We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
PRO
also known as K Altman Law
Virtual Consultation Available
7
Practice Areas
9 years | 300 cases
20 cases
18 years | 8 cases
10 cases
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
State: Michigan
Acquired: 2017
No misconduct found
State: California
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
State: Illinois
No misconduct found
30474 Fox Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI, 48331
kaltmanlaw.com53 Client Reviews
Showing 6 - 10 of 13 reviews | Lawsuits & Disputes
Posted by anonymous | October 10, 2022 | Hired Attorney
Saved My Degree and Livelihood
I thought I had lost my degree. I (F) was terrified of my professors/program heads (M), the school dropped the investigation, and I didn't even know if they had followed through on their threat to eject me from the program for standing up to them. This was only a single month before my graduation. I ...
We're so glad we were able to help you with this matter, our best of luck with your new job!
Posted by anonymous | October 05, 2022 | Hired Attorney
Saved my career
I was wrongly accused of cheating at a previous university. The professor was adamant about their accusations and made it their last move to accuse me before retiring from a long career. As a result, his word carried significant weight and I was told I'd lose because of the preponderance of the evide...
I'm so glad we were able to help you with this issue and we wish you the best moving forward!
Posted by Shay | December 30, 2025 | Hired Attorney
Ghosted me for months and no attorney ever reached out to school on my behalf
Did a terrible job at making my case and did not put any effort into making contact with the school. Never spoke to an attorney after the initial consultation meeting. Had three or four different attorneys throughout the course of my case. There was a point when I spent four weeks trying to get in co...
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We take client concerns seriously and we’re sorry to hear you feel disappointed with the outcome. Because confidentiality obligations apply, even when a review is posted publicly, we cannot address the underlying facts of any individual matter in a public forum. That said, we can clarify a few general points about how our services work. Our engagement in matters like this is typically a flat-fee, non-litigation advocacy scope, which focuses on investigation, strategy, written advocacy, and communications with the institution and/or its counsel. It does not include filing a lawsuit or appearing in court unless a separate litigation engagement is executed. Additionally, outcomes and timelines are influenced by third parties (such as a school or its legal counsel) and cannot be guaranteed.
Posted by Betty | February 01, 2026 | Hired Attorney
Scammers
I paid this lawyer $11,000 and he did nothing but take my money. I was in my last Semester at Roane State Nursing, and the Disability Dept. The Asst. Dean and Instructor worked hand in hand to prevent me from graduating. I gave proof to support my claim, and he agreed to take the case, long story sh...
We disagree with your characterization of the work performed in your matter. Our records reflect that your engagement involved substantial advocacy work, including written submissions to the institution’s counsel, a conference with General Counsel, repeated follow-up efforts over several months, a formal demand letter, receipt and transmission of the school’s response, and subsequent records work in connection with possible next steps. Because we take client confidentiality seriously, we will not discuss the details of your matter in a public forum.
Posted by anonymous | May 12, 2025 | Hired Attorney
Paid $11,000 — No Legal Action Taken, Refund Tied to Silence
I signed a retainer agreement with K Altman Law on April 30 and paid $11,000. By May 6 — just one week later — I had already asked for a refund. Why? Because all they did was attend one meeting. No letters, no legal action, no strategy. They refused to send even a single demand letter. I had alrea...
We are disappointed to read this review and must respectfully clarify several key facts that have been omitted or misrepresented. Ms. Liu initially contacted our office on April 23, 2025, and we began assisting her immediately, even before a signed agreement, because she was in clear distress. After reviewing the matter and initiating contact with her university, she asked us to pause the engagement on April 25. She then re-engaged us on April 28 and formally signed our standard flat-fee agreement on April 30, which explicitly excluded the filing of a lawsuit. Over the course of this short engagement—just six business days—our team: Conducted multiple consultations and reviewed all documents submitted by the client; Determined that the client had not sent her accommodation documentation to the appropriate university office; Attended a Zoom meeting with Ohio State University officials, which resulted in the school approving the client’s original request for remote testing; Drafted (80% complete) a comprehensive advocacy letter to the university and its General Counsel requesting alternative accommodations due to the client’s admission that she could not pass the course using the standard final; Maintained regular communication and attempted to guide the matter through a legally appropriate, good-faith process. While our efforts yielded positive results in a very short and high-pressure period, the client was dissatisfied that we would not immediately pursue a formal demand letter and Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)—legal actions that, under both law and ethics, would have been premature and unsupported at that stage. It’s important to note: The client terminated the engagement, not the firm. We offered a $3,000 partial refund in good faith, accompanied by a standard mutual release and non-disparagement agreement used widely across the legal profession. This was not “hush money”—it was a customary and ethical tool to resolve a prematurely ended engagement. The client’s portrayal that “nothing was done” ignores the factual record and the significant progress that was made. We hope she ultimately achieves the resolution she is seeking, and we stand by the work our team did—swiftly, strategically, and compassionately—within a difficult and short window.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2010 - Present
Owner / Senior Attorney, KAltman Law
2017 - Present
Michigan Bar AssociationMember
2008 - Present
State Bar of CaliforniaMember
1997 - Present
American Association for JusticeFounder of the Electronic Litigation Group
2008
BS - Bachelor of Science
2008
JD - Juris Doctor
2020
Electronic Discovery
2010
Electronic Discovery
2009
Electronic Discovery
2005
English
Spanish
Legal Answers
Top Contributor
Keith earned significant contribution points in 2024.
Should I sue my flight school / college?
13 Jul 2026
What can i do
11 Jul 2026
How do I navigate this situation? Do I sue the school? Is it worth attempting to lawyer?
13 Jul 2026