Marc J. Randazza

Marc J. Randazza

4.7
Rating: 8.5

Licensed for 24 years

Constitutional Lawyer at Las Vegas, NV
Practice Areas: Constitutional, Intellectual Property, Libel & Slander

2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV

About Marc

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Constitutional 50%

Primarily in the area of First Amendment rights.

24 years

50%
Intellectual Property 25%

Trademark and Copyright matters including registration, advice, licensing, and litigation.

24 years

25%
Libel and Slander 25%

The majority of my defamation practice is defense oriented, but I do consult with plaintiffs as well - usually to help them avoiding mistakes that defamation plaintiff's lawyers often make.

24 years

25%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 700-900 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Nevada for 14 years

State: Nevada

Acquired: 2012

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2018

Licensed in Arizona for 15 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 2010

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2019

Licensed in California for 15 years

State: California

Acquired: 2010

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2020

Licensed in Florida for 23 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 2003

Member in Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2020

Licensed in Massachusetts for 24 years

State: Massachusetts

Acquired: 2002

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2019

Location

Randazza Legal Group

2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV, 89117

Randazza Legal Group Gloucester Office

2 Main Street, Unit 4W1, Gloucester, MA, 01930

Randazza Legal Group

2 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2600, Miami, FL, 33131

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Marc J. Randazza's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

31 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (31) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Tim | January 12, 2016

Randazza

In my time of need for legal services, Mr. Marc Randazza has stepped up to the plate on more than one occasion, returning my phone calls personally. Mr. Randazza is extremely helpful on more than just the legal end. He has had an open line of communication during difficult times, which was extremely ...helpful in keeping me informed, thus lowering my stress levels and heightening my knowledge of what is happening from moment to moment. One thing I like about Mr.Randazza is his utmost honesty. He WILL tell you like it is. Some things in life may be difficult to hear, but Randazza will pull no punches and will not lead you into a costly, drawn out situation for his own personnal financial gain. I highly recommend Mr.Randazza for any legal needs you might have. This guy is licensed in 5 states, not an easy task. Mr. Randazza is not afraid of hard work, in fact he thrives on it. I haven't had a need for a lawyer in a long while, but if I do Randazza is the guy to call.

Posted by Amy | August 24, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Marc John Randazza is a fierce and brilliant defender - highly recommended - saved my financial life

Marc Randazza saved my financial life with his defense of me. I highly, highly recommend him. In short, he is an attack dog but never loses sight of what is the wise and prudent thing to do. He compiled an attack that, on multiple fronts, decimated every argument of the lawyer and client coming af...ter me. My experience of him is that he is passionately committed to fairness and doing what’s right, and as I saw it, does not see losing a case as an option for himself. I know he must occasionally lose a case (because this can’t always be in control of the lawyer due to the client’s situation and the law), but the way he approaches them -- with this fierceness that losing is not an option -- made me feel secure from the start that I didn’t have to worry at all; I just needed to wait for him to finish what he needed to do. I feel confident in saying that whatever the best possible outcome is, Randazza will get it for a client. I also want to explain that while he is fierce, he is not just fierce. He is also methodical, meticulous, and highly incisive. In his defense of my case -- which he made go away rather than going to trial (phew!), I found him to be a brilliant writer (of the brief) and a leave-no-stones-unturned thinker and arguer. While I’m extremely grateful to him for all he did to defend me, I’m also extremely grateful I wasn’t the client on the other side of him. He, plain and simple, wiped the floor with every argument the other side’s lawyer made. And that’s no exaggeration. He brilliantly, brilliantly answered every argument the other lawyer made with a legally-supported argument (based in prior cases, state law, and constitutional law) that just made every argument the other side had just shrivel up -- to the point where the other side probably understood that they were lucky to just walk away and not walk away with a countersuit. (I did not want a countersuit; I just wanted the other side to go away; so I was very, very happy with this outcome.) I also want to say that though Randazza is a fierce and committed defender of free speech -- mine and all of ours -- he never lost sight of my best interests. He was careful in informing me of all my alternatives, including the possible benefits of settling, and emphasized that this was an option for me, and explained all the reasons that this approach might have merits for me. Another very important way that Randazza is fierce is that he’s fiercely ethical. It’s important to me to have a lawyer who, while exploiting every angle, never stops coming from moral high ground. I don’t really understand people who sneer at their lawyers for being sleazy. It’s up to a client to choose a lawyer who, in their initial conversations, reflects that they are both extremely intelligent/clever (and will figure out the puzzle of how to get you out of trouble) and comes from moral high ground. This matters to judges and it matters in terms of public opinion, if there is any public reflection on your case, which their was on mine. I found, at every turn, that Randazza drew on his mind and case law rather than ever doing anything underhanded. And finally, I think you can understand a lot about a lawyer through his associates. The people who work for Marc Randazza are like mini-Randazzas in many ways, but the important part to me was that they seem to truly love and respect the guy. Love and respect. They love him because he’s decent to the core -- a man of principle -- and they respect him because of all I wrote above. I highly, highly recommend Marc Randazza as a lawyer and a human being -- although I strongly suggest that you avoid being on the other side of him, because he’ll eat you and your lawyer for breakfast and eat whatever’s left for a mid-day snack. Great man, great lawyer; I was extremely lucky and will forever be grateful to him for his defense of me.

Posted by Eric | July 09, 2012 | Lawsuits & Disputes

What a Lawyer Should Be

When faced with being a defendant in a SLAPP suit, there is no better attorney than Marc Randazza. He is smart, witty, and down-to-earth. For someone like me who has no experience in First Amendment or Civil Law, he explained everything perfectly and kept me informed at every step. I went from depres...sion about being sued to feeling confident that everything would work in my favor. I am thankful for his help and grateful to the experienced attorneys who referred Marc to me.

Posted by Michael | July 09, 2012 | Libel & Slander

A lawyer's lawyer

I've long admired Marc's written work and litigation strategies. Marc’s work is significant and his public outreach is admirable. But it's easy to be a reader of someone's blog posts and articles. Reading someone's work only costs us a few seconds of our time. The Internet is free. I've often ...told Marc how significant and meaningful his work is. Compliments are a cheap currency. They are mere words. The best compliment a man can pay another man is to hire him. When I was sued for defamation, there was only one person I wanted representing me – Marc Randazza. Clients often complain that lawyers refuse to return calls. Marc's responses to my emails are scary-fast, making me wonder if he ever takes a day off. I’ve never felt that Marc, unlike so many other lawyers, was paying lip service to my needs. Marc has never pressured me to take a litigation position that I wasn’t comfortable with. He has updated me on case developments and given me the pros and cons of every position. He has given me my options without insisting that I do what he suggested. Being sued is never pleasant. However, with Marc as my lawyer, I feel that I am in the best place a client can be. I’m proud to call him my lawyer.

Posted by anonymous | June 11, 2009 | Lawsuits & Disputes

ONE OF A KIND!!

Mr. Randazza helped us out of a serious bind in 2008. We were referred through another local lawyer who spoke very highly of him saying, "he's a great guy, real down to Earth, and probably one of the best in his field." Every word of that recommendation was proven true. Marc took an immediate pers...onal interest in our case. Being that my company is small with a meager budget I expected to be moved to the back burner. However, this was not the case. Mr. Randazza kept in contact with us constantly with personal phone calls (more than once late on Friday night), personal emails, and face to face meetings. His keen intellect and knack for out of the box thinking are valuable assets in the legal biz. He attacked our company's case with creativity and vigor, not bureaucracy. Nothing was ever "rubber stamped" or just passed across the desk. When all was said and done, with Mr. Randazza's help, we came out on top of a case where the odds were stacked against us. You always hear the expression, "I'd trust the guy with my life" thrown around. People usually say it in regards to family and long time friends. Funny thing, I trusted Mr. Randazza with mine and walked away a better person.

See All Client Reviews

Marc J. Randazza's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Marc
Bryan Anthony Reo headshot
Bryan Reo

Libel and slander lawyer | Jun 21

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer. He has a deep and meaningful understanding and appreciation of the First Amendment, particularly as it relates to the Speech clause."

Steven K. Dimopoulos headshot
Steven Dimopoulos

Intellectual property lawyer | Dec 11

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Attorney Randazza represents my law firm with regard to First Amendment and Intellectual Property issues. I highly recommend this attorney."

Homa S. Woodrum headshot
Homa Woodrum

Unknown lawyer | Jan 06

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Highly professional and diligent - Marc is an asset to the legal community!"

John A. Di Giacomo headshot
John Di Giacomo

Libel and slander lawyer | Dec 15

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Marc is, in my opinion, the best First Amendment lawyer in the United States. He is a great person, easy to work with, a gracious host whenever I visit Las Vegas, and highly respected in his field. I can't say enough good things about him."

Michael David Bixon headshot
Michael Bixon

Libel and slander lawyer | Nov 18

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Fantastic lawyer, you couldn't do any better."

Sandy Van headshot
Sandy Van

Intellectual property lawyer | Nov 02

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Great First Amendment Right Attorney. Knows his stuff and is in several high profile cases."

D. Gill Sperlein headshot
D. Sperlein

Intellectual property lawyer | Jun 24

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I met Marc more then 10 years ago at a meeting of the First Amendment Lawyers Association. Since then we have worked on many cases together, primarily in the area of intellectual property. Above all Marc is a litigator. He is a fierce advocate - one you definitely want in your corner and hope never to see across the ring."

M. Todd Miller headshot
M. Miller

Copyright infringement lawyer | Dec 31

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Jason Lee Van Dyke headshot
Jason Van Dyke

Libel and slander lawyer | Oct 28

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"This is the lawyer I would hire if I was dealing with any sort of defamation or First Amendment issue. There is nobody better."

Christopher Daniel Leroi headshot
Christopher Leroi

Libel and slander lawyer | Aug 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Excellent attorney. Mr. Randazza continues to provide valuable advice on Avvo each time that he responds to a question. Although I have been licensed and practicing for 24 years, including time spent as a judge and magistrate, I continually learn from his answers about different aspects of the law. I would recommend him to everyone."

Eric Turkewitz headshot
Eric Turkewitz

Libel and slander lawyer | May 29

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Marc was pro hac vice counsel (admitted in another state for just that case) in a complex defamation matter where I served as local counsel in New York. We represented over a dozen people, most of whom were lawyers. Marc did an outstanding job -- which was no easy task when you have a bunch of lawyers for clients. I'd recommend Marc for any intellectual property or First Amendment issue -- and that comes from someone who worked with him closely on a high profile matter. As the saying goes, two thumbs up -- way up."

Howard Robert Roitman headshot
Howard Roitman

Libel and slander lawyer | Mar 30

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Kyle J. Bristow headshot
Kyle Bristow

Internet lawyer | Jan 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Mr. Randazza. He is a smart and principled attorney."

Thomas Gregory Haren headshot
Thomas Haren

Libel and slander lawyer | Jan 03

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I had the unique honor of working on a case with Marc, whose reputation had preceded him -- he did not disappoint. He is an exemplary talent and an attorney who has a true mastery of the law. His character is beyond reproach. I gladly endorse Marc as an advisor, as a counselor, and most of all as an advocate."

Christine C McCall headshot
Christine McCall

Libel and slander lawyer | Nov 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mr. Randazza's voice and point of view here on the Avvo Q and A board are distinctive, incisive, and brutally pragmatic. His contributions here are a genuine gift to the public and to the legal community. This service is very much richer and more vital for his participation. I would hire Mr. Randazza in an instant for any legal work in which he was willing to engage, although I suspect he picks and chooses the matters in which he wants to be involved. Real skill and talent tends to allow that kind of practice."

Jay M Wolman headshot
Jay Wolman

Intellectual property lawyer | Nov 26

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known Mr. Randazza in a personal and professional capacity for over 15 years. In that time, I have observed him become a fierce advocate and pragmatic counselor. His devotion to the public interest and to the development of the law has made him an incredibly well rounded attorney. I would happily refer a complex intellectual property or first amendment matter to him, knowing the client would be in skilled hands."

Bennet Gerard Kelley headshot
Bennet Kelley

Copyright infringement lawyer | Nov 23

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Bryce A. Fetter headshot
Bryce Fetter

Constitutional lawyer | Oct 02

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Daniel Gary Rosenthal headshot
Daniel Rosenthal

Internet lawyer | Jun 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mark is a well known attorney -- featured on sites like Above the Law, Lawyerist, and Volokh Daily. His legal writing and advocacy style were "unofficial" study in my law school, and frankly, I learned more about internet law from his blogging and reading his filings than many professors could teach. I wholeheartedly endorse Mark in fields such as intellectual property, constitutional law (First Amendment, specifically), and general internet law. He is a zealous advocate and many in our field could learn a lot from him."

Daniel E. Green headshot
Daniel Green

Constitutional lawyer | May 05

Relationship: Friend

"I've known Marc since 1988, and he gives his 110% to anything he does in life. Law is no different for him."

View All Endorsements
Richard Brian Newman headshot
Richard Newman

Business lawyer

Adam Leberthon headshot
Adam Leberthon

Litigation lawyer

Alina Suzanne Morris headshot
Alina Morris

Trademark application lawyer

Homa S. Woodrum headshot
Homa Woodrum

Guardianship lawyer

John A. Di Giacomo headshot
John Di Giacomo

Internet lawyer

Sandy Van headshot
Sandy Van

Real estate lawyer

D. Gill Sperlein headshot
D. Sperlein

Internet lawyer

Leo Michael Mulvihill Jr. headshot
Leo Mulvihill

Civil rights lawyer

Tara Marie Warrington headshot
Tara Warrington

Real estate lawyer

Gergana Hristova Miteva headshot
Gergana Miteva

Trademark application lawyer

Eric Turkewitz headshot
Eric Turkewitz

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer

Robert J Ambrogi headshot
Robert Ambrogi

Communications and media lawyer

Cary Stephen Wiggins headshot
Cary Wiggins

Constitutional lawyer

Robert L Corn-Revere headshot
Robert Corn-Revere

Constitutional lawyer

David Scott Gingras headshot
David Gingras

Litigation lawyer

Andrew John Contiguglia headshot
Andrew Contiguglia

Criminal defense lawyer

Clyde F. Dewitt headshot
Clyde Dewitt

Entertainment lawyer

A Jordan Rushie headshot
A Rushie

Copyright infringement lawyer

Craig Allen Pugatch headshot
Craig Pugatch

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer

Daniel E. Green headshot
Daniel Green

Immigration lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.5 (Excellent)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2020.

Public Reprimand - with Conditions issued in FL, 2020

updated on 03/24/2021

Public reprimand means the attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar warns the lawyer in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior and places conditions on the lawyer's license.

Discipline, Probation; no Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2020

updated on 03/20/2020

This sanction means the attorney had a suspension placed on hold (and ultimately removed) by complying with certain requirements.

Reciprocal - Suspension issued in MA, 2019

updated on 02/10/2021

This means that the attorney's misconduct in another state, or jurisdiction, also violated the rules for practicing law in Massachusetts.

Reciprocal - Reprimand issued in AZ, 2019

updated on 02/10/2021

This means that the attorney's misconduct in another state, or jurisdiction, also violated the rules for practicing law in Arizona.

Stayed Suspension issued in NV, 2018

updated on 12/07/2018

Stayed suspension means the attorney has been suspended, but that the suspension is placed on hold (and ultimately removed) if the attorney complies with certain requirements.

Honors

2025

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Best Lawyers in Southern Nevada - Lawsuits and Disputes, Vegas Inc. / Avvo

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Managing Partner, Randazza Legal Group

2006 - 2009

Adjunct Professor, Barry University School of Law

2004 - 2009

, Weston, Garrou, Walters & Mooney

2003 - 2004

, Becker & Poliakoff

2000 - 2002

Research Assistant, University of Florida

Associations

2012 - Present

First Amendment Lawyers Association

National Secretary

2006 - Present

International Trademark Association

Member

2003 - Present

First Amendment Lawyers Association

Member

First Amendment Lawyers Association

Past President

Sample of Legal Cases

Op. Corp. v. Roca Labs, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8507 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2016)

VanVoorhis v. Comins, 40 Fla. L. Weekly 2694 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)

Case Transferred to New Venue

Roca Labs, Inc. v. Consumer Op. Corp., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143107 (Oct. 21, 2015)

Summary Judgment for Defendant

Tobinick v. Novella, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150083 (Sept. 30, 2015)

Summary Judgement for Defendant

Tobinick v. Novella, 43 Media L. Rep. 1803 (S.D. Fla. June 4, 2015)

Anti-SLAPP Motion Granted

Ellora's Cave Publ., Inc. v. Dear Author Media Network, LLC, 308 F.R.D. 160 (N.D. Ohio 2015)

NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20722 (D. Nev. Feb. 19, 2015)

Motion to Unseal Granted

Comins v. VanVoorhis, 135 So. 3d 545; 42 Media L. Rep. 2021 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)

Judgment Affirmed

Chevaldina v. Katz, 42 Media L. Rep. 1224 (3d DCA 2014)

reversed

AirFX.com v. AirFX, LLC

Plaintiff received fees and costs. Defendant's motion to dismiss denied.

Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall (11th Circuit Court of Appeals))

District Court's dismissal was reversed and case was remanded.

Ricks v. BMEzine.com, LLC

BMEzine prevailed on a motion for summary judgment on Ricks' claims.

Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall (Fla. Supreme Court)

Returned to 11th Circuit Court of Appeals

Beck v. Eiland-Hall

Panel ruled against complainant

Solid Host, NL v. Namecheap, Inc.

Defendant's motion to dismiss denied.

Salle v. Meadows

Defendant was found liable under Anti-Cybersquatting provisions of the Lanham Act.

Alpine Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Walter Alvarez

Panel ruled in favor of complainant

Liberty Media Holdings v. Henson, 516 F. App’x. 673 (9th Cir. 2013)

Sanchez v. Joel, 94 So. 3d 594, (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)

Katz v. Chevaldina, 900 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

Rakofsky v. Washington Post, 971 N.Y.S.2d 74, 2013; 41 Media L. Rep. 1863 (N.Y. 2013)

Suen v. Las Vegas Sands Inc., 41 Med.L.Rptr. 1980 (Nev. Dist. Ct. 2013)

Liberty Media Holdings, LLC v. BitTorrent Swarm, 277 F.R.D. 669 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

Doe v. Fry, 22 Fla. L. Weekly 378, (M.D. Fla. 2010)

Gerling v. Consumer Op. Corp., 43 Med.L.Rptr. 2968 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2014)

Lexington Homes Inc. v. Siskind, 34 Med.L.Rptr. 2212 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2005)

Bilzerian v. Dirty World, LLC, 44 Med.L.Rptr. 1102(Nev. Dist. Ct. 2015)

Righthaven, LLC v. Hoehn

Judgment in defendant's favor.

Expert Witness Case: Calista Enters. v. Tenza Trading, 43 F. Supp. 3d 1099 (D. Or. 2014)

Roca Labs, Inc. v. Consumer Op. Corp., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143107 (Oct. 21, 2015)

Ellora's Cave Publ., Inc. v. Dear Author Media Network, LLC, 308 F.R.D. 160 (N.D. Ohio 2015).

In re Tam, No. 14-1203 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 22, 2015).

Jones v. Dirty World Entm’t Recordings, 755 F .3d 398; 42 Media L. Rep. 1984 (6th Cir. 2014)

IO Group Inc, et al. v. GLBT Ltd.

Liberty Media Holdings, LLC v. Vinigay.com

Judgment in Plaintiff's favor

Righthaven LLC v. Leon et al.

Case dismissed against client, attorneys' fees awarded.

Righthaven LLC v. Vote For The Worst LLC

Dismissal of Plaintiff's case.

Righthaven LLC v. NewsBlaze LLC

Dismissal of Plaintiff's case.

Righthaven LLC v. Wolf

Judgment in defendant's favor.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2014

Universita di Torino Facolta di Giurisprudenza

LL.M - Master of Laws

2003

University of Florida

Master of Arts

2000

Georgetown University Law Center

law

1994

University of Massachusetts

Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2016

FALA Meeting

Morality and IP Rights

2015

James Joyce School

Joyce's Ulysses, and Unsung Hero in the Fight for Freedom of Expression

2015

Internet Law Leadership Conference

Anti-SLAPP Statutes and Litigation Strategies

2015

European Law Students' Association Summer Law Institute

Global Freedom of Expression and New Media, an American Perspective

2015

European Law Students' Association Summer Law Institute

Freedom of Expression and Morality-based Impediments to the Enforcement of IP Rights

2014

Virgin Islands

The Law and Ethics of Social Media

2014

US Virgin Islands

Anti-SLAPP laws and freedom of expression in the Virgin Islands

2014

First Amendment Lawyer's Assocation Mtg

A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and American Defamation Law

2013

Nevada Legislature

Argument for Passage of revised Nevada Anti-SLAPP Statute

2012

First Amendment Lawyers Association, San Diego, CA

Anti-SLAPP Update: Developments in the Status and Application of Laws Against Abusive Litigation

2012

American Intellectual Property Law Association Spring Meeting, Austin, TX

Intellectual Property Enforcement and Trolling

2011

First Amendment Lawyers Association

BitTorrent Litigation

2011

First Amendment Lawyers Association

Piracy

2009

First Amendment Lawyers’ Association New Orleans

Intellectual Property and Free Speech

2009

First Amendment Lawyer's Association - Vancouver

Defamation and Douchebags - Recent developments in online defamation law

2008

Seminole County Inns of Court Meeting

Defamation Law

2008

First Amendment Lawyers’ Association Meeting - San Francisco

Intellectual Property and the Adult Entertainment Industry

2001

Media, Civil Society and Good Governance in Southeast Asia

Media Law

2001

International Institute of Communications Annual Meeting

Media Law

2001

AEJMC Southeast Colloquium

Internet Law

Publications

2017

Nevada Law Journal Porn is not Prostitution

2016

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law and Practice Lenz v. Universal: A Call to Reform § 512(f) of the DMCA

2016

University of Massachusetts Law Review Ulysses - A Mighty Hero in the Fight for Freedom of Expression

2016

Wisconsin International Law Journal Kosovo's Digital Independence: Time for Kosovo's ccTLD

2015

Todd L. Archibald and Randall Scott Echlin, eds. Annual Review of Civil Litigation in Canada "War of the Words": Differing Canadian and American Approaches to Internet Defamation

2015

XBIZ What the Adult Industry Owes to James Joyce

2014

CNN What Happened to Sterling was Wrong

2014

XBIZ Copyright Ruling May have Implications for Adult Industry

2014

XBIZ Reversal of Fortune in Taiwan for Porn Producers

2012

XBIZ The Case for Relocaitng Porn Production to Las Vegas

2012

Xbiz Challenging the Copyrightability of Porn

2012

Adult Video News Malign Neglect

2010

AVN Standard Deviation: What's Obscene in an Online Word?

2008

AVN A Domain by Any Other Name

2007

Marquette Elder Law Advisor The Legal Status of Gambling in America’s Senior Communities

2006

Florida Bar Journal The Florida Supreme Court Dulls the Edge of Rule 1.420(e)

2005

Adult Video News 2257 Regs a Boon to Patriotic Adult Film Producers

2005

XBiz Foreign Content and Section 2257

2005

XBiz Republicans Save US Jobs (unwittingly)

2005

Adult Video News Commentary for Congress

2004

Minn. Law & Politics Kiffmeyer - Too Partisan for the Job?

2003

Condo Management Satellite Dishes and Community Associations

2003

Condo Management Copyright and the Clubhouse

2003

Skydiving Magazine Copyright Issues for Free Fall Photographers

2002

Michigan State Law Review Getting to Yes With Terrorists

2001

UCLA Journal of Law and Technology Breaking Duverger's Law is not Illegal: Strategic Voting, the Internet and the 2000 Presidential Election

2001

Intermedia The Forgotten Electoral Controversy

Languages

Italian

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2020
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution