We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
PRO
also known as K Altman Law
Virtual Consultation Available
7
Practice Areas
9 years | 300 cases
20 cases
18 years | 8 cases
10 cases
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
State: Michigan
Acquired: 2017
No misconduct found
State: California
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
State: Illinois
No misconduct found
30474 Fox Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI, 48331
kaltmanlaw.com46 Client Reviews
Showing 31 - 35 of 46 reviews
Posted by anonymous | July 30, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Appeals
STAY AWAY.
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars Review Title: Took My Money and Vanished I hired this lawyer for help with an appeal and paid $11,000. Aside from writing the appeal, they did nothing I was aware of. Communication completely stopped after I paid. No returned calls or emails — total silence until I termin...
We are sorry to hear that this reviewer feels dissatisfied with their experience and appreciate the opportunity to clarify the services provided. The reviewer retained K Altman Law for an expedited academic dismissal appeal with a 24‑hour deadline. During this critical timeframe, our team: Conducted a detailed consultation and reviewed the case and supporting materials; Researched the school’s academic integrity and appeal policies to confirm the proper procedure; Drafted and finalized a comprehensive appeal letter, which was submitted to meet the school’s deadline; and Provided instructions for submission, FERPA compliance, and outlined next steps, including preparation of a petition to stay dismissal and potential direct advocacy with the school’s General Counsel. These services were provided in accordance with the Student Defense Fee Agreement, which specifies that the flat fee is earned upon receipt and not contingent upon outcome. While we regret that the reviewer was disappointed with aspects of communication and that the initial appeal did not succeed, substantial professional services were rendered on an expedited basis, and the fee was fully earned. We are willing to help if the reviewer wishes to proceed to the next stage of the process. We sincerely wish them the best as they move forward. — K Altman Law
Posted by anonymous | May 12, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Education
Paid $11,000 — No Legal Action Taken, Refund Tied to Silence
I signed a retainer agreement with K Altman Law on April 30 and paid $11,000. By May 6 — just one week later — I had already asked for a refund. Why? Because all they did was attend one meeting. No letters, no legal action, no strategy. They refused to send even a single demand letter. I had alrea...
We are disappointed to read this review and must respectfully clarify several key facts that have been omitted or misrepresented. Ms. Liu initially contacted our office on April 23, 2025, and we began assisting her immediately, even before a signed agreement, because she was in clear distress. After reviewing the matter and initiating contact with her university, she asked us to pause the engagement on April 25. She then re-engaged us on April 28 and formally signed our standard flat-fee agreement on April 30, which explicitly excluded the filing of a lawsuit. Over the course of this short engagement—just six business days—our team: Conducted multiple consultations and reviewed all documents submitted by the client; Determined that the client had not sent her accommodation documentation to the appropriate university office; Attended a Zoom meeting with Ohio State University officials, which resulted in the school approving the client’s original request for remote testing; Drafted (80% complete) a comprehensive advocacy letter to the university and its General Counsel requesting alternative accommodations due to the client’s admission that she could not pass the course using the standard final; Maintained regular communication and attempted to guide the matter through a legally appropriate, good-faith process. While our efforts yielded positive results in a very short and high-pressure period, the client was dissatisfied that we would not immediately pursue a formal demand letter and Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)—legal actions that, under both law and ethics, would have been premature and unsupported at that stage. It’s important to note: The client terminated the engagement, not the firm. We offered a $3,000 partial refund in good faith, accompanied by a standard mutual release and non-disparagement agreement used widely across the legal profession. This was not “hush money”—it was a customary and ethical tool to resolve a prematurely ended engagement. The client’s portrayal that “nothing was done” ignores the factual record and the significant progress that was made. We hope she ultimately achieves the resolution she is seeking, and we stand by the work our team did—swiftly, strategically, and compassionately—within a difficult and short window.
Posted by M | March 18, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Education
Do Not Hire for Any reason!!
Do not hire this "Lawyer", or his firm; I made that mistake and I will share the experience. I contacted Joseph Lento and he brought Keith Altman in during the initial consult April 2021, all three of us on conference call. I explained my severe issue with a university pharmacy school administration...
We take all client concerns seriously and appreciate the opportunity to provide clarity regarding this matter. While we are unable to discuss specific client details due to confidentiality, we would like to address the misleading and inaccurate statements presented in this review. Our firm was retained to investigate and address the client’s concerns regarding alleged falsified transcripts. After conducting thorough due diligence—including multiple communications with the university’s general counsel and independent verification with the relevant licensing board—it became clear that the allegations were unfounded. The client was informed that nothing was preventing them from proceeding with their professional licensing and that there was no valid legal claim to pursue. Attorneys have an ethical obligation not to pursue baseless litigation, and once it was determined that the proposed lawsuit lacked merit, our firm appropriately declined to file. Despite significant time and effort spent on the client’s behalf, we returned the unused funds in full. It is also important to note that at no point did our firm accept any payment from the opposing party, nor did any external matters—such as unrelated litigation between other attorneys—have any impact on the handling of this case. Furthermore, the client had previously retained another law firm, which reached the same conclusion we did, yet that detail was conveniently omitted from this review. We understand that legal matters can be frustrating, particularly when the outcome is not what a client had hoped for. However, our firm remains committed to ethical legal representation and ensuring that any claims pursued are legally sound. We encourage potential clients to rely on factual information when making decisions about legal representation.
Posted by anonymous | March 07, 2025 | Education
HIGH legal cost special education matters
I was afforded a free consultation after contacts with K Altman law firm. The consultation went great very informative until we discussed the cost I was quoted $26000 non-refundable which covered education advocacy for my children (2) meaning attending IEP meetings, determining appropriate services i...
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We appreciate the opportunity to have spoken with you regarding your children's education and the challenges you are facing in securing the appropriate services and accommodations they need. We understand that navigating the special education system can be overwhelming, particularly when advocating for two children with distinct and complex needs. Due process hearings require extensive legal preparation, including reviewing school records, conducting legal research, developing expert testimony, attending pre-hearing meetings, filing motions, and ultimately presenting the case at a formal hearing. Because these cases often involve significant legal and evidentiary challenges, our flat fee structure reflects the comprehensive representation required to pursue the best possible outcome for both of your children. We regret that there was a delay in responding to your request regarding partial services, as it is never our intention to leave a family feeling unheard. While due process cases are often best pursued comprehensively, we are always willing to discuss tailored approaches based on a family’s specific needs. If you are still seeking legal assistance or advocacy support, we would be happy to revisit your case and explore potential options that may be feasible. We sincerely wish you and your children the best in securing the educational support they deserve. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out.
Posted by Leslie | January 08, 2025 | Contracts & Agreements
Would not use
I would not reccomend anyone use this attorney or his office as I spent yesterday calling over 30 places and this was one of them, I briefly discussed what was going on for less than a 4-10 minute phone call to someone at there front desk and today received a bill which is against the law as i didn’t...
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We take customer satisfaction seriously and appreciate the opportunity to improve. We’re truly sorry to hear that your experience didn’t meet expectations. Our Intake Specialists are dedicated to gathering initial information to determine whether your situation falls within the scope of our services — but they are not attorneys and cannot provide legal advice. Additionally, while we strive to communicate our consultation process clearly, it sounds like there was a misunderstanding about the associated costs, and we regret any confusion this may have caused. We apologize for the form being sent without properly explaining that it is NOT a bill and does not need to be paid unless moving forward with a consultation.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2010 - Present
Owner / Senior Attorney, KAltman Law
2017 - Present
Michigan Bar AssociationMember
2008 - Present
State Bar of CaliforniaMember
1997 - Present
American Association for JusticeFounder of the Electronic Litigation Group
2008
BS - Bachelor of Science
2008
JD - Juris Doctor
2020
Electronic Discovery
2010
Electronic Discovery
2009
Electronic Discovery
2005
English
Spanish
Legal Answers
Top Contributor
Keith earned significant contribution points in 2024.
How to proceed after my 11 yo child received medical treatment at school without parental consent?
03 Apr 2026
Are private schools allowed to restrict access to bathrooms completely?
30 Mar 2026
How should i answer this question on my university application?
26 Mar 2026