Case Conclusion Date: 03.12.2008
Practice Area: Child Custody
Outcome: Court found in favor of Douglas Kepanis's client - the "trip log" was not "new evidence".
Description: Adversary argued that a father's "trip log" of traffic jams and travel times to effectuate visitation with parties' child was "new evidence" warranted the granting of a Motion to Renew. Douglas Kepanis, on behalf of the mother, argued that this "trip log" was self-serving and did not constitute "new evidence".