Jeffrey A. Marks

Mr. Marks was a great PI lawyer. He has handled several PI cases and helped me to understand my rights. He was fighting for me and made it clear that I was his first priority. He helped to explain the process and put my needs first. He was attentive and responsible. I would definitely recommend. With... any concerns I had he made it clear that he cared and advised me appropriately. Overall, Mr. Marks was professional, caring, and sympathetic to the pain and difficult process that a client may experience during a PI case.

I got in a car accident for the first time and didnt know who to go to. I had a very bad back no car and very scared and didnt know what to do. So i called a friend of mine and he suggested me to jeff and said he did a very good job with him and he said to call him and he will help me with all the tr...oubles that are going on. Believe me that was the best decision i have ever made. The fist thing jeff did after i had a spoken to him is to put me with a chiopractor and gave me as much help as he could possibly do. I made a very smart choice in hiring him and will deffinetly go to him with anything else .

Accepted my case as plaintiff in PI case, defendant in civil matter and then as plaintiff in civil action all within same stretch of time. The latter two were at behest of his Legal Plan which recommended his "expertise." It became abundantly clear he had no trial expertise (unprepared to show video ...prepared for him at his request) nor did he have any real estate expertise. In the real estate matter, he simply jumped onto the opposing party's bandwagon of claims with adequately researching and violated Legal Plan rules in process. I was overcharged without retainer in excess of thousands and then he refused dispute resolution procedure in lieu of going to Bar for ethics. He seemed to know firsthand their system lacked the resources to investigate him, so he dragged it out and abandoned my PI case midway in retaliation for my requesting refund repeatedly. His staff were employed to prevent access and behave rudely to the end of holding him unaccountable. It's really a shame that firms are allowed to engage in shenanigans with Legal Plans to exaggerate one another's credentials and profit from what appears as absolutely unethical conduct. ( He swore he'd never take another real estate case as my title lawyer and other counsel demonstrated his erroneous assumptions, but you can see on Avvo that not anything he ever said was true because complaints about his real estate bungling persist and I'm sure each one along the way received that same flowery Welcome Letter package exclaiming how he'd work his honest best to "professionally" represent his clients--yadayadayada. What good is such a flowery Agreement when no one will assertively communicate its meaning with respect for the facts transpiring as they develop? All he did for me was offer bad service, refusal to look at his errors using factual outside legal analyses, refusal to "reapportion" his accounting errors to the end of refund, and act like he never knew what was wrong in spite of letters, emails, voice messages and meetings. I don't know the word appropriate to describe such a character, but you won't find it on Avvo.