Jane Grace Michalakes

Jane Grace Michalakes

also known as Jane Grace Michalakes-Gunning

4.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 9 years

Lawsuits and disputes Lawyer at Denver, CO
Practice Areas: Lawsuits & Disputes, Litigation, Insurance

4100 E. Mississippi Ave, Suite 1600, Denver, CO

About Jane

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Litigation 25%

Civil litigation and defense against personal injury cases.

25%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Colorado for 9 years

State: Colorado

Acquired: 2016

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Montgomery, Kolodny, Amatuzio & Dusbabek, LLP

4100 E. Mississippi Ave, Suite 1600, Denver, CO, 80246

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jane Grace Michalakes's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

5 star (3)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by anonymous | August 1, 2023 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Dishonesty and Money-Seeking Concerns

This review is completely unrelated to the outcome of my case. I felt compelled to write it to caution others to consider other attorneys because you may be able to save yourself thousands of dollars. There are 3 main factors that have led me to write this candid review: 1) Dishonesty, 2) Inexperienc...e, 3) Money-seeking. 1) DISHONESTY: Jane will give you false hope of success in the name of “optimism”. After losing the initial motion, we started discussing a possible appeal. Jane quoted me a chance of success to be up to 50% when in reality it was less than 5% to 15%. Other firms recommended not proceeding with an appeal. To quote one attorney, "...I still don't feel that our firm will have a high potential of prevailing on the requested appeal". Jane was never candid like this, but instead kept covering her known loss by repeating statements such as “but we don’t know what the judge is going to decide”. When confronted about the drastic difference in appeal percentage estimates, Jane said she’s “not a numbers person”. It's difficult to believe that someone who has a doctorate degree and is obviously intelligent does not have an understanding of basic statistics. One can only deduce that she is after money and not the best interest of the client. Had she not taken this approach of “optimism” and a money-grab, I would have taken my ex-husband/abuser up on a different financial offer that would have freed me from him much sooner than 11 years from now. During my final conversation with Jane (after I had declined proceeding with an appeal), Jane commented “I stopped billing you a long time ago”…yet I was billed for every single item thereafter. I always expect to pay my bills, so this is simply the principle of the comment which turned out to be a blatant lie. Your attorney should never lie to you. When I sent an email to Jane and Gavin Halligan (partner) inquiring what she meant by that comment, I never received a reply. 2) INEXPERIENCE: Jane is inexperienced and will either take a long time to do research or frequently have to go to Gavin to discuss your case. Because the client gets billed for both of these delays, Jane should truly be billing at a lower hourly rate until she becomes more efficient. As an example, I was billed $800 for an email response that took nearly a week to receive from her. I thought my attorney had "ghosted" me because she had set a deadline for a decision regarding my appeal, but the responses I needed from her to make a decision were pending that email response. For the initial filing, I provided Jane with the same information at least 5 times because it seemed like it would very specifically address the court rule we were filing under. She did not include the information in the initial filing. She only included it in a response after I mentioned it AGAIN (but a response is not taken into consideration in the judge's ruling - something Jane did not know). After receiving the judge's order denial, it seems my case would have had a better chance if she had included the information I provided repeatedly. When I asked Jane what she would have done differently if she was filing all over again, she said "oh I don't know" and then didn't elaborate further. Clearly, she had not done any self-reflection to learn from this loss for future clients. 3) MONEY-SEEKING: Shortly after the initial consultation, I was informed by other firms that my initial filing would have cost $3k on the high end. Jane billed me $10k for this. In addition, she mentioned that should I decide to proceed with an appeal the retainer would increase from $5k to $20k and that the appeal itself would likely cost $20k. This was immediately unsettling, but she said most firms increase to this amount for appeals. After discussing with 5 other firms found on the same websites, their retainer remained at $5k-$7.5k and were surprised to hear the $20k fee. Be prepared to be billed promptly every 2 weeks to keep your retainer at $5k.

Jane Michalakes

Replied last August 3, 2023

Dear Yamel, We sincerely appreciate your feedback as client satisfaction is at the forefront of our firm's values. We welcome this opportunity to address your concerns. As you pointed out, it’s important to remember that legal matters can be complex and multifaceted, often involving many variables and uncertainties. Our attorneys, including Jane, pride themselves on providing clear and transparent communication, with years of family law experience to support the guidance they offer. We do our utmost to provide clients with as much information as possible, allowing them to make informed decisions every step of the way. As a firm, we respect and adhere to the ethical guidelines of the legal profession, including not making any guarantees about case outcomes. Jane is indeed an experienced attorney who takes the time to consult with Gavin, our founder, who brings over a decade of expertise in family law, including filing and drafting appeals. This collaborative approach is one of the unique strengths of our firm, ensuring that every case benefits from our collective wisdom and experience. Regarding your concerns over billing, we strive to maintain complete transparency. Costs are clearly explained in our fee agreements, outlining the nature of our billable work and how retainer fees are utilized. This is to ensure that clients, like yourself, are always well-informed about the financial aspects of their case. While we understand and empathize with the financial burden that legal proceedings can impose, the costs associated with filing an appeal, in particular, reflect the immense time, dedication, and expertise required to draft and file such documents. When a client is considering an appeal, we assist the client in the cost benefit analysis by pointing out the total minimum costs the client should expect to pay, and not just the initial retainer. Our primary goal is to provide our clients with the highest quality representation, which comes with costs. We are, however, committed to working with our clients to navigate these costs and provide the best possible value. Our client’s best interests are always at the heart of our work. It is always a difficult decision when advising clients on the potential outcomes of an appeal, particularly given that these outcomes can never be guaranteed and that statistically most appeals are unsuccessful. We strive to provide the best advice based on our years of experience and understanding of the law. Lastly, it's worth noting that in the complex world of family law, each case has unique dynamics and challenges. We stand by the value we offer through our extensive experience, dedication, and meticulous attention to detail. Again, we appreciate your feedback. We continually strive to improve our services and client communication. Please feel free to contact us directly if you would like to discuss this matter further. Warm regards, the team at Halligan LLC

Posted by Michael | November 4, 2022 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Very Professional

I contacted this law firm to help finalize my divorce. Jane was assigned to my case and has been outstanding in the quickness she got started for me. My head was spinning and the stress I was feeling was overwhelming until I talked with Jane and she started on my case. Jane is good medicine!

Posted by Mary | November 9, 2021 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

5 Star Attorney

My situation has been mind boggling, however, my attorney, Jane, has been WONDERFUL. She has been upfront, honest, on top of it, professional, understanding, and calming through this process. I highly recommend Jane and the rest of the team at Halligan LLC!

Posted by anonymous | July 13, 2021 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Great Attorney

Jane Michalakes was my attorney for my divorce process. Although I had my doubts in the beginning as I thought she was being "too nice" responding to my ex she came through very professionally in the end and put the ex in their place when she needed to. Jane and her team of paralegals/staff at Hall...igan LLC did a wonderful job at handling all the required documents, mediation, research, being the middle person with the ex, and etc... I would highly recommend them. Thanks again for all your hard work.

See All Client Reviews

Jane Grace Michalakes's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jane
Christina Lukacsy Friedman headshot
Christina Friedman

Divorce and separation lawyer | Mar 08

Relationship: Co-worker

"Jane is an astute and extremely knowledgable attorney. She is a dedicated advocate and a pleasure to work with. I endorse this lawyer."

Claire Marie Lopez-Jauffret headshot
Claire Lopez-Jauffret

Family lawyer | Mar 08

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Jane is a compassionate and extremely intelligent attorney. She is a strong advocate and a pleasure to work with. I endorse this lawyer."

Laurence I. Gendelman headshot
Laurence Gendelman

Family lawyer | Sep 08

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jane is a highly competent and compassionate attorney. She is professional, a pleasure to work with, and is a strong advocate for her clients. I endorse this lawyer."

Melanie K. Snyder headshot
Melanie Snyder

Unknown lawyer | Aug 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jane is a highly intelligent and deeply caring lawyer. I have always been impressed by her quick insights and work ethic. I strongly endorse her."

Alex James Gunning headshot
Alex Gunning

Family lawyer | Aug 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Matthew Alexander Kilby headshot
Matthew Kilby

Family lawyer | Aug 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Linda Kapsak headshot
Linda Kapsak

Unknown lawyer | Aug 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jane is an excellent and strong advocate. She is realistic and straightforward, and she fights for her clients in a way that is realistic and valuable. She is a great asset to her clients."

Heather Marie White headshot
Heather White

Family lawyer | Aug 16

Relationship: Co-worker

"Jane is a hard working, kind attorney who effectively achieves her client's goals through thoughtful legal advice and representation. Jane is skilled in helping her clients focus on the big picture and remaining as civil as possible during difficult times. I would recommend Jane for any family law matter. She is prepared, experienced and truly cares about her clients."

Alexandra Vandyke Dietzgen headshot
Alexandra Dietzgen

Family lawyer | Sep 22

Relationship: Co-worker

"Jane is a passionate and effective advocate. She works tirelessly to achieve the best outcome possible for her clients whether that be through mediation or in the courtroom."

Gavin M. Halligan headshot
Gavin Halligan

Family lawyer | Jun 15

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"Jane is a fierce advocate and very experienced in family law matters. She is a talented litigator and is result oriented, always considering the best interests of her clients. Jane is caring and responsive to her clients and anyone going through a family law matter can trust her to handle your case."

Joshua Thomas Nowak headshot
Joshua Nowak

Family lawyer | May 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jane is an outstanding advocate for her clients. I have had the privilege of working with Jane on estate planning matters during law school and she is the first person that I contact regarding family law matters. She is professional, brilliant, and a fierce defender of her clients."

Jason A. Marquez headshot
Jason Marquez

Family lawyer | Aug 19

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Knicky Van Goetz headshot
Knicky Van Goetz

Family lawyer | Aug 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jane has passion and integrity. She is a strong attorney that places her clients first."

Genet Johnson headshot
Genet Johnson

Family lawyer | Aug 06

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"Jane provides practical and compassionate representation to her clients. Her understanding of the law and her ability to make her clients’ needs heard contribute to her skills as an advocate and negotiator. I endorse her without hesitation."

View All Endorsements
Melanie K. Snyder headshot
Melanie Snyder

Life sciences and biotechnology lawyer

Matthew Alexander Kilby headshot
Matthew Kilby

Family lawyer

Louisa Schlieben headshot
Louisa Schlieben

Family lawyer

Linda Kapsak headshot
Linda Kapsak

Family lawyer

Shannon Avery Hughes headshot
Shannon Hughes

Employment and labor lawyer

Alex James Gunning headshot
Alex Gunning

Insurance lawyer

Jason A. Marquez headshot
Jason Marquez

Family lawyer

Michelle L. Searcy headshot
Michelle Searcy

Family lawyer

Gavin M. Halligan headshot
Gavin Halligan

Family lawyer

Knicky Van Goetz headshot
Knicky Van Goetz

Family lawyer

Heather Marie White headshot
Heather White

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Work Experience

2018 - 2019

Associate Attorney, Modern Family Law

2016 - 2018

Associate Attorney, The Law Firm of Marla C. Underell, LLC

Associations

2018 - Present

Denver Bar Association, Family Law Section

Member

2016 - Present

Colorado Bar Association

Member

Education

2016

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Juris Doctor

2010

University of Colorado - Boulder

Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Hearsay, Exceptions, Foundation, and Relevance: A Practice Primer

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Just the Facts…and the Law: Effective Presentation of a Case at Temp Orders and Final Orders

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Part 1: Parenting Plans: Tips and Tricks to Avoid PostDecree Litigation

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Effective Use of Children’s Legal Representatives in DR Cases – When, How & Why?

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Keep Your Eye on the Ball – Tracing Separate Property

2022

Colorado Bar Association

A Judge, a Domestic Violence Expert Witness, and Two Lawyers Walk into a Courtroom

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Child Support 101+

2022

Colorado Bar Association

It’s Not Always Alienation: Untangling Alienation and NonPhysical Abuse Claims in Domestic Court

2022

Colorado Bar Association

It’s Complicated: No One Size Fits All

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Understanding and Cross-Examining Professional Judgment of Financial Experts

2022

Colorado Bar Association

ESI and the Ethics of Operating a Modern Family Law Practice in a Virtual World

2022

Colorado Bar Association

C.R.P.C. 1.5, 2.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, and 8.3

2022

Colorado Bar Association

: You Mean I Can Choose My Own Therapist, but I Cannot Choose Which Parent With Whom I Want to Live? A Child’s Wishes: At What Age Can a Child Decide?

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Navigating Custody Battles During and in the Aftermath of COVID-19

2022

Colorado Bar Association

I Signed a Premarital Agreement, What Did I Do?

2022

Colorado Bar Association

New Changes to Litigating Nondisclosure Cases Under C.R.C.P. 16.2

2022

Colorado Bar Association

Different types of DV

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution