Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington

Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington

4.8
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 22 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Weston, FL
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

1792 Bell Tower Ln #218, Weston, FL

About Alexandra

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Criminal Defense 100%

Felony cases in Federal and State Court. Court martial cases, Article 15, NJP, Separation Boards, Show Cause Boards

23 years | 1,500 cases

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Florida for 2 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 2023

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Georgia for 22 years

State: Georgia

Acquired: 2003

Active Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC

1792 Bell Tower Ln #218, Weston, FL, 33326

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.8 /5.0

44 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 17 reviews | Professionalism

Posted by Kyle | August 12, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Second to none

Before you read any further reviews, consider this... What is your career worth to you? Is it worth fighting for? Would you hire the best defense if possible for your case? Than look no further. I can not express how deeply grateful I am for Mrs. Waddington. The odds were stacked against me for an... allegation that I did not commit. No one believed me, until I hired Mrs. Waddington. She constantly checked up on my case and was always available especially as I was overseas and still was able to answer any questions I had. She was always helpful and took the time to talk to me with such a kind and nurturing tone. She thoroughly looked at all evidence presented with such persistence and care. She was able to destroy the government's offense on multiple fronts which helped my case in a favorable outcome. Would I hire this attorney again? Absolutely. Not only is she a great attorney, but she was able to look and talk to me as a human being first and that is ultimately influenced my decision to hire her. If you are ever second guessing on whether or not to hire this attorney, I will help you, JUST HIRE HER. It is worth it. Once you speak to her even as a consultation, you will understand this is the attorney who is on your side. She ultimately was able to give me a chance to show that I was to be believed and I can finally move on with my life. Thank you for everything.

Posted by Marvin | September 29, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Second Chance

Let me start by saying that I was falsely accused of sexual assault by this crazy lady. My old CSM gave me the best advice at the moment; he told me to seek a civilian attorney and not talk to CID. The whole process was completed in 17 months. Charges were preferred at around 12 months. I immediat...ely called Mr. and Mrs. Waddington. Once they decided to take on my case, I was happy because I believed I had a fighting chance against the US government. I saved all my messages between me and this crazy lazy and sent Mr. and Mrs. Waddington everything to show her erratic behavior. I hired one attorney, but I gained two exceptional attorneys. The Army issued me a TDS attorney a week before my Article 32 hearing which we waived. TDS attorney PCS two months before the trial date, I was assigned another TDS lawyer, and she was terrific. Now my legal was set, and I know it will be a battle. The Government dropped evidence on our lap 30 days out. Mr. Waddington called me. I explain my side of the story. The whole time Mr. and Mrs. Waddington treated me with dignity and respect and believed in my truth, always finding a way to make me feel at ease. Once again, my case went on for 17 months; it was a long, painful journey. You need someone like Mr. and Mrs. Waddington to represent you in this biased military justice system (UCMJ). The Government had every intention of trying to convict me of something I did not do, especially in this War against sexual assault. Mr. and Mrs. Waddington flew to Germany a week before the Trial, and we prepared to fight. The night before the Trial, this liar changes her story in version five. From the open statement, witness cross-examination to the closing statement, Mr. Waddington is FANTASTIC. The Army had their most senior and best on the case; however, Mr. Waddington was outclassed and outmatched; it was not even close. Mr. Waddington caught this lady on every lie while on the stand. He asked the right questions and argued only relevant things. The Government did not present a CID agent, Amberg police, DNA evidence, or any experts; let's not forget a video that was missing the first five minutes. The prosecutor says members of the Jury, all these things are irrelevant. We don't want to waste your guy's time presenting this nonsense. The truth came out in the courtroom, and after four hours of waiting on deliberation, NOT GUILTY!!!!!!!! I stood in the position of attention and cried so hard for 17 months, and it was over on the day of my 17th year in the Army; Mr. and Mrs. Waddington gave me a second chance at life. To end this, the military could care less if you get accused of anything. Their goal is to get a conviction. Don't hesitate to call The Waddington's. It will be money well spent; I promise you will make that money.

Posted by Chris | August 26, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

Best Defense Lawyer. Period!

Best Defense Lawyers. Period. I first contacted Mr. Michael Waddington and Mrs. Alexandria Waddington in September of 2021 right after my Command started an investigation into the CMEO report that was filed by a junior of mine. I first spoke with Mrs. Waddington and she advised me to make no state...ment and to retain them once charges were formally made. My Command however, conducted three investigations over the span of 5 months. During this time I was promoted, and then after the last and final investigation it nearly sealed the deal on my career, resulting in my Commanding Officer removing my hard earned promotion administratively and giving me two adverse evaluations. All of this was based on the investigation and the CO’s subsequent “Loss of Confidence.” The Command sent me TAD to the next higher Command while I waited to receive punishment. That day I called and retained the Waddington’s. Through multiple attempts my Command failed to return any correspondence to my counsel as to why for 3 whole months this had happened. I waited and desperately wanted to know what I was officially accused of since everything had been so quiet. I finally received notice of the investigation findings. They were heavily biased opinions stated as fact, fabricated stories and statements, significant questions as to why individuals were not questioned by the Investigating Officer. These all later proved to aid Mr. Michael Waddington into dismantling their whole case one character witness at a time. I refused NJP and then elected to do Courts-Martial and was subsequently given an Administrative Separation Board. I was completely unsure how this whole case would play out. My JAG assured me I was in good hands. Mr. Waddington was clearly in his element while arguing my case to the board. During that opening statement I knew right then and there that I definitely made the right choice to retain them. You can compare him to the side of the prosecution, but it wouldn’t be fair. The prosecution was clearly out matched. Their case was feeble, and if logic prevailed we would be victorious. The prosecution called no witnesses, submitted no further evidence, and Michael called them out on it. Even after multiple attempts to contact witnesses who made statements against me the Command and that witness made no attempt to communicate with the Waddington’s or show up to my board as requested. This didn’t look good for the prosecution. We submitted multiple character statements and called forth witnesses in person and via phone. Each witness questioned by Mr. Waddington showed more of my side of the story, and dismantled their case before I had even taken the stand. At Michael’s request I took the stand. I was confident, and ready to explain and answer any question. I did so and through my testimony the story was set straight. I finished testifying and the prosecution's closing statement was so outshined by Mr. Waddington’s closing statement you completely forgot what the prosecution had said.. He is THE CLOSER. We left the room and the board deliberated for less than 30 minutes with a finding of NO MISCONDUCT. That was a great feeling. I am extremely glad and thankful I chose the Waddington’s to defend me, my career, and my future. If you need representation look no further. I would definitely seek their counsel in the future, and would refer them to anyone who would need their counsel. If you know you're innocent, the Military will punish you first and ask questions later. Hit them hard, and keep what is yours!

Posted by J. | July 26, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

The Money Collector / Fearmonger

I wanted to wait to write this review until my case was complete. Today it finally is, and it was an uphill battle because of her husband, Mr. Michaelr Waddington, who felt "pity for me" in his response to my review, but the real wolf clothed as sheep was Mrs. Waddington. Today, a Board of Inquiry fo...und no basis for misconduct. Today, I resigned on top of that, and I would be discharged with an Honorable Discharge. I did all this with the evidence they assured me would convict me and make me a sexual offender. The same evidence, plus the one I pointed them to look, got the opposite outcome. While she and her husband drafted a contract that would collect a fee was long as they went to trial, they did nothing to stop the process. The facts: The NJP was closed door, and later retracted. The co-counsel of her, was investigated by the IG and recuses from the case. The evidence was found, and no basis as well. They declined a refund, declined to represent me at any board and collected 30,000 for just a few e-mails. Fearmongering and high fees are what people are in store for. Today, I am a free man, with no record, Honorable Discharge, and clean, thanks to a different attorney who took the time to fight my case and only charged... 5K!!!!! I do feel pity, like her husband says, for hiring them! I also feel pity for whoever hires them too! Stay away from this "big brand, aggressive representation". They are just there for the money! I so regret falling into the trap of her smooth talking!

Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington

Replied last August 26, 2022

This review is absolutely false and is somewhat surprising to me, especially since I personally spent so many hours working with this Officer towards his defense. In 2022, he was kicked out of the Navy as a result of an administrative Separation Board with no criminal conviction on his record as a result of my efforts. In 2021, my Law Firm saved this Naval officer from being a convicted sex offender and a convicted felon. He knows the UCMJ well and was trained as a legal officer, and he willingly went to NJP/Mast to avoid a criminal conviction. He was accused of multiple crimes, including: sexual assault, physical assault of an enlisted sailor, and sexual harassment of various subordinates while aboard a US naval destroyer. There were multiple victims, of different ranks, including two female Naval officers, and he outranked all of them. In fact, there were even recordings of him harassing one of them by asking her to kiss him while in his room on the ship. Of course, he was also married and had children back home. After months of hands on dealing with the prosecution, and preparing for trial, the government agreed to drop the two Article 120 sexual assaults, the Article 128 assault, and the Article 92 violations of a lawful general order charges, effectively removing the case from a criminal setting, if he agreed to go to a Captain’s Mast for only having violated a lawful general order. This would avoid sex offender registration, federal felony convictions, jail time, and a Dismissal from the Navy. As a result, the officer has NO criminal record. He willingly accepted the deal and was most certainly informed of his rights and the pros and cons of facing a criminal trial vs an NJP when he chose to do so. Afterwards, he sent us a personalized “Thank you” gift and letter, thanking us for helping him and then he continued to text me to ask for legal advice because he knew he might be facing a Board down the line. I informed him that we could not represent him at the board because part of his negotiated NJP deal was that he would submit a board waiver. And I advised him to hire other legal counsel if he wanted to fight that. Almost a year later, after he got the benefit of the deal, he posted this negative review. I should have known, but despite all of the signs I suppose I still wanted to see the best in him. This false review is extremely disappointing. Shame on you Jorge.

Posted by anonymous | June 05, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

Justice Was Served

Mr. Waddington and his team are a true powerhouse duo! I was facing three charges: Article 120, w/2x specifications, Article 128b, w/2x specifications, and Article 128, w/1x specification. All these charges combined was enough jail time for two lifetimes. I knew I needed a professional with experien...ce under the laws of the UCMJ. My ex-wife is a master manipulator. She convinced several officers, OSI agents, adult protective services, child protective services and her entire prosecution team they had a solid case moving forward. Mr. Waddington helped me gather and analyze information that supported the case. His thinking outside the box created new ways to relay information to the court. Waddington and González have extensive knowledge in dealing with Article 120 cases and their expertise ensured the outcome was favorable. They recommended and hired key experienced doctors to examine evidence providing critical insight to the lies and manipulation being alleged. Three days into the court martial the prosecution realized based on the extensive evidence we compiled that it was in the best interest of my ex-wife to tell the truth before she severely perjured herself on the stand. My ex-wife decided not to participate resulting in all charges being dismissed. Waddington and González's professional team have given me the opportunity to finish my last couple years in the Air Force and to retire without any repercussions to my career. Thanks to Mr. Waddington and his team justice was served. He saved my life.

See All Client Reviews

Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Alexandra
Jason S. Barrix headshot
Jason Barrix

Criminal defense lawyer | Mar 09

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer."

Halil Hasic headshot
Halil Hasic

Unknown lawyer | Apr 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Dennis A. Banning headshot
Dennis Banning

Military law lawyer | Aug 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. She has an outstanding reputation."

Gilberto Romilio Izquierdo headshot
Gilberto Izquierdo

Military law lawyer | May 19

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer."

Anthony Diaz Jr. headshot
Anthony Diaz

Unknown lawyer | Apr 13

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Herman Martinez headshot
Herman Martinez

Military law lawyer | Jan 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Justin Michael Schiks headshot
Justin Schiks

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 13

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Zachary Robert Wall headshot
Zachary Wall

Unknown lawyer | Nov 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Robert Wasmuth Galbraith headshot
Robert Galbraith

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Jason T. Sutton headshot
Jason Sutton

Criminal defense lawyer | May 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Rahul Aggarwal headshot
Rahul Aggarwal

Unknown lawyer | Mar 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"An excellent lawyer who treats clients with patience, care, understanding, and utmost professionalism - an even better person and I wholeheartedly recommend for future services."

Charles Burns Upton II headshot
Charles Upton

Military law lawyer | Dec 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Elena Denevich headshot
Elena Denevich

Criminal defense lawyer | Nov 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Thomas J. Crane headshot
Thomas Crane

Criminal defense lawyer | Nov 17

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Peter Robert Stone headshot
Peter Stone

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 30

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Zachary Matthew Alfant headshot
Zachary Alfant

Unknown lawyer | Jun 30

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Trevor Daniel Anderson headshot
Trevor Anderson

Unknown lawyer | May 04

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Jeffrey Feulner headshot
Jeffrey Feulner

Unknown lawyer | Apr 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Alexander Kraff headshot
Alexander Kraff

Unknown lawyer | Mar 13

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Walter Rudolph Hnot, III headshot
Walter Hnot,

Criminal defense lawyer | Mar 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Alexandra is an excellent attorney committed to providing the highest quality representation to clients. I endorse him without reservation."

View All Endorsements
Bradford William Sperr headshot
Bradford Sperr

Elder law lawyer

Sarah Condor-Fisher headshot
Sarah Condor-Fisher

Personal injury lawyer

Peter Kageleiry, Jr. headshot
Peter Kageleiry,

Military law lawyer

Philip Douglas Cave headshot
Philip Cave

Criminal defense lawyer

Stephen P. Karns headshot
Stephen Karns

Criminal defense lawyer

Dalma Catherine Grandjean headshot
Dalma Grandjean

Criminal defense lawyer

Manuel Vincent Fajardo Jr. headshot
Manuel Fajardo

Criminal defense lawyer

Anna E Meddin headshot
Anna Meddin

Criminal defense lawyer

John-Paul LaPre headshot
John-Paul LaPre

Criminal defense lawyer

Joanne Reisman headshot
Joanne Reisman

Criminal defense lawyer

Jessica Rose Rieffel headshot
Jessica Rieffel

Criminal defense lawyer

Luis Alberto Yanez Rascon headshot
Luis Rascon

Criminal defense lawyer

Ryan Hamilton headshot
Ryan Hamilton

Criminal defense lawyer

Robert C. LeBrasseur headshot
Robert LeBrasseur

Criminal defense lawyer

Carmine John Giardino headshot
Carmine Giardino

Criminal defense lawyer

Michael Owen Massey headshot
Michael Massey

Criminal defense lawyer

Thomas Christopher Lewis headshot
Thomas Lewis

Criminal defense lawyer

Joy Nicole Owenby headshot
Joy Owenby

Criminal defense lawyer

Alberto Virgen headshot
Alberto Virgen

Criminal defense lawyer

Terrence F. McCarthy headshot
Terrence McCarthy

Criminal defense lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2000

Honors in Trial Advocacy, Temple University School of Law

Work Experience

2005 - Present

Partner, Gonzalez & Waddington, LLC

2004 - 2005

Defense Lawyer, Augusta GA Public Defenders Office

Associations

2010 - Present

National Association of Court Martial Lawyers

Board Member

2006 - Present

Augusta Family Bar Association

Member

2006 - Present

National Association of Military Defense Lawyers

Past President

2005 - Present

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Member

2003 - Present

Augusta Bar Young Lawyers Division

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

US v. RB

NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2013

NACDL Seminar Defending the Unthinkable: Zealous Advocacy in Sexual Assault and Child Victims Cases

2013

National Association of Trial Lawyers: Trial Lawyers Summit

2011

NACDL Seminar DWI Means Defend With Ingenuity: "Winning at Every Level"

2010

NACDL Advanced Criminal Law Seminar

2007

Georgia Registered Mediator

2006

NACDL Criminal Defense Midwinter Seminar

2001

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

Duquesne University

BA

N/A

Universite Catholique D'Angers

Speaking Engagements

2017

Trial Lawyers Summit 2017

Appealing to Diverse Juries Without Building Walls

2011

Annual Conference Summer 2011

Cross Examining Alleged Victims in Sex Cases

Publications

2021

The State of Criminal Justice 2021. ABA Press. Military Justice Act of 2016’s Expansion of Military Subpoena Power.

2021

NACDL Press Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide

2020

The State of Criminal Justice 2020. ABA Press. Changes to the Punitive Articles Under the Military Justice Act of 2016

2020

NACDL Press Pattern Cross-Examination for Forensic Experts: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide

2019

The State of Criminal Justice 2019. ABA Press. MJA 2016

2018

The State of Criminal Justice 2018. ABA Press. Overview of the Military Justice Act of 2016

2017

The State of Criminal Justice 2017. ABA Press. Military Criminal Justice: Further Expanded Victim Rights and Overarching Refinements

2016

The State of Criminal Justice 2016. ABA Press. Military Criminal Justice: Expanded Rights for Sexual Assault Victims

2015

The State of Criminal Justice 2015. ABA Press. Supreme Court Signals The Right To Privacy In Digitally Stored Data

2014

The State of Criminal Justice 2014. ABA Press. Changes to The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Pertaining to Rape and Sexual Assault

2012

Thomson Reuters The Civilian Attorney's Guide to Winning a Court Martial

2011

Amazon.com How to Upgrade an Army Discharge

Languages

Spanish

French

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution