We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Arizona
Acquired: 2011
No misconduct found
3931 E. Kristal Way, Phoenix, AZ, 85050
Showing 1 - 5 of 5 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by Lacey | August 5, 2023 | Hired Attorney
I initially met Chris to have my name legally changed. I consulted him when my father was killed in a car accident. I hired him and he fought hard for justice. We have multiple suits against various parties including Maricopa County and the software manufacturer for the faulty traffic light. We won a...
Posted by Kesha-Nicole | October 4, 2014
Christopher Post is an excellent attorney and person. His upbeat personality mixed with his professionalism makes it easy to trust in what this man has to say. As my attorney, Christopher Post represented me in a case, and with his valid researched information, he helped to win my case. Christopher m...
Posted by Dave | September 28, 2014
I would highly recommend Chris Post. I was arrested last summer and Chris sat in night court until almost midnight to wait for my arraignment. Out of about 30 others arraigned with me that night, only I was released without bail. Chris was awesome. Without him arguing on my behalf, I would have h...
Posted by anonymous | May 20, 2013
I was told about this firm from a legal link program through an insurance policy I have. I guess its true, you get what you pay for. I only had to put up $1500 and that surprisingly made it to court- tells you how much research was done. I was originally supposed to work with fabiola who is the firm ...
Unfortunately this client made some very poor choices in his personal life that negatively affected his case. Not surprisingly, those poor choices were not addressed by the client in his review above. Although the client was straightforward with these issues at least to us, those circumstances certainly did not exist when the client retained our services, and they were not brought up to counsel until shortly before trial. We tell our clients that they have the God-given right to self-implode in their own personal lives, but the best we as attorneys can do is to minimize the damage if those poor choices affect the client’s case. Arizona prefers joint custody and essentially equal parenting time for both parents. If you are not awarded joint custody and equal parenting time by the court, it either means that there are circumstances beyond your control to facilitate such an arrangement (such as living out of state), OR that you need to reevaluate your ability and fitness as a parent. The opposing party’s “transgressions” cited above were too far removed in time to have been relevant at trial. But unfortunately for this client, his actions were very recent and weighed heavily in the judge’s decision.
Posted by anonymous | March 20, 2013
I am in the middle of a relocation case involving my daughter. I relocated with my daughter to Oregon my husband got a great job her. Her father filed for a temporary order hearing. I am the primary custodial parent so moving should have been fine as it states in Arizona law. At the hearing he w...
This review could not be further from the truth. In actuality, the client and I prepared for the hearing together. The client approved the argument and the judge agreed with us, ruling in favor of our client. At the last minute, however, the opposing party brought a very crucial piece of evidence to the judge’s attention—the very piece of evidence our client claimed not to have been in existence. After the reviewing this piece of evidence, the judge instead ruled in favor of the opposing party. Had our client not lied to us, she might have gotten a different result. And when a client writes a negative review claiming that her lawyer sat there and “said nothing”, what that really means is that the lawyer was so irate that his client lied through her teeth throughout the entire representation. To summarize, in order to be successful in a relocation case, you should not lie to your lawyer, withhold crucial evidence, and profess your “knowledge” of the law when in fact you have no clue what you are talking about. Case in point: after the hearing, this client retained another lawyer for trial. As one might imagine, our former client lost at trial with her new lawyer. I guess this client’s knowledge of Arizona law really came in handy.
"It is with pleasure that I endorse Mr. Post. We had a case where multiple issues needed to be addressed with the Court both in the initial dissolution of marriage and post decree matters. I found Mr. Post to be proactive in communication, professional with counsel and the Court and timely in working on the case with me. Mr. Post has great attention to detail and advocated effectively for his client."
Divorce and separation lawyer
N/A