Keith L Altman

PRO

Keith L Altman

also known as K Altman Law

3.2
Rating: 6.9

Licensed for 17 years

Education Lawyer at Farmington Hills, MI
Practice Areas: Education, Class Action, Civil Rights ... +4 more

30474 Fox Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI

Virtual Consultation Available

About Keith

Biography

A seasoned lawyer specializing in student defense, Title IX and complex litigation.

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

A seasoned lawyer specializing in student defense, Title IX and complex litigation.

We Take Tough Cases That Other Law Firms Avoid!

Practice Areas

7

Practice Areas

Education 50%

Specialist in School Law and Title IX

9 years | 300 cases

50%
Civil Rights 10%

20 cases

10%
Class Action 10%

18 years | 8 cases

10%
Consumer Protection 10%

10 cases

10%
Litigation 10%

20 cases

10%
Defective and Dangerous Products 5%

Specialize in complex pharmaceutical torts and adverse events due to defective products. Also specialize in all aspects of electronic discovery and forensic data analysis

18 years | 100 cases

5%
Employment and Labor 5%

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Top Contributor
Top Contributor
2024 2023
Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2023 2022

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 8 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 2017

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 17 years

State: California

Acquired: 2008

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois

State: Illinois

Active Out of State Lawyer - Permitted to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

The Law Office of Keith Altman, PLLC

30474 Fox Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI, 48331

kaltmanlaw.com

Keith L Altman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.2 /5.0

47 Client Reviews

Showing 11 - 13 of 13 reviews | Lawsuits & Disputes

Posted by M | March 18, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Do Not Hire for Any reason!!

Do not hire this "Lawyer", or his firm; I made that mistake and I will share the experience. I contacted Joseph Lento and he brought Keith Altman in during the initial consult April 2021, all three of us on conference call. I explained my severe issue with a university pharmacy school administration... involved in mass cheating cover-ups followed by retaliation against me for not condoning the cover-up. The retaliation included multiple years of accusations, manipulations, and persecution to force me to quit, fail, or be removed; including falsifying my transcripts and IRS 1099's. I formally hired the duo, signed the contract and payed each lawyer $5000.00 November 2021; Keith became the main contact and litigating lawyer for the lawsuit. The lawsuit was for abuse of power, force the correction of my transcripts/ files, pain and suffering for 8 years of hell of a 4-year program. Keith said "don't worry, we got your back". Keith Altman expressed to me his ability to practice in the Northern district of Texas where the school is located. I knew the school to be dishonest, but they would not roll over; this was going to be a fight. 22 months later, this lawyer rolled over. I supplied a deposition, hundreds of emails, official documents, audio files, and video files to Keith Altman during consultation with interns beginning Jan 2022.We provided a demand letter; Keith Altman reviewed, signed, and sent to the school June 2022. July 2022 school response was to refuse correcting transcripts but informed the transcripts were sent to the National Board a year earlier, unbeknownst to me. Keith instructed to begin the formal complaint/ grievance. Communication at this point became mostly unsuccessful. Keith failed to disclose the lawsuit filed against him by Joseph Lento whom accused Keith of stealing clients and not paying him; discovered while investigating Keith Altman law due to lack of communication. April 2023, I learned Keith was unable to practice in the Northern district of Texas and was trying get licensed to practice or find a local attorney for help with the case. June 2023, Keith asked if the formal grievance/ complaint was ready, the intern and I answered in agreement; Keith responded this to be his marching orders to begin the official lawsuit. I was unable to get updates for the next 2 months. September 2023, Keith contacted the National Board without consulting me first. He accepted their response without question, decided the case was over, quit without filing the formal grievance, and refunded his portion of the fee ($5000) received November 2023. On the conference call, Keith told me he agreed with what I was standing for and I was correct, but just give in to the school, get licensed and then ask the school to correct the transcripts. When questioned, Keith said to just file the formal grievance myself if I wanted to continue the case, he provided the grievance with a short letter saying I experienced a "hard time in college" giving the exact same false information as the school concerning the transcripts. I believe Keith was paid off by the school to quit the case. A person cannot agree with fraud to get licensed and then go back and question the fraudulent records. I consulted another attorney and was informed the statutes of limitations expired, (November 2023) and possible legal malpractice by Keith Altman. I contacted the National Board and asked detailed verification questions. The board wanted to go over my transcripts, I gave the same details, documentation, and emails provided to Keith Altman. The board followed up by deleting the transcripts based upon the discrepancies the school hid. If Keith provided the detailed documentation with questions to the board, they would have provided proof of dishonest manipulation/ activity by the school. The school ruined my education and killed my future career; Keith Altman hammered the final nail in the coffin. Why did this lawyer not do his job, was he paid?

Keith Altman

Replied last March 19, 2025

We take all client concerns seriously and appreciate the opportunity to provide clarity regarding this matter. While we are unable to discuss specific client details due to confidentiality, we would like to address the misleading and inaccurate statements presented in this review. Our firm was retained to investigate and address the client’s concerns regarding alleged falsified transcripts. After conducting thorough due diligence—including multiple communications with the university’s general counsel and independent verification with the relevant licensing board—it became clear that the allegations were unfounded. The client was informed that nothing was preventing them from proceeding with their professional licensing and that there was no valid legal claim to pursue. Attorneys have an ethical obligation not to pursue baseless litigation, and once it was determined that the proposed lawsuit lacked merit, our firm appropriately declined to file. Despite significant time and effort spent on the client’s behalf, we returned the unused funds in full. It is also important to note that at no point did our firm accept any payment from the opposing party, nor did any external matters—such as unrelated litigation between other attorneys—have any impact on the handling of this case. Furthermore, the client had previously retained another law firm, which reached the same conclusion we did, yet that detail was conveniently omitted from this review. We understand that legal matters can be frustrating, particularly when the outcome is not what a client had hoped for. However, our firm remains committed to ethical legal representation and ensuring that any claims pursued are legally sound. We encourage potential clients to rely on factual information when making decisions about legal representation.

Posted by Joseph Barten | December 11, 2024 | Lawsuits & Disputes

This law firm is a joke

Basically this guy will fight against you and the institution that you are trying to sue even if your rights were violated he doesn't care

Keith Altman

Replied last December 12, 2024

Dear Mr. Barten: Thank you for taking the time to leave a review. While we value feedback, it’s important to address some inaccuracies in your comments to provide clarity about your interaction with our firm. First and foremost, you did not speak with any attorney or member of our legal team. Your case was reviewed during our standard intake process, where we assess whether potential cases align with our practice areas and expertise. Based on the information you provided, our intake team promptly informed you that we were unable to assist with your matter and suggested alternative resources, such as contacting your local Bar Association. It is both untrue and unfair to imply that our firm has a bias or hidden agenda to protect institutions like Capella University. K Altman Law Firm has a well-documented history of standing up for individuals whose rights have been violated, including against large institutions. However, we cannot take on every matter that comes to our attention. This is not a reflection of the validity of your concerns but rather a determination based on the nature of your case and our ability to provide effective representation. We understand how frustrating it can be to seek legal help and feel unsupported. However, we expect reviews to be truthful and constructive. Mischaracterizing our intentions and professional integrity does a disservice to both our team and prospective clients seeking genuine insight into our services. We would respectfully ask you to take your review down. We wish you the best as you pursue your case and hope the resources, we have provided help you find the right advocate for your situation.

Posted by anonymous | December 28, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Do NOT hire them

First off, during the initial consultation with Attorney Altman, he told me he knew my school’s attorney and made it seem like I had a strong case. If he tells you he is familiar with the other party’s attorney, don’t believe him. His office did the bare minimum work in my case. If they had put in mo...re effort and we still lost the case, I wouldn’t be as upset. Except for the general counsel meeting, they did nothing differently that I myself hadn’t already tried to do (write an appeals, send a few emails.) They charged me $13,000 and I got absolutely nothing out of this case. During talks with my case advisor, she would forget details and had to consult her notes. Sometimes I had to send multiple emails to get a response. They put me through 5 months of anxiety and stress with very slow progress and I ended up losing the case for reinstatement to medical school. After losing the case, they tried to just get rid of it and didn’t even try to genuinely explore other ways to help. I hired them after reading positive reviews on here but I am starting to think those reviews are fake. Do NOT hire this firm unless you want to lose thousands of dollars and have no outcome in your case.

Keith Altman

Replied last June 04, 2024

Regarding your initial consultation with Attorney Altman, we regret if there was any misunderstanding about our familiarity with your school’s attorney. Our intention is always to provide an honest assessment of your case based on our experience and knowledge. We apologize if you felt that the work done on your case was insufficient. We aim to give every case the attention it deserves, and it’s concerning to hear that you felt we did not go beyond the basics. The outcome of your case is disappointing, and we understand the frustration this has caused. While we cannot guarantee results, we are committed to exploring all possible avenues to support our clients. It’s disheartening to hear that you felt abandoned after the case conclusion. We value transparency and honesty in our reviews and assure you that we do not engage in any practices to falsify reviews. Your experience and feedback are important to us, and we will use this information to improve our services.

See All Client Reviews

Keith L Altman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Keith

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.9 (Good)

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Owner / Senior Attorney, KAltman Law

Associations

2017 - Present

Michigan Bar Association

Member

2008 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

1997 - Present

American Association for Justice

Founder of the Electronic Litigation Group

Education

2008

Suny Ctr At Stony Brook

BS - Bachelor of Science

2008

Concord Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

Speaking Engagements

2020

AAJ Annual Convention

Electronic Discovery

2010

AAJ Annual Meeting

Electronic Discovery

2009

AAJ Annual Meeting

Electronic Discovery

Publications

2005

Trial (American Association for Justice) Deciphering the Adverse Event Reporting System

Languages

English

Spanish

Activity

Top Contributor

Keith earned significant contribution points in 2024.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution