| Experience | |
| Industry Recognition | |
| Professional Conduct |
Contributor level 14
Practice Areas |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Free Consultation (15 minutes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||
Contact Information |
|
||
Languages Spoken |
|
||
About MePhotos (2)Videos (0) |
JON M. ZIMMERMAN is an attorney in Seattle whose primary focus is the zealous representation of people who have been cited for traffic offenses in the State of... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“2 more speeding tickets snuffed out and dismissed by Mr. Zimmerman!!!”Posted by: Mike R., 6 days ago.
Client Review:
I have written a previous review of Mr. Zimmerman's work for me on this site back in January of 2013. This review will echo the last one. Since...
more
Flag
“Thanks, Jon!”Posted by: David, 7 days ago.
Client Review:
Jon was a law school classmate of mine, which is why when he told me he was handling traffic offenses I didn't think twice about hiring him to...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
I endorse this lawyer. Endorsement from lawyer: Matisyahu Wolfberg , Monsey (NY), 7 months agoJon is a great lawyer. Highly effective and very knowledgeable . I highly recommend anyone with a speeding ticket to go with him. Jon knows all of... more Endorsement from lawyer: Damian Mendez , Seattle (WA), 10 months ago |
License |
8 years since Jon Michael Zimmerman was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 14
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Affirmed in part, vacated in part.
Outcome: Prevailed - Awarded Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition against DOL and its Director, mandating a hearing and prohibiting the license revocation from taking effect.
Outcome: Prevailed - Reversed on RALJ appeal.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|