Overall Rating
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
3.7 /5.0
33 Client Reviews
Over 25 years of legal experience in representing employees and small business employers in Chicago in Employment Law; Discrimination; ADA, Sexual Harassment; Wrongful Termination; Negotiating Employment and Severance Agreements.
Admitted to practice in the State of Illinois in 1984. Admitted to practice before U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois Trial Bar; U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; United States Court of Federal Claims
Extensive experience before the following Special Agencies: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Merit Systems Protection Board; Illinois Department of Human Rights; Human Rights Commission (IL).; State, City and County Civil Service Boards.
Practice includes the following areas: Employment Law representing individuals and small businesses in actions for wrongful discharge, sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation in the Greater Chicago Area, including:
• Title VII Employment Discrimination
• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
• Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA),
• Sarbanes Oxley,
• USERRA,
• Retaliatory Discharge
5
Practice Areas
41 years
41 years
41 years
41 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
State: Illinois
Acquired: 1984
No misconduct found
Other places you can find Arthur online.
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Criminal Defense
Posted by anonymous | September 16, 2015 | Criminal Defense
Discrimination
1. 1/2 hour wait time even though appt. time was set. 2. Mr. Ehrlich was in a hurry constantly trying to speed up the process of short (17min) consultation. 3. Very impatient even answering my questions. Even though I was prepared for this consultation he would still appear very fidget and unpleas...
A client should feel 100% comfortable with the attorney she is going to retain. So if a prospective client believes or feels that I was not patient or thinks I "sighed" too much, then she should most definitely find someone with whom she is more comfortable. While I fully respect and support this client's decision to hire another attorney, I do not agree with her description of what she claims occurred and must respectfully disagree with this review. There are times that I cannot see a client at the appointed time because a prior client arrived late, I required additional time to review a prior client’s case, or I was on the phone handling an important and pressing matter with another client. 30 Minutes late is not common but it has happened on occasion due to circumstances beyond my control. I also respectfully disagree with the other complaints that were raised. I typically allow for a 30 minute appointment, and within that time frame, I fully and carefully answer questions any client asks that are related to her case. If there is no one waiting for me, I will go a little beyond that 30 minute time frame if necessary. I reviewed my detailed notes of my meeting with this client which lasted more than the 17 minutes she believes I gave her. My notes contain all the relevant details from that meeting and list 3 potential legal claims that I noted and discussed with the client. I also took notes about the reasons the employer (falsely) claimed were the reason for terminating this client. I do recall that this client wanted to go through each of those issues as alleged by the employer in more detail, but I had more than enough information from the client at the time to understand how and why she felt these performance complaints were unjustified and false. I am sorry for whatever I did that gave this perception to this client but I would not have these details in my notes if I had acted the way this person claims.
"Arthur understands the complicated regulatory system at both the state and federal level. You need an experienced attorney who represents private employees. Arthur also works with municipal employees and small businesses, helping them to handle employment discrimination and non-compete issues. When we have a question, Arthur always has an answer."
"I endorse Arthur. Highly respected in the legal community. A skilled lawyer with a strong reputation for client advocacy and dedication."
"I wholeheartedly endorse this lawyer. A brilliant attorney, highly respected in the legal community."
"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Ehrlich is a skilled and respected member of the legal community. He is a zealous advocate for the rights and interests of his clients."
"I have been referring Plaintiff-Employee matters to Arthur for at least 10 years, and to date, have received nothing but compliments and positive comments. Additionally, I have relied on Arthur's counsel and advice on matters when I am outside my "wheel-house", because he is knowledgeable and experienced in other areas, and provides well-thought out comments and advice. He is ethical, knowledgeable, informative and professional, and I give Arthur Ehrlich my highest recommendation."
"I have known Arthur Ehrlich for over ten years and find him to be a reputable and experienced attorney in the field of employment law. He is well-respected by the judiciary and his peers and I have no hesitation in endorsing him."
"I endorse this lawyer. I have known Arthur for almost twenty years and know that his reputation in the legal community is excellent. I have no hesitation referring work to Arthur as I know he has a great legal mind."
Employment and labor lawyer
Real estate lawyer
Employment and labor lawyer
Divorce and separation lawyer
Divorce and separation lawyer
Employment and labor lawyer
Divorce and separation lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Litigation lawyer
Debt settlement lawyer
Commercial real estate lawyer
Employment and labor lawyer
Employee benefits lawyer
2014
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2013
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell
2012
AV Preeminent Peer Review rating, Martindale-Hubbell
2011
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell
2000
Who's Who,
1985 - Present
Partner, Goldman & Ehrlich
Member
Member
Verdict for Barnes, reinstatement and backpay
Judgment for Plaintiff
Jury verdict for Plaintiff
Verdict for plaintiff
Decision in favor of Teacher
Verdict for Plaintiff
1984
JD - Juris Doctor,with Honors
1981
BA - Bachelor of Arts, Magna Cum Laude
2015
A, B, C's of Hiring and Firing
2015
Retaliation: the Gift that Keeps on Giving
2014
Legal Issues in Social Media and Social Websites
2014
Law Firm HR Decisions and Policies
2013
Do's and Dont's of hiring and firing employees
2012
Do's and Don'ts of employment termination
Legal Answers
Top Contributor
Arthur earned significant contribution points in 2014.
Can my employer request medical documents? If I refuse, can they punish me?
03 Jun 2021
As an employer, do I need to provide copies to signed pages of the employment application to employees? - More detail below
09 Mar 2021
Overly friendly nurse excessively and uncomfortably rubbed, touched, and kissed me.
25 Apr 2018