Kenneth Herbert Carlson

Kenneth Herbert Carlson

4.4
Rating: 7.1

Licensed for 45 years

Landlord or tenant Lawyer at Idyllwild, CA
Practice Areas: Landlord & Tenant

PO Box 2417, Idyllwild, CA

About Kenneth

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 45 years

State: California

Acquired: 1980

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2003

Location

Kenneth H. Carlson

PO Box 2417, Idyllwild, CA, 92549

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kenneth Herbert Carlson's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.4 /5.0

105 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Bankruptcy & Debt

Posted by anonymous | November 12, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Bankruptcy & Debt

Incompetent & Fraudulent Practice

Ken prefaces by saying, it’s going to look like you’re losing, but our goal here isn’t to have our motions granted, rather we’re playing the system. That system, is a time game. Most of the folks fighting the evictions are exploiting loopholes from the restrictions on evictions and so in essence,... as long as you follow their little roadmap to finality, you milk another 6 months out of your current situation. Where you run into trouble is if you countersue, or file a complaint regarding habitability. As others have mentioned, Ken is competent although incredibly egotistical and lacks any integrity whatsoever. He’s entirely driven monetarily and will fail to communicate unless there’s a pressing reason AND he’s been pre-paid. It’s a crapshoot with regard to who you’ll end up with after Ken performs the consult. We’ve had the misfortune of dealing with Mike Hanna. Not only will you spend thousands on an eviction, but thousands more on a counterclaim suit, you’ll consistently miss deadlines and hearings, be instructed to refuse seemingly reasonable offers to settle and end up significantly worse through it all. Your motions and documents are rife with misspellings, misinformation and glaring inaccuracies—you’ll spend ages editing and revising elementary mistakes. After a year of enduring this, and at hearing how desperate we were for him to just perform, Mike suggested we file bankruptcy as a final last laugh to the landlord. So we paid nearly ten thousand dollars between multiple cases that went no where and weren’t settled, and as the final laugh we can ruin our financial situation and credit for the next five years? We’ve been garnished and will likely have no choice but to do so at this point. I imagine that in cases where landlords are in a weaker position and settle, clients end up happy campers. In cases where the landlords lawyerup and don’t back down folks really get the wrong end of the stick. I would never recommend this route to anyone after going through what we have, and I suggest you learn from our mistakes. These guys are horrendous and Ken (or Mike) no longer represent actual clients in proceedings (you’ll do all the work pro per) because they ran into some legal trouble themselves and came close to not being able practice law anymore. I suggest you do some research before making a decision. All of these folks come with baggage and a unique legal history to include run-ins with the law (on the opposite side of the scope they’re representing), bizarre complaints confirmed by their governing bodies and quirks that can only be defined by their varying levels of veiled criminality. No matter how desperate you are, these jackwagons are not the choice.

Posted by anonymous | October 14, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Bankruptcy & Debt

Disappointment

Ken is fine. If he passes you to Mike Hanna do yourself a favor & RUN. Mike screwed up my case BIG time. He was paid to complete & file paperwork which he had a MONTH to do but just didn’t bother. He was constantly contacted & reminded about this paperwork that had a deadline, yet he still failed to ...do the work. There was no excuse/reason as to why he didn’t do it. Not even an apology. This resulted in my easily winnable case being transformed into a complete nightmare. The whole case should have been thrown out. It’s still going on. If he did the work he was paid to do, I wouldn’t be in this mess. After massively botching up my case Mike did some free work, as he should have. If he didn’t mess up so badly he wouldn’t of had to. Even then he was making a range of mistakes with paperwork, filing, WHERE to file. The number of mistakes he made is absurd, I had to point them out to him & have them corrected. He gave legal advice that was either regurgitated from Ken, wrong or he seemed like he was making a blind guess. He has poor communication. $75 per email, $6 p/min hotline; to talk to someone who doesn’t even know what they’re doing?Absolute joke. His response to most questions is “Let me ask Ken” - is there anything you do know? I’m calling your $6 p/min hotline to receive legal advice/help from you. Mike would always say “I’ll get back to you”. Never would. I’d follow up with emails+texts asking if he could get back to me like he promised. If he did decide to grace me with a response, it wouldn’t be until days later after constant persistence. I asked multiple times if he had any issues with me due to the way he was treating me + my case, only for him to deny he had; yet continued with his unprofessional behavior. Mistakes related to my case could have been realized if he put the effort into doing some research. I found legal arguments for myself just by looking online. I am not educated/trained in law, yet I found discrepancies in my case which he didn’t pick up. It’s questionable whether he actually looked through my case file. If he had any passion for the line of work he’s in, maybe he would put in some effort & find these things out for himself. I raised my concerns to Ken. Pointed out mistakes made, his insufficiency when it came to communication… I asked if my case could be reassigned to someone else. Ken denied + advised that if I wanted to get ahold of Mike I would have to call his hotline. Why should anyone be paying for “I’ll ask Ken” or to chase him for not getting back on something as promised? Money is the motive, no professional pride. Mike is a provisional lawyer under Ken’s supervision. I don’t think he’s getting the supervision needed based on his level of work, that’s if he decides to do it. This is my life that has been messed up due to Mike’s actions & lack of. As stated, Ken knew of my concerns & didn’t do much to ease them. He is as much to blame as Mike. Ken once said to me, & I quote; “I don’t think Mike explained it correctly, so I’ll explain”. Why have him working on my case (which he clearly didn’t care about) or anyone else’s if you, his employer don’t even have confidence in him? At the end, both Ken + Mike completely ignored me after having sent emails asking for help & asking if they had any issues with me. To even have to ask that question is a red flag in itself. I have a hearing coming up which they were supposed to be helping me with & there’s been nothing but radio silence. They’ve left me in a mess they essentially created. Not only that, they don’t even have the courtesy to let me know that they decided to recuse themselves from my case. If you want a professional lawyer who cares about their clients, I would recommend elsewhere. Because of their incompetence, I was on the brink of filing for bankruptcy- which I told both Ken&Mike, asking for help only to be ignored. I’ve now paid a PARALEGAL to look at my case who noticed my judgement is void & is fixing their mistakes

Posted by Tom | August 13, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Bankruptcy & Debt

Best in the Business for Tenants

It's rare to find a real advocate. Someone who not only supports and advises, but who does so with both honor and intelligent strategy. Mr Carlson has literally kept me from living in a shopping cart. And gave me the time to get back on my feet. And in the process, saved me a lot of money. And the ...Plaintiff's attorney remains frustrated and embarrassed.

See All Client Reviews

Kenneth Herbert Carlson's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kenneth
Brittany Renee Torbert headshot
Brittany Torbert

Landlord or tenant lawyer | Apr 26

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Ken knows his stuff and doesn't back down to bully landlords. Ken is creative in his methods and gets results. He is a pleasure to work with."

Deborah M. Vasquez headshot
Deborah Vasquez

Landlord or tenant lawyer | Feb 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Ken has a brilliant mind and is a true advocate for tenant rights. I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Deborah M. Vasquez headshot
Deborah Vasquez

Landlord or tenant lawyer

John V. DiAna headshot
John DiAna

Landlord or tenant lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.1 (Very Good)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2003.

Discipline, Probation; no Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2003

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney had a suspension placed on hold (and ultimately removed) by complying with certain requirements.

Education

N/A

Loyola Law School

N/A

University of California - Berkeley

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2003
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution