a Business Purposes Only Driver License / BPO / Hardship License (due to your prior DUI) so I conducted a Formal Review Hearing at DMV which afforded me an opportunity to cross-examine the Officers involved in your case. That information coupled with review of the BWC footage (which you watched as well & after which we discussed the same) led us to conclude that we were "double-dog-dead" on the facts, were we to proceed to Trial you'd likely get clobbered & thus the decision was made to negotiate the best possible Plea Bargain. At Sounding (a pretrial Hearing where the Court determines whether or not both sides are ready for Trial) the State offered you the standard "min-mands" (albeit "enhanced due to the accident) but, rather than accepting, & even though I knew that you weren't going to "roll the [proverbial] dice", I announced "ready" for Trial. The State asked for their witnesses to be on "standby" (i.e. not physically in the Courtroom like you & I but rather "just a phone call away"). As to The PoPo I agreed but I asked the Judge to Order the State to have it's critical civilian witness physically present. The State argued against that prompting me to ask whether or not they were in contact with said civilian (aside alert: Cops are easy for Prosecutors to reach & serve but that's not always the case with civilian witnesses). We went back & forth long enough for the Judge to (predictably & as I expected) loose patience & rule that Law Enforcement witnesses could be on stand-by but the civilian must attend. (Double aside alert: 1) As to announcing "ready" while I knew there was precisely a 0.0% chance that you'd go to Trial I was 100% confident that even if the State revoked their offer & sought additional penalties - a "Trial Tax" - then the odds were excellent that I'd get the same "min-mand" plea deal from the Judge; & 2) as to being so aggressively insistent about the "wheel witness'" presence in Court I knew that he'd be subject to the same conditions as you & I, to wit: the potential for Monday morning traffic, parking & building security to conspire & cause any of us to be late. I also know that when it comes to DUI Court in The 305 most Judges - including ours - have a "15 minute grace period" such that if the witness wasn't present when we called the case & if 15 minutes passed without that person appearing then you'd get a "breakdown" from your 2nd DUI with a traffic crash to Reckless Driving, which is a major win.) You & I were early (as I insisted), I was already at the dais when the Judge entered, our case was called first & the civilian was not present. The Judge passed the case, we waited patiently, recalled the case 15 minutes later & sans their necessary wheel witness the State was forced to break your case down. Experience, skill & effort prevailed. ¡Felicitaciones! Juan, & ty again. Fondly, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
"I endorse this lawyer. I first met Mike about 20 years ago when I was a Special Prosecutor in the Narcotics Unit at the Miami Dade State Attorney's Office. He was and still is a hard working and knowledgable attorney, who fought for his client then and still does today. He has always been honest, fair and ethical. He is always fighting to achieve the best possible results for his clients. When I left the Miami Dade State Attorney's Office to start my private practice, I maintained my relationship with him and he and I would consult each other on some of our individual cases. He is a wealth of information and our friendship has grown over the years. Currently we co-host a podcast on Mondays at 2p.m. on Miami's Community Newspapers on Facebook Live titled "At Your Service with Haber and Martinez.""
"I endorse this lawyer. Attorney Haber in my opinion is an attorney that is truly for the people. I have followed him for a few years now, and remain inestimably impressed with both the amount of knowledge he has in criminal law and also the amount of knowledge he gives to anyone in need of legal guidance. Attorney Haber has a way of breaking down complex legal concepts into very understandable pieces that can be easily digested by someone not so familiar with legal phrases and wording. To have the career he has and the number of years he has dedicated to this craft and still be willing to help out the community at large at a second's notice is what I feel makes him a continual asset and resource to both the legal community and the state of Florida."
"I endorse Mike Haber. He is a knowledgeable, zealous attorney with decades of experience helping his clients. His answers on this platform showcase his wealth and breadth of legal knowledge, as well as his direct and sound advice. Although we practice in different areas of the state, I have spoken to Mike at length about his practice. After having done so, I am confident that Mike is a lawyer you want on your side in the courtroom. When hiring a lawyer, be sure that lawyer has the experience, knowledge, and skills necessary to effectively defend your case. If you are worried about a crime, know that Mike is one of those lawyers."
"I strongly endorse this lawyer. Mr. Haber is a brilliant legal mind and respected by his peers. I have had the pleasure of co-answering many legal questions on the Avvo platform and Mr. Haber always has an insightful answer to share. I would not hesitate to count on Mr. Haber!"
"I have consistently seen Michael providing detailed and thoughtful responses to the many questions that pop-up in the Q&A section on Avvo. I have no doubt that he provides his clients with the same great legal advice."
"Simply put, Attorney Haber knows criminal defense. He is familiar with criminal statutes, the case law and criminal procedure. But what sets Attorney Haber apart is his mastery of strategy. Make no mistake, you are in excellent hands with Attorney Haber defending you. I fully recommend him."
"It has been my pleasure to work with Mr. Haber in the Avvo forums answering legal questions. Mr. Haber always has a grasp for the client's needs and his vast knowledge and experience lend to his ability to offer sound legal advice. After reviewing his astute legal guides, I was even further impressed. It is my pleasure to endorse this lawyer."
"A shark. I'd recommend Mr Haber to my family if they needed criminal defense, without a doubt. Highly experienced and well recommended."
"Mr. Haber is a skilled and experienced lawyer whose legal expertise is displayed through every answer he has written on Avvo and through the awards he has earned for his legal work. The reviews he has received reveal his dedication to applying his talents to the betterment of the lives of his clients. He is an asset to our profession, and it is my pleasure to endorse him. If either myself or any family member were arrested, the first call I would make would be to Michael."
"Attorney Haber and I met when I noticed that there was one attorney on Avvo that always answered the criminal law questions that come out first. I have reviewed hundreds of analyses by attorney Haber from injunctions to bond issues, and everything in-between. There is no attorney with a better conceptual understanding of the law and promptness in its truest form."
"I endorse this lawyer. Attorney Haber possesses the knowledge, expertise and dedication to help his client's navigate through the criminal justice system."
"Mr. Haber is an incredibly skilled criminal defense attorney. I am constantly amazed at the depth and breadth of his criminal defense knowledge. One needs to look no further than his Avvo guides and YouTube info videos to see that Mr. Haber is able to boil complex legal issues into terms that non-attorneys can understand. This rare and important skill allows Mr. Haber to more effectively communicate with juries to deliver favorable results for his clients. If I, or someone I cared about, was ever in trouble in the Dade County area, I would not hesitate to seek out Mr. Haber for representation."
"I endorse this lawyer. He is extremely knowledgeable about all areas of criminal defense. When other attorneys do not know how to resolve an issue, Mr. Haber always does . His clients love his aggressive demeanor that surely puts the Assistant State Attorneys he works with at a disadvantage. This area of law is constantly changing and you can bet Mr. Haber keeps up with all of the changes. I can't think of another lawyer I would recommend for criminal defense in Florida."
"I endorse this lawyer. Attorney Haber has shown consistent mastery of criminal defense topics and is an asset to the community."
"Mr. Haber is always willing to provide advice to both lawyer and clients alike. His answers are straightforward and pragmatic. Since I don't practice in the Miami area, Michael is an attorney that I would refer clients to without hesitation. I strongly endorse him."
"I endorse this lawyer. Extremely knowledgeable and generous with his free advice to the community. I look forward to reading his responses to community questions. Never disappointed."
Speeding and traffic ticket lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Medical malpractice lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Family lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
DUI and DWI lawyer
Insurance lawyer
Estate planning lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
DUI and DWI lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
2020
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, AVVO
2020
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2019
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, AVVO
2019
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2018
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, AVVO
2018
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2017
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, Avvo
2017
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2016
Superb 10.0 5 Star Rated, Avvo
2016
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2015
Superb 10.0 5 Star Rating, AVVO.com
2015
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2014
Superb 10.0 5 Star Rating, AVVO.com
2014
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2013
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2012
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2011
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2010
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2009
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2008
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2007
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2017 - 2018
Pres., #HaberPA
1991 - 2018
Pres., Law Offices of Michael A. Haber, P.A.
2017 - Present
AVVOSuperb 10.0 5-Star Rated
Life member
N/A
law
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2024
2024
2024
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2013
English
Spanish
Legal Answers
Legal Guides
Top Contributor
Michael earned significant contribution points in 2026.
Will I need a public defender at court?
04 Apr 2026
What are my options if I can’t afford bail?
03 Apr 2026
The state wants max for a misdemeanor first degree for political reasons, expectations??
01 Apr 2026
#HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 216) What happens at a Stand Your Ground / SYG Statutory Immunity Hearing?
11 Aug 2020
#HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 215) How do I use Stand Your Ground / SYG as a Defense to a Prosecution?
11 Aug 2020
#HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 294) Can I drive if I have a medical marijuana Rx?
11 Aug 2020