Case Conclusion Date:March 12, 2008
Practice Area:Child Custody
Outcome:Court found in favor of Douglas Kepanis's client - the "trip log" was not "new evidence".
Description:Adversary argued that a father's "trip log" of traffic jams and travel times to effectuate visitation with parties' child was "new evidence" warranted the granting of a Motion to Renew. Douglas Kepanis, on behalf of the mother, argued that this "trip log" was self-serving and did not constitute "new evidence".