Jacob William Sider

Jacob William Sider

4.8
Rating: 7.3

Licensed for 20 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Oakland, CA
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Wrongful Termination

447 61st St, Oakland, CA

About Jacob

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 10 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 20 years

State: California

Acquired: 2005

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Jacob Sider

447 61st St, Oakland, CA, 94609

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jacob William Sider's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.8 /5.0

116 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | 1 star

Posted by anonymous | February 01, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Uncaring and rude. Not a true advocate for employees.

I contracted with this attorney for a severance negotiation. After saying he could complete my letter in an hour, he ghosted me for several days. When I asked for status of case he informed me in a very cutting and callous way that after review of the communications that I basically had no case, he ...wouldn't be able to get me much more money than offered and that nothing I could tell him would change his opinion of the documentation provided. So this is an attorney that contracts with a client and then refuses to listen to them for even one second. Then after this horrible one-sided conversation he much later sends a CYA email that was much softer and not quite in line with the verbal conversation he had with me. If his intention was to destroy all hope and get me to give up the matter so he didn't have to waste any more of his time on me, he succeeded. Dude, just review people's documents before agreeing to a case if it's an issue instead of getting people's hopes up and thinking they have an advocate that cares. It's sad that an employment lawyer representing employees would treat a client this way, considering all the trauma and financial and mental harm that has already been inflicted on the employee (hence why they are seeking a lawyer). Just another violation of trust and as usual, the little people get outsmarted by not just the big companies, but the lawyers every time. Bad experience.

Jacob Sider

Replied last February 22, 2024

I took on this client with the understanding that they had been TERMINATED. The truth is that THEY HAD QUIT. Once I learned this very important fact, I explained that my ability to leverage a significantly larger severance payment for them was extremely limited. I charged no money for my services. Please see my many 5-star reviews here, left by clients whose facts were in line with what was discussed at the time they hired me.

Posted by anonymous | June 01, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Not a good experience.

Seemed to have a lot on his plate. Forgot things we discussed frequently and didn't follow-up in writing. Difficult to have a phone conversation; you get talked over a lot. Working with basic technology was difficult. The day before my hearing, I received less than 24 hours notice that he wasn't goin...g to represent me. A few days later I got a letter of disengagement.

Jacob Sider

Replied last June 01, 2018

1) I do have a lot on my plate. 2) I didn't frequently forget things we discussed. I often have clients go over events more than once, as this can help jog their memory regarding important details. I can see how this might try someone's patience, but it's often part of the job. 3) Sometimes I followed up in writing. Sometimes I did not. Not every aspect of the attorney-client relationship requires written follow-up with the client. 4) I did talk over this client a few times. I am not free to explain in detail why I found this necessary. 5) I'm no tech guru. but I work just fine with basic technology. I prefer not to use text messages with clients and I prefer stand-alone emailed attachments to clients sending me zip drives. I hope that's OK with you. If not, no hard feelings. And, if you're old school, I have a fax. 6) At the time I told this client I was not going to the hearing, I was no longer under any obligation to attend the hearing. And the client had not originally hired me for the purpose of representing them at this hearing. 7) I did indeed disengage from this client.

Posted by Debby | March 20, 2018 | Employment & Labor

He left me in the lurch

I had retained attorney Sider due to harassment at my job. It was a difficult situation and I reluctantly decided that I was not ready to leave my job without a new job and that it would be difficult for me to negotiate a severance agreement at that time. About two weeks later, I found out I was ...losing my rented home due to the owner selling and that my job didn't pay enough, nor was it secure enough to sign a year lease at a new place. I new I had to leave then. I e-mailed him and left him a phone message asking him if he could assist me. For no good reason, he sent me a curt e-mail saying that he declined and that I had "disengaged" his services. His response left me in the lurch and made me feel like I had done something wrong. NOT OKAY AT ALL.

Jacob Sider

Replied last March 20, 2018

This former client of mine is not telling the truth here. I can't go into too much detail, due to the confidential nature of our communications. Without going into specific communications, this client actually discharged ME, not the other way around. When you discharge an attorney, the attorney does owe you some ongoing duties, but, for the good of both the client and the attorney, it is important to have clear communication that the representation has closed. At the time of the "curt email", this person was no longer my client - as a result of their own decision. An attorney who reminds you that they no longer represent you is not leaving you "in the lurch." I am sorry that this person lost their rental home. I can see how the stress of such difficult circumstances might cause a person to lash out at the nearest and easiest target. I hope they landed on their feet.

See All Client Reviews

Jacob William Sider's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jacob
Melissa A. Newman headshot
Melissa Newman

Employment and labor lawyer | Oct 10

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I highly endorse this lawyer! He has a very direct communication style and is trustworthy and very knowledgable."

Felipe Raimondo Parker headshot
Felipe Parker

Employment and labor lawyer | Oct 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jacob is a straight shooter and a hard worker. I endorse this attorney."

Nicholas James de Blouw headshot
Nicholas de Blouw

Employment and labor lawyer | Nov 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Jacob Sider is a strategic employment law attorney. Our firm has worked extensively with Mr. Sider on a variety of matters involving California Labor Code violations. Jacob will consider not only legal tactics, but business realities in providing labor and employment advice and litigation options. Mr. Sider has become a fellow soldier in the battle for employees' rights."

View All Endorsements
Melissa A. Newman headshot
Melissa Newman

Employment and labor lawyer

Nicholas James de Blouw headshot
Nicholas de Blouw

Class action lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.3 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Sole Practicioner, Law Office of Jacob Sider

2003 - 2003

Intern, San Francisco Public Defender

Associations

2014 - Present

California Employment Lawyers Association

Member

2010 - Present

Alameda County Bar Association, Labor and Employment Section

Member

Education

2004

U of San Francisco SOL

law

2000

Univ of California Santa Cruz

undergraduate

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution