Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship

PRO

Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship

also known as Scott C. G. Blankenship, Scott Blankenship

4.5
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 33 years

Discrimination Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Discrimination, Employment & Labor, Personal Injury ... +2 more

1000 2nd Ave, Suite 3250, Seattle, WA

Virtual Consultation Available

About Scott

Biography

Undaunted Commitment to Justice: Experienced Trial Lawyers with Proven Results. Call Us Today

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Discrimination 50%

50%
Employment and Labor 20%

20%
Personal Injury 20%

20%
Class Action 5%

5%
Medical Malpractice 5%

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2023
Gold Client Champion
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Alaska for 17 years

State: Alaska

Acquired: 2008

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 20 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2006

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Washington for 33 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1992

Active

No misconduct found

Location

The Blankenship Law Firm, PLLC

1000 2nd Ave, Suite 3250, Seattle, WA, 98104

blankenshiplawfirm.com/

Online Presence

Other places you can find Scott online.

Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.5 /5.0

43 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Punctuality

Posted by Rachel | February 16, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Professional, Knowledgeable, Effective

Scott and his team took on my case and worked closely with me to win a settlement. He took time to get to know me and the facts of my case, then fight for the ideal outcome. Scott was on the spot for my deposition, taking extra care to make sure I was comfortable and able to do my best. He ran the de...positions like a pro, showing his stellar questioning skills and making me feel vindicated. His team was responsive to every email and phone call from me. They always helped me understand what was happening and why. Scott and his team achieved the ideal resolution for my case. I highly recommend Scott Blankenship as an attorney. He helped me gain closure and move forward successfully from a very painful episode of my life.

Posted by Jeff | March 20, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Here I have found the difference between good lawyers and GREAT lawyers.

I was extremely selective in choosing representation because of the considerably large size and scope of my case and the numerous individuals who it benefits. A lot of good firms expressed a high degree of interest in my case, but I wanted the best. I sought out The Blankenship Law Firm and whe...n I first met Scott and his dedicated team I was immediately impressed by how they took ownership of my problem and gave me confidence by laying out how they will do everything possible to help my case succeed. Scott and his team are highly motivated, often working into the night on my case and taking extreme ownership of it. Additionally on motivation, the firm doesn’t just respond when I call them; they make my phone ring. Good lawyers try to deliver, but great lawyers DELIVER: Scott and his team consistently do what they say they will and get it executed by when they tell me they will. I have found the team devotion to excellence, brilliant knowledge of the law and providing access to justice to be First Class every step of the way. I cannot give a strong enough recommendation here. They have definitely earned every one of the 5 Stars I am giving.

See All Client Reviews

Scott Crispin Greco Blankenship's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Scott
Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Personal injury lawyer | May 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Scott. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Stephen A. Teller headshot
Stephen Teller

Wrongful termination lawyer | Nov 17

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have worked with Scott drafting legislation to improve workers' rights in Washington. He is clear, articulate, and organized. He is also easy to get along with when he's on your team, but I hear he's tough on the other side!"

Peter Malden Brown headshot
Peter Brown

Civil rights lawyer | Jun 07

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I had the pleasure to work with Scott as co-counsel in the race discrimination trial of Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods. The jury returned a verdict of $3,100,000.00, which is one of the highest awards ever returned for this type of case. Scott fought for this client serving as appellate and lead counsel all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. He ultimately obtained a final recovery of close to $4,000,000.00. This exceptional outcome is a testament to Scott’s high standards of trial preparation, tenaciousness in court, and skill as an appellate lawyer. I have no hesitation in recommending Scott to any potential client. Peter M. Brown, Dawson-Brown ps"

Steven Michael Dickinson headshot
Steven Dickinson

Discrimination lawyer | Jun 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"When our clients need an employment discrimination attorney, we refer them over to Scott. Need I say more?"

Mary Ruth Mann headshot
Mary Mann

Litigation lawyer | Jun 05

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Scott Blankenship is a talented lawyer I have seen in many legal settings, and have observed and worked with in trial. He is excellent. "

View All Endorsements
Stephen A. Teller headshot
Stephen Teller

Employment and labor lawyer

Charles P. Moure headshot
Charles Moure

Business lawyer

Peter Malden Brown headshot
Peter Brown

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer

Mary Ruth Mann headshot
Mary Mann

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2024

Best in the NW, The Seattle Times

2024

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2024

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2024

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2023

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2023

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2023

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2022

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2021

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2020

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2019

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2018

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2017

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2016

Best Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

2014 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2014

Top 100 Trial Lawyer, The National Trial Lawyers

2014

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2013

2013 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2013

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Top 100 Trial Lawyer, The National Trial Lawyers

2012

2012 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Top 100 Trial Lawyer, The National Trial Lawyers (Formerly ATLA)

2012

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2011

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2011

2011 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2011

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2010

2010 Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2010

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2010

Top Attorneys In Employment And Labor, Super Lawyers Magazine, National Corporate Counsel Edition

2010

Top 100 Trial Lawyers (ATLA), American Trial Lawyers Association

2009

Featured Attorney in September 2009 Bar Bulletin, King County Bar Association

2009

Top Attorneys In Employment And Labor, Super Lawyers Magazine, National Corporate Counsel Edition

2009

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2009

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2008

Avvo Top Employment/Labor Lawyer, Washington CEO Magazine

2008

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2008

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2007

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA)

2007

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2006

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2005

Workplace Warrior: Top 5 Cases -- Employee Rights 1985-2005, National Employment Lawyer Associaton

2005

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2004

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2003

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2002

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2001

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2000

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

N/A

AV® Preeminent™ 5.0 out of 5, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1994 - Present

Managing Shareholder, The Blankenship Law Firm, PLLC

1993 - 1994

Partner, Blankenship, Gillette, and Rogowski

1991 - 1993

Associate, Gaitan & Cusack

1988 - 1988

Clerk/Intern, U.S. Senate Judiciary Commitee

Associations

2002 - Present

Washington State Trial Lawyers Association

Eagle Member

2000 - Present

Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Attorney Member

King County Bar Association

Member

Washington State Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association

Member

National Employment Lawyers Association

Member

Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

Association of Trial Lawyers of America

Member

Alaska State Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Miranda v. Alaska Longline, LLC

$1.85 Million Settlement

Anel v. CHI

$2.5 Million Settlement

EEOC, Lam and Rios v. Fry's Electronics

$2.4 million including $100,000 in sanctions and 2.3 million dollars settlement after arbitraion

Li et. al. v. Washington State University et. al.

$650,000 Settlement with non-monetary relief, consent decree and posting

Lindell v. City of Mercer Island et. al.

$1,000,000 + $90,560 for Public Records Act Violation Under Washington Law

EEOC et .all v. Mason County Forest Products

$900,000

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.

$1.72 Million Settlement with EEOC Consent Decree

Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods

$3,963,033

Sharma v. City of Vancouver, et al.

$1,650,000

See More Legal Cases

Education

1991

Tulane University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

University of California - Los Angeles

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2013

WSAJ CLE Employment Deskbook

Remedies In Employment Cases

2010

Washington Employment Lawyers Association CLE

Lecturer: Avoiding Dismissal After Iqbal

2010

A Perspective From Counsel for the Employee

Ethical Considertions In Workplace Investigations

2007

National Employment Lawyers Association, Annual Convention

Lecturer: National Origin Discrimination

2003

Washington State Trial Lawyers Employment Law Seminar

Lecturer: Strategies for Prosecuting Disability Cases Under State and Federal Law

2002

Damages: Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, Eagle Only Seminar

Lecturer: Proving Punitive Damages

2001

Plaintiff's Employment Litigation For The New Millennium: Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Lecturer: Persuading a Jury to Award Substantial Damages

2000

Washington State Trial Lawyers Employment Law Seminar

Lecturer: Substance & Subtlety: New Law and Effective Tactics for Plaintiff's Employment Lawyers

Publications

2013

Washington State Trial Lawyers Association Employment Law Deskbook Remedies

2009

American Association for Justice (AAJ) Employment Rights Quarterly Ashcroft v. Iqbal's Limited Application to Employment Discrimination Cases

2009

Trial News, Washington State Association for Justice The Power of Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Cases

2009

Washington State Association for Justice (WSAJ) Employment Deskbook Remedies for Employment Discrimination

2007

National Employment Lawyers Association Section 1981: The Most Powerful Law for Prosecuting National Origin Discrimination

2005

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers Class Actions: Justice in Action

2004

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers Federal Jury Awards Punitive Damages in Racial Discrimination Suit

2004

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Review Race Discrimination Verdict Awarded to Chinese American

2003

Washington State Trial Lawyers Employment Law Seminar Strategies for Prosecuting Disability Cases Under State and Federal Law

2002

Trial News, Washington State Trial Lawyers Employee Stock Compensation is Wages: Attorney's Fees Available for Recovery Under Washington Wage Law

2002

CLE for Eagle Members of Washington State Trial Lawyers Damages in Employment Cases

1990

Tulane Environmental Law Journal Unveiled: Corporate Officer, Parent and Successor Liability Under CERCLA

Languages

Spanish

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution