650 Ten Rod Road Suite 128BNorth Kingstown, RI, 02852United States (401) 379-9675
Joseph R. Daigle's response: 1. This client was aware before I was hired that the construction contractor could file for bankruptcy. When I confirmed for her that this was possible and that it was a risk for her claim, she waited more than six months before she finally decided to hire me.
2. Upon our filing the lawsuit, the contractor promptly filed for bankruptcy, stopping all litigation. I then filed a complaint in the Bankruptcy Court asserting that the contractor had committed fraud by misrepresenting his qualifications to build the deck. (Debts arising from fraudulent acts are harder to discharge in bankruptcy.)
A key to succeeding on this fraud claim was to have an expert witness who could testify that the deck was constructed in a manner that violated basic building code and construction standards. So, when the client found a qualified contractor to replace the deck with a new one, I was able to convince him to serve as our expert witnesses in the Bankruptcy Court.
When this second contractor started the work, the client raved that he was very professional, and the deck was “beautiful”. However, completion of the deck was apparently delayed because a special-order part was not delivered by a supplier for many months. This client then began accusing the new contractor of lying and she refused to pay him even though the deck was mostly complete. By the time I learned how she had been treating him, it was too late - she ruined the relationship with our key expert witness! I then suggested that the building inspector might be brought in to testify as an expert witness (a long shot). This was not the original plan, like she is claiming, and I only suggested it because I no longer had an expert who could testify about the conditions of the original decking.
3. The client claims that I had a chance to settle, but did not. I informed her by email on March 6, 2017 that the contractor’s bankruptcy attorney might offer a thousand dollars if we dropped our bankruptcy complaint. The client’s response was that she wanted to be “made whole”, i.e., all the money she had paid him, all the extra money she paid her new contractor, plus her attorney’s fees: $40,000+ - she was unwilling to negotiate for less, and the Bankruptcy Court eventually discharged the debt.
4. Most of my fee in this case was contingent – in other words, I was to receive most of my pay out of the money recovered from the contractor. I did not earn a profit on this case. For the $2,000 the client paid me: I examined the deck at the client’s home on two occasions, worked with the client’s new contractor regarding his expert witness testimony, drafted pleadings and filed a lawsuit in Superior Court (filing fees and constable - $231), drafted written discovery requests, filed a second complaint in Bankruptcy Court, corresponded with the Defendant and then his attorney on multiple occasions, attended a hearing at bankruptcy court, consulted with two separate bankruptcy attorneys regarding strategy, and wrote numerous emails to the client explaining the law and how the case was proceeding.
$2000 doesn’t begin to cover the amount of time and expense I put in to this case.
Joseph R. Daigle
Open for BusinessVirtual Consultation
Avvo Rating8.9
- North Kingstown, RI
- Licensed for 28 years
About Joseph
Photos and videos
Contact
Resume
License
| State | Status | Acquired | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| RI | Authorized to practice law | 1995 | 06/08/2022 |
| MA | Active | 1993 | 05/30/2022 |
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
Avvo Contributions
| Legal answers | 0 |
| Legal guides | 0 |
High level of experience and expertise combined with high level of professionalism
5.0 stars
Posted by Deborah
April 8, 2018
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyProfessional, Responsive and Competent
5.0 stars
Posted by anonymous
April 4, 2018
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyOutside Sales
5.0 stars
Posted by Stuart
April 3, 2018
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyExcellent Experience!
5.0 stars
Posted by Lisa
April 3, 2018
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyGreat
5.0 stars
Posted by Jessie
February 7, 2017
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyWorst Mistake Office in Providence Now
1.0 star
Posted by Sandy
December 30, 2017
This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
Hired attorneyAttorney endorsements
(4)David Stillman, Personal injury Attorney on Jun 2, 2022
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
I first met Joe when we were on opposite sides of a personal injury case. If I have a personal injury case that I can't handle, Joe is the first person I would refer it to because he is smart, ethical and gets great results. I would recommend him without reservation.
Geoffrey Schoos, Litigation Attorney on Mar 24, 2022
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
I endorse this lawyer. I’ve know and worked with Joe for nearly 15 years. Through all that time he has been and remains one of the most diligent and zealous attorneys in service to his clients. I have referred clients to him and all were pleased by his representation. I highly recommend and endorse Joe Daigle to all in need of representation!
