Rosemarie Merrill

I am writing to formally express my dissatisfaction with the consultation I had with Ms. Merrill. From the beginning of the call, I was repeatedly interrupted and not given a fair opportunity to explain the details of my situation. Nearly every attempt I made to speak or clarify the facts was cut ...short. This made it impossible to properly present the context of my case. Additionally, I found Ms. Merrill’s tone to be dismissive and unnecessarily confrontational. Rather than listening to my concerns, she appeared to minimize them and responded in a manner that felt condescending and unprofessional. The interaction felt more like being reprimanded than participating in a professional legal consultation. Prior to the call, Ms. Merrill asked me to send all of my supporting materials, including documentation and a video recording. I promptly provided everything requested. However, during the consultation it became clear that the evidence I submitted had not been reviewed at all. This was particularly frustrating, as I had taken the time to organize and provide the information she specifically requested. My reason for seeking legal assistance was straightforward: I wanted guidance and help with sending a cease-and-desist letter regarding an ongoing dispute. Instead, the conversation was quickly redirected toward pursuing a defamation lawsuit and discussing statutes of limitation—topics that were not relevant to the assistance I was seeking. When I attempted to return the discussion to the original issue, my concerns were again dismissed. Overall, the consultation was a deeply disappointing experience. I felt unheard, disrespected, and unable to meaningfully communicate the facts of my case. I believe a professional consultation should involve listening to a client’s concerns, reviewing the materials provided, and engaging in a respectful and constructive discussion. Unfortunately, that was not my experience in this case.

I was called by Parker Stanbury twice by this lawyer Rosemarie Merril and both times she was short, rude and obtuse. The first time she wasn't trying to hear me and take my side but instead was determining if she could win as opposed to give me my day in court to air my grievance and see what an im...partial judge or jury decides. The second time, she tried to be rude with her explanation of what a tort is as if I am supposed to know what that is just being Joe Citizen with no law education. This lady is a bad person. No people skills. Don't be mean to other people the way people were once rude with you.