Frank E. Mann III

Frank E. Mann III

4.0
Rating: 8.3

Licensed for 41 years

Litigation Lawyer Practice Areas: Litigation

About Frank

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 41 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1984

Eligible to Practice in Texas

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2015

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Frank E. Mann III's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

103 Client Reviews

Showing 11 - 12 of 12 reviews | Punctuality

Posted by Brian | September 09, 2012 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Extremely disappointed Mann's firm’s inability to meet minimal expectations

Simple task such as returning a phone call, answering basic questions via email, supplying correct court appearance times and dates, omitting necessary documentation for the clients discovery process, a proper introduction to the associate attorney that would be representing, more than 1 line sentenc...es from a blackberry to address our sincere concerns, a timely reply to our emails if any at all, respecting the time of the client and the court by at least appearing on time to a hearing, an invoice or description of services rendered, became non-existent. Please know that we did take the requested routes of contact per your policy, but after a week of unanswered emails and a rapidly approaching uncertain court date, we needed answers quickly. Mr. Mann, we trusted you and your team to handle this crisis. You assured us, you were confident in handling our case and we trusted you. This may be true for you, but clearly not of your staff, with the exception of Nicole. After your assurance, we didn’t hear from you again. I personally believe that you are a competent attorney and confident that YOU could’ve easily handled this case, however, with the exception of 1 individual in your employ, your staff and associate attorney are beyond unprofessional. There were only 2 occurrences where work was actually being performed on our case to our knowledge, once when you verbally berated your staff during the first 2 weeks of acquiring your services, due to them not properly delivering my documentation to you and the last 4 days prior to going to our embarrassing hearing as my wife was in correspondence with Nicole. I would like to believe I am a fair and just man, with ethics and values, but at no time, should a client ever be treated in the manner that my wife and I have had to suffer under your firm’s inability to meet minimal expectations. Understandably, you may be in question of my explanations of the prior events that have transpired and may even believe that I am attempting to embellish my statements. For this reason and for your records, I am requesting a statement from the presiding HON. BRENDA MULLINIX and Attorney W. Tyler Moore Jr., both of which aided me on the day of my hearing when your associate attorney could and would not; also a brief statement from a third party, non-biased attorney regarding the level of professionalism and handling of a similar situation. Again, I’d like to reiterate, that I do believe you are a good attorney, but I want to make sure you are fully aware of the inner workings and breakdowns within your firm, not only from my point of view, but from the views of your peers. I am requesting at this time, as you are also a man of ethics and values, that you find just cause to refund me a significant portion of the total monies that I have paid until this point, $1,950.

Posted by AMANDA GUERRERO | September 27, 2011 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Unproffesional and Unreliable Attorney

He failed on so many levels as an attorney. He failed to keep many court hearings-delaying my case longer than it shouldve, failed to communicate & failed to keep my trust as his client. When he actually did communicate w/ me, he was extremely rude & impatient! I really should've done more homework o...n this guy before hiring him & believing his phony website! I wouldve found out that just as fast as he takes on a case, he "legally withdraws" from them- and thats a public fact! During my time as his client he withdrew from 6 out of 9 cases! Not a very good background to have as an attorney.

See All Client Reviews

Frank E. Mann III's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Frank
Kunal Mukesh Patel headshot
Kunal Patel

Family lawyer | Oct 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Frank is a hard-worker and zealous advocate. He would be the kind of divorce lawyer you'd want on your side."

Jessica Marie Cartwright headshot
Jessica Cartwright

Family lawyer | Aug 05

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer. I have worked with him on several family law cases and am impressed with his depth of knowledge in family law and his skilled and zealous advocacy for his clients."

Jane Navid Joseph headshot
Jane Joseph

Family lawyer | May 30

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Frank Mann and I have worked together many times. He is responsible and efficient and a pleasure to know and to work with"

Finis E. Cowan III headshot
Finis Cowan

Family lawyer | May 23

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this Frank Mann. He has a special way with people that makes him stand out among family law specialists."

Benjamin Kirke Sanchez headshot
Benjamin Sanchez

Family lawyer | May 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Frank is a well-known family attorney, experienced in all family litigation matters such as separation, divorce, custody, and child support. Frank knows the ins-and-outs of the local family courts and preferences of the judges. I endorse Frank for his expertise in family law."

Scott Kevin Boates headshot
Scott Boates

Family lawyer | May 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. We've worked together on several cases. I'm always impressed with his thoughtful and careful preparation. His years of experience and knowledge of the local Family Law community are invaluable. I've even requested Frank's counsel on my personal Family Law issues. I'm glad to endorse Frank Mann as a thoughtful and conscientious member of the Family Law bar."

Matthew Stephen Muller headshot
Matthew Muller

Family lawyer | May 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Frank and I have worked together on matters at Court. I admire his strength, good judgment and persistence in pursuing client litigation goals. He is a friend, and I endorse him both personally and professionally."

Fran Brochstein headshot
Fran Brochstein

Divorce and separation lawyer | Dec 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I recently did a divorce mediation for Mr. Mann. He came well prepared and was a strong advocate for his client. It was a difficult mediation and we resolved it due in large part to the hard work and advocacy skills of both attorneys."

View All Endorsements
Leslie A. Garcia headshot
Leslie Garcia

Divorce and separation lawyer

Brian Lee Plotts headshot
Brian Plotts

Immigration lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.3 (Excellent)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2015.

Public Reprimand issued in TX, 2015

updated on 05/16/2016

Public reprimand means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The State gives the lawyer a public reprimand in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.

Frank’s comment:

“This public reprimand involved an issue with Mr. Mann's paralegal. Mr. Mann instructed his paralegal to file a Motion to Mediate for a client, but she did not timely comply with Mr. Mann's instructions which caused an unnecessary delay for the client. Mr. Mann took prompt action against the paralegal by a reprimand and dismissal from employment. Mr. Mann accepted a public reprimand in this situation because he took responsibility for his paralegal's failure to act.”

Fully Probated Suspension issued in TX, 1990

updated on 01/23/2019

Fully probated suspension means an attorney is technically suspended but may still practice law. The State monitors the lawyer's activities during the suspension to make sure that he or she does not repeat the behavior.

Honors

1983

Finalist in Fisher Gallagher Mock Trial Competition, South Texas College of Law

1982

Meritorious Service to the Law School and Legal Profession, South Texas College of Law

Work Experience

1982 - 1983

Law Clerk, Vinson & Elkins

Associations

2000 - Present

State Bar College

Member

2000 - Present

Texas Trial Lawyers Association

Member

1995 - Present

Houston Bar Association

Member

1984 - Present

State Bar of Texas

Member

1984 - Present

Texas State Bar Association- Familly Law Section

Member

1984 - Present

South Texas College of Law Alumni Association

Member

1995 - 2016

Houston Bar Association- Family Law Section

Member

1983 - 1984

South Texas College Of Law Board of Advocates

Director

Sample of Legal Cases

In the Interest of Jordan Bleimeyer

Father's rights terminated

In the Interest of Tevor and Tyler Araguz

Successful

See More Legal Cases

Education

1983

South Texas College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1980

Texas A&M University

B.B.A

1980

University of London

none

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2015
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution