Bonner Charles Walsh

Bonner Charles Walsh

4.6
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 18 years

Consumer protection Lawyer at Grangeville, ID
Practice Areas: Consumer Protection, Class Action

1561 Long Haul Rd, Grangeville, ID

About Bonner

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Class Action 50%

Consumer class actions.

50%
Consumer Protection 50%

Consumer protection. Lemon Law, Auto Dealer finance, Debt collection abusive practices. Debt consolidation abusive practices. Fraudulent consumer sales.

50%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Contingency

33%-45%

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Idaho for 11 years

State: Idaho

Acquired: 2015

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Washington for 11 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2015

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 12 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2013

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Texas for 18 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2007

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

Walsh PLLC

1561 Long Haul Rd, Grangeville, ID, 83530

Walsh PLLC

3100 SCR 406, PO Box 1343, Sonora, TX, 76950

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Bonner Charles Walsh's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.6 /5.0

19 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (19) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | 1 star

Posted by anonymous | October 18, 2024 | Lemon Law

Will be reaching out to a different lawyer

I reached out in hopes that I would be able to have the same experience as others. I have done a lot of research on my vehicle it being 2014 Hyundai Santa Fe sport. I found him listed as a lawyer to consult if needing help with advice to the lawsuit back in 2021. My vehicle is involved in the lawsuit... and has had an engine replacement done prior. I would explain my situation fully but this would be an essay, long story short I reached out and wasn’t even able to even discuss my scenario fully without being rudely interrupted and asked questions, which I answered, but then was rudely told he has thousands and thousands of cases, I understand completely Hyundai has a lot of these cars so it’s expected, but then told me he took a week off [redacted] and unless I want to pay an hourly rate of $700 then he would be willing to listen to me. I insisted I could pay the $700 because I believe that I have a case and I have the money, my fiance is a driller in the mines for gold he makes over a 100,000 a year so we would be willing to pay for him as our lawyer if he had not treated me poorly after our first phone call. Completely understand that we all have bad days but to take it out on me [redacted] and that you have thousands and thousands of cases. You could be a lot nicer about it and say I’m going through a hard time right now and don’t have the time to take your case I apologize and I wish you the best. Then I could have gone my way nicely and wouldn’t be writing this review. Unprofessional I’m sure that’s not the case with everyone who contacts him and maybe I just caught him on a bad day but I was highly disappointed.

Bonner Walsh

Replied last October 18, 2024

There are always two sides of course. I admit I was short and did interrupt, but that was how the conversation was from both sides. I probably could have handled it better. Missing details from the above are as follows: I explained to her what the class action covered, I explained its limited nature, the further limited nature of Idaho law for her situation, and covered issues she might see when having another attorney evaluate. She also fails to mention that she hung up on me during the conversation. I would say the bad experience for her was due to several things. I was having a bad day; our personalities simply clashed; and being told that I could not assist with the issues was unacceptable to her. Sorry, and I wish you the best with a challenging situation.

Posted by Lavette | October 30, 2022 | Class Action

Rude

I emailed Walsh regarding the Hyundai Class Action and I guess I sent one too many emails. Because he did not respond to the second email, so I sent a third email and Wow his response was so rude and impolite and the tone in his email was uncalled for. So when I responded by calling him out on... his rudeness, he responded basically telling me F…..off and find someone else to help me. I’m happy those 5 star reviewers were satisfied…….I definitely was not.

Bonner Walsh

Replied last November 04, 2022

I wanted to take the time to respond to this review. While Lavette was not my client, she was one of the millions of class members in a class action that was resolved in 2020. Since that case closed, I have assisted thousands of people with issues they had or just generally with the claims process. Generally, I get along with everyone during this process, but given the numbers sometimes people are just not going to mesh. There were more emails exchanged than noted. The last two emails Lavette referenced sending me, were blank, did not ask a question, and were after I had made an inquiry for her and had advised it would take some time for Hyundai to get back to me. The sending of duplicative blank emails rubbed me the wrong way and I let her know. However, there was not an email “basically telling me F off” at least that is not how I read it or it was intended. Regardless I am open about how I do business. There was no confidential information in these emails, so below is the email string for you to judge. The actual emails are in quotes following the explanatory headings. Due to how AVVO formats these I am inserting "_'s" to separate them. ______________________________________________________________ The claimed “F off Email” ______________________________________________________________“I am a very responsive individual. I try and be respectful of people and their time. I am sorry that you did not find it that way. I sent a further response with information that I obtained. Since you do not find me as someone you would like to interact with I suggest that you follow with someone else should you need further assistance. In case you missed the other email, it seems that information was requested but you did not respond and deadlines were missed. I hope that you are able to find the assistance that you need.” ______________________________________________________________ Lavette’s email “calling me out.” ______________________________________________________________ “You are a very rude individual. I sent the second email in error. The 3rd email was sent because I didn’t get a response from you when I sent the corrected VIN, considering how quickly you responded when I sent the incorrect VIN. The hundreds of emails you get per day is not my concern. The way you responded today with that unprofessional email, I sure could have responded a few days ago with a more appropriate email. I will just wait to hear from you. “ ______________________________________________________________ My initial email following the blank emails that were sent. ______________________________________________________________ “I got your first, second and current email on this. I have reached out to who I needed to. In fact, I did it Wednesday at 3:16:30 pm. They have not responded. I have followed up twice. I get hundreds of emails each day. You don't need to keep responding to the same one with blank info. If you have questions or something fine. But please do not send me blank emails that take zero time for you to generate. I try and respond to each and every email with substance. I ignored the last few because they were blank. Please wait at least until next Tuesday to reach back out. I hope to have some answers before then, but I am not in control of how fast other people respond to my inquiries. Bonner”

See All Client Reviews

Bonner Charles Walsh's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Bonner
Matthew John Bergstrom headshot
Matthew Bergstrom

Trusts lawyer | Apr 15

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Bonner Walsh is a very professional and experienced attorney, and I've greatly enjoyed the opportunity to work with him. He has always proven to be knowledgeable and responsive."

Cody Lee Cofer headshot
Cody Cofer

Consumer protection lawyer | Jan 20

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I had the pleasure of working with Bonner on a case while he was still in Athens, Texas. I was overwhelmed by his knowledge of the law and skill in tactics. Any client with Bonner at their table is at the right table."

Jeffrey Lee Weinstein headshot
Jeffrey Weinstein

Personal injury lawyer | Mar 10

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"Bonner is truly an amazing person and lawyer. I say this because he really cares about everyone he helps. If Bonner tells you he will help you, you can trust that he will do everything he can within our rules to resolve your case favorably for you."

View All Endorsements
Craig Richard Heidemann headshot
Craig Heidemann

Class action lawyer

Carlin John Phillips headshot
Carlin Phillips

Consumer protection lawyer

Craig Madison Patrick headshot
Craig Patrick

Consumer protection lawyer

John Victor Mastriani headshot
John Mastriani

Litigation lawyer

Jeffrey Lee Weinstein headshot
Jeffrey Weinstein

Car accident lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2013 - Present

Managing Member, Walsh LLC

2012 - Present

Managing Member, Walsh PLLC

2008 - 2012

Attorney, Weinstein Law

Associations

2008 - Present

National Association of Consumer Advocates

Member

Education

2006

Southern Methodist University

JD - Juris Doctor

2001

Washington State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution