Free Consultation
$0 first 60 minutes
Edward Calvelo Pamintuan
also known as Edward Pamintuan, Ed Pamintuan
About Edward
Biography
As an attorney of 17 years, I love to serve my clients with the responsiveness, trustworthiness, and attention to detail that all people deserve from a professional they hire. My drive towards expertise, negotiation skills, and desire to make sure you are well-informed every step of the way are the hallmarks of my service. I specialize litigation and personal injury cases and will fight to get you the compensation of peace of mind that you deserve.
Practice Areas
1
Practice Area
Personal Injury
100%
16 years | 200 cases
Fees and Rates
Cost
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in California for 18 years
State: California
Acquired: 2007
No misconduct found
Licensed in District of Columbia for 17 years
State: District of Columbia
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
Licensed in Florida for 18 years
State: Florida
Acquired: 2007
No misconduct found
Location
No contact information is available for this lawyer
Gallery
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Edward Calvelo Pamintuan's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
30 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (30)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Showing 11 - 15 of 21 reviews | Case Results
Posted by Lorenzo | March 19, 2015 | Debt Settlement
Motion for reconsideration to reduce restitution monthly payment .
Atty Ed Pamintuan performed an excellent job in resolving my case in court to reduce monthly payment.I highly recommend him as a very good criminal defense lawyer.
Edward Pamintuan
Replied last March 19, 2015Lorenzo was ordered by the court to pay criminal restitution to a victim during the course of his 3 year probation for a misdemeanor crime to which he admitted guilt. He was informed by the court to report to court collections so that his ability to pay could be assessed in order for court collections to calculate a monthly restitution payment. Court collections assessed his ability to pay but ignored certain monthly expense obligations which resulted in a monthly restitution payment that was beyond his ability to pay. The assessment was unfair and unreasonable and would eventually require Lorenzo to borrow money to pay the monthly payment or else suffer a violation of his probation and of the order to pay the restitution. I was able to convince the court to order court collections to reassess Lorenzo's ability to pay taking into account the monthly expense obligations that they had previously ignored. Court collections reassessed the client's ability to pay and lowered the amount of monthly restitution by $300 for the entire course of his 3 year probation (5 years if his probation is later extended) allowing him to pay back the restitution at a monthly rate that is within his means.
Posted by Edward | January 23, 2015 | Insurance
Best Attorney Ever
This Man is a godsend. He will do everything in his ability to help you and is very easy to contact for information. He will walk you through the processes and will help you get the best possible outcome. I have complete faith in Mr. Pamintuan's abilities and i couldn't be happier with my outcome. ...
Edward Pamintuan
Replied last January 23, 2015From the outset of Edward's case his insurance company had provided him poor service; shortchanging him on his property damage claim. I was intent on making sure that his insurance company made good on their promise to insure that he be made whole with regards to his bodily injury claim. Edward was badly injured by a driver who did not have any auto insurance. It was a good thing that Edward had excellent Uninsured Motorist Coverage through his own insurance company. Initially, Edward's insurance company tried to deny his Uninsured Motorist demand, claiming that because there was no actual physical contact between Edward's vehicle and the at-fault driver's vehicle that Uninsured Motorist Coverage was not triggered. However, the insurance company quickly changed it's position when it's lawyers reviewed a memorandum I sent summarizing case law, statutory law and the insurance companies own policy manual regarding Uninsured Motorist Coverage. In my letter I put the insurance company on notice that Edward had a valid Uninsured Motorist Claim and that if they not agree we would demand binding arbitration to ensure that Edward received fair and just compensation for his injuries and pain and suffering. The insurance company agreed that actual physical contact is not required to trigger Uninsured Motorist Coverage when the identity of the uninsured at-fault driver is known. I was able to negotiate a settlement with the insurance company which paid all of Edward's medical bills and justly compensated him for his pain and suffering. The most important thing is that Edward is on his way to fully recovering and can now put this horrible accident behind him.
Posted by Dan Nguyen | December 07, 2014 | Criminal Defense
This is no fake review people. Truly the best hard working guy I know for the job
My name is dan Nguyen and I'm from prembroke pines florida. Mr. Pamintuan help me out with my case a few years back when I was charged with carrying a concealed weapon and possession of marijuana. I met Mr. Pamintuan the first day I had to go to court and he was the most helpful, kind hearted, and tr...
Edward Pamintuan
Replied last December 07, 2014The police officer who arrested Dan violated his constitutional rights. With out probable cause, the officer stopped the vehicle Dan was driving while he was leaving a gas station parking lot and ordered Dan to exit the vehicle. Although one of Dan's passengers had littered from inside of the car the police officer did not have the authority to stop Dan and order him to step out of the car. Dan, who was scared and under the impression that he could not resist the commands of officer because of the officers illegal show of authority, gave the police officer consent to search the vehicle he was driving. The police officer found contraband in the vehicle (which did not belong to Dan) and arrested Dan. I filed a motion to suppress evidence and argued that the police officer violated Dan's constitutional rights when he commanded Dan to stop the car and exit the vehicle without having seen Dan's commit any violation of the law. The court agreed with my arguments and the prosecution was forced to dismiss Dan's case. Some people might say that Dan's case was dismissed because of a legal "technicality" however I would argue that Dan's case is a sad story of profiling by a police officer who abused his power that happened to have a happy ending. Most police officers are good people who do a good job protecting us but there are a few bad apples who give good cops a bad name. I'm glad that I made sure that Dan did not become a victim of this bad cop.
Posted by Ferdinand | December 07, 2014 | Domestic Violence
Highly recommended!
My name is Ferdinand D. I went to Mr. Pamintuan to seek help for my sister who was placed on custody for a domestic dispute with her husband. Mr. Pamintuan was very professional throughout the whole process. He was not only straight- forward and honest but also very reassuring of the possible outcome...
Edward Pamintuan
Replied last December 07, 2014This gentleman's sister was arrested for alleged felony domestic violence. Ferdinand contacted me the day after his sister was arrested and informed me that his sister was innocent of the charges. It was a good thing that he contacted me so quickly after the arrest because charges had not yet been filed against his sister, which gave us a chance to convince the District Attorney to "no action" her case before charges are formally filed. It is often times less difficult to convince the D.A. to "no action" a case before charges are filed than to obtain a "dismissal" after charges are filed. The alleged victim signed a declaration that explained the incident and informed the D.A. that he did not want charges to be filed and that if charges were filed he would not testify against his wife. Hours after I provided the declaration to the D.A. Family Protection Unit and the Police Department Family Protection Unit the case was rejected by the D.A.'s office and Ferdinand's sister was released from jail without bail. She is now back to her everyday life and avoided any adverse consequences with regard to her immigration status in the United States.
Posted by lakesha09 | February 21, 2014 | Criminal Defense
Charles bush
I recommend Mr. pamintuan he is a very good lawyer , I thank God for.meeting him I was on House arrest for two year for a crime I didn't commit I went to trail and won he's not just a Lawyer he really cares I feel like he's a part of my family I will never forget Edward my freedom was on the line I...
Edward Pamintuan
Replied last February 21, 2014Mr. Bush was charged with Armed Robbery, a life felony, and was looking at a minimum 10 years in prison if convicted because he was alleged to have produced a firearm in the commission of the alleged robbery. It was alleged that Mr. Bush robbed Mr. Ross at gun point after a card game. The prosecution and police were hot to convict Mr. Bush because months prior they were forced to hold off filing charges against him in a murder case where it was proven that he defended himself against an attacker who pulled a gun on him. This case came down to discrediting the police investigation, impeachment and more impeachment, excellent testimony from Mr. Bush and a closing argument that tied everything together. The two main witnesses in the case were one Johnny Ross, the alleged victim, and one James Pinckney, Mr. Bush's "father-in-law" so to speak. The police investigation consisted of pointing the finger at Mr. Bush and not considering any other possibilities. The police conducted a 3 hour long interrogation of Mr. Bush during which the police brought up the prior murder case (which we had redacted so the jury would not be influenced by it) and continuously attempted to coerce Mr. Bush into admitting to participation in the robbery by trying to deprive him of sleep and food, redirection, aggressive questioning, putting words in his mouth and flat out lying to him. My trial partner cross-examined both Mr. Ross and Mr. Pinkney. During cross-examination of Mr. Ross it was shown to the jury that Mr. Ross had drugs on him at the time of the incident, invited an acquaintance to the card game to "use" the cocaine and that he was bragging about having $20,000 on his person. In other words, the jury could infer that he was a drug dealer (rumor has it he was recently shot and killed). From the cross-examination of Mr. Pinkney the jury could easily infer that he set up the card game and that he was running a gambling house, that he was afraid of Johnny Ross and that he waited 30 minutes to call the police, after Mr. Bush had left. I pointed out that he likely attempted to tamper with the jury by making secret hand signals to the jury during a break (resulting in a jury member being dismissed). It was proven on cross-examination that he probably lied about not being in the room during the card game and the drug use (he stated it was Superbowl Sunday and he was in another room watching the game, it was not Superbowl Sunday a fact well known to the football loving jury). Both Mr. Ross and Mr. Pinkney admitted that there was another person watching the card game, a man named "Red" who no one knew well but they believed Mr. Bush had invited. I questioned Mr. Bush on direct examination and he testified well because what he was saying was the truth. In essence, he told the jury he had no reason to rob Mr. Ross because he owned a thriving landscaping business his father left to him, that Johnny Ross was acting like a big shot, that "Red" over heard Mr. Ross' big talk and that it was "Red" who robbed Mr. Ross. Mr. Bush also informed the jury that although he had a firearm on him at the time, the firearm was licensed, he was given a concealed weapons permit, and he did not attempt to get rid of the gun because he had done nothing wrong. It was also pointed out that Mr. Bush's gun was black when one of the other witnesses testified the gun was silver. Mr. Bush stated he watched the entire robbery occur outside of the house, while he and Mr. Pinkney watched from inside the house and that Mr. Pickney did not attempt to come to the aid of Johnny Ross, his friend. Lastly, Mr. Bush's testimony established that Mr. Ross and Mr. Pickney believed he knew "Red" and that Mr. Bush set up the robbery. The jury could infer that Mr. Ross believed Mr. Bush was involved in the robbery and had employed Mr. Pinkney to lie about Mr. Bush's involvement. I gave the closing argument, tying together all the evidence. The jury came back not guilty.
Edward Calvelo Pamintuan's Lawyer Endorsements
"I worked with Mr. Pamintuan as a trial partner in a felony trial unit/ I was able to watch my trial partner pull many "rabbits out of the hat". with incredible trial skills and outstanding work ethic, I highly endorse this lawyer. If I ever have a client who needs help in California, he's my first call."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"Edward is very knowledgeable in criminal defense in personal injury. I endorse and highly recommend Edward."
"I endorse this lawyer. An extremely talented and well respected attorney in the legal community."
"I endorse this lawyer. An extremely talented and well respected attorney in the legal community."
"It is obvious from client reviews and recognition by fellow lawyers that Attorney Pamintuan is top-notch. I endorse this lawyer."
"This attorney works very hard for the client and keeps up with the law by attending legal seminars to assist them in this regard. I endorse this attorney."
"I had the pleasure of working with Edward for the past five years at the Broward County Public Defenders office. I am impressed by his ability to prepare and think through serious litigation manners. His hard work and dedication is an asset for those he represents. What is amazing is ability to be ready and prepared for trial and the attention and care he gives his clients. At one point i remember him winning ten trials in a row. I highly recommend him ."
"I endorse this lawyer. Highly regarded in the legal community."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I endorse this lawyer for your Bankruptcy Dept needs."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"Your resume speaks for itself and I consider you a valuable member of the attorney community. I would recommend you to anyone and everyone who needs your services. I whole heartedly endorse this lawyer!"
"I endorse this lawyer. He is a very good attorney and works extremely hard for his clients."
"Edward is an extremely talented attorney. I have worked with him on several cases and he is wholeheartedly dedicated to his clients and getting them best result possible, whether it's negotiating a great deal or taking a difficult case to trial Edward never backs down. I recommend him to anyone needing a criminal defense attorney."
"I endorse this lawyer. Ed is a diligent, zealous advocate."
"I worked with Ed at the public defender's office for almost four years. I know him to be a great strategist when he works his cases up for trial, and has great command in a courtroom. He is the only lawyer that I know, or even heard of, to have won 10 jury trials in row - an unsurpassable feat only a select few lawyers can say they have accomplished."
"I have tried several cases against Ed while I was a prosecutor, and he was my opposing Public Defender. Ed is able to draw upon a deep knowledge of the law to build strong defenses for each of his clients. We were all sad to see Florida lose such a hard working and compassionate attorney."
Michael Ryan
Criminal defense lawyer
Aryan Aliakbarzadeh
Car accident lawyer
James Bishop
Criminal defense lawyer
Adrian Terrado
Personal injury lawyer
David Stallone
Business lawyer
Marcus Musante
Criminal defense lawyer
Logan Quirk
Personal injury lawyer
Nathaniel Wojan
Criminal defense lawyer
Rosalio Castro
Criminal defense lawyer
Alicia James
Tax lawyer
Chirnese Liverpool
Chapter 7 bankruptcy lawyer
Luis Macias
Criminal defense lawyer
Howard Roitman
Personal injury lawyer
Matisyahu Wolfberg
Criminal defense lawyer
Richard Dwyer
Litigation lawyer
Fabian Powell
Personal injury lawyer
J Smith
Chapter 7 bankruptcy lawyer
Daniel Fisher
Immigration lawyer
Peter Singer
Real estate lawyer
Richard Ostrow
Litigation lawyer
Experience
Honors
2015
Clients' Choice, Avvo
2015
Excellent Rating, Avvo
2014
Clients' Choice, Avvo
2014
Excellent Rating, Avvo
2013
Excellent Rating, Avvo
2013
Clients' Choice, Avvo
2006
Cum Laude, Thomas Jefferson School of Law Student Bar Association
2004
Fellowship with the Center of Law and Technology, Thomas Jefferson School of Law Student Bar Association
Work Experience
2013 - Present
Managing Partner, The Law Office of Edward Pamintuan
2008 - Present
Assistant Public Defender, Broward County Public Defender's Office
2006 - 2006
Of Counsel, The American Legal Center
2006 - 2006
Law Clerk, The Law Office Ellis Rubin and Robert Barrar
2006 - 2006
Legal Intern, Casa Cornelia Law Center
2005 - 2005
Legal Intern, San Diego County Office Of The Public Defender
Associations
2014 - Present
Cavite Association of Southern CaliforniaPresident
2014 - Present
Mater Dei Catholic ChurchParishoner
2013 - Present
United States District Court for the Southern District of CaliforniaAttorney Member
2013 - Present
Consumer Attorneys of San DiegoAttorney Member
2013 - Present
United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaAttorney Member
2007 - Present
Freemasonry - Southwest Lodge 283Master Mason
Sample of Legal Cases
People v. R.T.
No action before charges filed
People v. J.T. (Domestic Violence)
No action before charges filed
People v. C.C. (DUI)
Favorable plea bargain for the client
People v. A.G. (Domestic Violence)
Dismissed Counts 2 and 3. Misdemeanor charge on Count 1 with 3 years informal probation.
People v. S.A. (Domestic Violence)
No Action before charges filed
People v. J.S. (Felony)
Dismissed Counts 2 and 3. Misdemeanor charge on Count 1 with 3 years informal probation.
State of Florida v. E.B. (Adult Felony)
Charge Dismissed after Stand Your Ground Hearing
State of Florida v. J.T. (Adult Felony)
Not Guilty after Jury Trial
State of Florida v. I.A. (Adult Felony)
Not Guilty (Felony Aggravated Assault with Deadly Weapon), Guilty (Misdemeanor Battery, Time Served)
State of Florida v. R.A.M. (Adult Felony)
Not Guilty after Jury Trial
State of Florida v. A.F. (Adult Felony)
Not Guilty after Jury Trial
State of Florida v. V.H. (Adult Felony)
Not Guilty (Burglary of a Dwelling), Guilty (Misdemeanor Battery and Petit Theft, Time Served)
State of Florida v. M.D. (Adult Felony)
Not Guilty after Jury Trial
In the Matter of E.F. (Chapter 7 Bankruptcy)
Full discharged, no assets used to pay creditors
Education
2006
Thomas Jefferson School of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
2003
University of California - Irvine
BA - Bachelor of Arts
Speaking Engagements
2015
Showbiz Watcher
Criminal Defense and Personal Injury
2013
National Criminal Procedure Tournament
Moot Court Judge
2013
DZXL Radyo Mo Nationwide 558
Special Guest - U.S. Perspective on Philippine Legal Issues
Publications
2013
The Law Office of Edward Pamintuan Website
The Law Office of Edward Pamintuan Website
Languages
English
Tagalog
Activity
Legal Answers
Legal Guides
Legal Answers
Q&A
I was hit by a drunk driver while riding my motorcycle last year in May. The man who hit me has the lowest insurance policy.
17 Mar 2015
Q&A
Auto accident in CA. If driver is a prop 213 driver. Will injured passenger (live in girlfriend) also be considered prop 213?
16 Mar 2015
Q&A
Two years ago i was assaulted while inside my friends apartment and as result i had my jaw broken in two places.
16 Mar 2015
Legal Guides
Legal Guide
The Statute of Limitations Applied to Mortgages
12 Sep 2013
Legal Guide
Refinanced Mortgages: Recourse or Non-recourse
12 Sep 2013
Legal Guide
California Criminal Defense Bail Reductions
23 Aug 2013