Scott Frederick Lundberg

Scott founded the law firm of Lundberg & Peschel, P.S., Inc. with his partner, Brian Peschel, in 1986. The firm has grown in 30 years to be one of Washington’s premier personal injury law firms – Greater Lundberg Peschel, hence the name GLP Attorneys. The firm's practice is devoted solely devoted to handling plaintiff's personal injury matters, including automobile accidents, product liability claims, premise liability actions, construction accidents, wrongful death, nursing home abuse/neglect cases, maritime injury claims and aviation accidents. 

Since 1994, Scott has been periodically appointed as a Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Washington, representing Labor & Industries and workers who have been injured by the fault of entities other than their employer. He has served as a primary tutor in the State of Washington's Admission to Practice Rule Law Clerk Program successfully tutoring, mentoring, teaching and coaching a law clerk on all relevant subjects of law required for admission into Washington State's bar. 

Honors include an AV-Preeminent rating (1999-Present), by peers through the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory Association, for his legal ability and adherence to professional standards of ethics. Scott is also a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, an organization that recognizes attorneys who have successfully resolved claims of their clients for one million dollars or more. Scott has been honored by Washington Law & Politics as a Washington "Super Lawyer" for 2007 and 2015, as well as received recognition in 2010 by Seattle Metropolitan Magazine as a Top Plaintiff's Personal Injury Lawyer. 

Scott enjoys running, having completed marathons in Oregon, California, Texas, Illinois, Maryland and Arizona, as well as skiing, hiking, biking, boating and flying. 

Representative Graham Lundberg Peschel Published Court Decisions: 

Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, 159 wn. 2d 413, 150 P. 3d 545 (2007).

Mr. Lundberg was lead trial counsel where a personal representative of a decedent’s estate filed a negligence suit against a general contractor. The Washington Supreme Court abandoned the completion and acceptance doctrine because it was outmoded, incorrect and harmful. 

Hamm v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 151 wn. 2d 303, 88 P. 3d 395 (2004).

A finding against an insured was improper where, in order to take a personal injury protection reimbursement, the insurer was required to pay a pro rata share of the legal expenses incurred by the insured to arbitrate the uninsured motorist claim. 

Sundquist v. Bre Properties, Inc., United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Case No. C11-0209-JCC

A landowner has an affirmative duty to maintain common areas in a reasonably safe condition. The duty extends to the removal of snow and ice and is based upon the tenant’s expectation that the premises have been made safe for the tenant’s use. The Court held a Plaintiff may prevail on her negligence claim by showing either actual or constructive notice of the unsafe condition or that the unsafe condition was reasonably foreseeable.