Skip to main content

Michael P Matesky II

also known as Mike Matesky
  Save
Avvo Rating10
  • Seattle, WA
  • Licensed for 15 years
Michael P Matesky II
Michael P Matesky II
AboutContactReviewsCost

About Michael

Mike Matesky provides business, intellectual property, technology, arts & entertainment counsel.

Mike Matesky is the founder of Matesky Law, a Seattle-based law firm providing business, intellectual property, technology, arts and entertainment advice and representation to clients of all sizes.

Mike's interest in arts, entertainment, and intellectual property law began as a musician growing up in a family of musicians.  As an attorney, Mike has represented a wide range of clients, from Fortune 100 technology titans to solo artists, developers, and inventors working out of garages and coffee shops.  

After practicing for years at an international "BigLaw" firm and regional intellectual property boutiques, Mike founded Matesky Law to more easily provide high-quality advice and representation on flexible terms that meet the needs of all clients.

Read More

Practice areas

OtherCopyright infringementContracts and agreementsIntellectual propertyLitigation
  1. Litigation: 20%

    16 years

  2. Intellectual property: 15%

    16 years

  3. Contracts and agreements: 15%

    8 years

  4. Copyright infringement: 15%

    16 years

  1. Trademark infringement: 15%

    16 years

  2. Entertainment: 10%

    16 years

  3. Internet: 10%

    16 years

Languages spoken

English

Contact

Matesky Law PLLC

4500 9th Ave. NE
Suite 300
Seattle, WA, 98105

Website
http://www.mateskylaw.com 

      Resume

      License
      StateStatusAcquiredUpdated
      WAActive200707/08/2021
      MNResigned200507/14/2021
      We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
      Avvo Contributions
      Legal answers182
      Legal guides0
      Awards
      Award nameGrantorDate granted
      Pro Bono Services RecognitionKing County Bar Association, Pro Bono Services2011
      First Place - 2005 Comments ContestSanta Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal2005
      First Place - 2005 Notes DriveVirginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal2005
      First Place - Nathan Burkan Memorial CompetitionASCAP2004
      Work Experience
      TitleCompany nameDuration
      AssociateChristensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness, PLLC2010 - 2013
      AssociateKlarquist Sparkman, LLP2007 - 2010
      AssociateDorsey & Whitney, LLP2005 - 2007
      Associations
      Association namePosition nameDuration
      National Academy of Recording Arts & SciencesAssociate Member2013 - Present
      Seattle Intellectual Property American Inn of CourtBarrister2012 - Present
      Washington State Bar AssociationMember2007 - Present
      King County Bar AssociationMember2007 - Present
      American Bar AssociationMember2005 - Present
      Publications
      Publication nameTitleDate
      Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law JournalWhose Song is it Anyway? When are Sound Recordings Used in Audiovisual Works Subject to Termination Rights and When are They Works Made for Hire?2005
      Chicago-Kent Law ReviewThe Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Non-Infringing Use: Can Mandatory Labeling of Digital Media Products Keep the Sky from Falling?2005
      Education
      School nameDegreeGraduated
      Chicago-Kent College of Law Illinois Institute of TechnologyJD - Juris Doctor2005
      University of WashingtonBA - Bachelor of Arts2001
      University of WashingtonBA - Bachelor of Arts2001
      Speaking Engagements
      Conference nameTitleDate
      Seattle University -- Law Firm Business PlanningSolo Practitioner's Panel2017
      Work-Made-For-Hire Agreements: What They Are, When You Need Them, and WhyWork-Made-For-Hire Agreements: What They Are, When You Need Them, and Why2017
      Seattle Intellectual Property American Inn of CourtOracle v. Google: Fair Use on Trial2017
      Seattle University -- Law Firm Business PlanningSolo Practitioner's Panel2014
      King County Bar Association Intellectual Property Section MeetingBitTorrent Litigation: Extortionist Trolls or Legitimate Pirate Hunters?2014
      Audio Engineering Society, Pacific Northwest Section MeetingTermination Rights: How Artists May be Able to Undo Old Deals and Reclaim Copyrights2012
      Northwest Entrepreneur Network PresentationFive Intellectual Property Pitfalls for Startups, and How to Avoid Them2012
      Northwest Entrepreneur Network WorkshopProtecting Your Intellectual Property2012
      COJK Breakfast BriefingTrademark Enforcement2012
      COJK Breakfast BriefingTrademark Basics2011
      Northwest Entrepreneur Network WorkshopProtecting Your Intellectual Property2011
      COJK Case Law ReviewUniloc v. Microsoft: The Federal Circuit Rejects the 25% Rule for Reasonable Royalty Damages2011
      COJK CLE PresentationThe Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy: A Useful Tool for Battling Online Trademark Infringement2010
      King County Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section MeetingAttorney-Client Privilege: Tips for Prosecutors and Litigators2009
      Audio Engineering Society, Pacific Northwest Chapter MeetingCopyright Law and Music/Recording Issues: The Rules, The Exceptions, and Practical Advice2008
      Legal cases
      Case nameOutcome
      Iunu, LLC v. Iunu Lights, Inc., NO. 15-2-07474-1 SEA (Wash. Super. Ct.)Successfully consolidated California and Washington cases in King County Superior Court; Obtained remand and attorney fee award after improper removal to federal court; Settlement reached after commencement of discovery
      Elf-Man, LLC v. John Does 1-152Motion to dismiss granted; Case dismissed without judgment of liability for all clients
      Elf-Man, LLC v. John Does 1-29Dismissal with prejudice for all clients
      The Thompsons Film, LLC v.Motion to dismiss granted; Case dismissed without judgment of liability and/or settlement reached for all clients
      Preferred Nutrition Inc., et. al. v. Lorna Vanderhaeghe, et. al.Obtained favorable settlement for plaintiffs after some discovery and motion practice.
      CollegeNET, Inc. v. Collegenetportal.comObtained favorable settlement under which the domain name was transferred to plaintiff before discovery or motions.
      CollegeNET, Inc. v. The College Network, Inc.Obtained favorable settlement after extensive discovery.
      Anascape, Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp., et. al.Obtained favorable settlement shortly before trial, after partial stay and partial summary judgment of noninfringement and no willful infringement.
      Kirlin Charitable Foundation v Direct Privacy LTD Direct Privacy ID 39C08Obtained decision ordering transfer of infringing domain name to Complainant
      Symetra Life Ins. Co. v. McintoshObtained decision ordering transfer of infringing domain name to Complainant
      CollegeNET, Inc. v. ZerboObtained decision ordering transfer of infringing domain name to Complainant

      Reviews

      (9)
      5 Star
      		100%
      4 Star
      		0%
      3 Star
      		0%
      2 Star
      		0%
      1 Star
      		0%
      Review Michael Matesky

      Professional, Attentive and Concise

      Posted by

      Highly recommended, resolved issues quickly and professionally. No complaints, would refer and be first on a list to use in the future.

      Strategic Thinker

      Posted by

      I agree with all the other reviews describing Mike as a thorough, reliable, knowledgeable and highly responsive professional. In addition, I would like to add that Mike was able to clearly describe and play out all the strategic paths and options so I could make informed decisions based on my priorities and risk tolerance. In the end, Mike got me an outcome that satisfied all my needs and, best of all, at a cost much lower than I had anticipated.

      Artist

      Posted by

      Mike helped us navigate a copyright violation issue to a satisfactory solution. We appreciate his skill, and efficiency.
      This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
      Hired attorney

      Trademark filing capably handled

      Posted by

      Mike provided clear guidance and even-handed explanations as I navigated my first trademark filing. He listened well and took the time to understood the purpose of the service being trademarked, which I feel was reflected in the coverages we were ultimately received when the trademark was awarded. During the process, an inspector at the USPTO raised a minor issue. Mike understood the "why" of the concern, and handled it quickly. I would absolutely recommend Mike to others, and have continued to use him myself for other IP and contract-related needs.
      This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
      Hired attorney

      Nick

      Posted by

      Mike helped me with a copyright case, and I can't say enough about him. He was a great communicator, and very transparent about work hours and cost. I never felt in the dark as to what he was working on, and what the next steps were. He ultimately helped me settle my case in my favor, and I will hire him again.
      This review is from a person who hired this attorney.
      Hired attorney

      Definitely recommend Mike

      Posted by

      Mike was able to answer our many questions we had involving our copy right infringement case, kept us informed every step of the way, and responded within very short order anytime we had an inquiry or additional question on anything. He was very considerate as to how we wanted to communicate whether by phone or electronic communications and was flexible on arranging phone conversations that fit our crazy work schedules. Great experience with client/attorney relationship. We would not hesitate to recommend Mike.

      Professional, Responsive, Friendly - Highly Recommended

      Posted by

      Mike was a big help to me when I had a claim against me. He replied to every email and phone call in a prompt manner, even when he was out of town. He was very clear in his responses, but also had no problems explaining things if need be. I was very well informed in each new development of the case, which was great. I would definitely recommend Mike to someone who is need of a fair, friendly, professional and overall great lawyer.

      Highly recommended

      Posted by

      A top shelf attorney, Mike was very helpful and went the extra mile to make sure our case was handled in a upstanding way. Mike met all our expectations and then some! We plan to use Mike's services for future projects!

      Expert Trademark Filing Services

      Posted by

      Michael not only prepared and filed our federal trademark application but advised us on decisions leading up to the filing and provided great assistance in communications which were instrumental in securing our trademark. I found him to be very knowledgeable, dependable, trustworthy and responsive. In addition to these professional traits he is friendly and easy to communicate with. I would definitely hire Mr. Matesky for legal services again if the need arose.

      Attorney endorsements

      (10)
      Are you an attorney? Endorse this lawyer

      Greg McLawsen, Intellectual property Attorney on Mar 28, 2014
      Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

      I routinely refer other attorneys to Mike when they have intellectual property issues. In my own practice I've turned also to Mike for advice about how to protect intellectual property. Mike's easy to work with and trustworthy - recommended!

      Preston Cheung, Litigation Attorney on Dec 8, 2016
      Relationship: Worked together on matter

      Mike and I represented a mutual client in a contentiously litigated business dispute. He is an effective and efficient litigator who understands the needs of his clientele and receives positive results. His legal services are highly recommended.

      John Houvener, Intellectual property Attorney on Jan 5, 2017
      Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

      Mike is a fantastic attorney! Understanding and relating the law is second nature for him. Mike has helped my clients work through some legal challenges and I love referring him clients I am not able to help. I consider Mike a Mentor in the legal community for intellectual property law.

      Emily Peyser, Intellectual property Attorney on Jan 5, 2017
      Relationship: Worked together on matter

      I endorse this lawyer.

      Preston Cheung, Litigation Attorney on Dec 8, 2016
      Relationship: Worked together on matter

      Mike and I represented a mutual client in a contentiously litigated business dispute. He is an effective and efficient litigator who understands the needs of his clientele and receives positive results. His legal services are highly recommended.

      Lilian Demonteverde-Hoats, Litigation Attorney on Sep 9, 2016
      Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

      I endorse this lawyer. He is well respected in community.

      Benjamin Justus, Copyright infringement Attorney on Dec 5, 2014
      Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

      Mike has great knowledge and experience in several different areas of intellectual property law. While some lawyers in this specialized area are known for studious introversion, Mike is engaging and personable. He cares very much for his clients and always has their best interests in mind.

      Greg McLawsen, Intellectual property Attorney on Mar 28, 2014
      Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

      I routinely refer other attorneys to Mike when they have intellectual property issues. In my own practice I've turned also to Mike for advice about how to protect intellectual property. Mike's easy to work with and trustworthy - recommended!

      John Whitaker, Intellectual property Attorney on Jan 23, 2014
      Relationship: Worked together on matter

      Mike is a great lawyer with a unique way of approaching matters. He always brings an interesting perspective to challenging legal issues.

      Niloufar Park, Trademark infringement Attorney on Nov 13, 2013
      Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

      Mike has great experience with trademark infringement issues and he is very personable.

      Tatiana Kadetskaya

      Truly excellent lawyer. Well respected in the legal community.

      Michael Doland, Intellectual property Attorney on Nov 27, 2012
      Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

      Although new to Avvo, the answers of Mr. Matesky reflect a great deal of experience, and are accurate, analytic, and customized to the needs of the Avvo asker. These are precisely the qualities a client would be looking for in hiring an attorney. Welcome to Avvo.

      Cost

      RATES
      • Hourly Rates$250-$500/hour
        PAYMENT METHODS

        Cash, Check, Credit Card