Deborah Anne Bianco

Deborah Anne Bianco

2.8
Rating: 7.4

Licensed for 42 years

Family Lawyer at Bellevue, WA
Practice Areas: Family

14535 Bellevue-Redmond Rd., Suite 201, Bellevue, WA

About Deborah

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Family 100%

42 years

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 300-300 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 35 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1990

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois for 42 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1983

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Location

Deborah A. Bianco P.S.

14535 Bellevue-Redmond Rd., Suite 201, Bellevue, WA, 98007

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Deborah Anne Bianco's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

2.8 /5.0

12 Client Reviews

Posted by Leslie | October 1, 2020 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

NO stars- (app requires a selection) Anyone that posts a favorable rating for “Deb” Bianco is suspect.

“Deb” Bianco is focused solely on practicing law for financial gain. I have witnessed first hand -Deb Bianco lie to the court and attempt to use her position as pro tem commissioner in family court to manipulate the legal process and to gain favor with other commissioners on her private practice cas...es. Deb Bianco has violated DV PTO orders in place by the court (against her client) by seeking contact of the friends, family members, acquaintances m, coworkers, ex husband and former relationships of the protected party. ABD Deb Bianco sought to legally represent these parties against the “protected victim”. Deb Bianco violated a DV PTO -stalking protection order by making contact and she’s obtained information about the protected party to use in court on behalf of her client the perpetrator. Further Deb Bianco manipulated a third party by offering to legally representation- AND Deb Bianco accepted payment for legal services. Yet.,., Deb Bianco denied- In deposition filed in King County representing the third party and she denied accepting payment by check. Deb Bianco should be removed as a commissioner in King County Family court. “Conflict of interest” is an understatement.

Posted by anonymous | February 3, 2017 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

Not trained at all in domestic violence and doesn't read court records beforehand

If I could give her negative stars, I would. She was issuing Domestic Violence Protection Orders in court, but yet seemed to have no knowledge of domestic violence at all. She also did not read over any of the court records for the defendant and based her decisions off of what was said during the h...earing. If she did, she would have known about the consistent issues the defendant was presenting with. I did not feel supported at all and felt like she had no idea what she was doing, but is yet up there making all types of decisions about peoples lives and safety. I want to make a complaint about her

Posted by Sylvia | February 26, 2015

Great Attorney WITH Ethics

Deb and Lesley handled my case with the utmost professionalism and care. Although it took over two years to obtain a divorce decree and another two years in Appellate Court (both were in our favor) she handled my stresses and unending questions with kindness and compassion. While I certainly hope ...no one goes through what we had to endure, I would recommend Deborah to anyone - and have!

Posted by anonymous | December 11, 2014

Beware!

I faced Ms. Bianco for a court case to receive temporary orders (financial and parenting) for my divorce. The facts (supported with evidence) which were disclosed for the case included: my ex liquidated our 6- figure IRA (without my knowledge), liquidated all but a very small amount of our daughter's... college fund (without my knowledge) , had a hidden bank account in another state, had hidden credit cards mailed to an alternate address, and was refusing to support the children financially. Further, my ex had collapsed with a 0.3 BAC (over 3 times the legal limit) and credit card charges showed an average of $400 per month on alcohol. Ms. Bianco refused to transfer my daughter's remaining 529 into my name to prevent him from removing any more from it (this decision was revoked and I gained control over the remaining funds in the final divorce decree). She refused to apply 191 restrictions or mandate an alcohol evaluation based upon his history and expenses (an alcohol evaluation was later ordered by the parenting evaluator). She established a residential schedule which allowed him to return the children mid-week after their bedtime (this was revoked later when my ex was found in contempt of the parenting plan and he lost all mid-week visitation; the parenting evaluation also supported that the children did not spend mid-week with their father). Ms. Bianco also mandated joint decision making, which resulted in my ex refusing to allow the children to participate in counseling (this decision was also revoked after the parenting evaluation and I received sole medical/mental health decision making). Despite a written agreement between my ex and i (and our attorneys) which outlined the upcoming spring break was to be spent with me (and travel had already been arranged), and despite a declaration from the pediatrician which indicated my ex should not travel out of state with our medically fragile child (as he had never cared for him when he was acutely ill), she disregarded this and allowed my ex to have the children for the break. Not only were the orders unclear - they required amending to clarify financial division of costs for child care, date child support was due, and no consequence if my ex opted not to exercise his residential time (which costed additional fees). Just about every ruling Ms. Bianco made for temporary orders were revoked, repealed, or adjusted based upon facts, evidence, evaluations, etc. Just this fact alone should make you steer clear of Ms. Bianco. If you want the best outcome for your children, do not go to Ms. Bianco.

Posted by anonymous | November 26, 2014

Great results

I would recommend Deborah to anyone, any time, She has been my lawyer for over ten years. The past three years I have been in and out of court with my ex for changes to my parenting plan, child support modification and enforcement of my parenting plan. I have won every single time. Deborah knows fami...ly law and has been spot on with what the end result would be.

See All Client Reviews

Deborah Anne Bianco's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Deborah
Amir John Showrai headshot
Amir John Showrai

Family lawyer | Feb 27

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I first met Debbie as opposing counsel on a case in summer 2008. However, subsequent to that, I have also appeared before her when she acted as a commissioner pro tem on the King County Family Law Calendar, and most recently, we came together on a case where I acted as a mediator and she represented one of the parties. Debbie's years of experience, her solid grasp of the law, and her wisdom to know when to push and when to relent are without parallel. I endorse her without any reservation."

Paige Diana Haley headshot
Paige Haley

Family lawyer | Apr 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I highly recommend Deb for individual representation or for arbitration/mediation services. She is a pleasure to work with and was successful in mediating some very contentious cases of mine. She "gives it to you straight" and is very knowledgeable. If I have a conflict and cannot represent someone, I refer them to Deb."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.4 (Very Good)

Education

1983

Washington University School of Law

Juris Doctor

1980

Washington University in St. Louis

Bachelor of Arts

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution