Michael Jamie Eng

Michael Jamie Eng

4.7
Rating: 8.2

Licensed for 22 years

Tax Lawyer at San Jose, CA
Practice Areas: Tax, Trusts, Real Estate

111 North Market Street, Suite 300, San Jose, CA

About Michael

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Tax 65%

IRS debt, collections, liens, levies, audits, and appeals; U.S. Tax Court

65%
Trusts 20%

Trust administration and litigation; breach of trust; beneficiary's rights; trustee's rights and duties

20%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 8 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2018

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 22 years

State: California

Acquired: 2004

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Office of Michael J. Eng

111 North Market Street, Suite 300, San Jose, CA, 95113

Law Office of Michael J. Eng

1900 South Norfolk Street, Suite 350, San Mateo, CA, 94403

Law Office of Michael J. Eng

22722 29th Drive S.E., Suite 100, Bothell, WA, 98021

Law Office of Michael J. Eng

2211 Elliott Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA, 98121

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael Jamie Eng's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

104 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 8 reviews | 1 star

Posted by Chen | September 26, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Get no help and insulted, hire Michael!

Choose Michael ONLY FOR GETING INSULTED AND NO HELP AT ALL! We contacted them for a simple traffic case. All they provided is “go deal with the police and court yourself, we won’t be there for x, y, and z!” . All we heard was “Don’t bother us with this crap but leave your legal plan money here!”. ...“You should be responsible for all the chores you did because WE ASSUME YOU DID SOMETHING WRONG BEFORE THE COURT SAYS SO!”. If you need someone to remind yourself how unfortunate you are for needing a legal assistance, go get Michael. They are the perfect person to do so! Oh and make sure to share all your legal plan details if you have one, they’ll probably make sure to get the money for doing just the reminder for you. That’s it! Enjoy your life with them, you’ll appreciate it!

Michael Eng

Replied last September 27, 2026

Chen, your review cannot be trusted because you omitted and misrepresented critical facts. Here are the facts you kept hidden from the reader. First, no one insulted you. In fact, you used abusive language in your emails to me, while I maintained my professionalism. I think the reader can easily see the abusive language you used by looking at your review. Your tone is palpable. Second, your case is not simple. We explained to you in detail and in no uncertain terms (on multiple occasions) the legal process involved in your case. We also asked you several times to provide the necessary documents so we can review and analyze the facts and issues in your case. The legal process is created by the state and federal governments, not us. No one likes the legal process. But everyone must follow it if they want to protect their rights. You just refused to follow the legal process and our instructions. Like you said, "That's it!" Third, your legal plan specifically instructed you to provide your plan ID for us to confirm your coverage. You failed to provide that information when you contacted us. Again, you just refused to follow instructions. Finally, Avvo Review Guidelines instructed you, among other things, to "Be factually accurate. While you are free to express your opinion, it is important to not exaggerate or misrepresent your experience." Once again, you just refused to follow instructions. Your frustration simply boils down to that, and it has nothing to do with us. It is difficult to trust someone who does not tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Posted by anonymous | May 24, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Do not ignore the red flags like I did

Michael is probably the worst lawyer I’ve ever worked with. He’s impatient, arrogant, defensive, and extremely unprofessional. When I read his past reviews, it was already a red flag that he responded to every single bad review with an “it’s not my fault, it’s yours” attitude. It was naive of me t...o ignore that warning, so I hope you won't make the same mistake. When I worked with Michael, he started by rambling for so long that he didn’t really give me a chance to speak. When I finally got a word in, his English wasn’t great, so he would misinterpret me and then blame me for not stating things clearly. He would remember things when it benefited him and conveniently “forget” things when it didn’t. Then he started attacking me over my personal life and got incredibly defensive when I called him out on it. I want everyone to know that while his price might be cheaper than other lawyers, when you hire him, you are NOT going to find someone who is on your side. He has a desire to belittle people and talk like he is smarter than everyone else. If you want more stress in your life, go ahead and hire him.

Michael Eng

Replied last May 29, 2026

Your review is fake. In fact, it is AI-generated. Please do not insult the public's intelligence. The public is a lot smarter than you think. You are only fooling yourself. You used 215 words in your review. Yet, none of those words say anything about the legal services you purportedly sought. Our rates are significantly higher than most lawyers because of our experience, expertise, and selectivity of cases. Further, I in fact speak perfect English. That means your review is defamatory and racist. By the way, you and your review are being investigated by Avvo. This will remain posted so everyone can see your defamatory, racist, and fake review.

Posted by anonymous | April 11, 2025

Incorrect Legal Advice (IRS Collections)

I spoke with Michael last year regarding a CP2000 notice I had received. While he was professional and asked what seemed like the right questions, his ultimate advice was for me to visit a local IRS office. A year later, I engaged a different firm that clearly explained the proper process for hand...ling underpayment issues with the IRS. It turns out the entire process is automated, and the suggestion to visit the IRS in person was not only unnecessary but ultimately incorrect. As a result, my case was delayed significantly, and I’ve now incurred over $20,000 in interest. Although Michael was courteous and professional, his guidance reflected a lack of understanding of how the IRS actually operates. Proceed with caution.

Michael Eng

Replied last April 12, 2025

Your review cannot be trusted. You left out many critical facts. First, your case involved multiple tax issues dating back several years. It did not simply involve underpayment. At the beginning of our call, I said to you in no uncertain terms what we can do and what we cannot do for your case and that you should seek another attorney for a second opinion and for the other issues that are outside the scope of our expertise. You said you understand. I proceeded to provide you with our analysis of the issues that we can handle and strategies and options to resolve those issues. I suggested three options and told you about the risks associated with each option. I also said that you ultimately will have to choose one of those options yourself and that I cannot choose one for you. You again said you understand. Apparently, you took a risk and chose the wrong option, and now you blame us for your own risk-taking. Second, you compounded your problem by not following my guidance last year to seek another attorney to help you further. Instead, you waited a year later to do what I suggested to you a year earlier, and again now you blame us for a delay caused by your own doing (or lack thereof). Just to refresh your memory, your tax problems were caused by what you did, what you did not do, and/or the circumstances in your life long before you ever contacted our law firm. Your tax issues were not caused by us in any way. We understand that tax issues can be stressful and that IRS procedures and processes are frustrating. However, that does not give you the right to use us as a punching bag. That is not only mean-spirited but also puerile. It appears your review is a reflection of your character.

Posted by anonymous | June 02, 2024

Still waiting on what they actually do or help with

Still waiting on what they actually do or help with. Like literally waited two / three months for a reply.

Michael Eng

Replied last June 12, 2024

Your review is fake. Not sure who you are trying to fool. Avvo does not provide our contact information. So, how did you contact us? If you contacted us through our website, you would have seen very clearly the areas of law we practice in. Avvo also lists those areas of law. Further, if you have emailed, called, or texted us, we would have responded within 24 hours (excluding weekends), as that is our policy. There are 1.33 million lawyers in the US, and you only wanted us? Seriously!?! And you waited "literally two/three months" to find out the information that is already on the Avvo website and our website? Really!?!

Posted by anonymous | October 11, 2023

Picks and chooses when to help

I was assigned this attorney through a network benefit from my employer. I told them exactly what I needed and I was never properly matched. Another attorney was kind enough to correspond with the plaintiffs attorney but no one actually worked or assisted with my case. Michael doesn’t care, he didn’...t want to touch it because another attorney literally communicated in an attempt to help but was never actively working my case. To prevent eviction a paralegal submitted paperwork but again is not touching any other aspect of case. But due to this he can’t help. I think it was a weak move and a cop out. How are you working a case touched by another attorney when it’s only due to kindness I even got the help I got? I guess I’ll just have to wait to be kicked out since he didn’t even care about the specific details of the case. I finally after over a month of begging got assigned to someone that could help and won’t. It’s frustrating and things like this is why I’m studying for the LSAT. I want to help ppl who had bad luck and just want to get their lives back on track. I would never want anyone to feel have I have been left to feel.

Michael Eng

Replied last October 13, 2023

Anonymous, you are simply ranting because you did not get what you want. Further, you are omitting key facts. Here are the key facts. Your case was referred to our office in early September 2023. You did not contact us until a few days ago, over a month later. When you finally did, I responded to all your emails (and there were many) within hours, after reviewing and analyzing all your information. We did not charge you anything for the legal services, which we could have. At any rate, we are a busy law firm. As such, it is humanly impossible for us to accept every case that comes to us. So, we have to choose cases based on criteria that are crucial to our law practice. We do not handle cases that have been worked on by another attorney, regardless of the type of work the other attorney did on the case. Many other law firms have similar policies. Further, your case is not the first one we have declined for that same reason. Finally, in case you are not aware, you have the right to choose which attorney you want to work with. Similarly, we (like every other law firm) have the right to choose which case we want to work on. In your situation, you chose several other attorneys before contacting us. It turns out, as you stated to me, that none of them worked out. More importantly, you stated, "it seems I should have been matched with you from the start." So now, you are ranting and using me as a punching bag simply because you feel you got the wrong attorneys before contacting us. I am not sure how that relates to the quality of our legal services.

See All Client Reviews

Michael Jamie Eng's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael
Christopher Walter Dull headshot
Christopher Dull

Tax lawyer | Nov 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Michael is very intelligent and knowledgeable when it comes to tax issues. He has advised me on matters and I have referred cases to him that dealt with estate tax and federal income tax issues."

Hanlen Jereme Chang headshot
Hanlen Chang

Tax lawyer | Jul 08

Relationship: Co-worker

"I worked with Michael Eng on several difficult and complex cases. He is diligent, hard working, a great communicator, and always gets the job done. I recommend Mike to anyone with a tax problem."

Alison Yew headshot
Alison Yew

Litigation lawyer | Mar 13

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse Michael without qualification. Michael is intelligent, and a detailed oriented practitioner. His work product is impeccable and he is a credible and compelling litigator."

View All Endorsements
Hanlen Jereme Chang headshot
Hanlen Chang

Estate planning lawyer

Alison Yew headshot
Alison Yew

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.2 (Excellent)

Honors

2024

Clients' Choice Award, Avvo

2023

Clients' Choice Award, Avvo

2022

Clients' Choice Award, Avvo

2021

Clients' Choice Award, Avvo

2020

Clients' Choice Award, Avvo

2019

Clients' Choice Award, Avvo

1998

CALI Award, Excellence in Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis

Work Experience

2013 - Present

Prinicipal Attorney, Law Office of Michael J. Eng

2003 - 2013

Associate Attorney, Various AM Law 100 and 200 firms and Boutique Law Firms

2002 - 2003

Judicial Law Clerk, Supreme Court Of Hawaii

2000 - 2001

Law Clerk, United States Attorney's Office

Associations

2018 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Attorney Member

2004 - Present

State Bar of California

Attorney Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Residential Real Estate Disputes

Resolved in favor of Clients; $6.8 million

IRS Dispute Regarding $2.5 Million in Taxes

Resolved case in client's favor

Attorney on Brief, Haque v. Fry’s Electronics, Inc., 2006 WL 584435 (9th Cir. (Cal) 2006).

Successful appeal.

Trust Dispute Involving $1.5 Million Estate

Resolved case in client's favor

US Tax Court Appeal

Resolved case in client's favor

Probate Involving $1.0 Million Estate

Resolved case in client's favor

See More Legal Cases

Education

2001

University of San Francisco School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1998

University of Rochester

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2018

Community Workshop

IRS Offers in Compromise

2017

Community Workshop

IRS Audits

2016

Estate Administration

Trust Administration

Publications

2000

University of San Francisco Law Review “Free Speech Coalition v. Reno: Has the Ninth Circuit Given Child Pornographers a New Tool to Exploit Children?”

Languages

Cantonese

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution