We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
PRO
Joseph L. Jordan
Virtual Consultation Available
About Joseph
Biography
Joseph Jordan, Attorney at Law, is based out of the Fort Hood & Killeen, Texas area. He is an accomplished, experienced Criminal Defense Attorney, who specializes in defending ALL service members against violations of the UCMJ. He believes in getting Justice for Soldiers, Sailors, Coast Guardsmen, Airmen and Marines worldwide.
Joseph Jordan has successfully defended service members of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard at military courts-martials. He has established a successful track record with multiple, high profile, and complicated military justice cases. Joseph has achieved worldwide success defending Soldiers against allegations of rape, sexual assault, attempted murder, and manslaughter. He has also successfully defended against various types of white-collar crimes. Joseph’s aggressive, uncompromising, blue-collar approach demands results for his clients.
Joseph Jordan has over 10 years of experience in the U.S Army. He served as an enlisted Soldier for three years, giving him valuable insight into the day-to-day life of an enlisted service member. His service as an Officer and Judge Advocate, afforded him opportunities to advise on legal matters at the highest levels of command. Joseph has first hand experience on the inner workings of various Command UCMJ and Administrative decision-making processes, advising numerous Commanders on all levels of military justice. Joseph has served in Germany, Korea, Kuwait and all over the continental United States.
Joseph is an accomplished trial lawyer, successfully leveraging his experience as a former Army prosecutor to the benefit of his military clients. As a prosecutor, he practiced in two of the toughest and busiest jurisdictions in the Army; Fort Hood, Texas and 2nd Infantry Division, in South Korea. Joseph brings a wealth of knowledge and resources to the representation of his clients. As defense counsel, his cases have been reported in numerous media outlets to include Fox News, ABC News, the Wall Street Journal as well as numerous local and military affiliated newspapers.
Our goal is securing a Not Guilty Verdict for you. First, we accomplish this by aggressively investigating each detail of the case. Mr. Jordan visits the scene. He asks the hard questions and he never gives up until he has the answer he seeks. Second, Mr. Jordan thoroughly cross-examines each government witness. Thorough cross-examination can only come from aggressive investigation. Cross-examination will expose the glaring weaknesses in the military prosecutors case, and seed doubt in the panel members mind. Each seed of doubt is a step towards NOT GUILTY! Lastly, Mr. Jordan passionately advocates your case in closing. He wraps the case up for the panel. He tells your story! Trials are emotional dogfights and the stakes are extremely high. Through aggressive, hard-hitting advocacy, Mr. Jordan will achieve the best result possible in your case.
As you navigate this site, you will notice Mr. Jordan’s experience, case results and testimonials. You will notice his Global Reach. A current list of all of the places around the globe he has traveled to represent his past clients is listed on this site. The News & Events tab will show some of the cases he is involved with, along with several other high profile military cases around the globe. Lastly, you will notice that Mr. Jordan is a dedicated advocate for your cause. Mr. Jordan does not back down from a fight. You can never go wrong with him by your side in a court martial!
- Clerked for the Honorable District Court Judge Donald Nolan, 11th Judicial District, Kansas
- Clerked for Department of Workforce Services, Arkansas
- Former Army JAG Officer
- Army Prosecutor in Korea and at Fort Hood
- Served as Interim Chief of Military Justice
- Legal Assistance Attorney
- Claims Attorney
- Operational Law Attorney
- Administrative Law Attorney
Professional Associations
- American Bar Association
- Arkansas Bar Association
- Military Law Section for Texas Bar Association
- Litigation Section for American Bar Association
- Criminal Law Section for American Bar Association
Education
Civilian
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock, J.D.
- Pittsburg State University, B.S. in Justice Studies
Military
- Basic Training
- AIT for 92A
- Pittsburg State University ROTC Graduate
- Judge Advocate Officer Basic Course
- Brigade Judge Advocate Mission Primer
- Collateral Damage Estimation
Serving Military Bases Worldwide
- United States
- US territories
- Latin America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Middle East -Africa
Defending Worldwide, Winning Big — Over 200 Court Martial Cases with 80% Success Across All Military Services. Call Today at (833) 884-2715 for Hard-Charging Representation!
Practice Areas
1
Practice Area
Military Law
100%
20 years | 1,000 cases
Fees and Rates
Awards
2025 2022 2020
...
+
3
Licenses
Licensed in Arkansas for 19 years
State: Arkansas
Acquired: 2006
No misconduct found
Location
Joseph L. Jordan, Attorney at Law
1033 South Fort Hood Street, Suite 200 #242, Killeen, TX, 76540
jordanucmjlaw.comGallery
Online Presence
Other places you can find Joseph online.
Joseph L. Jordan's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
62 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (62)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Violent Crime
Posted by anonymous | May 08, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Violent Crime
Excellent, Diligent and Professional
We retained the services of Mr Jordan when my son was wrongfully accused of rape / sexual assult. The prosection team was dead set on requesting a 20 year prison sentence. My son was in confinement for a total of 11 months awaiting trial. The original trial date had to be postponed 2 days prior to th...
Posted by Zane Josi | August 24, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Violent Crime
Don't waste your time or money!
I hired Joseph Jordan to defend me against 17 charges of sexual assault and domestic violence. At first he seemed interested and helpful, until he got a hold of my money. That's when things changed drastically. He charged me $21000 to defend my case of which he took $14000 of it. He advised me to wai...
Joseph Jordan
Replied last August 24, 2016This client was in pre-trial confinement during the whole time I represented him. I was the second attorney he hired. It was difficult to get in touch with him and his Coast Guard Defense Counsel routed most of my communications to him. At my direction we secured a navy investigator to actively hunt down leads I identified in this case. I spent over 74 hours analyzing, reading, viewing and listening to material and evidence regarding this case. My staff spent another 24 hours on this case working and analyzing materials. At his request, an itemized invoice of work completed was provided to the client. I do not apologize for the fees incurred because they were earned. The case had not been referred to trial yet. However, I had already prepared and drafted a motion to be filed for his release from confinement the day the case was released from trial. I was let go before that could occur. When the evidence appears overwhelming, I advised this client that a plea is always on the table and that he should consider it. I also said that we were actively tracking down leads and interviewing witnesses. We continued to pursue leads up until the time I was let go. I also advised that even if a plea was offered we can withdraw at any point. When a client tells me know "I want to fight" than that is what I do and that is what I did in his case. Sometimes hard discussions have to occur with clients. They don't want to hear the worst case scenario. I am the type of attorney that does not beat around the bush. I tell you like it is. I tell you how the evidence will be presented to the jury and what the problems are with it. Any of my clients, past or present will tell you that. I will not betray the confidence or the evidence in this case. I am glad he received his desired result. I wish him well in his Coast Guard Career.
Joseph L. Jordan's Lawyer Endorsements
"I endorse this lawyer. I have been in trial against Mr. Jordan as a prosecutor. He's a tough litigator, well prepared, good on his feet. I much prefer to have him on my side of the courtroom!"
"I endorse this lawyer. Joseph is a legend in the Military Defense world and a great guy. Definitely one of the best if not the best."
"I endorse this lawyer. One of the very best military defense attorneys in America. This man is dedicated, intelligent, and talented. He knows how to win and he knows how to fight. Worth every penny."
"One of the most zealous advocates I know. I had the privilege of serving as Mr. Jordan's co-counsel one two matters which both ended favorably for our clients. Truly a dedicated professional."
"Top-notch attorney. I endorse this lawyer."
"I endorse this lawyer. He has excellent credentials and experience in the field of military justice."
"Joseph is a solid advocate for his clients. I had the opportunity to work with Mr. Jordan and litigate a number of cases with him. He always proved to be an aggressive trial attorney who was not afraid to take even the toughest cases to trial. I give Mr. Jordan my unqualified endorsement."
"I endorse this lawyer. Joseph is a skilled lawyer providing impeccable service to his clients."
"I endorse this lawyer. We served in the Army together and have both gone into private practice since. Mr. Jordan works hard for his clients and is always looking for a creative way to solve a problem."
"I endorse this lawyer! He knows his stuff and gets clients results they deserve!"
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I endorse this lawyer. Joseph knows his craft. Trust him."
"Joe is the ultimate blue-collar litigator who is never afraid to get tough in court. I endorse Joe and he will fight for your rights."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"I strongly endorse this attorney. Joseph will always work with utmost diligence and laser focused passion to ensure justice for his clients and when appropriate vindication and complete relief from prosecutorial overreach and sad ruthless vindictiveness that seems to relentlessly face those on active duty. Joseph knows the "system" and will strive to overcome all odds to earn acquittals for his clients. I have personally worked with Joseph and can testify that his vigorous efforts and attention to detail are unmatched. Joseph will ensure his clients receive the best defense possible regardless of the situation. As a former Army JAG Captain with knowledge of the internal workings of the military justice system inside the military, those needing representation should hire this awesome advocate. I strongly recommend this lawyer."
"Mr. Jordan is an extremely effective and experienced trial attorney; especially in the areas of military justice and criminal defense. He tends to be very fact intensive in his research, and is tenacious in his representation of his clients."
Mickey Williams
Military law lawyer
Robert Capovilla
Military law lawyer
Joseph Flees
Criminal defense lawyer
C. Nicole Cooper
Criminal defense lawyer
Michael Phillips
Personal injury lawyer
Ryan Coward
Litigation lawyer
Rachel Brenke
Business lawyer
Chayah Skye
Military law lawyer
Bill Meili
Military law lawyer
Tequiero Smith
Employment and labor lawyer
Terri Zimmermann
Military law lawyer
Anthony Spratley
Criminal defense lawyer
Joseph Easter
Personal injury lawyer
Brandon Moffitt
Real estate lawyer
Lyndsey Dilks
Chapter 13 bankruptcy lawyer
Alex Hyman
DUI and DWI lawyer
Bradford Glendening
Criminal defense lawyer
Jefferson Moore
Criminal defense lawyer
Robert Jones
Tax lawyer
Alexander Pickands
Military law lawyer
Experience
Honors
2023
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2022
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2021
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2021
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2020
Client's Choice, Avvo
2020
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2019
Client's Choice, Avvo
2019
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2018
Client's Choice, Avvo
2018
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2017
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2016
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2015
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2015
10 Best for Client Satisfaction, American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
2014
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2014
Top 40 Under 40, National Trial Lawyers
N/A
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
Work Experience
2011 - Present
Owner, Joseph Jordan Attorney at Law
2006 - 2011
Judge Advocate, United States Army Jag Corps
2004 - 2006
Law Clerk, Arkansas Department of Workforce Services
2003 - 2003
Clerk, Honorable District Court Judge Donald Nolan, 11th Judicial District, Kansas
2003 - 2006
Law Clerk, United States Army
Associations
2011 - Present
American Bar Association
2011 - Present
Arkansas Bar Association
2011 - Present
State Bar of Texas, Military Law Section
2011 - Present
American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section
2011 - Present
American Bar Association, Litigation SectionMember
Sample of Legal Cases
US v. O-3 at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri (Forcible Rape, Article 120 of UCMJ)
Full Aquittal
US v. Navy E-6 -Bahrain- (Article 120, Article 128 Rape and Aggravated Assault)
Charges Dropped!
U.S. v. Navy E-4 – NAS Bahrain (RAPE, Article 120)
NOT GUILTY of Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Sexual Assault!! Guilty of Wrongful Sexual Contact, False Official Statement and Sentence: NO PUNISHMENT!!.
U.S. Army v. E-5 – Fort Bliss, Texas (RAPE, Article 120)
NOT GUILTY of Rape, and Forcible Sodomy 2. Conspiracy to commit rape and forcible sodomy charges were DROPPED 3. Guilty of false official statement and conspiracy to obstruct justice Sentence: NO CONFINMENT.
US v. Navy E-3 Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston Texas (Sexual Assault, Article 120)
Charges Dropped
April 2012 – U.S. v. Coast Guard E-5 (SUBSTANCE ABUSE)
Charges Dropped!
U.S. v. Army E-4 – Fort Drum, New York (MANSLAUGHTER)
Charges Dropped! Administrative Discharge. He has no criminal record and no felony conviction.
U.S. v. Coast Guard E-7 – Mayport Naval Station, Florida (LARCENY)
Full Aquittal!
US v. Air Force E-7 (Article 81, Article 132, Article 134)
NOT GUILTY of Article 81, Article 132 and 1 Specification of Article 134. Guilty of Obstruction of Justice, Sentence: Reprimand and reduction in grade one rank. NO PUNITIVE DISCHARGE! RETIREMENT SAVED!!
US Army v. CW2 (Board of Inquiry)
This Veteran Chief Warrant Officer was Retained!!
US Army v. MAJ (Board of Inquiry)
This Highly Decorated Veteran was RETAINED!!!
US Army v. Warrant Officer (Board of Inquiry)
Honorable Discharge Recommendation. Overall disposition pending due to MEB findings.
US v. E-7 (Administrative Separation Board for patterns of misconduct)
Honorable Discharge due to Medical Reasons. Board recommended General Discharge, however the defense was able to successfully advocate to the Commanding General that the medical discharge was more appropriate in our clients case.
US Army v. CPT (GOMOR Rebuttal)
The GOMOR was filed locally. When this CPT PCS's, then the GOMOR will be shredded. It has no effect on the officer's permanent file.
U.S. Army v. E-4 (Line of Duty Investigation)
Injury occurred IN THE LINE OF DUTY
US Army V. Captain, (Rape, Article 120)
Rape, Not Guilty! Aggravated Sexual Assault Charge Dropped!
US Army v. E-5 (Article 120b, Child Sexual Assault)
NOT GUILTY! FULL ACQUITTAL!
U.S. Army V. E-4, (Forcible Rape, Forcible Sodomy, Violations of Article 120, UCMJ).
NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS! FULL ACQUITTAL!!
US Army V. CW2 (Board of Inquiry)
Not Guilty of Misconduct! Retained!
US Army V. SFC (Adverse Enlisted Administrative Separation Board)
Not Guilty of Misconduct! Retained!
US Army V. SGT (Adverse Enlisted Administrative Separation Board)
Not Guilty of Misconduct! Retained!
NEW CASE RESULT: 18 Year E-7 Army Veteran NOT GUILTY of sexual assault.
Not Guilty of all Sexual Assault Charges, Guilty of Assault, was sentenced to a reprimand and a minor forfeiture for two months.
U.S. Army v. 1LT (GOMOR)
Result: The GOMOR was locally filed, and she was able to continue her career.
U.S. Army v. SSG (Article 15)
The battalion commander found him not guilty, and the Article 15 was dismissed.
U.S. ARMY V. COL (GOMOR)
GOMOR was Locally Filed.
US Air Force v. E-5 (Sexual Assault, Solicitation, Pandering)
Charges Dropped!! Administratively Discharged, in lieu of Court Martial. Federal Felony Avoided! Sexual Assault Registration Avoided!
U.S. Army v. E-6, (Sexual Assault, Sexual Assault of a Minor, Assault, Obstruction of Justice)
Not Guilty of All Charges and Specifications!!
U.S. Army v. E-5
NOT GUILTY OF ALL SEXUAL ASSAULT CHARGES, NOT GUILTY OF SODOMY. Guilty of Desertion and Guilty of False Official Statement.
US Army v. E-4
NOT GUILTY of all Rape of a Child charges, NOT GUILTY of the Sexual Abuse of a Child charge, NOT GUILTY of indecent liberties with a child. Guilty only of the Article 92 violations, and the sexual abuse of a child charges relating to the two butt slaps.
U.S. AIR FORCE V. E-7
Not Guilty of the Charge
US Army v. 03 (GOMOR) (Sexual Assault, False Official Statement)
The GOMOR was withdrawn and DESTROYED!
US Air Force v. E-6 (Article 15) (Sexual Assault, Hazing)
Article 15 dismissed. Letter of Concern issued (this does not go in Client’s permanent file.
United States Army v. O-6 (15-6 Command Directed Investigation)
The Investigation was thrown out.
US Army v. 02 (Spousal Rape, Domestic Violence, Child Endangerment)
Not Guilty of all Sexual Assault and Rape Charges. Not Guilty of all Child Endangerment Charges. Guilty of only 3 of the 9 specifications of assault.
United States Coast Guard v. 01 (Article 120, Sexual Assault)
Charges were not Preferred against Client. Investigation closed in favor of the Client
US Army v. E-5 (Article 120, Sexual Assault, Article 120c Indecent Viewing and Video Recording)
Charges were not Preferred against Client. Investigation closed in favor of the Client
United States Marine Corps v. E-6 (Article 120, Rape)
Charges were not Preferred against Client. Investigation closed in favor of the Client
US Army v. E-6 (Article 120, Article 134) (Sexual Assault)
Charges were not Preferred against Client. Investigation closed in favor of the Client.
US Army v. E-7 (Article 128, Domestic Violence)
Charges were not Preferred against Client. Investigation closed in favor of the Client. Client was allowed to Retire with Dignity.
United States Coast Guard v. E3 (Article 121, Larceny)
Case was negotiated to be resolved at Summary Court Martial. Finding was Guilty. Sentence was extra duty for 30 days. No adverse administrative separation action was initiated against client.
US Army v. 1LT (Sexual Assault – Article 120)
NOT GUILTY! Special Thanks to CPT Nick Allen and CPT Alex Altimas of the Fort Bragg Trial Defense Services in helping secure a victory on behalf of this client in front of an 82nd Airborne Panel.
U.S. Army v. E-4 (Sexual Abuse of a Minor)
FULL ACQUITTAL
US Army vs. E1 (Article 112a, Drug Distribution)
FULL ACQUITTAL
US Air Force v. E-6 (Article 120 Sexual assault, Article 128 Assault)
ACQUITTAL
U.S. Air force V. E-5, (Article 120, Rape)
ACQUITTAL
U.S. Army v. E-4 (Adverse Administrative Separation Board)
RETAINED
U.S. Army v. 0-2 (Article 120) Sex Assault
RETAINED
U.S. Army v. E-3 (Article 112a) Wrongful Ingestion of a Controlled Substance
NOT GUILTY
U.S. Air Force v. E-3 (Article 120) Sex Assault
NOT GUILTY
US ARMY V. E-8 (ARTICLE 121, LARCENY, BAH FRAUD)
NOT GUILTY
U.S. Army v. E-3 (Paratrooper)(Article 120) Sexual Assault
NOT GUILTY
U.S. Navy v. O-5
No Charges Brought! While portions of the initial investigation were founded, several mitigating circumstances were highlighted allowing this fine officer to continue on in his career.
U.S. Army v. E-7 (LARCENY)
NOT GUILTY
US ARMY V. CAPTAIN, (INDECENT CONDUCT, WRONGFUL SEXUAL CONTACT, CHILD MOLESTATION, ARTICLE 120)
NOT GUILTY
U.S. Navy v. E6 (NCIS Investigation)
Months later of "investigating" it was determined there was not enough evidence for Navy personnel to prosecute.
US v. E8 (Sexual Assault, False Official Statement & Violating a Lawful Order)
Reduction to E-4. NOT GUILTY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT. Guilty of inappropriate relationship and false official statement.
U.S. Army V. E-7, (Sexual Assault, Assault, Violations of Article 120 and 128, UCMJ)
NOT GUILTY of Sexual Assault, Guilty of Assault by exceptions and substitutions, excepting out the words assault by strangulation, and substituting the words tussle with a purse. Reprimand, Forfeiture of $1,000 for two months. NO PUNITIVE DISCHARGE.
US Army v. E-7 (Article 93 Cruelty and Maltreatment to Subordinates x4, Article 128 Assault x 6, Article 134 x 2)
NOT GUILTY
US Air Force V. E-4, (Article 120, Forcible Rape And Wrongful Sexual Contact)
NOT GUILTY
U.S. Air Force v. E-7 (Article 81, Article 132, Article 134) Conspiracy, Making False Claims Against the Government, Obstruction
NOT GUILTY of Article 81, Article 132 and 1 Specification of Article 134. Acquitted of Conspiracy, making false claims and wrongful receipt of government funds. Guilty of obstruction of justice. Reprimand and reduction in grade one rank.
U.S. Navy v. E-3 (Rape, Violation of Article 120; UCM, Indecent Exposure, Violation of Article 120c)
NOT GUILTY
US Army v. CPT(Board of Inquiry)(Show Cause Board)
NOT GUILTY! RETAINED!
U.S. Navy v. E-6 (Sexual Assault, Indecent Viewing) Article 120 and Article 120c
NOT GUILTY
US V. 0-5 – US ARMY RECRUITING COMMAND (REFERRED 15-6 INVESTIGATION)
NOT GUILTY
Sexual Assault
NOT GUILTY
US Army v. E-4 (Sexual Assault)
FULL AQUITTAL! Special Thanks to CPT Sam Conrad, CPT Erin Maloney and CPT Alberto Delgado of the US Army Europe Trial Defense Services!
U.S. Airforce v. O4 (Rape, Sexual Assault, Assault)
NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS!
US Army v. CW2 (Board of Inquiry)(Show Cause Board)
RETAINED
U.S. ARMY V. MAJOR (BOARD OF INQUIRY)
RETAINED
US Army v. CPT(Board of Inquiry)(Show Cause Board)
RETAINED
U.S. Army v. SGT (Article 121, Larceny, BAH Fraud)
Case Dismissed
U.S. Army v. E-5, (Forcible Rape, Violation of Article 120, UCMJ)
Case Dismissed
US Marines v. Warrant Officer, (Article 120, Sex Assault Charges)
Case Dismissed
U.S. Army v. E-5 (Article 120b) Child Sex Assault
After charging and much litigation, DISMISSED!!
U.S. Army v. E-4 (Article 120)(Female on Female alleged sexual assault)
CASE DROPPED! NO CHARGES BROUGHT!
U.S. Navy v. E-5 (Alleged violations of Article 92, Article 128, Article 134 of the UCMJ)
Case Dismissed
U.S. ARMY V. E6 (SEXUAL ASSAULT, ABUSIVE SEXUAL CONTACT)
Case Dismissed
U.S. Navy v. LT (NJP) (Officer Misconduct, Sexual Harassment Claims)
Case Dismissed
US Army v. CW2 (Article 120, Sexual Assault of a Minor)
CASE DROPPED! NO CHARGES BROUGHT!
US Air Force v TSgT (Article 121, Article 132)
CHARGES DROPPED
U.S. Army v. E-2 (Article 112a) Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance
UPGRADED TO HONORABLE DISCHARGE!
US v. E-4 (Administrative Separation Board for patterns of misconduct)
Honorable Discharge
U.S. Army v. SGT (Article 15)
REDUCTION
US Air Force v. E-4 (Article 112a, Article 92, Article 89, Article 111, Article 134)
1 YEAR OF CONFINEMENT ADJUGED
US Marine Corps vs. E-6, (Article 120, Sexual Assault)
NO CONFINEMENT
Article 15
REDUCTION OF PAY
US Air Force vs. E8 (Article 92, Unprofessional Relationship)
NO PUNITIVE ACTION
U.S. Army v. CW3 (GOMOR)
CONTINUED CAREER
US Army v. E-7 (Article 93 Cruelty and Maltreatment to Subordinates)
SENTENCE REDUCTION
U.S. Army v. CPT (GOMOR)
RESUMED COMMAND
US Army v. E-6 (Article 121, Larceny; Article 108)
NO CHARGES
U.S. Army v. SGT (Article 15)
LOSS OF ONE STRIPE
U.S. Army v. E-3 (AWOL)
SENTENCE REDUCTION
U.S. Army v. CPT/ O-3 (GOMOR)
LOCALLY FILED
U.S. Army v. SFC (Letter of Reprimand)
NO NEGATIVE IMPACT
US Army v. E-6 (Article 112a, Article 92)
RESCINDED
Article 121, Article 134
GOMOR filed in Unit Local File. No adverse effect on the this Soldier’s Career.
Army, MSG, E-8, stationed at Caserma Ederle, Italy
GOMAR Destroyed
Army, SSG, E-6 stationed in Belgium
Partial overturn – Rank Retained!
Army, SGT, E-5, Fort Campbell, Kentucky
CASE DISMISSED!
US Air Force v. TSgt, E-6 (Article 121, Wrongful Appropriation; Article 107, False Official Statement)
CASE DIMISSED!
US Air Force v. TSgt, E-6
CASE DISMISSED!
Education
2006
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, William H. Bowen School of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
N/A
Pittsburg State University
BS - Bachelor of Science
Speaking Engagements
2015
Oklahoma Bar Association
Military Justice
Languages
English
Activity
Legal Answers
Legal Answers
Q&A
Can a 19 year old get severely punished by the UCMJ by receiving nudes and having sex with his then 17 year old girlfriend?
07 Jul 2020
Q&A
My husband is in the military and kicked me out of our home and literally left me with absolutely nothing!
11 Apr 2013
Q&A
Is the military police allowed to come into a house with no one home?
10 Apr 2013