David Ivan Bliven

PRO

David Ivan Bliven

4.8
190 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 28 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at White Plains, NY
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Child Custody, Child Support ... +5 more

140 Grand St., Suite 402, White Plains, NY

Virtual Consultation Available

About David

Biography

Former Family Court prosecutor who gives personalized attention to your case!

Practice Areas

8

Practice Areas

Divorce and Separation 70%

29 years | 400 cases

70%
Child Custody 12%

29 years | 275 cases

12%
Child Support 7%

This does not count the 1,000+ cases I handled as a prosecutor.

29 years | 225 cases

7%
Family 5%

This in an umbrella term, and thus includes alot of overlap from the other case categories. This also does not count the 1,000+ cases I handled as a prosecutor.

29 years | 850 cases

5%
Domestic Violence 2%

29 years | 100 cases

2%
Marriage and Prenuptials 2%

Prenuptial Agreements

29 years | 50 cases

2%
Adoption 1%

1%
Alimony 1%

1%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2025 2024 2023
...
+ 10
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
2020 2019 2018
...
+ 6
Platinum Client Champion
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 28 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1998

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of David Bliven

140 Grand St., Suite 402, White Plains, NY, 10601

blivenlaw.net/

Bliven David

3190 Riverdale Avenue, Suite 1, Bronx, NY, 10463

blivenlaw.net/

Online Presence

Other places you can find David online.

David Ivan Bliven's Reviews

Showing 41 - 44 of 44 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | September 28, 2012 | Divorce & Separation

retired

Several years ago David handled my divorce agreement. David was extremely professional and knowledgeable. Everything was processed in a timely manner. Should the need arise in the future I would not hesitate to seek his services again and would highly recommend him to others.

Posted by anonymous | September 06, 2011

Couldn't be more satisfied with the service given.

Mr. Bliven is one lawyer that I can say knows his stuff. He is very knowledgeable about the law and is willing to the research if needed. He not only represents you but he looks out for his client's best interest. With over 14 years of experience, I can trust him to do what is in the best interest ...for me. He is not afraid to let me know what the situation looks like and give me false hope. He is up front and honest which is what I needed. Thank you Mr Bliven for making a tough time in my life go as smoothly as possible.

Posted by Greg | December 02, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody

Great attorney who assisted with a very traumatic experience!

Met with David to deal with a child custody suit which involved the mother relocating our child across the country without my knowledge or consent. David was very helpful from the beginning, answering many of questions from the consultation on. He informed me of my rights and what courses of action c...ould be taken to have my child returned back to the state. We strategized and executed a plan which resulted in the outcome which we had predicted. I was very happy with the results. I would recommend David to anyone who is unfortunate enough to have to deal with child custody matters.

Posted by anonymous | December 31, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Family

Disappointed

I hired David Bliven largely on the strength of these reviews, and because his office is accessible to me. First his staff repeatedly screwed up appointments with him, including my first and last meetings with David. He didn't show up to scheduled online meetings and then, when I called the office,... it was clear the appointment times had not been reserved even though a member of his staff who answered the phone had confirmed my meeting times. As I said, this happened more than once. They also couldn't find one of the payments I had called and made to a receptionist until I called and asked a different receptionist to look for the payment. In the beginning of my case I received notification by email and phone of court dates but by the end I wasn't receiving reminders. That's ok with me; I don't need to be reminded of court dates but his staff were clearly inconsistent. As some of these reviews say, I did receive summaries of all of my conversations with David, although after re-reading his reviews here and on other sites I think he keeps those notes in large part for himself and to write elaborate defenses of himself online. But I'm sure that is also normal lawyerly practice. David showed up 1 minute before almost all of our court dates and was indeed late to one online court hearing, albeit by 4 minutes. I believe it was in that same hearing that David starting saying things that didn't even pertain to my case when asked to speak about my reasons for going to court. He obviously didn't know, or didn't remember, anything about me and dove into his mental file of reasons people go to court to see if one of them would stick. I'm sure that David will say that that was my fault and that I should have met with him more often. Well, at $600 hourly I was disinclined to schedule extra meetings and I would say that it was his responsibility to at least refresh his mind on my case before a hearing. But all of this I could forgive. The bigger problem was that, for me, I never felt that David really fought for or "represented" me. For example, my ex's lawyer was a complete boob but was definitely fighting for my ex. I'm sure that someone will say that David just keeps his cool in court and doesn't get drawn into meaningless fights. But it went beyond not getting drawn into pointless fights. In court, David isn't a good speaker and constantly says "um" in front of the judge. I'm sure he will say differently, but I don't think I needed David to get the settlement I got in the end. I think I could have gone into court self-represented and gotten the same exact result and saved myself $20,000. Next time I probably won't do that but I will hire a different family law attorney.

David Bliven

Replied last January 02, 2024

Preliminarily, one should note this review is "anonymous," and thus is may not be a legitimate review. It also deprives me of responding with specifics based on a review of this particular person's file. That said, I'll respond as best I can as follows: (1) I can only state that nearly all of my clients are quite happy with my services & the actions of my staff. If this 1 person is not it may be more a function of this person's disgruntlement with his life situation than anything else. (2) If we couldn't find aa payment he made, it was more likely that he sent in a payment (via Zelle, etc.) without letting us know. Zelle doesn't automatically notify us of payments - which is why we ask in our payments due e-mail for clients to confirm the payments with us. Apparently this person didn't - thus the frustration. (3) Regarding my note-taking - I do NOT post notes from clients online (same would be unethical) so I have no idea what this person is talking about. As for taking note "for myself" - I submit the primary purpose is so myself & my clients are "on the same page." Nearly all my clients are grateful to receiving my notes of appointments & court proceedings. Indeed, many who've had prior counsel have stated they really like this service in particular as their prior attorneys often kept them in the dark about what was discussed with opposing counsel or the Judge outside of their presence. (4) This person has the gall to criticize me for being on-time. With this person, it's apparent I can't win - if I'm on-time, I'm faulted. But I'm also quite sure if I showed up 15-20 minutes early -and billed him for sitting there & staring at the wall - he'd resent that as well. More importantly, the reason I don't usually show up to court substantially early is because I pride myself on preparing the case beforehand - meeting with my clients, striving to communicate with opposing counsel & reviewing my file. If my guest is right as to who this person is, then his frustration was because he often failed to abide by specific recommendations of mine to scheduled appointments to meet with me prior to each court hearing. (7) Again, if I have this person right, I had advised him he was committing massive tax fraud & would likely lose at trial. I was his 3d attorney - and he hired me after many other attorneys (according to him) rejected his case because he sunk himself by representing himself for several months & then sought to retain counsel on the eve of 2 depositions. Not only did I take on his case, but got him a quite favorable result. Among other things, he ended up paying child support based on HIS representation of his income - as opposed to his actual gross income of between $200-300k. Additionally, his executed settlement states: "he is fully satisfied with the representation of his attorney, and represents that he does not have any dispute or claim against his attorney, including but not limited to performance and/or fees." I further disagree I'm "not a good speaker in court" - even my other negative reviews on this site don't say that. As such, this may be seen as more the lens thru which an angry person sees the rest of the world. Finally, if I have this person right, he received a far more favorable settlement than one he would've received had he represented himself. I recall a prior client who had 5 PhD's who chose to represent himself at trial as he believed he was smarter than most attorneys. His result: alimony & support of $18,000 per month and attorneys fees owed to his ex-wife if $300,000. "Those who represent themselves have a fool for a client." From the sound of things, from a Karma perspective, here's hoping he chooses to represent himself next time - no offense.

See All Client Reviews

David Ivan Bliven's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse David
Derek Jacques headshot
Derek Jacques

Child custody lawyer | Jan 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mr. Bliven is an excellent advocate for his clients. I would not hesitate to recommend him to a client in need. He is also an asset to the Avvo Community, providing invaluable resources to those seeking help."

Scottie Lynn Leming headshot
Scottie Leming

Child custody lawyer | Mar 01

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this attorney, who gives so generously to the AVVO community."

Somair Syed Alam headshot
Somair Alam

Civil rights lawyer | Feb 13

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Exceptional attorney, dedicated to client success. Highly recommended."

Darren DeUrso headshot
Darren DeUrso

Divorce and separation lawyer | Dec 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. David Bliven provides his clients with a comprehensive approach. I have had many cases with him and have found him to be well-prepared and professional in all aspects of the case."

Ted Zink Jr. headshot
Ted Zink

Unknown lawyer | Jul 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Noah K. Peterson headshot
Noah Peterson

Child custody lawyer | Feb 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mr. Bliven consistently provides accurate legal analysis to the online avvo community. I endorse this lawyer."

Mark V. Clay headshot
Mark Clay

Family lawyer | Aug 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I highly endorse Mr. Bliven. Truly exceptional and caring attorney who achieves great results in representing clients! I want all people to contact him for help."

Jill L Rogers headshot
Jill Rogers

Unknown lawyer | Mar 25

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer. Such a wonderful spirit and is truly dedicated to clients."

Paul Karl Siepmann headshot
Paul Siepmann

Divorce and separation lawyer | Jan 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. It should be readily apparent to anyone dealing with Attorney David Bliven that he is both highly skilled and very knowledgeable in the Matrimonial and Family Law areas. He's clearly a zealous advocate for his clients and a formidable adversary for opposing counsel."

Sean Cleary headshot
Sean Cleary

Child custody lawyer | Dec 18

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I wholeheartedly endorse this lawyer. A brilliant, trustworthy and highly respected attorney in the legal community."

Ingrid Gherman headshot
Ingrid Gherman

Family lawyer | Dec 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I enthusiastically endorse this lawyer. He is a credit to the family law community."

D. Morgan Burkett headshot
D. Burkett

Child custody lawyer | Nov 08

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Mr. Bliven and I worked on a custody/relocation matter that required extensive pre-trial negotiation and attempts at settlement which ultimately failed despite the attorneys' best efforts. He was a thoroughly professional, courteous, and impressive adversary, without whose efforts would have had no chance of settling. I look forward to our next matter together."

Judd S Nemiro headshot
Judd Nemiro

Unknown lawyer | Oct 19

Relationship: Other

"This attorney has an excellent reputation for providing the highest quality representation to clients. Experience and proven results!"

William Hilton Ridings Jr headshot
William Ridings

Child custody lawyer | Sep 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Cheryl Ann Berzer headshot
Cheryl Berzer

Divorce and separation lawyer | Aug 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Extremely knowledgeable attorney!"

Mario David Cometti headshot
Mario Cometti

Family lawyer | Jul 30

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer. I found his answers on AVVO to be thoughtful and informative."

Hovanes Margarian headshot
Hovanes Margarian

Child custody lawyer | Jul 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Wayne F. Crowe headshot
Wayne Crowe

Child custody lawyer | Jul 05

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Great Custody Attorney. Very prepared and willing to take on any Attorney, Any Judge. Would highly recommend."

Gina M. Famularo headshot
Gina Famularo

Family lawyer | Jun 27

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Bennett James Wills headshot
Bennett Wills

Unknown lawyer | Jun 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Nancy D. Kellman headshot
Nancy Kellman

Divorce and separation lawyer

Darren DeUrso headshot
Darren DeUrso

Family lawyer

Gregory A Salant headshot
Gregory Salant

Family lawyer

Steven P. Forbes headshot
Steven Forbes

Family lawyer

Ingrid Gherman headshot
Ingrid Gherman

Family lawyer

David Zaslavsky headshot
David Zaslavsky

Divorce and separation lawyer

Wayne F. Crowe headshot
Wayne Crowe

Family lawyer

Bruce Provda headshot
Bruce Provda

Divorce and separation lawyer

Arthur Wemegah headshot
Arthur Wemegah

Divorce and separation lawyer

Steven P. Kuhn headshot
Steven Kuhn

Divorce and separation lawyer

Ian S. Mednick headshot
Ian Mednick

Family lawyer

John Anthony Van Ness headshot
John Van Ness

Real estate lawyer

Mike E. Saint-Pre headshot
Mike Saint-Pre

Divorce and separation lawyer

Guljit Kaur Bains headshot
Guljit Bains

Family lawyer

Brad S. Margolis headshot
Brad Margolis

Family lawyer

Eric Edward Rothstein headshot
Eric Rothstein

Family lawyer

Philip Adam Kusnetz headshot
Philip Kusnetz

Family lawyer

Jack Richard Lebowitz headshot
Jack Lebowitz

Family lawyer

Ivan E. Young headshot
Ivan Young

Foreclosure lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Top Attorney - NY Metro & Westchester Area, Westchester Magazine

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Certified Financial Litigator, AACFL

2018

Super Lawyers, Thompson Reuters

2018

AV Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

A+ Rating, Better Business Bureau

2014

Superb Rating, Avvo

2014

Top Contributor, Avvo

2013

Superb Rating, Avvo

2013

Clients' Choice, AVVO

2013

Top Contributor, AVVO

2012

Top Contributor, AVVO

2011

Attorneys for Children - Private-Pay Assignments, Appellate Division, Second Department

2007

Assigned Counsel Panel member, Westchester County Bar Association

2005

Lawyer Referral Panel, New York County Lawyers' Association

1998

SDNY & EDNY Admittance, Federal Bar Association

1997

Cum Laude, New York Law School

1997

Top 15% Class Rank, New York Law School

1993

Cum Laude, Syracuse University

Work Experience

2000 - Present

Attorney, Law Offices of David Bliven

1999 - 2000

Prosecuting Attorney, Nyc Administration For Children's Services

1998 - 1999

Prosecuting Attorney, New York City Corporation Counsel

1997 - 1997

Legal Intern, Lansner & Kubitscheck

1997 - 1998

Associate, Wolfson & Carroll

1996 - 1997

Tutor, New York Law School

1994 - 1994

Legal Intern, Supreme Court Of The State Of New York

1993 - 1994

Legal Intern, New York State Unified Court System

Associations

2011 - Present

Attorneys for Children Panel - Westchester

Attorney Member

2010 - Present

Bronx Bar Association

Attorney Member

2006 - Present

New York State Bar Association, Family Law Section

Attorney Member

2006 - Present

Westchester County Bar Association, Family Law Section

Attorney Member

2005 - Present

Westchester County Bar Association

Member

2005 - Present

National Lawyers Guild, National Police Accountability Project

Attorney Member

New York State Bar Association

Member

New York County Lawyers' Association

Member

National Lawyers Guild

Attorney Member

2000 - 2005

Attorneys for Children Panel - Queens

Attorney Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Isichenko v Isichenko, 161 A.D.3d 833, 75 N.Y.S.3d 530 (2d Dept. 2018)

Won Appeal!

Matter of Nevaeh R. (Veronica B.—Rueben M.)

Adoption Appeal confirmed!

Backhaus v. Backhaus, 128 A.D.3d 872, 9 N.Y.S.3d 618 (2d Dept 2015)

Trial Court reversed

Matter of Delehia J., 93 A.D.3d 668, 939 N.Y.S.2d 570 (2d Dept 2012)

Precedent established

Ito v. Ito, 73 A.D.3d 983, 900 N.Y.S.2d 665 (2d Dept. 2010)

Won appeal

Barnette v. Blair, 57 A.D.3d 893, 870 N.Y.S.2d 409 (2d Dept 2008)

Appeal won

Scott v. Scott, 62 A.D.3d 714, 879 N.Y.S.2d 488 (2d Dept 2009)

Appeal won.

Khan v. Dolly, 6 A.D.3d 437, 774 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2d Dept 2004)

Appeal won

In re Cory M., 307 A.D.2d 1035, 763 N.Y.S.2d 771 (2d Dept 2003)

Appeal won

Colvin v. Guo

Custody restored!

See More Legal Cases

Education

1997

New York Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1993

Syracuse University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2014

2014

2013

How to Assist Your Child Welfare Defense Attorney

Child Abuse

2005

Child Abuse & Neglect Proceedings

Shaken Baby Syndrome

Publications

2022

Speakeasy Publishing Navigating Your New York Post-Divorce Case: Modifications & Enforcement

2021

Speakeasy Publishing Navigating Your New York High Net Worth Divorce Case

2020

Speakeasy Publishing Navigating Your New York Family Court Case

2018

Languages

English

Activity

Top Contributor

David earned significant contribution points in 2020.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution