$ 275-275 per hour
As an experienced litigator, I provide my clients a sense of confidence and comfort knowing that they'll not be taken advantage of. Whether your case requires an agressive approach or a subtle nudge, I can help you define and achieve your goals.
3
Practice Areas
$ 275-275 per hour
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Indiana
Acquired: 2005
No misconduct found
333 N. Alabama, Suite 350, Indianapolis, IN, 46204-1989
5 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Posted by Eric | May 23, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody
Child Advocacy and Family Interests: Outstanding Service!
Nathan is definitely a reputable advocate of law. He handled a case of mine efficiently, effectively, and righteously through conference calls, emails, and meetings. I appreciate the Clio app that the firm sets up for clients. The app keeps track of all submitted case-relative documents, memos, da...
Posted by Tez | February 23, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Domestic Violence
INCOMPETENT in my opinion.
Hired Mr. Hacker to get a restraining order to protect my wife and family from the mother of my daughter. In addition to verbal intimidation and social media documented threats, my daughters mother forced her way into my home and physically attacked my wife, Mr. Hacker failed to even call my wife int...
Mr. *******, I am sorry that the case moved forward the way it did as I explained after the hearing. In regards to the protective order issued, the court ruled that the mother of your child had more compelling evidence due in part to the concussion she sustained. I disagree with the issuance of only one protective order in this instance as opposed to granting both, but again this is an issue for appeal. In response to your claim that we failed to call a witness to testify, as I explained during the case, we cannot subpoena a witness without their address. I had been promised that this witness would be physically brought to the hearing since it was not possible for us to subpoena them. I was also disappointed when the witness did not arrive and was not able to testify. Despite the lack of testimony there were several issues we preserved which may result in a reversal upon appeal. Again, I’m sorry that the case moved forward the way it did and that you feel I did not perform my best. I wish you and your family luck moving forward, and that the court of appeals will have the opportunity to consider this issue for you. This can also be a lesson to all clients regardless of who your attorney is. If you believe that a witness is vital to your case, either 1) provide an address so that they can be subpoenaed, or 2) deliver the witness to court to testify if you cannot provide an address.
Posted by Marc | May 16, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
I highly recommend!
Nathan proved time and again that I, his client, was his #1 priority. He and his team always worked in my best interest, and delivered on their promises. I was delighted with the outcome they obtained on my behalf. Also, I was later able to use the free Eskew Law pen to write down the license plate o...
Posted by James | April 26, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Family
Honest, Knowledgable, and Persistant Family Law Attorney
Anyone looking for a great family law attorney needs to check out Nathan Hacker. This guy by far is the best. He is very detailed oriented, knows his stuff frontwards and backwards, and if you are anything like me and find yourself in this extremely difficult situation of fighting to remain an activ...
Posted by Ravi | January 22, 2015 | Family
Divorce case review
Nate keeps it real, extremely responsive, treats you as a partner, watches out for your best interest and is truthful about not running up the tab. His loyalty is with you and not any firm he works for. Awesome experience and i will recommend Nate to anyone who needs help with Family law.
"I would highly recommend Mr. Hacker to anyone seeking counsel in the field of family law. He has a great reputation in the legal community."
"I endorse this lawyer. I highly recommend Nathan. He is a hard-working and knowledgeable advocate for his clients."
"Nathan is dedicated to providing excellent legal services for his clients, either through negotiating a favorable and fair settlement, or by diligently representing clients in court."
"Nathan is a very hardworking, and aggressive attorney who looks out for his client's best interests."
Estate planning lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
2004
Leftstein Award for Pro Bono Service, Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis
2014 - Present
Attorney, Eskew Law LLC
2011 - 2014
Attorney, Cordell & Cordell
2007 - 2011
Attorney, Nathan Hacker Attorney at Law
2006 - 2011
Major Felony Attorney, Marion County Public Defender Agency
2019 - Present
Hamilton County Bar Association
2019 - Present
Indianapolis Bar Association, Family Law Section
won
2005
JD - Juris Doctor
2000
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2016
Complex Division of Real Estate
2011
Use of Technology at Trial
2012
English
Spanish
Legal Answers
When does support end and is the custodial parent under same legal obligation to report certain changes to their household?
28 Dec 2020
If I’m on child support for a child that I’m not sure is mine does that mean the mother illegally put me on the affidavit?
30 Nov 2020
How can I make my ex give me my son back if we have joint custody and he wont give him back to me
26 May 2020