About Stephen

Biography

It´s in Our Results. Under investigation or facing a board or court-martial? We have the experience, track record, and expertise. If you’re dealing with CID, MPI, or OSI, you need more than general online advice. You need a dream team based in Europe and around the world.

Practice Areas

Practice Area

Military Law 100%

• Drunk Driving – DUI/DWI • Extramarital Sexual Conduct & Adultery • Sexual Harassment • Drug Use • Fraternization • Conduct Unbecoming Officer • Domestic Violence • Sexual Assault • Drunk & Disorderly Conduct

31 years | 400 cases

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Payment Methods

Cash
Check
Credit Card

Awards

2025 2024 2023

...

+ 13

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 29 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1996

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 30 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1995

Resigned

No misconduct found

See All Attorney Licenses See Less Attorney Licenses

Location

Court & Carpenter, P.C.

Sauerwiesen 2, Court-Martial & Board Defense Lawyers, Kaiserslautern Germany, UM, 67661

militarylawfirm.com

Get Directions

See All Locations See Less Locations

Gallery

Stephen Carpenter Jr.'s Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.9 /5.0

224 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 224 reviews

Posted by anonymous | March 18, 2026 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

Retained: Officer BOI

Retained at Officer board of inquiry. Mr. Carpenter also provided good follow up after the case to request removal of negative records from my file.

Stephen Carpenter Jr.

Replied last March 19, 2026

Beyond retention, it was noteworthy that my client was cleared of the "conduct unbecoming at officer" offense. I was gratified the 21st TSC recorder took, in the end, "no position" on the HRC initiated elimination. Finally, being in Ansbach in person was key, as one board member appeared remotely.

Posted by anonymous | January 29, 2026 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

Article 15

Mr. Carpenter went above and beyond in a way I will never forget. He took the time to truly understand my situation, saw things from my point of view, and defended me when it mattered most. During a very difficult time—especially around the holidays, when everything felt rushed and impersonal—he show...ed real compassion and care. Although I had the option of being assigned a military lawyer, the process felt rushed, as if the priority was simply to move things along so people could go home. Mr. Carpenter was the complete opposite. He took time out of his own vacation to advocate for me, ensuring my voice was heard and my well-being mattered. That level of dedication and humanity made a critical difference in both my mental and physical health. Mr. Carpenter didn’t just do his job—he genuinely cared, and that meant everything. I am deeply grateful for his integrity, advocacy, and compassion, and I would recommend him without hesitation.

See Full Review Collapse Review

Stephen Carpenter Jr.

Replied last March 18, 2026

I am thrilled we got the good result, which I was happy to orchestrate, in part, while on leave. It was well worth it!

Posted by anonymous | January 15, 2026 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

Case pending dismissal

For the last year, I’ve been battling for my career over a false failure to follow a direct order and fraternization allegation; all of which led to a recommendation for Seperation. After researching attorneys, I reached out and hired Mr. Carpenter. For many, going through my first ever legal case w...as highly stressful. Mr. Carpenter reviewed my documents and wrote a tremendous memorandum to be submitted up to the Marine Corps. Through several conversations with USMC attorneys highlighting the evidence in my favor, character witness statements, an his personal memorandum, Mr. Carpenter’s efforts has resulted in two endorsements for my retention. The case is now just pending one final signature to be completely dropped. Overall I am highly please with my experience with Mr. Carpenter. My only negative in this experience was poor/slow communication in emails and texts. While I could only imagine the case load he personally handles, fighting for a response was often stressful as a client. Overall thought, very please!

See Full Review Collapse Review

Stephen Carpenter Jr.

Replied last March 18, 2026

In a nutshell, this was a fascinating case that pitted the differing customary expectations (and differences) of Marine and Navy leadership. I am also pleased that this fighter pilot was FULLY cleared by HQMC today, 18 March 2026. As such, we can now finally forward, seek promotion and perhaps backpay.

Posted by anonymous | November 03, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

Case dropped

I went under investigation. It happened out of no where when my career was going good. I was completely devastated. I felt helpless I was given no information and I was left with more questions than answers. I didn’t know where to turn the military lawyers that are supposedly provided to you didn’t g...et back to me at all. So Stephen was one of the top choices for where I was looking. His prices were reasonable and fair compared to a lot of other military lawyers and basically if you’re near or far it doesn’t matter. I think of the biggest questions for me was would this make my case more difficult if he’s hours or days away. But it didn’t he literally made sure CID, command or whoever if they wanted to talk to me they’d have to go through him. And he made it known and handled everything and basically made everything flow smoothly. I hope this gives you all some hope when you’re looking for a lawyer that specializes in military law. Because lawyers on the civilian side that specialize are far and few between. And good ones are been harder to come by. So basically what I’m saying is Stephen is the best out there plain and simple trust the process.

See Full Review Collapse Review

Posted by anonymous | August 10, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

WoFR Board Decision -ABCMR Vacated

Falsely accused of 2x sexual harassment allegations and underwent as many 15-6 investigations. However, even though cleared both times by two (2) different Investigating Officers (IOs), the CG sent me notification that he intended to separate me through a Withdrawal of Federal Recognition Board (WoF...R); but was going to ensure that he succeeded by not only, in addition to adding 2 GOMORs to my AMHRR, having both my Rater and Senior Rater submit a substandard RFC OER “Capable/Qualified” rating. This after an 18+ year Enlisted and Commissioned career, with the majority of the OERs at “Outstanding Performance/Best Qualified” and “Excels/Most Qualified” – “promote ahead of peers” ratings. I contacted Mr. Carpenter and he represented me at the WoFR Board hearing. The board, handpicked by the CG, was comprised of 4 COLs, one of which, the President of the Board, held 2 votes. All the cards stacked against me, as the Board proceeded through a very long day, Mr. Carpenter submitted several objections, noting outdated regulations as well as a multitude of additional discrepancies, to include violations of due process; pointing out to the Board that, while attempting to contact government witnesses, all witnesses/accusers refused to speak/communicate with him; to include the government’s “expert witness,” a fulltime SM. In March 2020 I was notified that the WoFR Board Majority decided for my Separation. The CG submitted my WoFR through NGB and had me Involuntarily Separated. I proceeded to appeal the WoFR Board’s decision to the Army Board of Corrections Military Records (ABCMR). Considering the conditions, Mr. Carpenter represented me to the best of his abilities; and his objections, while ignored by both the President of the Board and the Legal Counsel for the Board -a LTC, also handpicked by the CG, were “noted” by the ABCMR and in June 2025, determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation of partial relief. As a result, the Board recommended, unanimously, that all Department of the Army records be corrected vacating the WoFR Board findings and decision. I recommend Mr. Carpenter to anyone facing adverse actions potentially affecting their career.

See Full Review Collapse Review

See All Client Reviews

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Next › Last »

Stephen Carpenter Jr.'s Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Stephen

Daniel Russ

Military law lawyer | May 24

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I am deeply honored to provide an endorsement of Stephen Carpenter, Jr. He is unequivocally the most competent and outstanding U.S. military attorney I have ever worked with. His client communication, case preparation, legal writing, and courtroom advocacy is the best of any lawyer I know. I have worked on military cases with Stephen since 2010: Stephen is the trial attorney's - trial attorney. His courtroom capabilities are legendary: he is able to quickly adapt to trial changes, strategy changes, and his cross examining skill are extraordinary. He is not intimidated by the weight of evidence against his client: he has the rare ability to find even small openings in evidence and exploit them. He gives 100% of his effort to every client, and he makes the other lawyers on his team stronger. In the U.S. vs. McCorkle case at Ft. Knox, TN: against all odds we prevailed (prima facie evidence against us): not guilty! He's the best."

Patrick Johnson

Military law lawyer | Jul 19

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I had the opportunity to work as co-counsel with Stephen Carpenter on an Army Administrative Separation board. Mr. Carpenter compiled a powerful list of character witnesses and argued effectively on behalf of our client. His legal knowledge and outstanding advocacy skills resulted in the retention of a very deserving soldier despite some significant challenges."

William Cassara

Military law lawyer | Jan 27

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Steve and I have worked together on cases. He is a great trial lawyer and a true professional. If you are suspected of a military crime, contact Steve."

Paul Burton

Military law lawyer | Feb 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Steve Carpenter is not only an outstanding lawyer, he is also an outstanding contributor to the legal community. I was privileged to serve with Steve on the Board and as a member of the Legal Assistance to Military Personnel (LAMP) Section of the Washington State Bar Association. Steve was, and is, an outstanding member, demonstrated by his election as President of LAMP. You could not find a better attorney. There simply is no finer attorney practicing than Steve Carpenter. I endorse him enthusiastically."

Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Joseph Torri

Unknown lawyer | Aug 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Patrick Angel

Military law lawyer | Nov 29

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

Steven Krupa

Military law lawyer | Nov 29

Relationship: Other

"Steve and I served as JAGs together. He will fight hard for you. I endorse this lawyer."

Michael Waddington

Military law lawyer | Oct 08

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Zachary Wagnild

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 06

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. I dealt with Stephen when I was a prosecutor and, more recently, have conferred with him on cases. Stephen is always very professional and very prepared. The more I deal with Stephen the more impressed I've become with him as a person and as an attorney."

Aaron Rocke

Criminal defense lawyer | May 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Stephen is a brilliant trial attorney with experience in criminal defense in military and white collar contexts. He is as thoughtful as he is skillful, and he understands how to present a case at trial."

See More Lawyer Endorsements See Less Lawyer Endorsements View All Endorsements

Jason Greene

Military law lawyer

Benjamin Hillner

Military law lawyer

Daniel Russ

Military law lawyer

Paul Burton

Military law lawyer

Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington

Military law lawyer

Heather Straub

Military law lawyer

Patrick Johnson

Military law lawyer

Gregory Wolk

Employment and labor lawyer

Steven Krupa

Unknown lawyer

Jeffrey Lustick

Unknown lawyer

Michael Waddington

Unknown lawyer

Thomas Rask

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer

Mark Johnson

Ethics and professional responsibility lawyer

Aaron Rocke

Litigation lawyer

Hardeep Rekhi

Discrimination lawyer

Experience

Rating: 10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2026

Client's Choice Award / Military Law, Avvo

2025

Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyer in Nation, The National Trial Lawyers

See All Honors See Less Honors

Work Experience

2008 - Present

Managing Attorney, Court & Carpenter

2006 - 2008

Assistant Attorney General Prosecutor, Washington State Attorney General's Office

See All Work Experiences See Less Work Experiences

Associations

2024 - 2026

Washington State Bar Association Legal Assistance to Military Personnel Section (LAMP)

Chair

2007 - 2009

University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, WA

Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy

See All Associations See Less Associations

Sample of Legal Cases

US v. Army (MAJ)

BOI Retains Officer

US v. Army (SPC)

Government initially offered 27 years confinement on attempted murder plea deal. Defense showed case weaknesses and Government revised offer. Result: 10 years confinement, and dishonorable discharge

US v. Army, (SSG)

Fully acquitted of all charges

US v. USCG (LCDR)

No Punishment

US v. Navy (LT)

Retained

US v. Army (CPT)

Retained

US v. Army (CPT)

Client found not guilty of all but one charge, which is up on appeal.

US v. Army (CW2)

Retained

US v. Navy (LTJG)

No Punishment

US v. Air Force (Tsgt)

Fully Acquitted by Military Panel

US v. Army (SFC)

Court-Martial Guilty Plea to Single Charge. Retained. Not reduced, kept E-7 rank. Served over 2 months confinement,.

US v. Navy (STG1)

Board Finds "No Bases" and Retains Sailor.

US v. Army (PVT)

Fully Acquitted by Military Panel

US v. Army (CPT)

Retained at BOI

US v. Air Force (MSgt)

Fully Acquitted by Military Panel

US v. Army (MAJ)

Retained at BOI

US v. Army (1LT)

Separation with Honorable Discharge.

US v. WAANG (SPC)

Received General UNDER Honorable Discharge

US v. Navy (CAPT)

Client Awarded Full O-6 Retirement

US v. Army (MSG)

No Misconduct Found on 3-0 Vote.

US v. Army (SSG)

Client turns down NJP. Case dismissed. Flag lifted.

US v. Army (CPT)

No Misconduct Found on 3-0 Vote.

US v. Army (SGT)

Not Guilty of All Charges.

US v. Army (SPC)

Sex Assault Court-martial Dismissed.

US v. Navy (CSCCS)

No Misconduct Found on 3-0 Vote.

US v. Navy (LT)

Military judge awards 30 day jail sentence, and no dismissal. Client signs board waiver.

US v. Army (SGM)

Separation Board Finds "No Bases" on 3-0 Vote. Full exoneration for SGM!

US v. Army, (MAJ)

Board of Inquiry Retains Client

US v. Navy, (LCDR)

Not Guilty of All Charges.

US v. Navy, (LTJG)

Retained at BOI.

US v. Army, (MAJ)

Retained at BOI.

US v. Army, (1LT)

Officer Retained. Exonerated in 4 out of the 5 factual allegations.

US v. USCG (BM1)

Retained in the service. Military judge found client guilty of assault. Prosecutors demanded a bad conduct discharge and 6 months in confinement. Client merely received 45 days.

US v. USCG (EM3)

Military Judge finds 3-Star Admiral committed unlawful command influence. Client sentenced to serve 4 years confinement, completely rebuking USCG Prosecutor demand for 7 years.

U.S. v. USMC, (SSgt)

Guilty, 18 month. But on account of prior time in confinement, immediately eligible for parole. Case under appeal.

US v. Army, (CPT)

Board of Inquiry Recommends General Under Honorable Conditions Discharge

U.S. v. Navy (ENS)

Guilty Plea: 3 years confinement and dismissal.

U.S. v. Army (E-5)

Panel Verdict. "Not Guilty of all Sexual Assault Charges." Guilty of Adultery. Retained in service. No Reduction. 30 days hard labor without confinement about $1000 in forfeitures.

US v. Army SSG (E-6)

Panel verdict: "Not Guilty of BAH Fraud" more than $50,000. Guilty of remaining relatively minor offenses at Special Court-martial. Panel Sentence: Reduction to E-4 (no jail, reprimand or punitive discharge).

U.S. v. Army SFC (E-7)

Panel Verdict: "Not Guilty of All Charges" at General Court-martial.

U.S. v. Army SFC (E-7)

Panel Verdict: "Not Guilty of all Sexual Assault Charges." Guilty of Patronization and Nonconsensual Recording. Panel Verdict: Reduction E-4, reprimand, 30 days in local jail. Clemency pending.

U.S. v. Army SGT (E-5)

Summary Court Officer Verdict: "Not Guilty of All Charges" at Summary Court-Martial.

U.S. v. Army SPC (E-4)

Panel Verdict: "Not Guilty of All Charges" at General Court-martial.

U.S. v. USCG Master Chief (E-9)

Client retired at E-8 rank, and awarded Honorable discharge.

U.S. v. Army PVT (E-1)

Panel Verdict: "Not Guilty of All Charges" at General Court-martial.

U.S. v. Army, SSG (E-6)

Panel Verdict: "Not Guilty of All Charges" at General Court-martial.

U.S. v. USCG Master Chief (E-9)

Sentence: Reduction to E-6 & 1 month confinement. No Punitive Discharge.

U.S. v. Army SSG (E-6)

Command lifts bar to enlistment.

U.S. v. Army 1LT (O-2)

Officer exonerated. Second Army Regulation (AR) 15-6 investigating officer "substantiates" the sexual assault allegation and finds evidence of "command reprisal."

U.S. v. Air Force MSgt (E-7)

Panel finds MSgt "Not Guilty" of all drug disto charges and of cocaine use. He is convicted of misusing his own prescribed medication and for solicitiation. Receives 43 days jail and reduced to E-6. "Drug Waiver" was approved. Client will retire.

U.S. v. USCG Capt (O-6)

Client pled guilty pursuant to a extremely favorable Pre-trial Agreement. Confined for 60 days. $25,000 fine. Retires with "full benefits" at reduced rate and under honorable conditions.

U.S. v. Army SGT (E-5)

Board makes a few findings of misconduct but retains the Soldier in the service. Soldier cleared of abusive sexual contact because recorder failed to prove it occurred by a preponderence of the evidence.

Amn, U.S. Air Force

Panel Verdict: "Not Guilty of All Charges" at General Court-martial.

MSG, U.S. Army (E-8)

Military Judge Verdict: "Not Guilty of All Sexual Assault Charges." Guilty of fraternization. Sentence: Reduction to E-7.

CPT, U.S. Army

Military Judge: Retained Client in service by military judge. 30 days confinement. No other punishment.

SSG, U.S. Army

Retained in service by military panel, and no jail time. Reduced one rank, and forfeiture of $1200.

PFC, U.S. Army

Retained in service. Sentenced to 30 days restriction.

SSgt, U.S. Air Force

"Not Guilty" of all rape and sexual assault charges, and one aggravated battery charge. No sex registration. Guilty of two charges of simple assault, 2 days in jail, reduced to E-4. Case pending review of GCMCA ref disapproval of these two convictions.

SrA, U.S. Air Force

Panel sentenced him to serve 14-days in confinment and awarded a BCD. Prosecutors' had recomemnded panel mete out a 12 month sentence, Case referred to a special court-martial.

PFC, U.S. Army

Prior to the referral of charges, Defense reviews evidence, interviews witnesses and holds several discussions with the prosecutor. Chapter 10 approved by Commanding General. Soldier avoids federal conviction, 7 years in confinement and sex registration.

MAJ, U.S. Army

Retained by Board. Officer effectively found "Not Guilty" of "misconduct" but Board finds he engaged in "conduct unbecoming an officer." Officer "did" essentially concede to as much prior to the board convening.

SGT, U.S. Army

No jail time. No federal conviction. Chapter 10 approved.

MSG, U.S. Army

Charges related to this complaining witness were dismissed.

SPC, U.S. Army

"Not Guilty" of the most serious sexual assault charge. Retained in the service. 4 months confinement. Reduction to E-1

CW2, U.S. Army

General Discharge under honorable conditions. Case being Appealed to Army Review Board.

SPC, U.S. Army

Retained in the service. No jail time. Reduction to E-3, 45 days hard labor without confinement

TSgt, U.S. Air Force

No jail time. No federal drug conviction. Chapter 4 approved.

1LT, U.S. Army

No jail time. No federal conviction. Chapter 10 approved.

LT, U.S. Navy

Retained by BOI. Retired with 30-years in service. Promoted and retired.

SrA, U.S. Air Force

"Not Guilty" of Attempted Murder and Aggravated Assault. Guilty of Battery.

1LT, U.S. Army

"Not Guilty" of All Charges. Sexual assault and contact.

AD3, U.S. Navy

"Not Guilty" of All Charges. Rape and Forcible Sodomy at General Court-martial.

SGT, U.S. Army

"Not Guilty" of All charges at Article 15, UCMJ proceeding.

FA, USCG

Client's prison sentence reduced by 33-months based upon pretrial manuvering by defense team.

SPC, U.S. Army

Soldier Retained in Service.

AET2, USCG

Based upon negotiated "Guilty Plea" client sentenced to serve 9-months in confinement and awarded bad conduct discharge. Pretrial agreement essentially cut client's jail time in half. Five criminal charges were likewise dismissed.

SGT, U.S. Army

"Not Guilty" of Rape and Sexual Assault at General Court-martial. Guilty of adultery. Reduced to E-3 with 45 days extra duty.

MK2, USCG

Prosecutors agree to dismiss sexual assault charges. No federal sex registration required. Pleads to simple assault, unalwful entry into a female berthing and being drunk. Retained in service, reduction to E3, and 2-months confinement.

MAJ, U.S. Army

Officer released from jail. Commmanding General GRANTS clemency, reducing officer's confinement period by nearly 18-months. Underlying case is pending appellate review.

SGT, U.S. Army

Retained in service by military judge. Reduced to PV2. 7-months confinement, with good time reduction client should be released in about 5-months.

SSG, U.S. Army

Article 15, UCMJ torn-up by Battalion Commander, with no further adverse actions taken. Case dismissed.

CW2, U.S. Army

Retained. Board of Inquiry finds CW2 "did not engage" in alleged misconduct. BOI requests CG reconsider prior GOMOR OMPF filing.

FTSN, U.S. Navy

Sailor receives Honorable Discharge. Remains eligible for total GI Bill payments and Disability Benefits.

2LT, U.S. Army

Officer retained and provided rehabilitative transfer. Defense was able to discredit drug test result, and persuasively persuade Government that irrational behaviors warranted a second chance. Officer also avoids criminal conviction in state court.

Capt, U.S. Air Force

Court-martial charges dismissed

SPC, (E-4), U.S. Army

Sentenced to serve 12 months, and 2 weeks after good time deduction and pre-trial punishment reduction. Bad conduct discharge, reduction to E-1, and $2500 fine.

SSG, (E-6), U.S. Army

Court-martial charges dismissed

SrA, (E-4), U.S. Air Force

Board members find Airman did "not" engage in maintenance malpractice alleged by Article 15s, and retains him in service. Board specifically finds "no misconduct" related to 2/3 allegations. Client will retire with full benefits.

Petty Officer, U.S. Navy

Retained in service. Found "Not Guilty" by military judge of 3 of 4 fraud related charges. Reduced one rate and 24 days confinement. Sailor required to pay back $14,000, and not, as requested by military prosecutors, $53,000.

MSG, (E-7), AGR

Separation action dismissed. Retained in AGR Status. Reprimand "locally" filed. Reduced 1-stripe by TAG at Article 15. Negotiate "rehabilitation transfer" to another unit for fresh start.

CPT, (0-3), U.S. Army

Reprimand "locally" filed, separation action avoided.

1SG, (E-8), U.S. Army

Court-martial charges dismissed

SPC, (E-4), U.S. Army

Article 15 dismissed, separation action rescinded. Retained in service.

CDR, (0-5), NOAA

Officer Separation Board dismissed

SPC, (E-4), U.S. Army

Retained in service. No Article 15. Rehab transfer to different Battery in Schweinfurt Germany.

LTJG, (O-2), USCG

Retained in service. No show cause BOI. Remains eligible for Honorable Discharge and full GI Bill.

Capt, Air Force, (O-3)

Article 32, UCMJ, investigating officer (former military judge) recommends case not proceed to court-martial.

Tech Sgt, Air Force, (E-6)

Eligible for parole in 3 1/2 years. Punitive discharge.

Second Class Petty Officer, Coast Guard, (E-5)

"Not Guilty" of all charges. Full acquittal by military jury.

Chief, Navy, (E-7)

No federal conviction. No jail time. No punitive discharge. Honorable conditions discharge.

Senior Chief, Navy, (E-8)

No jail time. "Not Guilty" on all charges related to three out of five women. Punitive discharge. Clemency/Appeal pending.

First Class Petty Officer, Coast Guard, (E-6)

Found "Not Guilty" of sex registration offense involving minor, but guilty of vouyerism. Prosecutor demands eight years, six months jail sentence. Client sentenced to four months (to serve 3 with good time). Punitive discharge.

Major (P), Air Force, (0-4)

NJP overturned. After several months of lobbying and written submissions, Major General reconsiders UIF filing and removes adverse NJP from AF Major's otherwise pristine military record.

Commander, Navy, (0-5)

Investigation dropped. Case dismissed.

Airman First Class, Air Force, (E-3)

Court-martial case dismissed. No confinement. No federal convictions. No punitive discharge. CH 4 approved with OTH.

Captain, Marine, (0-3)

Court-martial case dismissed.

Private First Class, Marine, (E-2)

"Not Guilty" of all charges. Administrative context. Retained in service and deploys to Fleet. Update: Promoted to LCPL.

Private First Class, Army, (E-2)

Court-martial case not filed. Retained in service. Soldier receives "no punishment" after Article 15 hearing. Local file. Government also agrees to forego discharge and Soldier reenlists.

Petty Officer, Coast Guard, (E-3)

Reenlistment code upgraded. U.S. Coast Guard Board unanimously votes to grant all requested relief, including Reenlistment code upgrade allowing for his reenty into the service. Sailor previously awarded Honorable Discharge.

Sergeant, Army, (E-5)

Retained in service. Reduced to E-3. Client will serve approximately 2 months in confinement after reductions for pretrial confinement (50 days) and typical good time. PCS to Ft Sill.

First Leutenant, Navy, (0-3)

Adverse Administrative hold dismissed. Officer retires.

Chief Petty Officer, Coast Guard, (E-7)

Retained in service. No confinement. Reduced to E-6. Transferred to new CG station in New Jersey.

Chief Petty Officer, Navy, (E-7)

Guilty Plea. BCD. 6 months confinement.

First Leutenant, Navy, (0-3)

Commanding Officer reconsiders a highly prejudicial FITREP and signs a significantly improved version.

Captain, Army, (0-3)

Command dismisses adverse action.

Captain, Army, (0-3)

No dismissal from service. No confinement. No loss of pay. Reprimand and fine paid.

Private, Army, (E-1)

Command dismisses separation action.

Chief Petty Officer, Navy, (E-7)

No discharge from service. No loss of rank. No loss of pay. 45 days confinement.

Sergeant Major, Army, (E-9)

Resolved favorably for client. Volkswagen of America case.

Private First Class, Army, (E-3)

Command dismisses separation action.

Private First Class, Army, (E-2)

Resolved at Summary Court-martial. Soldier retained by unit. Update: Received Honorable Discharge and GI Bill!

U.S. v Navy (E-4)

Sailor retained in Service

Command Inquiry, Coast Guard (Captain, 0-6)

Retained in Service, Administrative Letter of Censure (Not Filed in Permanent Record)

U.S. v Army (E-6)

Retained in Service, 9 months, reduction to E-1

US v Army (E-4)

Retained in Service

CGIS/Command Inquiry, USCG (0-6)

Case abandoned by Government

U.S. v. USCG (E-6)

Retained in Service

US v. Air Force (0-5)

Retained in Service

US v Army (E-6)

Retained in service. Reduced to E-2

US v. Army (E-6)

Not Guilty, Full acquittal

US v. Army (E-6)

Not Guilty, Full acquittal

US v. Army (E-5)

"No Punishment" sentencing verdict.

US v Army (E-7)

No charges filed.

U.S. v U.S.M.C (E-6)

No charges filed.

Third Class Petty Officer, Coast Guard, (E-4)

Pending Trial

See More Legal Cases

Education

2023

Georgetown University Law Center - Washington, DC

LL.M. Masters of Law in National Security Law

1995

University of Oregon Law School - Eugene, OR

J.D. as Doctor in Jurisprudence

1990

University of Virginia - Charlottesville, VA

B.A. as Bachelor of Arts in Foreign Affairs

See All Education See Less Education

Speaking Engagements

2025

Tartu Law School Using Artificial Intelligence to Investigate Criminal Cases

2023

NATO Legal Operations

Artificial Intelligence Friend or Foe?

2023

LGBTQIA2S Law for Everyone

Defending Transgender Military Members

See All Speaking Engagements See Less Speaking Engagements

Publications

2019

Navy Times Sub officer found not guilty on stalking, assault and other charges

2019

Navy Times Another submarine officer busted for drugs

2017

The Japan Times Pedophile sting ops roil U.S. forces on Okinawa

See All Publications See Less Publications

Languages

German

See All Languages Spoken See Less Languages Spoken

Activity

Legal Answers

Legal Guides

Legal Answers

Q&A

What can I do if I’m being falsely accused of sexual assault and I had a witness with me that day on my soon to be ex wife?

22 Jan 2021

Q&A

How does a NJP with OTH separation for a failed urinalysis for cocaine affect back ground checks, gun laws, and jobs and VA?

15 Jan 2020

Q&A

Does a Special Court Martial, and the General Court Martial show in the DD-214?

22 Sep 2018

See More Legal Answers

Legal Guides

Legal Guide

How Do I Confront Sexual Harassment Claims during Military Investigations, Boards & Courts-martial?

15 Mar 2023

Legal Guide

What Decisions Need to be Made by the Defendant Facing a Court-Martial?

01 May 2020

Legal Guide

Military Defense 101: The AWOL Case

06 Oct 2010

See More Legal Guides