Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
Attorney Bio
Mr. Woodrow graduated from UC Berkeley and attended graduate school at UC San Diego. After working as a teacher for a couple of years he entered law school at UCLA.
Mr. Woodrow’s first job as an attorney was as a prosecutor in Grays Harbor County. After a year at the “Harbor” he was hired at Kitsap County as a prosecutor. After five or six years at Kitsap, Mr. Woodrow opened his practice in Tacoma and gradually after three or four years he moved his practice to Olympia.
Mr. Woodrow has defending numerous persons charged with murder, rape, child molestation, drug crimes, assaults and a variety of other charges. As one of the most aggressive and successful litigators in Thurston County Mr. Woodrow has established himself as one of the premier attorneys in Western Washington.
1
Practice Area
39 years | 1,000 cases
Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Washington
Acquired: 1989
No misconduct found
3732 Pacific Ave SE, Olympia, WA, 98501-2125
17 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Communication Style
Posted by anonymous | April 04, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense
Best Criminal defense Attorney
Being falsely accused of a crime and facing criminal charges is a traumatic experience and legal services are very expensive, so you want the very best lawyer to represent you at the start of your case. Richard Woodrow was the third attorney I hired to represent me. Had I known about him at the b...
Posted by Mat | June 06, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Speeding & Traffic Ticket
Review
I met with Richard Woodrow for the first time on July 30, 2015 after receiving a ticket. He explained that he would charge $250/hr with a cap at $1,500. On December 6, 2015 I received a court date. I went to Richard Woodrow for legal counsel on December 8, 2015. At that time, his secretary asked me t...
Matt hired me to represent him on a criminal charge filed in Federal magistrate court. I met with him two or three times and appeared in court with him one time. The case was dismissed. Immediately after the hearing Matt started to call my office demanding his money back. Matt was informed that the contract he signed stated that this was a "Flat fee in the amount of $1,500.00" Matt was informed that my office is in Olympia and Federal court is in Tacoma. I felt and Matt agreed that the distance I must drive to court and the fact that Federal court could take an hour or so for arraignment and negotiations that $1,500.00 was a fair price. Matt was informed that I bill at $250.00 an hour. A flat rate was explained to Matt. He knew that at any time he could terminate our relationship and I would refund his money to him. He also knew that, and I quote from the contract:: "A flat fee arrangement: In this type of arrangement the attorney and client agree that the client will be charged a flat fee, and no more, for the specific undertaking described herein. This may be amended, but only by the mutual consent of the parties. All monies will be deposited in Attorney's business account and not into the trust account. The flat fee is the attorney's property upon receipt. The services provided by the Attorney shall include all matters up to and include trial in this matter. The total amount of the fee shall be 1,500 dollars." Later on in the contract it states: "Client agrees to pay 1,500.00 flat rate." This contract was signed by Matt on December 16th, 2015. My office filed a notice of appearance on behalf on Matt. After the dismissal of the charges Matt demanded that all monies be returned to him. Due to Matt's rude behavior to my secretary I agreed to give his money back to him. On March 25, 2016 i agreed to return all of Matt's money to him. He filed this review 5 days later. His original complaint said that I kept his money. Mat lied. After he was contacted by Avvo and my office he indicated the money was returned to him. . When a person comments about an attorney on Avvo they are advised that they must and I quote: " Stick to the facts. Reviews that contain unsupported accusations will not be approved." Matt's claims are unsupported, false and defamatory and will be addressed in a different forum. It is unfortunate that people in today's society can post anything on websites like this and not be truthful about services that they received and contracts that they have signed. Matt was happy that his charges were dismissed but unhappy that he had to pay to have that happen. I am sorry that Matt felt that having the charges dismissed and all of his money returned to him left him feeling dissatisfied with my services. I returned the money not because I felt that I didn't earn the money but because of Matt's erratic and hostile behavior towards my staff. I feel that Matt's issues affected his ability to fully, fairly and ethically assess his position.
Posted by Brett | June 12, 2011 | Criminal Defense
Mr. Woodrow yous my boy!
 YPmobile ^Whos this dbag^ Mr. Woodrow is a bonafide badass BrettK1984 on 06/12/2011 Write a Review Disregard the latter review. Mr. Woodrow has now twice saved my bacon. I got on friendship diversion (w serious charges that normally dont qualify for the program) then got a dui while still in t...
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
1989 - 1994
Prosecutor, Prosecuting Attorney's Office
2000 - Present
Federal Trial Bar
2000 - Present
Washington Defender Association
Not Guilty
not guilty
Not Guilty
1982
BA - Bachelor of Arts
English
Legal Answers
Legal Guides
Will I go to jail at my arraignment for a DUI?
20 Dec 2016
Is this police misconduct and violation of my rights?
17 Oct 2015