Skip to main content

Various successful cases

Practice Area: DUI & DWI

Outcome: Successful Defenses

Description: State v. M.G. - .11 breath test and Speeding L.S. was pulled over for speeding. As he pulled his car to the roadside, he reached in the glove compartment for his insurance and registration documents. The officer assumed he was reaching for a weapon and approached his car with his gun drawn. L.S. put his hands out of the car and eventually performed field sobriety evaluations (poorly). Mr. Ryczek argued that the officer’s actions escalated the stop into a formal arrest and the field sobriety evaluations should be excluded. The prosecutor dismissed L.S.’s DUI case. State v. D.A. - .148 breath test. A concerned citizen saw D.A. getting sick on the side of the road and called the police. A Gwinnett County DUI Task Force officer arrived and found D.A. sitting on the pavement, throwing up next to his truck. The officer said he could smell a strong odor of alcohol from over ten feet away, and that D.A. admitted to driving, slurred his speech, and couldn’t sit up without swaying. D.A. admitted he was driving, but told the officer he was sick from eating bad shrimp. D.A. was arrested for DUI and registered .148 on the breath test. Mr. Ryczek argued to the jury that D.A.’s breath sample was invalidated when D.A. got sick. The officer should have allowed D.A. to rinse out his mouth before taking the test. The jury found D.A. not guilty of DUI. State v. A.H. - Refusal A.H. was pulled over for weaving. The officer noticed that A.H. had a strong odor of alcohol and he was unsteady on his feet. The officer testified that A.H. failed field sobriety evaluations, and arrested him for DUI. A.H. also admitted to taking Xanax. A.H. declined the officer’s request to blow into the breath test. At A.H.’s trial, Mr. Ryczek convinced the judge that the State improperly charged A.H. with DUI alcohol. A.H.’s impairment could have been caused by his drug ingestion, and the State failed to charge him properly. The judge dismissed A.H.’s DUI case. State v. B.E. - Refusal B.E. was stopped at a roadblock. The officer smelled an odor of alcohol and B.E. performed poorly on field sobriety evaluations. Mr. Ryczek argued to the jury B.E. was uncoordinated, and he was unable to perform the tests to the officer’s satisfaction even when he had not been drinking. At trial, the officer made a prejudicial remark and he judge granted Mr. Ryczek’s motion for a mistrial. The jurors told the prosecutor that they would have found B.E. not guilty. The prosecutor dismissed B.E.’s DUI. State v. T.M. - .202 breath test. DUI and Endangering a Child by DUI (2 counts) A veteran officer pulled T.M. over for weaving and saw that she had two children in the back of her car. T.M. performed poorly on field sobriety evaluations, and registered high on the breath test. The officer had a long history of harassing young women. Mr. Ryczek filed a Notice of Intent to Present Similar Transactions, notifying the Court he would present evidence of the officer’s harassment to the jury. The prosecutor dismissed T.M.’s DUI case. T.M. received treatment for her alcohol problem and is currently clean and sober. State v. R.D. - .14 breath test. R.D. was pulled over while speeding north on Interstate 85. Her speech was slurred, and her she was unsteady on her feet. She performed poorly on the field sobriety evaluations, and registered .14 on the breath test. At a motion to suppress hearing, the judge suppressed R.D.’s Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test because the officer failed to administer the test as he was trained. The prosecutor dismissed R.D.’s DUI and she entered a guilty plea to Reckless Driving. State v. J.K. - Refusal. 3rd DUI in five years, Driving on a Suspended License, and Hit & Run, and Open Container of alcohol. J.K. was arrested after his truck was involved in an accident, and he had an odor of alcohol. . . see for more. for more

See all Legal Cases