$ 200-250 per hour
Daniel Robert Schramm
About Daniel
Biography
I operate a solo law practice in St. Louis (Chesterfield), Missouri. I concentrate my practice in appeals, estate planning and general business law. I also assist trial lawyers on a contract basis with legal research and trial briefs. I teach appellate advocacy as an adjunct faculty member for the moot court program at Saint Louis University School of Law. And I teach business law as part of the adjunct faculty at Maryville University. The most unique aspect of my practice is my commitment to preparing persuasive written briefs and oral arguments. Visit the Reported Cases section of my Company website () for a list of my successful appellate decisions. View my sample briefs and articles on JD Supra.
(Disclaimer: Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Each case is different and must be judged on its own merits. You are further advised that Missouri rules generally prohibit lawyers from advertising that they specialize in any particular area of the law. Nothing in this profile should be construed to suggest such specialization. The choise of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.)
Practice Areas
3
Practice Areas
Fees and Rates
Cost
Hourly Rates
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in Missouri for 47 years
State: Missouri
Acquired: 1978
No misconduct found
Location
Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C.
121 Chesterfield Business Parkway, Chesterfield, MO, 63005
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Daniel Robert Schramm's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
3 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (3)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Recommendation
Posted by Matthew | May 31, 2012 | Contracts & Agreements
Extremely capable and trustworthy
I have used Dan for every aspect of my business from my incorporation to lease negotiation, unemployment law, and employment contracts. I find myself using him as house council for any legal matter that may present itself, large or small. I have referred his services to colleagues and without excepti...
Daniel Robert Schramm's Lawyer Endorsements
"I endorse Daniel Schramm, as he is a persuasive communicator with abundant legal knowledge."
"I recently worked with Dan on a complicated appeal in a new area of the law for Dan. He quickly got up to speed and showed his expertise in masterfully drafting compelling legal arguments on appeal. I would use Dan for every must-win appeal."
"I endorse this lawyer. I have worked with Dan on many cases and have always been impressed by his legal knowledge and his knack for crafting a winning argument."
"Dan was instrumental in an appeal case I had a few years back. He saved me tons of time and potential embarrasement when it came to the nuances of appellate practice vs. circuit court. I would highly reccommend Dan."
"I endorse this lawyer. I have hired him before to write appeals in family law and he has been amazing. Of course, he has won every appeal I've hired him to write and argue, he is wonderful with the clients, charges a reasonable amount, files everything on time and keeps me in the loop. What could be better?! I highly recommend him to any attorney who needs help appealing a case. He's the best!! Marta Papa, divorce attorney, St. Louis, Mo. voted "best divorce lawyer " by peers for Missouri Lawyers Weekly."
"Dan is my "go to" appellate practice lawyer. We have worked on various appeals over the years, and he is simply excellent in his field."
"Dan is a first rate legal mind and is well versed on a number of legal matters, including business, appeals and estate planning. He and I worked at the same firm many years ago and subsequently we have worked on cases together from time to time. A few years back I asked Dan for representation and he is one of the only attorneys I would trust to do so."
"I have known Dan as a professional colleague for twelve years and he is one of the finest appellate and estate planning practitioners in Missouri."
"I endorse this lawyer. I needed Daniel Schramm to help one of my clients for Estate Planning work and he was there willing to help on a Friday afternoon after giving him only a minute’s notice. He is very intelligent, capable and one of the best Estate Planning lawyers I know."
Joan Coulter
Divorce and separation lawyer
Ronald Ribaudo
Appeals lawyer
Christopher Dysart
Litigation lawyer
James Schleiffarth
Estate planning lawyer
David Cox
Immigration lawyer
Thomas Weaver
Appeals lawyer
Thomas Appelbaum
Chapter 7 bankruptcy lawyer
Jay Galmiche
Family lawyer
Michael Gross
Appeals lawyer
Kevin Roach
Personal injury lawyer
Michael Weeks
Elder law lawyer
Norman Newmark
Estate planning lawyer
Marta Papa
Family lawyer
Vita Tocco
Divorce and separation lawyer
Joanna Owen
Administrative law lawyer
Pete Woods
Family lawyer
John Dennis
Divorce and separation lawyer
Amarilis Dennis
Divorce and separation lawyer
Experience
Honors
2021
AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2021
Client Champion Award - Gold, Martindale-Hubbell
2016
"Academic Excellence Award" for Moot Court, Saint Louis University School of Law
2013
"Academic Excellence Award" for Moot Court, Saint Louis University School of Law
2013
"Best Brief Coach" Award for Moot Court, University of Arkansas School of Law
Work Experience
2010 - Present
Manager, Daniel R. Schramm, L.L.C.
2010 - 2014
Adjunct Faculty Member, Maryville University
2007 - 2010
Of Counsel, Timothy E. Hayes & Assoc., LC
2001 - 2016
Adjunct Assistant Professor for Moot Court Program, Saint Louis University School Of Law
2000 - 2007
Adjunct Faculty Member, University of Missouri-St. Louis
Associations
2001 - Present
American Bar Association
1985 - Present
Metropolitan Bar Association of St. Louis
1978 - Present
Missouri State Bar Association
Legal
Sample of Legal Cases
Courtney v. Courtney, 550 S.W.3d 522 (Mo.Ct.App. 2017)
The judgment was reversed primarily because of inherently inconsistent findings, including a reversal on all seven points raised by the mother in her cross-appeal.
Scott Family Props. v. Mo. Hwys. & Transp. Comm'n, 2017 U.S.App. LEXIS 1693 (8th Cir. Jan. 31, 2017)
The Eighth Circuit vacated the judgment with instructions to remand the case the state court.
Hughes v. Hughes, 2016 Mo.App. LEXIS 1280 (Mo.Ct.App. Dec. 13, 2016)
The Court reversed the judgment on the modifiability of maintenance, but affirmed on the ultimate decision to deny modification.
Courtney v. Courtney, 458 S.W.3d 462 (Mo.Ct.App. 2015)
The Court affirmed the relocation and award of attorney's fees for contempt, but reversed on custody, maintenance and child support. The cross-appeal from the contempt judgment was dismissed as premature.
M.L.G. v. R.W., 406 S.W.3d 115 (Mo.Ct.App. 2013)
The Eastern District reversed the judgment for a full order of protection and remanded with instructions to vacate the order.
Spirco Environmental, Inc. v. American Intern. Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 555 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 2009)
The Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment granting insurance coverage.
Batka v. Batka, 171 S.W.3d 757 (Mo.Ct.App. 2005)
The Eastern District reversed the trial court's judgment and terminated maintenance.
Dep't of Soc. Servs., Div. of Medical Servs. v. Little Hills Healthcare, L.L.C., 236 S.W.3d 637 (Mo. 2007)
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled in favor of the hospital. The Court affirmed a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission awarding reimbursement to the hospital.
Blue Pool Farms, LLC v. Basler, 239 S.W.3d 687 (Mo.Ct.App. 2007)
The Eastern District reversed the trial court's judgment denying a private road by necessity and remanded for a new trial on that issue
Hill v. Hill, 53 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. 2001)
The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the judgment on maintenance. The Court created a new test for assessing when an IRA could be considered in a maintenance case.
Ullrich v. CADCO, Inc., 244 S.W.3d 772 (Mo.Ct.App. 2008)
The Eastern District reversed a judgment for the defendants under the Merchandising Practices Act, including the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for attorney's fees and consequential damages. The case was remanded for further proceedings.
Education
1978
American University, Washington College of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
1975
Colgate University
BA
Speaking Engagements
2019
BAMSL Solo and Small Firm Annual CLE
Missouri Appellate Practice Update
2017
2017 BAMSL CLE Potpourri
Missouri Appellate Practice Update: The Ivie Trap and Other New Challenges
2016
Limited Liability Companies
Why Limited Liability Companies and How to Comply with Missouri LLC Law
2013
23rd Annual Potpourri
Appellate Practice Update
2012
22nd Annual CLE Potpourri
Missouri Appellate Practice for the General Practitioner
Publications
2017
2016
LinkedIn Pulse
The Ivie Trap: Mixed Questions of Fact and Law
2016
JD Supra
Why Limited Liability Companies?
2016
2015
LinkedIn Pulse
A Word of Caution for Missouri Appellate Lawyers
2015
2015
2014
2014
2013
2013
JD Supra
Missouri Appellate Law - 2013 Update
2013
JD Supra
When to Seek a Writ of Prohibition
2012
2012
2012
JD Supra
Succession Business Planning
Activity
Legal Guides
Legal Guides
Legal Guide
Asset Protection Techniques for Individuals and Small Businesses
12 Oct 2018
Legal Guide
When to Seek a Writ of Prohibition
21 Sep 2013
Legal Guide
HIPAA and Patient Privacy in Missouri
22 Jan 2013