This lawyer cannot be reviewed
No Photo

Christopher Post

3.4
Rating: 6.7

Licensed for 15 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice

3931 E. Kristal Way, Phoenix, AZ

About Christopher

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 15 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 2011

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Christopher Post

3931 E. Kristal Way, Phoenix, AZ, 85050

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Christopher Post's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.4 /5.0

5 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (5) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Family

Posted by anonymous | April 06, 2015 | Family

Stay away!!

I was told about this firm from a legal link program through an insurance policy I have. I guess its true, you get what you pay for. I only had to put up $1500 and that surprisingly made it to court- tells you how much research was done. I was originally supposed to work with fabiola who is the firm ...owner and got passed off to Christopher after two times meeting with her. He mad it seem like I had no issues of getting 50/50 custody and days withh daughter seeing as how I raised her from birth. The court day did not go that way. I just lost mg job before I went to court and my EX's attorney made me look like a dirt bag. Instead of asking questions that. Would show iI have always worked my butt off to support my dadaughter and before papers were filed I had my daughter the majority of days. He asked me if I think I should pay child support because I wasn't working... what am I supposed to respond to that. I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't... I gave him plant of information of my ex's transgressions, DUI, not spending days with my daughter on her days and so on and so on. He seemed like he had no idea what was going on or how to ask questions and paint a picture. I didn't spend as much as most, but now I'm thinking I should have and gotten a real family law firm. A few grand up front would have given me more time with my daughter and saved me money in the long run.

Christopher Post

Replied last April 06, 2015

Unfortunately this client made some very poor choices in his personal life that negatively affected his case. Not surprisingly, those poor choices were not addressed by the client in his review above. Although the client was straightforward with these issues at least to us, those circumstances certainly did not exist when the client retained our services, and they were not brought up to counsel until shortly before trial. We tell our clients that they have the God-given right to self-implode in their own personal lives, but the best we as attorneys can do is to minimize the damage if those poor choices affect the client’s case. Arizona prefers joint custody and essentially equal parenting time for both parents. If you are not awarded joint custody and equal parenting time by the court, it either means that there are circumstances beyond your control to facilitate such an arrangement (such as living out of state), OR that you need to reevaluate your ability and fitness as a parent. The opposing party’s “transgressions” cited above were too far removed in time to have been relevant at trial. But unfortunately for this client, his actions were very recent and weighed heavily in the judge’s decision.

Posted by anonymous | May 09, 2014 | Family

unhappy

I am in the middle of a relocation case involving my daughter. I relocated with my daughter to Oregon my husband got a great job her. Her father filed for a temporary order hearing. I am the primary custodial parent so moving should have been fine as it states in Arizona law. At the hearing he w...as not prepared. Seemed very unexperianced and not knowleable on the laws or the judge that was assigned. The father represented himself and won the argument because my lawyer did nothing and said nothing to sway or state my side of the story or case. As a result I have to move back to Tucson away from my husband with my other two children untill this case is settled. The firm that he works with has an inclusive fee and now I am out of $3500 for this guy to sit there with his thumb up his butt.

Christopher Post

Replied last May 09, 2014

This review could not be further from the truth. In actuality, the client and I prepared for the hearing together. The client approved the argument and the judge agreed with us, ruling in favor of our client. At the last minute, however, the opposing party brought a very crucial piece of evidence to the judge’s attention—the very piece of evidence our client claimed not to have been in existence. After the reviewing this piece of evidence, the judge instead ruled in favor of the opposing party. Had our client not lied to us, she might have gotten a different result. And when a client writes a negative review claiming that her lawyer sat there and “said nothing”, what that really means is that the lawyer was so irate that his client lied through her teeth throughout the entire representation. To summarize, in order to be successful in a relocation case, you should not lie to your lawyer, withhold crucial evidence, and profess your “knowledge” of the law when in fact you have no clue what you are talking about. Case in point: after the hearing, this client retained another lawyer for trial. As one might imagine, our former client lost at trial with her new lawyer. I guess this client’s knowledge of Arizona law really came in handy.

See All Client Reviews

Christopher Post's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Christopher
Heidi Lukacsik headshot
Heidi Lukacsik

Family lawyer | May 30

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"It is with pleasure that I endorse Mr. Post. We had a case where multiple issues needed to be addressed with the Court both in the initial dissolution of marriage and post decree matters. I found Mr. Post to be proactive in communication, professional with counsel and the Court and timely in working on the case with me. Mr. Post has great attention to detail and advocated effectively for his client."

View All Endorsements
Heidi Lukacsik headshot
Heidi Lukacsik

Divorce and separation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.7 (Good)

Education

N/A

New England School of Law

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution