State v MH, et al

Howard Woodley Bailey

Case Conclusion Date:July 30, 2009

Practice Area:Criminal Defense

Outcome:Racketeering Case w/ All Charges Dismissed

Description:Wiretap Racketeering Trial. Extensive Electronic Surveillance Evidence Issues. Client was charged as an accomplice in a large-scale prescription fraud case involving more then a dozen defendants. Extensive Motion practice contesting the investigation and the seizure of phone calls and the seizure of evidence by search warrants were argued. Jury selection was completed after 14 days of selection. The audibility hearings were conducted lasting approximately 4 weeks, with all attorneys and their clients listening to the recorded conversations. Several defendants pled guilty and as a result the State moved to sever all charges against our client, with the charges against our client dismissed at the sentencing of the codefendants.

973-982-1200