Free Consultation
$0 first 20 minutes
also known as Allan S. Lolly, Allan S. Lolly & Assoc. PC
A former Assistant Attorney General, RMI, I have more than 20 years experience as an attorney.
I enjoy developing personal relationships with my clients. Immigrating family members can be a stressful experience. Success in case processing makes all the difference in the lives of each family. I want cases to proceed with as little stress as possible. I have an experienced staff. We all work together as a team.
Our firm is devoted entirely to family immigration matters. We have obtained more than 11,000 visas and green cards for fiancées, spouses and children, as well as IR visas for parents, through the USCIS and overseas consulates; stateside green card adjustment of status cases, including for foreigners in the U.S. undocumented or out of status; 601 and 212 bar waivers based on illegal entry, over stays, and certain crimes.
Please call me at or go to our website at
1
Practice Area
Free Consultation
$0 first 20 minutes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: California
Acquired: 1990
No misconduct found
888 Prospect St., Suite 200, La Jolla, CA, 92037
260 Madison Avenue, Suite 8000A, New York, NY, 10016
143 Client Reviews
Showing 6 - 10 of 10 reviews | 1 star
Posted by anonymous | July 21, 2014 | Immigration
Do not have any dealings with Allan Lolly or the people he employs
Allan Lolly made 3 serious mistakes that cost us a great deal of money and wasted time. 1. Allan Lolly advised me that, before applying for US citizenship, I should give up my current green card and apply for a new one since I had traveled quite a bit outside of the US in the past years. I hired ...
The facts and situation are inaccurate, particularly item 2 above. This is an example of fears and worries overriding sensibility. Immigration is a stressful experience, so it can happen that a client will become less reasonable because they are fearful. It's understandable and I try to work through issues and be patient. There is only so much time and energy to devote to the emotional aspect of a case when communication itself becomes difficult. Early intervention can help, but not always. I try and watch for this and be supportive. Most clients are great, but sometimes it happens that anxieties are so high we just try to get through the case as best as possible and move along. The comment in item 2 above was a factual statement by me. If her application is thrown out, the worst thing that could happen to her is litigation. This is true, but it does not mean we would need to litigate, but just that this is the worst possibility. What I said and what she heard are different. Fear takes over. This client hired to obtain U.S. citizenship in the shortest time possible, not just to have a green card reissued. She entered the U.S. as a visitor multiple times and did not show her green card for fear she would lose it. She spent a majority of her time outside the U.S. over the course of many years. This suggests she was behaving as a visitor and not a permanent resident of the U.S., regardless of the expiration date on her green card. It makes applying for U.S. citizenship and further travel uncertain, and U.S. citizenship was the goal. If someone holds a green card based on marriage, she can apply for U.S. citizenship in 3 years rather than the normal 5 years. So, it was important to make sure she had a good application for U.S. citizenship when the time came to apply for it and that the U.S. citizenship application be filed at the nearest opportunity. In her situation, a new green card based on her marriage to a U.S. citizen was the best choice. These issues were discussed prior to hire and the decision was to make a new application for a green card rather than rely on her present status. It makes sense that an immigration officer at an interview could take the view that her green card status was fine. I stated pre-hire this is a possibility. Another officer could take the opposite view based on her primary residence in the U.K. and travel pattern to the U.S. as a visitor, and she could lose her permanent resident status. Officers do not all agree and there is discretion. If the goal was to apply for U.S. citizenship securely in the shortest time possible, then a new green card based on marriage was the most secure route. More than a year later, the client is still grinding on issues that were explained to the best of my ability. It's this emotional aspect of my practice that makes things difficult, but I try. As it stands, this client is in a good position to apply for U.S. citizenship at the nearest opportunity. Services were correct and were discussed.
Posted by anonymous | September 01, 2011 | Immigration
K1 Fiance Visa
I Hired Allan for a K1 Fiance visa at first they were so nice untill they received their money and my fiance was denied visa due to not acting fast on out behalf we lost the visa and they closed our case. After that we never heared from Allan and his staff any more and was told sorry to hear your vi...
Simply untrue. I have special expertise regarding visa refusals, including filing suit. There is much more to this case than stated above. This person is upset and acting out.
Posted by Trevor | March 15, 2011 | Immigration
Issues with Allan Lolly
I hired beginning in Summer of 2008. Allan S. Lolly and associates (at the time Holmes & Lolly, but now Allan S. Lolly And Associates) to assist in obtaining a visa for my wife. Allan S. Lolly mishandled my case throughout the entire process. I would not recommend this firm to anyone.
This former client already posted a negative review with Avvo 6 months ago. His recitation of the facts were disputed by this office and remain in dispute. This second, more recent posting can be for no purpose other than to attack. It is manipulative. Repeat negative comments like this run afoul of the spirit and intent of consumer feedback. One consumer, one comment. This posting is in bad faith.
Posted by Jim | September 18, 2010 | Immigration
Lacking in personal service and knowledge
Allan Lolly & Assocs. represented my wife and I in an immigration matter. The whole process felt like an immigration mill; we were treated like an account not like clients. He did a sufficient job (she got her green card so I can't say he failed us), but I just felt that I could have found a better...
This client felt he was not given enough attention. I am hired to help with immigration matters only. I am not a tax expert and cannot give tax advice, only immigration advice. I refer clients who need tax advice to consult with my accountant as needed. Most clients easily understand this and no phone call is required to understand. Generally, I try to be helpful and share what knowledge I have. I step in and help where needed, by email and phone. At the same time, we charge a flat fee for services and so I need to be efficient. I also must be careful not to give advice on areas with which I am not familiar. I don't know tax.
Posted by anonymous | January 05, 2010 | Immigration
Unreliable
I paid this firm a down payment of $600 to represent my fiancee and myself in the pursuance of a Fiancee Visa. The firm took my money and never delivered one bit of information to me. Thankfully, I thought to close my Master Card account before they took any more money from me. I am now in the pro...
This comment is false. The client wanted to move quickly and paid a deposit on a Friday afternoon with the understanding that we would start that same afternoon so he could work over the weekend, a good arrangement. On Saturday, he complained that he did not receive our initial client packet on Friday after he paid the deposit. I offered to drive to the office with my assistant and get the packet out on Sunday morning and then investigate on Monday the problem. He responded by email to terminate services. On Monday, my assistant reported that she did in fact begin correspondence with the client on Friday as agreed and there was no bounce back. I felt there was enough effort on our part to show good faith and I wanted to speak by phone with the client. I did not feel there was just cause under the circumstance to terminate services and wanted to try and smooth things over. His response was to post comments like this in multiple places. There was no effort to take further monies and so the comment is false.
"Knowledgeable and experienced in family immigration matters. I recommend Attorney Allan Lolly to clients with family immigration matters."
"I wholeheartedly endorse this lawyer. A brilliant, trustworthy and highly respected attorney in the legal community."
"This attorney works very hard for the clients and keeps up with the law by attending legal seminars to assist them in this regard. I endorse this attorney."
"I endorse Mr. Lolly without question. We have interacted on many matters and his knowledge is 'top notch'!"
"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Lolly has demonstrated he is extremely knowledgeable in Immigration and that he provides first-class service to his clients while collaborating with him on a couple cases. I would not hesitate to recommend him to anyone seeking immigration representation closer to the San Diego location."
"Mr. Lolly is simply an exceptional attorney who I would recommend to everyone and anyone. I am a former judge, former magistrate, former prosecutor, and an attorney with 24 years of experience. I still learn from his answers on Avvo on a daily basis and I am constantly impressed."
"Attorney Lolly is professional, knowledgable and extremely helpful. He assisted me with a case and I found his considerable expertise to be an invaluable resource. I can recommend this attorney as highly competent, caring and efficient, and do so unconditionally."
"I endorse Mr. Lolly. He offers invaluable assistance to his clientele. Furthermore, his services on Avvo are irreplaceable."
"I endorse Attorney Lolly. Through his postings on Avvo it is apparent that he is extremely knowledgable in the area of immigration and nationality law. Any client would be lucky to have Attorney Lolly represent them."
"Attorney Lolly has an outstanding resume and knows how to apply difficult laws to difficult situations."
"I endorse this lawyer. Attorney Lolly provides detailed and honest postings on AVVO assisting those with immigration law questions. His comments are extermely useful to not only AVVO posters but also to attorneys in the legal community. A true professional"
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Litigation lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Divorce and separation lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Lemon law lawyer
Family lawyer
Family lawyer
2017
Client Rating, Martindale-Hubbell
2015
Client Choice, Avvo
2015
A+, Better Business Bureau
2014
Client Choice, Avvo
2014
A+, Better Business Bureau
2000 - Present
Managing Attorney, Allan S. Lolly & Associates APC
1995 - 2000
Attorney, Allan S. Lolly, Law Offices
1992 - 1995
Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, RMI
1990 - 1992
Attorney, City Attorney's Office, San Diego
1989 - 1990
Clerk, Superior Court Of California, County Of San Mateo, Honorable Gene McDonald
2002 - Present
Better Business Bureau
1991 - Present
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1990 - Present
Santa Clara University Law Assoc.
1990 - Present
California Bar AssociaionAttorney
1984 - Present
U.C. Berkeley Alumni
1989
JD - Juris Doctor
1984
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2014
Sovereign Borders: The Problem of Childhood Arrivals
2012
Immigration overview and case studies
2011
Immigration History and Handling Undocumented Foregners - CLE @ University of San Diego
2010
Visa Refusals at Consulate Posts
Spanish
Russian
Ukrainian
Legal Answers
Can i be deported for class B misdemeanor
17 Jan 2017
US citizen gets married ESTA visa holder...
24 Jul 2015
Can an annulment based on fraud jeopardize my life if i get married again and have to file for AOS?
17 Jun 2015