We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
My name is Stephen P. Karns, and I defend Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen and Coast Guardsmen worldwide in military criminal prosecutions and other judicial and administrative military matters.
I am a former U.S. Army Major JAG Attorney and have practiced law for over two decades as a trial defense lawyer. My practice is 100% devoted to criminal defense and military law. I have traveled the world defending service members from military prosecutions, and I am ready to defend you no matter where you are serving: the United States, Europe, the Middle East, the Pacific, Afghanistan, or any other post, base, station, or camp.
1
Practice Area
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Texas
Acquired: 1994
No misconduct found
8117 Preston Road, Suite 300, Dallas, TX, 75225
52 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 5 of 8 reviews | Cost of Services
Posted by Shelby | August 11, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Military Law
The absolute best!
Last year my husband was pulled in and questioned by CID. His case was severe and there was undeniable evidence and he was facing an OTH discharge. We hired Mr. Karns and he began to work IMMEDIATELY! He and his Paralegal Rob worked HARD on my husbands case. He (and Rob) were always great about getti...
Posted by Kelly | June 30, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
Fired him
I cannot be specific enough with this guy. All cases was lost. Never defended me. Had his paralegal write paperwork and did not help with my case at all. My unit still had there way with me. Now bring up my case and I’ll respond in social media. I had to fire him . Paid him 6600 dollars to do nothing...
Thank you for your feedback. I’m sorry that we were not able to obtain the result you wanted. I always ask every client what their goal is, and my client’s goal becomes my goal. In your case, you were under investigation for fleeing after being ordered to provide a urinalysis after someone witnessed you smoking marijuana on post while on duty; wrongful use of marijuana; possession of marijuana in your barracks room; violating a lawful order for having a weapon in your barrack’s room; and rape. Understandably, you wanted all your charges dismissed; your gun returned; and an Honorable discharge. The rape charge was dismissed, but you decided to accept an Art. 15 for the remaining charges because you did not like your chances at trial. As is your right under Art. 15, UCMJ, I drafted a written presentation for your commander, which you approved and stated you “loved.” Unfortunately, your commander found you guilty which later led to your administrative separation with a General Under Honorable Conditions discharge. Again, my goal was your goal, and I regret we were unable to get all of your charges dismissed. Fortunately, your rape charge was dismissed, so you were able to avoid a court-martial.
Posted by anonymous | July 19, 2021 | Military Law
Not worth the money
I hired this guy 2 years ago for a case. He was aggressive at first and kept good contact with me throughout my case. Whenever I asked him to write something to my command or help me word something, he would always say, "What do you think you should write". I understand the guy can't write for you, b...
Thank you for your feedback and for acknowledging that I provided you aggressive representation and kept in good contact with you throughout your case. As for my letter to your command, naturally, I put it in my own words. However, I always provide a framework for the client to write their own statement because it's normal for the client to ask, "What should I say?" If after the first crack, the client is having trouble, I always provide further guidance, but I have to be careful about not writing it for them because it won't sound as sincere. Once the client gives me their statement, I always make edits for content, tone, and structure. If I asked you, "What do you think you should write," it was simply to help you with looking inward to draw from your own personal experience which hopefully would help you put your letter in your own words. I do believe the approach we used is what got you the good result you received. While you stated that there was a lot more I could have done, you did not provide any specifics. Nevertheless, I appreciate your feedback.
Posted by anonymous | July 19, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
I regret spending my money for advice
I cannot recommend Mr. Karns after the experience I had with him as my attorney. Mr. Karns was hired to represent me in my pending case, and prior to paying him, he told me a couple things we could do to initiate the best possible defense. After he was paid, he started my defense case but subsequentl...
Thank you for your feedback. As you acknowledge in your review, prior to hiring me, I suggested that you could take a polygraph and hair follicle test. However, you only brought it up again once you knew that you were beyond the time that it would have been useful. It was never a matter of you not knowing it was an option, nor was it a matter of me not reminding you. I assume that you never intended to take a hair follicle test because you knew you ingested the controlled substance, and your hair follicle test would come back positive. Plus, your defense was that you innocently ingested, not that you never ingested, so a negative hair follicle test would be pointless if you were already going to claim that you ingested it, but did so unknowingly. More importantly, a passed polygraph, which I recommended and was still an option, would have been more valuable to back up your innocent ingestion defense, but you declined to take one. Again, these were two options I proposed to you before you hired me, then after you hired me, you declined to pursue either one. While I recognize that you feel I didn’t do anything to fight your charges, and that I did not contact legal, that simply is not true. The first thing I do in every case is contact the client’s command and legal, and I was in continuous contact with legal, including the trial counsel and others up to the brigade level. Further, as you acknowledge in your review, before you hired me, I explained multiple defenses and legal options to prove your innocence. While you say that you called around to multiple civilian attorneys who all disagreed with my defense strategy, you make no mention in your review of the alternative strategies they recommended. Finally, I personally drafted the defense to your case, which my paralegal sent to you for your review, and you were happy with what I drafted. That was before you consulted with TDS, so to say that TDS did more than I did is also not accurate. Nevertheless, I appreciate your feedback and intend to use it to improve the services I provide to clients.
Posted by Jesse | July 19, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
Doesn't care about you!
This lawyer took my $6500 and did the bare minimum to defend my case. Once he received the hefty payment, he left everything up to me and his unfriendly paralegal. Even worse, this lawyer did not ensure my case was finalized before ending legal representation. I would not recommend this lawyer for an...
Thank you for your feedback. After we submitted a robust response to your adverse action, we were waiting for your command to notify you of their intent to administratively separate you since it was required based on your offenses. When you notified me that you received the notice and that your command recommended that you receive an Honorable Discharge, I believed it to be a great outcome based on your charges and assumed you would be happy as well. However, your claim that the ADC did more than I did is simply not accurate considering the ADC did not get on board until after I prepared and submitted your defense to the adverse action to your command, and your command had already recommended an Honorable Discharge after I submitted my response to your adverse action. Nevertheless, I appreciate your feedback. Your feelings on the matter are a reminder that I should redouble my efforts to ensure that every client is 100% satisfied.
"I endorse this highly qualified lawyer. His courtesy, professionalism and knowledge of the law is unsurpassed."
"I have directly observed Stephen Karns in his professional capacity, and he demonstrates unparalleled excellence. I have dealt with over 100 military lawyers in multiple states, and I would rank Stephen Karns as the #1 military criminal defense attorney in the nation. I have seen him under the most challenging tasks and his superb skills, combined with his unassailable integrity, make Stephen Karns the "go to" attorney for all criminal defense matters. He truly cares about every client, even the little guy, and I have personally witnessed him work equally as tenacious on many smaller matters as well as the most serious criminal allegations. I cannot speak highly enough about this talented individual. He is a top notch guy, and a top notch attorney. If you are accused of a crime, he will be your most valuable asset."
"I endorse this lawyer. I worked with Steve on a number of matters while I was stationed at Fort Hood, TX and was always impressed with his dedication and skill."
"I highly endorse Mr. Karns. Truly exceptional and caring attorney who achieves great results in representing clients! I want all people to contact him for help first."
Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 14
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
"I endorse this lawyer."
"Mr. Karns is one of the hardest working attorneys I know. He is extremely well-versed in military law, and I regularly refer cases to him. I am pleased to offer him my endorsement."
"Steve is an excellent and dedicated attorney. He works tirelessly for his clients and has great results. I have no hesitation in endorsing him."
"Stephen is a great lawyer and zealous advocate for his clients. I strongly recommend him for criminal law and military law matters."
"Steve is a great lawyer who is always fighting for his clients. If I had a military question I'd call him."
"Steve and I worked together on many cases. He is the epitome' of a team player and competent/ethical lawyer. Too often in military cases, rifts form between military and civilian counsel during representation. Steve does not let this happen. He firmly believes that every servicemember deserves a team of professionals to work together for a great result, and he works to make the civilian/military team operate at the highest level. He is a leader and zealous advocate. Any client who hires this lawyer is extremely fortunate."
"Stephen is a dedicated attorney, who aggressively advocates for his clients. He is detailed-oriented, and has a wide breadth of knowledge and experience in various military and criminal law matters. I highly recommend him."
Military law lawyer
Military law lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Federal crime lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
DUI and DWI lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Military law lawyer
Military law lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Military law lawyer
Military law lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Military law lawyer
Estate planning lawyer
2010
Readers Voice Best Criminal Defense Attorney, Dallas Voice
2009
Readers Voice Best Criminal Defense Attorney, Dallas Voice
2008
Readers Voice Best Criminal Defense Attorney, Dallas Voice
2007
Rising Star, Texas Super Lawyers Magazine
2007
Readers Voice Best Criminal Defense Attorney, Dallas Voice
2002
Distinguished Service Award, Dallas Association of Young Lawyers
1995
Parachutist Badge, US Army
N/A
Army Commendation Medal w/2 Oak Leaf Clusters, U.S. Army
1998 - Present
Owner, Law Office of Stephen P. Karns
2002 - 2005
Senior Defense Counsel, US JAG Corps Reserves
1995 - 1998
Defense Counsel, US Army JAG Corps
1994 - Present
State Bar of Texas
Member
Member
Member
Member
1995
1994
JD - Juris Doctor
1991
BBA
2004
Practice in Military Courts
2003
Practice in Military Courts
Spanish