Timothy P. Martin

Timothy P. Martin

4.8
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 32 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Wheaton, IL
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI, Federal Crime ... +2 more

610 East Roosevelt Road, Suite 200, Wheaton, IL

About Timothy

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 20%

34 years | 3,000 cases

20%
DUI and DWI 20%

34 years | 2,000 cases

20%
Federal Crime 20%

34 years | 500 cases

20%
Violent Crime 20%

34 years | 1,500 cases

20%
White Collar Crime 20%

34 years | 1,000 cases

20%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 32 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1993

Administrative - Not Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

Martin & Kent, L.L.C.

610 East Roosevelt Road, Suite 200, Wheaton, IL, 60187

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Timothy P. Martin's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.8 /5.0

152 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 7 reviews | 1 star

Posted by Alberto | June 01, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Shoplifting Case

Do your self a favor if you like your freedom keep looking this so call lawyer destroy my case by doing a 402 conference which he said was in my best interest the video show no wrong doing in my behalf I don’t even think he look at the video. I fired him but the damage was done already with the 402 ...conference. My second lawyer i hired said he should have taken it to bench trial and this case would have been over with me winning since the video show nothing now am looking at 18 mMonths in prison becase of what the judge knows in my background and it’s not a good ideal anymore too do any type of trial so I took a pea deal

Posted by anonymous | October 28, 2017 | Hired Attorney | DUI & DWI

He barely even tried in my case and now I can never advance in life

I was recommended this attorney by another friend who got off with a much serious case than I with much more evidence. I was 19 years old and was tried for a DUI with no breathalyzer records or video recording. Mr. Martin convinced me after paying almost $10,000 that he would have this dismissed. wit...hout a problem. typical attorney. I followed all the requirements and they never had any evidence other than verbal claims. He did not care nor try. He did not even try to get my record cleared when I was only 19 years old when this happened and had no solid evidence against me. I paid extra to do what I can because I knew my future relied on it but he did not take my case seriously. I have friends in police departments across Chicago and suburbs that are amazed how little he did for me and how this record will stick with me forever and has caused me loss of career opportunities 8 years later. Mr. Martin made supervision seem like a golden ticket that no one would notice. He is a false promiser and a liar. I regret every day that I hired such a low attorney. I must mention to all facing DUI's, I did not blow in a breathalyzer and there was no video evidence. I would've been better off with a pro-bono. DO NOT HIRE FOR DUI!!!!

Timothy Martin

Replied last October 28, 2017

I am sorry this client is feeling that he was not well represented. Sometimes it is in the client's best interest to negotiate a favorable plea agreement on a DUI case when the evidence is so stacked against you that a trial is not in your best interest. For example as in this case when two police officers testify that you had red, bloodshot eyes, a strong odor of alcohol on your breath, slurring your words and staggering while walking. Moreover, the Officers both notice that you failed the Field sobriety tests by: forgetting the sequence of the alphabet, staggering on the walking test and being unable to answer simple questions logically. If you have no chance at trial, it can be in your best interest to avoid license revocation, keep the DUI off your criminal record with Court Supervision, lower the fines and avoid jail. As former prosecutors with over 20 years experience, we have brought over 1500 cases to trial and we know when not to bring a case to trial and subject our client to horrible consequences following a loss at trial. For a first time general DUI offense we have never charged more than $1,500.00. Hence, your memory must be flawed after 10 years

Posted by William | August 13, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

No defence

I originally hired another attorney who inturn had me hire Mr. Martin in late 2000 after being charged with sexual abuse of a teenage male. That cost me two $10,000.00 retainers and $2,000.00 for a private investigator that was never hired. I just got out of prison 2 months ago. I refused to take a ...plea deal and went to trial. In the months before trial, Mr. Martin started saying things that should have made me fire him. I didn't and i regret it to this day. He told me he was not going to ruin his reputation in the community over my case. That if the state offered me a good plea deal and i didn't take it he would withdraw. (He didn't) He would change his stories about investigations that were supposedly going on to prove the police were not telling the truth in their reports. During trial he didn't call any witnesses for the defence. He didn't admit any thing into evidence even though there were over 30 inconsistent statements and I had proof that I was not in town or working on the days it was claimed to have happened. During jury selection he implied I was gay giving the jury the idea that I was a person that would have sex with a male even thow I have never admitted to being gay and I don't live a gay life style. He basically only asked the state's witnesses different versions of the same questions the state asked providing no reasonable doubt. He even went as far as to apologies to the alleged victim when he was on the stand for having to come to court and testify. In closing arguments he even admitted that some claimed acts did happen. After trial, when I wrote him a letter criticizing the states attorney, he wrote me back saying that "no one held a knife to your head and forced you to commit the crime." Just what you want to here from your defense attorney. In the end it cost me 14 years in prison and over $82,000.00. When i hired Mr. Martin, he was lead named partner in his law firm. After my case he left that firm and started another. I believe he has done that one more time after that. One has to wonder why he keeps doing that. If you plan on hiring this man you better ask youself the question, do I want to take the chance of this happening to me and is that the way an attorney should act no matter what the crime? I thought you were entitled to a vigorous defence no matter what. Not in my case.

Posted by Lora | March 23, 2015 | Criminal Defense

People should know the truth about this unprofessional incompetent lawyer.

Perhaps if your case is worthy of his attention, he may do a great job. I suspect this may be true, but my case clearly was insignificant to him and while 6k was spent for the defense, he only seemed interested in striking a deal. I know people who get arrested often lie about their innocence but I ...really was in this case (innocent) and I couldn't live with the horrible unfair charge. This was during the period he was going through a divorce so maybe it affected his performance but after clearly dealing with indifferent ( and condescending) advice, he flat out told me I was lucky I didn't get a more horrific charge that what I received and I had no defense!! Now when you are innocent of the original charge and then have your own lawyer accuse you of something worse, was unbearable. I am not an unreasonable person but this was totally unfair. So I decided to get a different attorney. I will put his name out there. Bitterness (especially since I won) is not healthy or the right approach - but I can't help it. Let me also mention that when I informed Mr. Martin ( nicely through voicemail since he never returned a call) that I retained another attorney, not only did not respond but his office never sent any of the defense documents. His office has video footage and statements that we never had access to for our defense. His office probably still has this stuff. I know he could have gotten in trouble over this but what a horrible thing to do. He never returned any money ( he made an easy 6k) - of course he had the right to keep the amount for the time he put in but believe me, the hours would have not been much if he were honest. I know things happen, but no one from his office showed up for one of the initial court dates- can't remember why but I really can't believe our experience was unique. Again, the year was 2009 and perhaps this was a tough year for him, but there was no excuse for the insensitive comments he made and the callous attitude when someone's reputation is on the line. So let me conclude by warning anyone who is considering have Mr. Martin defend them. FACT: A case that he insisted was unwinnable was creamed in court - easily as the transcript will show. Mr. Martin argued ( argued!) that I should take the plea- and frustratingly did not want to take it to court. When I refused any deal that I would have to plea guilty to knowing I was innocent- he responded that I was lucky I didn't get a worse charge. Shame on him and hopefully I will help someone avoid a horrible experience. Thank you.

Posted by Criminal Defense Client | September 21, 2014 | Criminal Defense

Not as good as you expect.........

Save your money...........Tim Martin wasted my time and charged me well above average for a criminal case. Tim said "it looks like we can win"....Well we didnt! He does not return calls timely and always is "talking" to the prosecution. I was thrown under the bus with this "deal" maker. Makes you cur...ious exactly what he has up his sleeve....Not Trusting at all.......lNot recommended!

See All Client Reviews

Timothy P. Martin's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Timothy
Audriana Tina Anderson headshot
Audriana Anderson

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 04

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known Tim for years. Tim works hard for his clients, is always prepared for court, handles difficult cases, is an excellent trial attorney, and is respected by opposing counsel and judges."

Jeremy Wang headshot
Jeremy Wang

Criminal defense lawyer | May 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"A highly respected monument in the legal community and a pillar to those seeking justice in the eyes of adversity. Tough, aggressive, and one of the best trial attorney I have ever seen. I endorse this attorney without reservation."

William Lowell Opal headshot
William Opal

Criminal defense lawyer | May 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known Tim for several years and he is active in the legal community, in court daily, and always a strong advocate for his clients."

Teresa Ann Mcadams headshot
Teresa Mcadams

Criminal defense lawyer | Jul 18

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Tim Martin is renowned for his ability to aggressively fight for his clients. He has a history of being successful because he is humble and honest, which endears him to juries, judges, and prosecutors. He is always prepared and seems to genuinely care about his clients. I have always been impressed by Tim Martin's professionalism. If you are in trouble, Tim will really help you through the crisis."

Robert A. Heap headshot
Robert Heap

Unknown lawyer | Mar 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Tim is a credit to the legal community. He is honest and one the hardest working attorneys I know. I recommend him without reservation."

Ronald Lee Burdge headshot
Ronald Burdge

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"You know what makes a great defense attorney? Someone who worked in the prosecutor's office. With recommendations from attorneys who know him and clients who love him, it's easy to recommend attorney Martin. He knows the system and he knows the law. His years of experience can also tell you what to expect when you deal with the Criminal Law Justice System. If you have a questions about Criminal Law, he is your answer. Simple as that."

Elizabeth Jeannie Chacko headshot
Elizabeth Chacko

Family lawyer | Jun 19

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I was initially impressed with Tim's skills and professional demeanor as he was able to multi-task between criminal and family law with an extensive knowledge of both areas of law. However, his dedication to meeting his clients' needs separates him from the rest of the field. Tim is honest, reliable and hard working and I strongly endorse him."

Thomas Mcgrath O'Connor headshot
Thomas O'Connor

Criminal defense lawyer | Feb 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known Mr. Martin my entire legal career as a former felony Prosecutor. When I started as a State's Attorney he was already ranked as the top criminal defense attorney and was a great source of information. His trial skills are unmatched in the courthouse. He is known for taking the most difficult cases to trial and winning them."

Scott Andrew Kent headshot
Scott Kent

Criminal defense lawyer | Dec 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Tim has a wealth of experience in the criminal defense field. He is known and respected by the local attorneys and judges in this and the surrounding counties. His excellent results and successful trial record speak volumes about his skill in and out of the courtroom. I would trust him to handle any type of criminal case."

Christian K. Lassen II headshot
Christian Lassen

Criminal defense lawyer | Dec 27

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Stephen Allen Brundage headshot
Stephen Brundage

Criminal defense lawyer | Apr 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Tim is an excellent lawyer and is well respected throughout the Chicago area. He is very attentive to his clients and well versed in the law. I highly recommend him."

Emily J. Kelly headshot
Emily Kelly

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have worked with Tim for many years and I recommend him to anyone who as a criminal matter."

Kurt August Carlson headshot
Kurt Carlson

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 13

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I have had cases with Tim, and have consistently found him to be highly skilled. He has an excellent reputation among the lawyers in our County, for both his legal knowledge and his integrity. I would refer a member of my family to Tim without hesitation."

View All Endorsements
Audriana Tina Anderson headshot
Audriana Anderson

Criminal defense lawyer

Francis J. Discipio headshot
Francis Discipio

Workers compensation lawyer

William Joseph Luby headshot
William Luby

Criminal defense lawyer

William Lowell Opal headshot
William Opal

Family lawyer

Teresa Ann Mcadams headshot
Teresa Mcadams

Family lawyer

Robert A. Heap headshot
Robert Heap

Criminal defense lawyer

Michael James Harrison headshot
Michael Harrison

Criminal defense lawyer

Michael William Reidy headshot
Michael Reidy

Criminal defense lawyer

Richard Daniel Felice headshot
Richard Felice

Family lawyer

Scott Andrew Kent headshot
Scott Kent

Criminal defense lawyer

Stephen Allen Brundage headshot
Stephen Brundage

DUI and DWI lawyer

Emily J. Kelly headshot
Emily Kelly

Divorce and separation lawyer

John William Flynn headshot
John Flynn

Constitutional lawyer

John Peter Stock III headshot
John Stock

Constitutional lawyer

Kurt August Carlson headshot
Kurt Carlson

Constitutional lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

1995

OUTSTANDING PROSECUTOR AWARD, DuPage County State's Attroney's Office

Work Experience

1996 - Present

Lead Trial Attorney, Martin & Kent, L.L.C.

Associations

2009 - Present

DuPage County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association

President

2009 - Present

DuPage County Bar Association

Director

1996 - Present

Kane County Bar Association

Member

1996 - Present

Illinois State Bar Association

Member

2004 - 2010

Illinois Racing Board

Commissioner

Sample of Legal Cases

People v. Eric Munoz

NOT GUILTY

See More Legal Cases

Education

1991

John Marshall Law School, Chicago

Juris Doctor

Speaking Engagements

2010

DuPage County Criminal Bar Association

Criminal Defense Polygraph Exonerations

2008

DuPage County Criminal Bar Association

Search and Seizure

2007

DuPage County Sherrif's Office

Use of Deadly Force seminar training

2006

illinois Shriff's Association Springfield, Illinois

4th amendment illegal automobile seaches

2006

Illinois Sherrif's Association Annual Meeting

Automobile searches

2004

DuPage County Sherrif's Office Conference Meeting

Use of Deadly Force seminar training

1994

Dupage State's Attorneys Office

DUI Blood Breath and Urine Admissibilility Foundations

Publications

2006

Du Page Bar Association Crawford v. Washington

1989

John Marshall Law Review Brock v. State

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution