We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
PRO
also known as K Altman Law
Virtual Consultation Available
7
Practice Areas
9 years | 300 cases
20 cases
18 years | 8 cases
10 cases
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
State: Michigan
Acquired: 2017
No misconduct found
State: California
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
State: Illinois
No misconduct found
30474 Fox Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI, 48331
kaltmanlaw.com48 Client Reviews
Showing 16 - 20 of 29 reviews | Advocacy
Posted by Lola | September 22, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Education
Nurse practitioner
Had issues with my school, contacted the attorney and he was always present at all meetings even when given few hours notification. I was well represented, did his best and I got justice!
Lola - thank you for your positive review, it means a great deal to me and my team!
Posted by anonymous | September 16, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Education
Falsely Accused of Title IX
I was falsely accused of a Title IX allegation in my workplace. Attorney Altman and his team were able to negotiation with my school to get the issue resolved in my favor without a hearing.
Thank you for the positive review, glad we could help you out.
Posted by Shay | December 30, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
Ghosted me for months and no attorney ever reached out to school on my behalf
Did a terrible job at making my case and did not put any effort into making contact with the school. Never spoke to an attorney after the initial consultation meeting. Had three or four different attorneys throughout the course of my case. There was a point when I spent four weeks trying to get in co...
Posted by anonymous | May 12, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Education
Paid $11,000 — No Legal Action Taken, Refund Tied to Silence
I signed a retainer agreement with K Altman Law on April 30 and paid $11,000. By May 6 — just one week later — I had already asked for a refund. Why? Because all they did was attend one meeting. No letters, no legal action, no strategy. They refused to send even a single demand letter. I had alrea...
We are disappointed to read this review and must respectfully clarify several key facts that have been omitted or misrepresented. Ms. Liu initially contacted our office on April 23, 2025, and we began assisting her immediately, even before a signed agreement, because she was in clear distress. After reviewing the matter and initiating contact with her university, she asked us to pause the engagement on April 25. She then re-engaged us on April 28 and formally signed our standard flat-fee agreement on April 30, which explicitly excluded the filing of a lawsuit. Over the course of this short engagement—just six business days—our team: Conducted multiple consultations and reviewed all documents submitted by the client; Determined that the client had not sent her accommodation documentation to the appropriate university office; Attended a Zoom meeting with Ohio State University officials, which resulted in the school approving the client’s original request for remote testing; Drafted (80% complete) a comprehensive advocacy letter to the university and its General Counsel requesting alternative accommodations due to the client’s admission that she could not pass the course using the standard final; Maintained regular communication and attempted to guide the matter through a legally appropriate, good-faith process. While our efforts yielded positive results in a very short and high-pressure period, the client was dissatisfied that we would not immediately pursue a formal demand letter and Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)—legal actions that, under both law and ethics, would have been premature and unsupported at that stage. It’s important to note: The client terminated the engagement, not the firm. We offered a $3,000 partial refund in good faith, accompanied by a standard mutual release and non-disparagement agreement used widely across the legal profession. This was not “hush money”—it was a customary and ethical tool to resolve a prematurely ended engagement. The client’s portrayal that “nothing was done” ignores the factual record and the significant progress that was made. We hope she ultimately achieves the resolution she is seeking, and we stand by the work our team did—swiftly, strategically, and compassionately—within a difficult and short window.
Posted by M | March 18, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Education
Do Not Hire for Any reason!!
Do not hire this "Lawyer", or his firm; I made that mistake and I will share the experience. I contacted Joseph Lento and he brought Keith Altman in during the initial consult April 2021, all three of us on conference call. I explained my severe issue with a university pharmacy school administration...
We take all client concerns seriously and appreciate the opportunity to provide clarity regarding this matter. While we are unable to discuss specific client details due to confidentiality, we would like to address the misleading and inaccurate statements presented in this review. Our firm was retained to investigate and address the client’s concerns regarding alleged falsified transcripts. After conducting thorough due diligence—including multiple communications with the university’s general counsel and independent verification with the relevant licensing board—it became clear that the allegations were unfounded. The client was informed that nothing was preventing them from proceeding with their professional licensing and that there was no valid legal claim to pursue. Attorneys have an ethical obligation not to pursue baseless litigation, and once it was determined that the proposed lawsuit lacked merit, our firm appropriately declined to file. Despite significant time and effort spent on the client’s behalf, we returned the unused funds in full. It is also important to note that at no point did our firm accept any payment from the opposing party, nor did any external matters—such as unrelated litigation between other attorneys—have any impact on the handling of this case. Furthermore, the client had previously retained another law firm, which reached the same conclusion we did, yet that detail was conveniently omitted from this review. We understand that legal matters can be frustrating, particularly when the outcome is not what a client had hoped for. However, our firm remains committed to ethical legal representation and ensuring that any claims pursued are legally sound. We encourage potential clients to rely on factual information when making decisions about legal representation.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2010 - Present
Owner / Senior Attorney, KAltman Law
2017 - Present
Michigan Bar AssociationMember
2008 - Present
State Bar of CaliforniaMember
1997 - Present
American Association for JusticeFounder of the Electronic Litigation Group
2008
BS - Bachelor of Science
2008
JD - Juris Doctor
2020
Electronic Discovery
2010
Electronic Discovery
2009
Electronic Discovery
2005
English
Spanish
Legal Answers
Top Contributor
Keith earned significant contribution points in 2024.
Is this fair? is this allowed?
29 May 2026
Can I sue a daycare
29 May 2026
Is there anyway to make my mother make me go to school ther or with my grandparents?
27 May 2026