No Photo

F. Douglas Hartnett

4.2
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 28 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Immigration, Discrimination ... +2 more

1101 - 30th Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC

About F.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 26 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2000

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Maryland for 28 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1997

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Elitok & Hartnett at Law PLLC

1101 - 30th Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20007

Elitok & Hartnett At Law Llc

2428 Wisconsin Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20007-1807

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

F. Douglas Hartnett's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.2 /5.0

10 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (10) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | September 18, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Very dismayed despite a glowing recommendation

I retained F. Douglas Hartnett to represent me in an EEO hearing. I delivered my EEO investigation report and he participated in vetting of an arbitrator. Several months later (approximately two to three) he informed me I needed to pay his retainer. I delivered it while in intense physical pain and i...n an orthopedic boot. That's when things started going downhill. When I would call to check in with him, I either got a receptionist or his machine. I would leave messages, but did not get a call back. It finally came down to me having to "catch" him in his office. I expressed my disappointment that did not return my calls, and he claimed he had "nothing to report." I then requested, as long lapses of time were going by, to at least let me know. It got worse when he repeatedly asked the name of the attorney representing my employer. Although he admitted he "should be more responsive" the non-return of phone calls continued. Finally, things began to move, and we had a pre-hearing scheduling phone conference with the attorney and selected arbitrator. At that time, I requested to meet with him prior as I was uncomfortable with his lack of familiarity with the issues of my case. At that phone conference, which I came to 1/2 an hour earlier, but waited an additional 15 minutes in the waiting room, when he announced that he had to "pee." Noting how unprofessional this pronouncement was to the receptionist, I awaited his return. He then began asking me questions such as "what is the statute of limitations," and "who are their witnesses." At this point, I had paid a hefty retainer and consultation fee. As the conversation went on, it became evident he was completely unfamiliar with the issues of my case, despite having had the report for at least 7 months. I am sure he sensed my discomfort, and as I left, he called me back to the conference room to inform me that the retainer and consultation fee "would not be sufficient" to cover a one-day hearing of 8 hours or less. I immediately left with the intention of discontinuing his services. I also inquired if he really thought he had done sufficient work to request additional fees as I didn't see what he had done for the money already paid. He agreed, and when I reviewed his contract, it mentioned that regardless of the status of the case, he would stop working until additional funds were paid. I terminated him via email, and then as his agreement stated, by certified mail. I only received half of the retainer back, although I do not think his work warranted keeping the other half. I then had to seek new counsel. His work was shoddy at best, and I received better advice and counsel for a fraction of his consultation fee, resulting in a satisfactory resolution from alternate counsel.

F. Hartnett

Replied last April 15, 2018

Annonymous - this does not sound like Mr. Hartnett, our our firm, and is, of course, very concerning. Please contact us to discuss, we would very much like to understand what happened and do what we can to resolve this.

Posted by anonymous | April 16, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Highly satisfied

Mr. Hartnett’s advice and support were critical to getting me through an unwanted employment separation, and the results were well beyond my expectations. Things happened very quickly, and he was always available if I needed to talk. He went out of his way to explain the law and my options, as I kn...ow nothing about employment law. I was struck by how accurately he predicted my employer’s actions and reactions as the situation unfolded. He was honest and realistic, and fought hard for what we determined we could achieve - and we did! Mr. Hartnett is a very kind, approachable, and low-key guy. If you are looking for a shark in a sharp suit, I would not recommend him. But if you want an attorney who will take time with you, not condescend, and stand by you in a crisis, you can’t do better.

Posted by Tom | May 20, 2014 | Employment & Labor

Friendly, Generous, and Knowledgable EEO/CR Lawyer

Mr. Hartnett is an excellent EEO/CR lawyer. He helped me through a very difficult time. If it was not for his kindness, expertise, and the respect he garnered from my employer I would not have received the nice settlement agreement that I got. The settlement agreement has helped me to not only sur...vive but start to thrive in my job with the same employer. He was also very generous in letting me keep more than my fair share of the settlement agreement, which helped us through that difficult time. I would highly recommend him to anyone who is experiencing discrimination from their employer and needs a friendly, generous, and knowledgable attorney to navigate them through the EEO complaint process.

See All Client Reviews

F. Douglas Hartnett's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse F.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Bernard A Solnik headshot
Bernard Solnik

Car accident lawyer

Thomas Sewell Rand Jr. headshot
Thomas Rand

Business lawyer

Bruce A Blaylock headshot
Bruce Blaylock

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution