We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
PRO
also known as #HaberPA, Michael A. Haber, P.A.
Virtual Consultation Available
At #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. "it's all about reasonable doubt"!
Whether in State or Federal Courts, Michael A. Haber, P.A. strives to ensure that his client's rights are respected and that his clients receive top-tier legal representation and counsel.
For 3+ decades I have striven to make #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. a business that custom tailors its services to meet the needs of the client. This incorporates such things as (but is not limited to) doing my best to meet clients at their convenience (as opposed to mine), in locations and at times which are mutually convenient (sometimes at their homes, places of business, independent ground - having free wifi and excellent coffee any Dunkin Donuts always works for me - and occasionally even at odd hours), structuring fees to reasonably accommodate the client, making myself personally available to the client as close to 24/7 as is possible and, perhaps most importantly, giving careful and comprehensive consideration to both micro and macro issues in a given case so as to be able to agree upon and effort toward a viable litigation objective. This is why I refer to #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. proudly providing "boutique" criminal defense litigation services ("boutique" meaning "a small company that offers highly specialized services"), and this is a large part of #HaberPA's / Michael A. Haber, P.A.'s mission statement.
Accordingly, #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. has provided personalized and boutique legal services to both individuals and entities, primarily in the South Florida area, since 1991. With no history of professional discipline whatsoever, Michael A. Haber, Esq. zealously advocates his client's interests and custom tailors his services to meet each client's particular situation, needs and desires.
Toward that end Michael A. Haber, Esq. makes himself directly available to his clients whether in person, over the phone or Toll Free, by cell, verbally or text), by e-mail, on Facebook, on Twittter, on AOL/IM, and also why I consistently add information to the public on both HaberPA's Criminal and DUI Defense Litigation Blog, and more importantly with #HaberPA's "Webisode" series on YouTube ("MichaelHaberLaw"), whcih currently features 401 short, educational, entertaining and informative VideoFAQ's on a variety of Criminal Defense, DUI, BUI, Domestic Violence, Victim's Rights Advocacy and Seal and Expunge related topics.
When you hire #HaberPA / Michael A. Haber, P.A. you get Michael A. Haber, Esq.!
And remember, at HaberPA, "It's all about Reasonable Doubt"!
4
Practice Areas
35 years
35 years
35 years
35 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
State: Florida
Acquired: 1991
No misconduct found
Mobile
12555 Biscayne Boulevard, # 893, North Miami, FL, 33181
criminallaw.com/lawyer/michael-a-haber
Other places you can find Michael online.
271 Client Reviews
Showing 6 - 10 of 148 reviews | Criminal Defense
Posted by anonymous | March 19, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
I Know the Difference Between the Right and Wrong Lawyer—Because I Hired Both.
The first attorney I hired barely looked at my case. He said nothing could be done, that I had to turn myself in and hope for the best. Had I listened, I might still be in jail. I was wrongfully accused of a serious felony, one that was typically non-bondable. I could have spent weeks in jail, una...
Dear Anonymous, Thank you for your amazing 5-Star Client Review (#HaberPA's 262nd on AVVO). I'm elated that you didn't ID yourself so I can freely discuss your case (although sadly the 4k characters allowed for my response can't capture the gravity of your situation). During the course of more than a year of vicious Family Court litigation your wife sought to remove your twin 6 y/o boys to a distant country. Your wife was a citizen of that country & your boys were dual citizens, having been (shout out to Bruce Springsteen "Born in the USA") although they only had U.S. Passports & she employed all sorts of unethical & even illegal methods of accomplishing her objective. From day 1 she tried to remove the kids to her home country (e.g. she tried to secure foreign passports from her country's Consulate, she secured an Ex Parte Domestic Violence Restraining Order which was later dissolved by the Court and petitioned both Family and DV Judges for permission to relocate) but you were able to parry all such efforts & secure an Injunction preventing her from removing the children from the Court's jurisdiction. She railroaded you with regard to support, custody, visitation, etc. to the point that you were homeless for close to a year, literally crashing on friend's couches. You ultimately got your support obligation cut by almost 85% (from $6k to $1k / month) at which time things radically changed for your wife. Within 3 months she was formally evicted, you secured an apartment outfitted for your kids 1 block from the home that their mother was ordered to vacate & your wife got desperate enough to conjure a bogus, unsubstantiated Criminal Complaint against you for which your then-lawyer agreed to serve you up to the Police (more on that at the end). Fortunately your Divorce Lawyer referred you to me. Via intensive, immediate discussions with you, your lawyer & reviewing the family case Clerk's online docket within a few hours I had a good enough understanding to reach out to the Detective. While I couldn't stave off an arrest I was able to proffer facts sufficient to raise doubt as to your wife's 1-sided statement & thus to radically effect the booking charge (i.e. I convinced the Detective to reduce "Burglary with a Battery", a Felony Punishable by Life in Prison to 2 misdemeanors, i.e. DV-Battery and Trespass). I arranged a prompt surrender, for bond to be posted & when you were released we got to work on piecing together a cogent history of the facts leading to your Arrest, as well as identifying an undeniably provable pattern & practice by your wife which clearly established her motive & tactics (including illegal / unethical acts by her family lawyers). Armed with facts & proof I went to work on the Prosecutor who agreed to "No Action" / dismiss the Trespass charge at Arraignment. Over the course of the next 2 week you & I worked together on specifics, gathering the necessary paper trail & equipping me to prepare a highly detailed proffer to the State Attorney intended to secure a dismissal. (In the interim I "coached" your family lawyer as to strategy that could be employed to both help me to help you in Criminal Court as well as inure to your benefit in Family Court.). It took about 3 weeks to convince the State that your wife (their alleged victim) was entirely lacking in credibility, that they couldn't ethically put her on the Witness Stand & as such the remaining misdemeanor was dismissed. It was about 60 days from your voluntarily surrender to a misinformed Detective for a "PBL Felony" to being booked & released on 2 Misdemeanors to having all charges dismissed & being en route to expungement, not to fail to mention you securing Primary Residential Custody of your boys. I wish I had more time to explain to the folks how badly your 1st Criminal Defense Lawyer almost f*cked you but I must stop here. I'm thrilled for you & your sons, am proud of myself (this was 1 in a million) & we're now family. With pride, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by Juan | March 12, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
Thanks for the victory
Dear Michael, First of all, I want to thank you for all your help and support during this process and for the peace you gave me when I arrived at the court, as my face of fear and worry was inevitable. Your experience over the years and the great work you do made this a victory in reducing the cha...
Dear Juan, Thank you for authoring #HaberPA's 261st 5-Star Client Review on AVVO! Because "Juan" is the 116th most popular given name in the US (estimated at 532,558, or 167.02 "Juans" per 100,000 Americans) I have no compunction about discussing "the why" of your Client Review, albeit with a briefer recap of the facts & circumstances & far more emphasis on our last (& your only) appearance in Criminal Court. You were arrested for a 2nd DUI (outside of 5 years so there was no "minimum mandatory" jail time) involving a traffic crash with no injuries & for which you were at fault. When the Cops arrived you were already outside of your car so the Police couldn't place you "behind the wheel" / in "Actual Physical Control", but the driver of the other vehicle did, & responding Police Officers did observe an "Open Container" inside of your car. You performed Field Sobriety Tests / Roadside Sobriety Tests, refused to provide a Breath Sample & everything was captured on Body Worn Camera (e.g. the open beer can & spilled liquid inside of your car & your very obvious failure of FSTs). You were ineligible for a Business Purposes Only Driver License / BPO / Hardship License (due to your prior DUI) so I conducted a Formal Review Hearing at DMV which afforded me an opportunity to cross-examine the Officers involved in your case. That information coupled with review of the BWC footage (which you watched as well & after which we discussed the same) led us to conclude that we were "double-dog-dead" on the facts, were we to proceed to Trial you'd likely get clobbered & thus the decision was made to negotiate the best possible Plea Bargain. At Sounding (a pretrial Hearing where the Court determines whether or not both sides are ready for Trial) the State offered you the standard "min-mands" (albeit "enhanced due to the accident) but, rather than accepting, & even though I knew that you weren't going to "roll the [proverbial] dice", I announced "ready" for Trial. The State asked for their witnesses to be on "standby" (i.e. not physically in the Courtroom like you & I but rather "just a phone call away"). As to The PoPo I agreed but I asked the Judge to Order the State to have it's critical civilian witness physically present. The State argued against that prompting me to ask whether or not they were in contact with said civilian (aside alert: Cops are easy for Prosecutors to reach & serve but that's not always the case with civilian witnesses). We went back & forth long enough for the Judge to (predictably & as I expected) loose patience & rule that Law Enforcement witnesses could be on stand-by but the civilian must attend. (Double aside alert: 1) As to announcing "ready" while I knew there was precisely a 0.0% chance that you'd go to Trial I was 100% confident that even if the State revoked their offer & sought additional penalties - a "Trial Tax" - then the odds were excellent that I'd get the same "min-mand" plea deal from the Judge; & 2) as to being so aggressively insistent about the "wheel witness'" presence in Court I knew that he'd be subject to the same conditions as you & I, to wit: the potential for Monday morning traffic, parking & building security to conspire & cause any of us to be late. I also know that when it comes to DUI Court in The 305 most Judges - including ours - have a "15 minute grace period" such that if the witness wasn't present when we called the case & if 15 minutes passed without that person appearing then you'd get a "breakdown" from your 2nd DUI with a traffic crash to Reckless Driving, which is a major win.) You & I were early (as I insisted), I was already at the dais when the Judge entered, our case was called first & the civilian was not present. The Judge passed the case, we waited patiently, recalled the case 15 minutes later & sans their necessary wheel witness the State was forced to break your case down. Experience, skill & effort prevailed. ¡Felicitaciones! Juan, & ty again. Fondly, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by anonymous | November 27, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
Great Lawyer!
I had an outstanding experience with Michael Haber and I couldn't be happier with the outcome of my case. After being stopped by FHP and issued a Notice to Appear for possession, I felt overwhelmed as it was my first time dealing with the legal system. Michael explained the entire process clearly and...
Dear Anonymous, I am elated that you chose to author #HaberPA's 259th 5-Star Client Review on AVVO "incognito" as I'm eager to share 3 detailed facts (to wit: informed choice, remote representation & early intervention) about your case with the folks & I couldn't've done so (not with any level of detail anyhow) had you ID'd yourself. That said let's get to it! INFORMED CHOICE: There are only a few ways that a Criminal Case can resolve (i.e. The State can "No Action" at Arraignment, the defense can levy a successful "Dispositive Pretrial Motion" - e.g. a Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Suppress or Motion for Statutory Immunity pursuant to Florida's Stand Your Ground Law - an agreed Plea Bargain can be brokered, Pretrial Diversion can be offered & successfully completed or the case can proceed to Verdict after either a Bench Trial or a Jury Trial) & it's incumbent on every Criminal Defense Lawyer to explain these options to potential clients. But, so as to offer responsible advise, a responsible Defense Lawyer must know the facts & circumstances, understand the State's case, identify the relative strengths & weaknesses, develop potential Defense Evidence, consider the various "free radicals" / variables in order to present viable paths & if asked then suggest the most prudent path to the Client in light of the Client's unique situation. In your case you reside in The 954 & were stopped by FHP in St. Lucie County for Speeding. The Trooper claimed to smell weed, ordered you out of the car, searched inside & located "leaf" marijuana, a grinder, a "vape pen" & rolling papers in a backpack which was in passenger seat area. The search of the car is at least arguably unlawful (some Florida Courts have held that humans are physically incapable of differentiating illegal THC from lawful hemp via smell & could find that what happened here was an illegal search & seizure, but other Courts look at it differently) & there was a definite legal question about the warrantless search of the backpack. We discussed these facts & you decided that the risks & costs associated with litigating a Motion to Suppress wasn't worth the ease & certainty of securing a dismissal via Diversion. Meantime I directed you to secure a Medical Marijuana Card (both because it's safer to use THC in The Sunshine State with a MMC & also as I expected that I could use it as a bargaining tool) & in the interim we kept our options open. REMOTE REPRESENTATION: Each Florida jurisdiction has it's own idiosyncrasies & as I don't routinely practice in St. Lucie County I'm unfamiliar with their proclivities. As such I suggested that if you wanted to litigate (as opposed to mitigate) then you'd likely be better served by hiring local counsel (who's familiar with the Judge, the Prosecutor & their policies and protocols), but you were adamant that you wanted PTD. As you had no priors & non-violent charges I was relatively sure that you'd qualify & so I opened a dialogue with the local State Attorney's Office, inquiring as to your eligibility & my ability to offer "remote representation". EARLY INTERVENTION: As you came to me within 24 hours of your Arrest (you were not taken into custody, rather you were given a PTA / Promise to Appear / Notice to Appear) I had a large window within which to maneuver, which gave us a strategic advantage (i.e. had you come to me with but a few days before Arraignment then we'd be playing defense instead of offense). It took just over 3 weeks for your file to be uploaded into the Clerk's system & for the State to open their file & during that window 2 critical things happened. First you in fact secured your MMC & second I learned both that you were PTD eligible & that we could navigate the process remotely. That said when I provided The State with your MMC they opted to file "No Information" / administratively dismiss your case (so you won quick, cheap & entirely). Thanks for the leap of faith & for your kind, nameless words. Fondly, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by anonymous | November 08, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
Highly Recommended!!!
I highly recommend Mr. Haber for his outstanding service, dedication, and commitment to my case. As a Boston resident and non-U.S. citizen on a Student Visa, I faced significant concerns when I was unexpectedly charged with a felony while on vacation in Miami. After finding Mr. Haber (through online ...
Dear Anonymous, Thank you so much² (² as 1, your exceptionally well-written, heartfelt words are heartwarmingly accepted & 2, as you didn't ID yourself I can share more about your case than I could if your identity were known). You were arrested on Felony Shoplifting charges while visiting The 305. With neither a clue as to how to navigate the Criminal Justice System nor whom to hire you did that which so many others in your situation do, to wit: you turned to the internet for direction & found me amongst untold numbers of other lawyers. As you explained it to me, it was my literal hundreds of 5-Star Client Reviews (yours now being # 257, thank you again) coupled with my detailed responses to each & every one of those Reviews (precisely as I am doing here & now) that prompted you to reach out. After that (& noting that you spoke with several other Miami based criminal defense lawyers) it was the fact that I "engaged in numerous discussions with me via phone, text, Zoom, and email" (which we did, as you were arguably overly concerned) coupled with my follow-through by having "always taking the time to patiently and thoroughly address my questions" which proved to you that I was the "right" attorney to assist you (& also that at #HaberPA we not only "talk the talk" but we "walk the walk"). That said 1 of the things that I initially noticed on your Arrest Report / Probable Cause Affidavit was that you were born outside of the US & were thus a foreign national (dual aside alert: first, Miami-Dade County is NOT a sanctuary / haven, both as such & a matter of protocol ICE is notified each & every time that a non-US citizen is booked into our Jail & second, as Jack Reacher famously, accurately & regularly opines, "details matter", & #HaberPA is ever attentive to details). Because of this during our initial consultation we discussed your immigration status, your prospective intentions & how your arrest & case resolution may significantly effect the same. You advised that you were legally in the US on a Visa & that you had a pending application for Canadian citizenship for which you had hired a Canadian immigration lawyer. As #HaberPA is a "boutique" Criminal Defense Litigation Law Firm (aside alert: to us "boutique" means that we make ourselves easily reachable by phone, email or on the internet, we practice open, honest, direct & frequent communication & we take a "global" view and approach toward representation - e.g. we take the time to consider the client's unique personal circumstances by coming to understand you & your situation, adopting your interests as our own, identifying & securing realistic litigation objectives, quoting & honoring reasonable fees in writing & thereafter rapidly investigating & preparing your case for whatever resolution may come, preferably the 1 that we identify as our "primary litigation objective" but if not then our secondary or even tertiary goals) I offered to assist as I may, suggesting that you put your Canadian Immigration Lawyer and I in touch sooner than later. I suggested that you do so in writing (in 1 email to both of us) so that it'd be clear that you'd knowingly waived the otherwise sacrosanct confidentiality of your Attorney-Client Privilege & authorized your lawyers to freely speak with one another about our respective cases in your common interest. In your particular instance I wound up spending nearly as much time with your Immigration Lawyer as I did in working on your criminal case (a fact that I didn't predict beforehand), still that was a courtesy which I was happy to provide without any additional cost (& is yet another example of #HaberPA's boutique nature). We were able to rapidly accomplish precisely that which we set out to do & you're well on the way to both righteousness & Canadian citizenship. It was my privilege to be able to serve & I'm humbled² (² = 1st to be chosen & 2 by your kind Client Review), which is sure to benefit others. Thanks again! Fondly, MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
Posted by BARBARA | November 06, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
Great Lawyer !
I am incredibly grateful for Michael A.'s legal expertise and dedication. He guided my son through a challenging case, and although I initially hoped for a different approach, Michael recommended pursuing a resolution through a diversion program. His strategy was effective, and he successfully had my...
Dear Barbara, Thank you for your kind words in the form of #HaberPA's 256th 5-Star Client Review on AVVO! Because your son chose to identify himself in his equally thoughtful Client Review & as anyone reading this response could likely do the math & figure out his identity for themselves (yes, I know that I just did the math for them but it matters not as...) I can't risk discussing anything that could possibly violate the sacrosanct confidence that your son & I share. I can, however, address non-confidential matters between you & I (i.e. a parent who retained me on behalf of her child & who happened to disagree with my recommended litigation objective / goal) by replying directly to your review. As I explained in my reply to your son, lawyers have an ethical obligation to serve the client in multiple capacities (specifically "as an advisor, advocate, negotiator & evaluator") but sometimes we need to improvise & serve as choreographers who compose the sequence of steps & moves for a performance (in this case litigation), but the key here is that these professional mandates are intended "to serve the client", not the client's parent, spouse, sibling or whomever may happen to foot the bill for legal services . This is something that I made clear to both you & your son from the get go, first via conversation & then again in the retainer agreement that we all signed (your son as the client, you as the guarantor of fees & me as the advisor, advocate, negotiator, evaluator & choreographer). In fact this is the exact language: "Attorney has been retained by Client’s mother. Although Client’s fees are being paid by his mother both Client and his mother expressly understand and agree to the proscriptions as contained in Rule 4-1.8(f), R.R.F.B. (i.e. that although Client consents to a third party paying his fees and costs, such third party is not the Client and cannot in any way interfere with the Attorney-Client relationship). Client and his mother further understand that any and all information relative to the representation of Client remains protected by the rules governing confidentiality - i.e. Rule 4-1.6, R.R.F.B., such that unless Client expressly waives the same and specifically authorizes Attorney to freely communicate with his mother, or anyone else, then the privilege is intact in regard to any and all aspects of the representation. By initialing here Client expressly authorizes Attorney to speak freely with his mother about his case (______)." In this way we were all clear about our rights, roles & responsibilities during the course of the case. That said, to say that your son's case was "challenging" puts it mildly, but it was even more difficult to conjure a way to get the State to agree to allow your son to enter into Diversion, earn a dismissal & effectively guarantee a "win" while running no risk whatsoever. On an irrelevant albeit a personal, selfish level I would have preferred to litigate & Try the case (not only because I became a Criminal Defense Lawyer to be in Court, arguing cases in front of Juries, dissecting the State's cases, cross-examining their witnesses & proverbially dogfighting over the admissibility of evidence but also because above & beyond the flat pretrial fee I charge a separate "per diem" / daily trial fee & so by resolving the case without a Trial I'm effectively costing myself both intellectual pleasure & pecuniary profit) but it was not in your son's interests for me to do so, not if I could manage to structure a path to victory without unnecessary risk & cost. Had diversion proved unattainable then I guess both you & I would've been happier (i.e. you'd've seen "a different approach" and I'd've benefited both professionally & financially) but in the end I was also a de facto parent to your son, serving "In Loco Parentis" & I was looking out for both he and you (his liberty & your money). I know that you understand & I appreciate you for it (& this review). Thanks again! MAH/Esq. #HaberPA
"I endorse this lawyer. I first met Mike about 20 years ago when I was a Special Prosecutor in the Narcotics Unit at the Miami Dade State Attorney's Office. He was and still is a hard working and knowledgable attorney, who fought for his client then and still does today. He has always been honest, fair and ethical. He is always fighting to achieve the best possible results for his clients. When I left the Miami Dade State Attorney's Office to start my private practice, I maintained my relationship with him and he and I would consult each other on some of our individual cases. He is a wealth of information and our friendship has grown over the years. Currently we co-host a podcast on Mondays at 2p.m. on Miami's Community Newspapers on Facebook Live titled "At Your Service with Haber and Martinez.""
"I endorse this lawyer. Attorney Haber in my opinion is an attorney that is truly for the people. I have followed him for a few years now, and remain inestimably impressed with both the amount of knowledge he has in criminal law and also the amount of knowledge he gives to anyone in need of legal guidance. Attorney Haber has a way of breaking down complex legal concepts into very understandable pieces that can be easily digested by someone not so familiar with legal phrases and wording. To have the career he has and the number of years he has dedicated to this craft and still be willing to help out the community at large at a second's notice is what I feel makes him a continual asset and resource to both the legal community and the state of Florida."
"I endorse Mike Haber. He is a knowledgeable, zealous attorney with decades of experience helping his clients. His answers on this platform showcase his wealth and breadth of legal knowledge, as well as his direct and sound advice. Although we practice in different areas of the state, I have spoken to Mike at length about his practice. After having done so, I am confident that Mike is a lawyer you want on your side in the courtroom. When hiring a lawyer, be sure that lawyer has the experience, knowledge, and skills necessary to effectively defend your case. If you are worried about a crime, know that Mike is one of those lawyers."
"I strongly endorse this lawyer. Mr. Haber is a brilliant legal mind and respected by his peers. I have had the pleasure of co-answering many legal questions on the Avvo platform and Mr. Haber always has an insightful answer to share. I would not hesitate to count on Mr. Haber!"
"I have consistently seen Michael providing detailed and thoughtful responses to the many questions that pop-up in the Q&A section on Avvo. I have no doubt that he provides his clients with the same great legal advice."
"Simply put, Attorney Haber knows criminal defense. He is familiar with criminal statutes, the case law and criminal procedure. But what sets Attorney Haber apart is his mastery of strategy. Make no mistake, you are in excellent hands with Attorney Haber defending you. I fully recommend him."
"It has been my pleasure to work with Mr. Haber in the Avvo forums answering legal questions. Mr. Haber always has a grasp for the client's needs and his vast knowledge and experience lend to his ability to offer sound legal advice. After reviewing his astute legal guides, I was even further impressed. It is my pleasure to endorse this lawyer."
"A shark. I'd recommend Mr Haber to my family if they needed criminal defense, without a doubt. Highly experienced and well recommended."
"Mr. Haber is a skilled and experienced lawyer whose legal expertise is displayed through every answer he has written on Avvo and through the awards he has earned for his legal work. The reviews he has received reveal his dedication to applying his talents to the betterment of the lives of his clients. He is an asset to our profession, and it is my pleasure to endorse him. If either myself or any family member were arrested, the first call I would make would be to Michael."
"Attorney Haber and I met when I noticed that there was one attorney on Avvo that always answered the criminal law questions that come out first. I have reviewed hundreds of analyses by attorney Haber from injunctions to bond issues, and everything in-between. There is no attorney with a better conceptual understanding of the law and promptness in its truest form."
"I endorse this lawyer. Attorney Haber possesses the knowledge, expertise and dedication to help his client's navigate through the criminal justice system."
"Mr. Haber is an incredibly skilled criminal defense attorney. I am constantly amazed at the depth and breadth of his criminal defense knowledge. One needs to look no further than his Avvo guides and YouTube info videos to see that Mr. Haber is able to boil complex legal issues into terms that non-attorneys can understand. This rare and important skill allows Mr. Haber to more effectively communicate with juries to deliver favorable results for his clients. If I, or someone I cared about, was ever in trouble in the Dade County area, I would not hesitate to seek out Mr. Haber for representation."
"I endorse this lawyer. He is extremely knowledgeable about all areas of criminal defense. When other attorneys do not know how to resolve an issue, Mr. Haber always does . His clients love his aggressive demeanor that surely puts the Assistant State Attorneys he works with at a disadvantage. This area of law is constantly changing and you can bet Mr. Haber keeps up with all of the changes. I can't think of another lawyer I would recommend for criminal defense in Florida."
"I endorse this lawyer. Attorney Haber has shown consistent mastery of criminal defense topics and is an asset to the community."
"Mr. Haber is always willing to provide advice to both lawyer and clients alike. His answers are straightforward and pragmatic. Since I don't practice in the Miami area, Michael is an attorney that I would refer clients to without hesitation. I strongly endorse him."
"I endorse this lawyer. Extremely knowledgeable and generous with his free advice to the community. I look forward to reading his responses to community questions. Never disappointed."
Speeding and traffic ticket lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Medical malpractice lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Family lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
DUI and DWI lawyer
Insurance lawyer
Estate planning lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
DUI and DWI lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
2020
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, AVVO
2020
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2019
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, AVVO
2019
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2018
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, AVVO
2018
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2017
Superb 10.0 5-Star Rated, Avvo
2017
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2016
Superb 10.0 5 Star Rated, Avvo
2016
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2015
Superb 10.0 5 Star Rating, AVVO.com
2015
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2014
Superb 10.0 5 Star Rating, AVVO.com
2014
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2013
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2012
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2011
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2010
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2009
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2008
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2007
Top Lawyer, South Florida Legal Guide
2017 - 2018
Pres., #HaberPA
1991 - 2018
Pres., Law Offices of Michael A. Haber, P.A.
2017 - Present
AVVOSuperb 10.0 5-Star Rated
Life member
N/A
law
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2022
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2024
2024
2024
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2013
English
Spanish
Legal Answers
Legal Guides
Top Contributor
Michael earned significant contribution points in 2026.
How can I run a gambling tournament in Florida?
13 May 2026
Will I be found guilty of stalking in Florida
13 May 2026
Can trial proceed without arraignment for superseding charges
13 May 2026
#HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 216) What happens at a Stand Your Ground / SYG Statutory Immunity Hearing?
11 Aug 2020
#HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 215) How do I use Stand Your Ground / SYG as a Defense to a Prosecution?
11 Aug 2020
#HaberPA's VideoFAQ # 294) Can I drive if I have a medical marijuana Rx?
11 Aug 2020