Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship

PRO

Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship

also known as Scott C. G. Blankenship, Scott Blankenship

4.5
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 33 years

Discrimination Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Discrimination, Employment & Labor, Personal Injury ... +2 more

1000 2nd Ave, Suite 3250, Seattle, WA

Virtual Consultation Available

About Scott

Biography

Undaunted Commitment to Justice: Experienced Trial Lawyers with Proven Results. Call Us Today

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Discrimination 50%

50%
Employment and Labor 20%

20%
Personal Injury 20%

20%
Class Action 5%

5%
Medical Malpractice 5%

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2023
Gold Client Champion
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Alaska for 17 years

State: Alaska

Acquired: 2008

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 20 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2006

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Washington for 33 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1992

Active

No misconduct found

Location

The Blankenship Law Firm, PLLC

1000 2nd Ave, Suite 3250, Seattle, WA, 98104

blankenshiplawfirm.com/

Online Presence

Other places you can find Scott online.

Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.5 /5.0

43 Client Reviews

Showing 6 - 10 of 11 reviews | General Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | July 19, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Outstanding attorney

I am writing this review of attorney Scott Blankenship to share the details of my experience with him to help others who are seeking legal representation. I recently needed his assistance again and the experience caused me to reflect on the quality of service that he provides and the quality person t...hat he is. Previously, I hired Scott as my attorney to represent me with an employment matter. This was the first time that I ever needed to hire an attorney. The process that I went through to find the right representation was not easy. When in distress, many of us are emotional and we want help immediately. When finding help is a challenge it only exasperates how one feels. I contacted four different legal firms, one of which was The Blankenship Law Firm. Two firms did not return my call after I provided their assistants with the details of my dispute; this was very discouraging. I met with another attorney at their office who showed little interest or empathy for my situation, but they gladly had me pay their fee at the end of our one hour meeting. My experience with the fourth firm that I contacted, The Blankenship Law Firm, was different. I left the same message with Scott Blankenship's assistant that I had left at the other three firms. I was told that Scott wasn't available but a time was scheduled when we could talk. After Scott and I talked by phone we scheduled a time to meet at his office. We discussed my situation in detail. I was impressed with how well he listened, how he engaged me and the questions that he asked. He felt strongly that I had a case that we could go forward with. We discussed his fee structure which I thought was fair and in-line with industry practices. I now had my attorney. Even though there was considerable time and work ahead of us to reach the finish line, knowing that I had someone of Scott's caliber assisting me and handling the strategy was a tremendous relief. Throughout my case I saw several things in Scott that reminded me that I had made the right decision. He showed that he cared for me and my situation. He was always a straight communicator. He was ethical. He was consistent. He had integrity. He coached me and helped me clearly understand what mattered and what did not, in order for us to possibly prevail. He never made any guarantees on what the outcome would be but he felt strongly that we had a good chance to succeed. There were times when the process was not moving along as fast as I would have liked but that was not because of Scott. He reminded me to remain patient because sometimes our expectations of time, as well as the final results, are not always realistic. Fortunately, we prevailed. I would recommend Scott and his team to anyone who is in need of an employment attorney who is formidable and does the very best he can to get the best possible result for his clients. The traits that I used to describe Scott in the preceding paragraph were always present from the beginning to the end. As I mentioned at the beginning of this review, I recently contacted Scott on another matter because I have total confidence in his abilities. I look forward to working with him again and do so with no hesitation.

Posted by Ramon | July 13, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Wrongful Termination

"With Scott’s Integrity, Work-ethic, and Razor-sharp Advocacy in Court, I Got a Great Result And Helped Me Clear my Name"

When I was abruptly terminated without cause, I knew it was grossly unfair and I had to fight it. But I didn’t know where to begin—my reputation was ruined and most people I approached, both professionally and socially, looked at me with suspicion and disdain. Since I was fired from a large, powerfu...l, popular Catholic healthcare system, colleagues and friends thought that I must have done something terrible to deserve termination. It was an extremely stressful time for my family and me. Thankfully, we eventually met Scott and his team as a referral from a physician colleague. Scott listened to me thoroughly and believed in me. While everyone—family, friends, and enemies alike—wanted me to just let it go and leave town, Scott understood my need to clear my name. This was all I needed. It was a great comfort to be heard, but also very empowering to know that a lawyer of his caliber and experience was willing to stand by a ruined individual like me to fight a big institution. Catholic Health Initiatives/CHI Franciscan Health was brutal and brazen with its retaliation and harassment, but Scott did not back down. He thoughtfully advised me about big and small decisions. He was always available to talk or meet. He was sincerely concerned about the lawsuit’s impact on my family. His staff was immensely supportive, thorough and efficient. I truly felt that I had a team before me and behind me at all times. They sought out my input constantly. It was a solid collaboration. I no longer felt alone. I saw Scott in action in many settings—in legal communications, in depositions, in court, in mediation — and he is razor-sharp and relentless. I was at awe at Scott’s attention to every legal detail. With his staff, we poured over more than 10,000 pages of documents and more than 40 hours of videos. Scott and I worked through several lunch hours and even met with witnesses on several Sundays. His work ethic is exemplary, his devotion to a just cause nothing short of admirable, and his integrity beyond reproach. Much to everyone’s surprise, just over a week before trial was to begin, we won a $2.5 million settlement from Catholic Health Initiatives/CHI Franciscan Health. It was only then that many people looked at me without suspicion and disdain. They began to listen and ask for details. Only then did they believe that a physician could be wrongfully terminated and maliciously framed by a big beloved Catholic institution. This made me appreciate Scott even more, that he trusted me and was willing to defend me when it was too inconvenient and complicated for most. I have no doubt that the successful resolution of my lawsuit was directly due to the great skill and expertise of Scott and his team at The Blankenship Law Firm.

Posted by David | September 09, 2009 | Mediation

What legal representation was meant to be

I feel very fortunate to have been represented by Scott Blankenship and the Blankenship Law Firm. Scott is a seasoned veteran when it comes to the legal in's and outs of a particular case. My case...as with many cases start with great client expectations of a large payout jury trial that nets tons of... $'s for the client. The Blankenship firm taught me there are economic practicalities & cost realities that can give a client what they want....and significantly shorten the process, cost and direction to a successful outcome. For me success came with the experience of nScott being applied to the opportunity to mediate. Scott showed patience and diligence in leading me to a logical outcome that made me whole without all of the trial expenses and costs and time and risk. I strongly recommend the Blankenship Law firm to anyone who is ready for a fresh approach to an outcome that is in a clients best interest. Our case mediated successfully, I got what I wanted and all others really got what they wanted. Scott effectively mediated my case so that it was a win-win-win outcome. I am positive that even my advesary is thankful to the Blankenship Law Firm...in particular Mr. Scott Blankenship. Additionally, I feel that I can trust Scott with matters and today I call myself a Friend....not a client! Thank you Mr. Blankenship for helping guide me to a positive outcome.

Posted by anonymous | September 03, 2009 | Wrongful Termination

Unrelenting Powerhouse

As you go through life you compile a mental list of those things that are most important. A solid family, good health, friends, and for some of us the occasion will arise to add one more item to the list — a great attorney. Nobody wants to seek legal help, but sometimes things are so egregious we... are left with no other alternative. I am a college educated veteran with more than 35 years as a successful business person in upper management. For many years I worked at the same firm and as my tenure there grew, so did the constant kidding about my age until it got downright nasty. Then it became a focal point to get rid of me when I complained about it. There is a lot more to the story, but let it suffice to say that being forced out solely because of my age was a real blow. This began two of the longest years of my life. I found Scott Blankenship after my former employer’s mother in law suggested I retain him. She had just won a suit against a former employer on similar grounds using Scott. I know this is getting a little complicated, but it points out how bad an employer can be when even his own family says to sue him. Scott and his staff teamed up and were unwavering in their assault. The opposition tried to drag in every phony witness they could muster, filed a counter suit and Scott picked them all apart in court like a skilled surgeon. He flushed out the liars and until finally they had no more falsehoods they could manufacture. Let me tell you there were some dark days in this lawsuit. The business community in our area got wind of it, and I had trouble finding work. But Scott never wavered; he fought as hard the last day as he did the first. We settled after more man hours then you can imagine. Scott’s firm, his close association with the EEOC, his reputation in the legal community with the judges and other attorneys assured our victory. You feel like you’re working with some very high test legal firm as depicted on TV. Actually you are working with an experienced, competent, and talented firm, absolutely the best. If you have any doubts, check his website for all the cases he has won and settlements he has received. A satisfied client.

Posted by anonymous | October 21, 2019 | Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Does not listen

After contacting, sending several emails with great detail, and even going over the case on the phone, it was clear that they were not listening. I was contacted by an intern (or similar employee) who was eating and only half listening during the phone call and clearly talking to someone else while o...n the phone with me. Repeating myself and going over the same info many times, which I definitely understand, but they kept asking me to repeat basic info like the company’s name etc.. When I asked why they were getting caught on an area of my case that was not related to the problem, they could not give me an answer. It felt like they were fishing for information while I was not protected under attorney client privilege which is something I’ll need to take another look into now.

See All Client Reviews

Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Scott
Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Personal injury lawyer | May 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Scott. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Stephen A. Teller headshot
Stephen Teller

Wrongful termination lawyer | Nov 17

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have worked with Scott drafting legislation to improve workers' rights in Washington. He is clear, articulate, and organized. He is also easy to get along with when he's on your team, but I hear he's tough on the other side!"

Peter Malden Brown headshot
Peter Brown

Civil rights lawyer | Jun 07

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I had the pleasure to work with Scott as co-counsel in the race discrimination trial of Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods. The jury returned a verdict of $3,100,000.00, which is one of the highest awards ever returned for this type of case. Scott fought for this client serving as appellate and lead counsel all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. He ultimately obtained a final recovery of close to $4,000,000.00. This exceptional outcome is a testament to Scott’s high standards of trial preparation, tenaciousness in court, and skill as an appellate lawyer. I have no hesitation in recommending Scott to any potential client. Peter M. Brown, Dawson-Brown ps"

Steven Michael Dickinson headshot
Steven Dickinson

Discrimination lawyer | Jun 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"When our clients need an employment discrimination attorney, we refer them over to Scott. Need I say more?"

Mary Ruth Mann headshot
Mary Mann

Litigation lawyer | Jun 05

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Scott Blankenship is a talented lawyer I have seen in many legal settings, and have observed and worked with in trial. He is excellent. "

View All Endorsements
Stephen A. Teller headshot
Stephen Teller

Employment and labor lawyer

Charles P. Moure headshot
Charles Moure

Business lawyer

Peter Malden Brown headshot
Peter Brown

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer

Mary Ruth Mann headshot
Mary Mann

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2024

Best in the NW, The Seattle Times

2024

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2024

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2024

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2023

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2023

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2023

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2022

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2021

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2020

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2019

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2018

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2017

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2016

Best Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

2014 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2014

Top 100 Trial Lawyer, The National Trial Lawyers

2014

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2013

2013 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2013

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Top 100 Trial Lawyer, The National Trial Lawyers

2012

2012 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Top 100 Trial Lawyer, The National Trial Lawyers (Formerly ATLA)

2012

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2011

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2011

2011 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2011

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2010

2010 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2010

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2010

Top Attorneys In Employment And Labor, Super Lawyers Magazine, National Corporate Counsel Edition

2010

Top 100 Trial Lawyers (ATLA), American Trial Lawyers Association

2009

Featured Attorney in September 2009 Bar Bulletin, King County Bar Association

2009

Top Attorneys In Employment And Labor, Super Lawyers Magazine, National Corporate Counsel Edition

2009

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2009

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2008

Avvo Top Employment/Labor Lawyer, Washington CEO Magazine

2008

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2008

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2007

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2007

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2006

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2005

Workplace Warrior: Top 5 Cases -- Employee Rights 1985-2005, National Employment Lawyer Associaton

2005

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2004

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2003

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2002

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2001

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2000

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

N/A

AV® Preeminent™ 5.0 out of 5, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1994 - Present

Managing Shareholder, The Blankenship Law Firm, PLLC

1993 - 1994

Partner, Blankenship, Gillette, and Rogowski

1991 - 1993

Associate, Gaitan & Cusack

1988 - 1988

Clerk/Intern, U.S. Senate Judiciary Commitee

Associations

2002 - Present

Washington State Trial Lawyers Association

Eagle Member

2000 - Present

Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Attorney Member

King County Bar Association

Member

Washington State Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association

Member

National Employment Lawyers Association

Member

Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

Association of Trial Lawyers of America

Member

Alaska State Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Miranda v. Alaska Longline, LLC

$1.85 Million Settlement

Anel v. CHI

$2.5 Million Settlement

EEOC, Lam and Rios v. Fry's Electronics

$2.4 million including $100,000 in sanctions and 2.3 million dollars settlement after arbitraion

Li et. al. v. Washington State University et. al.

$650,000 Settlement with non-monetary relief, consent decree and posting

Lindell v. City of Mercer Island et. al.

$1,000,000 + $90,560 for Public Records Act Violation Under Washington Law

EEOC et .all v. Mason County Forest Products

$900,000

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.

$1.72 Million Settlement with EEOC Consent Decree

Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods

$3,963,033

Sharma v. City of Vancouver, et al.

$1,650,000

See More Legal Cases

Education

1991

Tulane University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

University of California - Los Angeles

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2013

WSAJ CLE Employment Deskbook

Remedies In Employment Cases

2010

Washington Employment Lawyers Association CLE

Lecturer: Avoiding Dismissal After Iqbal

2010

A Perspective From Counsel for the Employee

Ethical Considertions In Workplace Investigations

2007

National Employment Lawyers Association, Annual Convention

Lecturer: National Origin Discrimination

2003

Washington State Trial Lawyers Employment Law Seminar

Lecturer: Strategies for Prosecuting Disability Cases Under State and Federal Law

2002

Damages: Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, Eagle Only Seminar

Lecturer: Proving Punitive Damages

2001

Plaintiff's Employment Litigation For The New Millennium: Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Lecturer: Persuading a Jury to Award Substantial Damages

2000

Washington State Trial Lawyers Employment Law Seminar

Lecturer: Substance & Subtlety: New Law and Effective Tactics for Plaintiff's Employment Lawyers

Publications

2013

Washington State Trial Lawyers Association Employment Law Deskbook Remedies

2009

American Association for Justice (AAJ) Employment Rights Quarterly Ashcroft v. Iqbal's Limited Application to Employment Discrimination Cases

2009

Trial News, Washington State Association for Justice The Power of Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Cases

2009

Washington State Association for Justice (WSAJ) Employment Deskbook Remedies for Employment Discrimination

2007

National Employment Lawyers Association Section 1981: The Most Powerful Law for Prosecuting National Origin Discrimination

2005

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers Class Actions: Justice in Action

2004

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers Federal Jury Awards Punitive Damages in Racial Discrimination Suit

2004

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Review Race Discrimination Verdict Awarded to Chinese American

2003

Washington State Trial Lawyers Employment Law Seminar Strategies for Prosecuting Disability Cases Under State and Federal Law

2002

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers Employee Stock Compensation is Wages: Attorney's Fees Available for Recovery Under Washington Wage Law

2002

CLE for Eagle Members of Washington State Trial Lawyers Damages in Employment Cases

1990

Tulane Environmental Law Journal Unveiled: Corporate Officer, Parent and Successor Liability Under CERCLA

Languages

Spanish

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution