Keith L Altman

PRO

Keith L Altman

also known as K Altman Law

3.2
Rating: 6.9

Licensed for 17 years

Education Lawyer at Farmington Hills, MI
Practice Areas: Education, Class Action, Civil Rights ... +4 more

30474 Fox Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI

Virtual Consultation Available

About Keith

Biography

A seasoned lawyer specializing in student defense, Title IX and complex litigation.

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

A seasoned lawyer specializing in student defense, Title IX and complex litigation.

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

Practice Areas

7

Practice Areas

Education 50%

Specialist in School Law and Title IX

9 years | 300 cases

50%
Civil Rights 10%

20 cases

10%
Class Action 10%

18 years | 8 cases

10%
Consumer Protection 10%

10 cases

10%
Litigation 10%

20 cases

10%
Defective and Dangerous Products 5%

Specialize in complex pharmaceutical torts and adverse events due to defective products. Also specialize in all aspects of electronic discovery and forensic data analysis

18 years | 100 cases

5%
Employment and Labor 5%

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Top Contributor
Top Contributor
2024 2023
Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2023 2022

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 8 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 2017

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 17 years

State: California

Acquired: 2008

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois

State: Illinois

Active Out of State Lawyer - Permitted to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

The Law Office of Keith Altman, PLLC

30474 Fox Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI, 48331

kaltmanlaw.com

Keith L Altman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.2 /5.0

46 Client Reviews

Showing 31 - 35 of 46 reviews

Posted by anonymous | July 30, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Appeals

STAY AWAY.

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars Review Title: Took My Money and Vanished I hired this lawyer for help with an appeal and paid $11,000. Aside from writing the appeal, they did nothing I was aware of. Communication completely stopped after I paid. No returned calls or emails — total silence until I termin...ated the agreement. They claimed they did other work, but never communicated that to me or provided any proof. They’re refusing a refund and using the signed contract to justify it. I feel completely scammed. Be very careful before hiring this attorney. Money does not match service rendered. They need to be reported to the bar association or disciplinary board. Life is already too hard for people to use their power to take from people that actually need help.

Keith Altman

Replied last August 04, 2025

We are sorry to hear that this reviewer feels dissatisfied with their experience and appreciate the opportunity to clarify the services provided. The reviewer retained K Altman Law for an expedited academic dismissal appeal with a 24‑hour deadline. During this critical timeframe, our team: Conducted a detailed consultation and reviewed the case and supporting materials; Researched the school’s academic integrity and appeal policies to confirm the proper procedure; Drafted and finalized a comprehensive appeal letter, which was submitted to meet the school’s deadline; and Provided instructions for submission, FERPA compliance, and outlined next steps, including preparation of a petition to stay dismissal and potential direct advocacy with the school’s General Counsel. These services were provided in accordance with the Student Defense Fee Agreement, which specifies that the flat fee is earned upon receipt and not contingent upon outcome. While we regret that the reviewer was disappointed with aspects of communication and that the initial appeal did not succeed, substantial professional services were rendered on an expedited basis, and the fee was fully earned. We are willing to help if the reviewer wishes to proceed to the next stage of the process. We sincerely wish them the best as they move forward. — K Altman Law

Posted by anonymous | May 12, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Education

Paid $11,000 — No Legal Action Taken, Refund Tied to Silence

I signed a retainer agreement with K Altman Law on April 30 and paid $11,000. By May 6 — just one week later — I had already asked for a refund. Why? Because all they did was attend one meeting. No letters, no legal action, no strategy. They refused to send even a single demand letter. I had alrea...dy exhausted my university’s appeal and grievance channels when I hired them — they knew this was my last resort. They offered a partial refund of $3,000 — but only if I signed a non-disparagement agreement. I declined. They kept $8,000 for doing virtually nothing. Every legal document in my case — TRO, exhibits, filings — I had to write myself. This firm did not represent me. They abandoned me. Full story with all facts and documentation: https://medium.com/@a9551443/i-paid-11-000-to-a-disability-rights-lawyer-then-they-threatened-me-into-silence-a14e5846168d

Keith Altman

Replied last May 14, 2025

We are disappointed to read this review and must respectfully clarify several key facts that have been omitted or misrepresented. Ms. Liu initially contacted our office on April 23, 2025, and we began assisting her immediately, even before a signed agreement, because she was in clear distress. After reviewing the matter and initiating contact with her university, she asked us to pause the engagement on April 25. She then re-engaged us on April 28 and formally signed our standard flat-fee agreement on April 30, which explicitly excluded the filing of a lawsuit. Over the course of this short engagement—just six business days—our team: Conducted multiple consultations and reviewed all documents submitted by the client; Determined that the client had not sent her accommodation documentation to the appropriate university office; Attended a Zoom meeting with Ohio State University officials, which resulted in the school approving the client’s original request for remote testing; Drafted (80% complete) a comprehensive advocacy letter to the university and its General Counsel requesting alternative accommodations due to the client’s admission that she could not pass the course using the standard final; Maintained regular communication and attempted to guide the matter through a legally appropriate, good-faith process. While our efforts yielded positive results in a very short and high-pressure period, the client was dissatisfied that we would not immediately pursue a formal demand letter and Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)—legal actions that, under both law and ethics, would have been premature and unsupported at that stage. It’s important to note: The client terminated the engagement, not the firm. We offered a $3,000 partial refund in good faith, accompanied by a standard mutual release and non-disparagement agreement used widely across the legal profession. This was not “hush money”—it was a customary and ethical tool to resolve a prematurely ended engagement. The client’s portrayal that “nothing was done” ignores the factual record and the significant progress that was made. We hope she ultimately achieves the resolution she is seeking, and we stand by the work our team did—swiftly, strategically, and compassionately—within a difficult and short window.

Posted by M | March 18, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Education

Do Not Hire for Any reason!!

Do not hire this "Lawyer", or his firm; I made that mistake and I will share the experience. I contacted Joseph Lento and he brought Keith Altman in during the initial consult April 2021, all three of us on conference call. I explained my severe issue with a university pharmacy school administration... involved in mass cheating cover-ups followed by retaliation against me for not condoning the cover-up. The retaliation included multiple years of accusations, manipulations, and persecution to force me to quit, fail, or be removed; including falsifying my transcripts and IRS 1099's. I formally hired the duo, signed the contract and payed each lawyer $5000.00 November 2021; Keith became the main contact and litigating lawyer for the lawsuit. The lawsuit was for abuse of power, force the correction of my transcripts/ files, pain and suffering for 8 years of hell of a 4-year program. Keith said "don't worry, we got your back". Keith Altman expressed to me his ability to practice in the Northern district of Texas where the school is located. I knew the school to be dishonest, but they would not roll over; this was going to be a fight. 22 months later, this lawyer rolled over. I supplied a deposition, hundreds of emails, official documents, audio files, and video files to Keith Altman during consultation with interns beginning Jan 2022.We provided a demand letter; Keith Altman reviewed, signed, and sent to the school June 2022. July 2022 school response was to refuse correcting transcripts but informed the transcripts were sent to the National Board a year earlier, unbeknownst to me. Keith instructed to begin the formal complaint/ grievance. Communication at this point became mostly unsuccessful. Keith failed to disclose the lawsuit filed against him by Joseph Lento whom accused Keith of stealing clients and not paying him; discovered while investigating Keith Altman law due to lack of communication. April 2023, I learned Keith was unable to practice in the Northern district of Texas and was trying get licensed to practice or find a local attorney for help with the case. June 2023, Keith asked if the formal grievance/ complaint was ready, the intern and I answered in agreement; Keith responded this to be his marching orders to begin the official lawsuit. I was unable to get updates for the next 2 months. September 2023, Keith contacted the National Board without consulting me first. He accepted their response without question, decided the case was over, quit without filing the formal grievance, and refunded his portion of the fee ($5000) received November 2023. On the conference call, Keith told me he agreed with what I was standing for and I was correct, but just give in to the school, get licensed and then ask the school to correct the transcripts. When questioned, Keith said to just file the formal grievance myself if I wanted to continue the case, he provided the grievance with a short letter saying I experienced a "hard time in college" giving the exact same false information as the school concerning the transcripts. I believe Keith was paid off by the school to quit the case. A person cannot agree with fraud to get licensed and then go back and question the fraudulent records. I consulted another attorney and was informed the statutes of limitations expired, (November 2023) and possible legal malpractice by Keith Altman. I contacted the National Board and asked detailed verification questions. The board wanted to go over my transcripts, I gave the same details, documentation, and emails provided to Keith Altman. The board followed up by deleting the transcripts based upon the discrepancies the school hid. If Keith provided the detailed documentation with questions to the board, they would have provided proof of dishonest manipulation/ activity by the school. The school ruined my education and killed my future career; Keith Altman hammered the final nail in the coffin. Why did this lawyer not do his job, was he paid?

Keith Altman

Replied last March 19, 2025

We take all client concerns seriously and appreciate the opportunity to provide clarity regarding this matter. While we are unable to discuss specific client details due to confidentiality, we would like to address the misleading and inaccurate statements presented in this review. Our firm was retained to investigate and address the client’s concerns regarding alleged falsified transcripts. After conducting thorough due diligence—including multiple communications with the university’s general counsel and independent verification with the relevant licensing board—it became clear that the allegations were unfounded. The client was informed that nothing was preventing them from proceeding with their professional licensing and that there was no valid legal claim to pursue. Attorneys have an ethical obligation not to pursue baseless litigation, and once it was determined that the proposed lawsuit lacked merit, our firm appropriately declined to file. Despite significant time and effort spent on the client’s behalf, we returned the unused funds in full. It is also important to note that at no point did our firm accept any payment from the opposing party, nor did any external matters—such as unrelated litigation between other attorneys—have any impact on the handling of this case. Furthermore, the client had previously retained another law firm, which reached the same conclusion we did, yet that detail was conveniently omitted from this review. We understand that legal matters can be frustrating, particularly when the outcome is not what a client had hoped for. However, our firm remains committed to ethical legal representation and ensuring that any claims pursued are legally sound. We encourage potential clients to rely on factual information when making decisions about legal representation.

Posted by anonymous | March 07, 2025 | Education

HIGH legal cost special education matters

I was afforded a free consultation after contacts with K Altman law firm. The consultation went great very informative until we discussed the cost I was quoted $26000 non-refundable which covered education advocacy for my children (2) meaning attending IEP meetings, determining appropriate services i...f due process was needed that would be another price mind you this is related to free public school matters, so just think families with children with disabilities are generally strained even if a two parent household but I am a one parent household. I feel like the price is astronomical people are capitalizing off of children with disabilities. This is big business attorneys charge just to talk about a case. I requested to discuss receiving partial services but I did not even receive a response. If I paid $26000 maybe I would have received a response even a email, do not bother after viewing this review.

Keith Altman

Replied last March 10, 2025

Thank you for sharing your feedback. We appreciate the opportunity to have spoken with you regarding your children's education and the challenges you are facing in securing the appropriate services and accommodations they need. We understand that navigating the special education system can be overwhelming, particularly when advocating for two children with distinct and complex needs. Due process hearings require extensive legal preparation, including reviewing school records, conducting legal research, developing expert testimony, attending pre-hearing meetings, filing motions, and ultimately presenting the case at a formal hearing. Because these cases often involve significant legal and evidentiary challenges, our flat fee structure reflects the comprehensive representation required to pursue the best possible outcome for both of your children. We regret that there was a delay in responding to your request regarding partial services, as it is never our intention to leave a family feeling unheard. While due process cases are often best pursued comprehensively, we are always willing to discuss tailored approaches based on a family’s specific needs. If you are still seeking legal assistance or advocacy support, we would be happy to revisit your case and explore potential options that may be feasible. We sincerely wish you and your children the best in securing the educational support they deserve. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out.

Posted by Leslie | January 08, 2025 | Contracts & Agreements

Would not use

I would not reccomend anyone use this attorney or his office as I spent yesterday calling over 30 places and this was one of them, I briefly discussed what was going on for less than a 4-10 minute phone call to someone at there front desk and today received a bill which is against the law as i didn’t... agree to work with them or anything, never signed a contract or anything either; so hence it means it doesn’t need to be paid either the bill was for 175.00 just for discussing potentially working with them and my child. We actually did not even speak to the attorney or come to any agreement, nor did I do a proper consultation which is usually free it was literally just a phone call and this is totally unacceptable. I already have an attorney and I was informed by him that because no agreement was made and I did not choose to retain a lawyer this is just them trying to charge me for them having a conversation with me for 175.00 which is a total disgrace and not ethical..

Keith Altman

Replied last March 19, 2025

Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We take customer satisfaction seriously and appreciate the opportunity to improve. We’re truly sorry to hear that your experience didn’t meet expectations. Our Intake Specialists are dedicated to gathering initial information to determine whether your situation falls within the scope of our services — but they are not attorneys and cannot provide legal advice. Additionally, while we strive to communicate our consultation process clearly, it sounds like there was a misunderstanding about the associated costs, and we regret any confusion this may have caused. We apologize for the form being sent without properly explaining that it is NOT a bill and does not need to be paid unless moving forward with a consultation.

See All Client Reviews

Keith L Altman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Keith

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.9 (Good)

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Owner / Senior Attorney, KAltman Law

Associations

2017 - Present

Michigan Bar Association

Member

2008 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

1997 - Present

American Association for Justice

Founder of the Electronic Litigation Group

Education

2008

Suny Ctr At Stony Brook

BS - Bachelor of Science

2008

Concord Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

Speaking Engagements

2020

AAJ Annual Convention

Electronic Discovery

2010

AAJ Annual Meeting

Electronic Discovery

2009

AAJ Annual Meeting

Electronic Discovery

Publications

2005

Trial (American Association for Justice) Deciphering the Adverse Event Reporting System

Languages

English

Spanish

Activity

Top Contributor

Keith earned significant contribution points in 2024.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution