Kenneth Lewis LaVan

Kenneth Lewis LaVan

also known as Kenneth L. LaVan

3.2
Rating: 8.0

Licensed for 28 years

Social Security & Disability Lawyer at Plantation, FL
Practice Areas: Social Security, Government, Insurance

7076 West Broward Blvd., Suite D, Plantation, FL

About Kenneth

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Social Security & Disability 60%

Our firm helps disabled individuals secure Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. We help you navigate through this complex process and appeal any denials. If necessary, we will argue your case in front of an administrative law judge and, if warranted take your claim all the way to the Federal District court.

17 years

60%
Government 20%

Veterans who have served our country should be treated with honor and respect. If you believe you have a service-connected physical or psychological injury we can help you secure Veterans' Compensation. Whether you are starting an application for compensation, seeking an increased rating, or appealing a denied request, we can increase your chances of approval.

20%
Insurance 20%

Private insurance agencies make money through your monthly payments, not through payouts, and it is in their best interest to delay claims, deny claims, or offer minimal support — making the filing process confusing. We know the system well and are very familiar with the tricks, loopholes, and red tape that the insurance companies depend upon for their profits — let us help you file a successful application or make a successful appeal. Protect yourself by seeking legal counsel immediately

17 years

20%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Contingency

20%-25%


Payment Methods

  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Georgia for 16 years

State: Georgia

Acquired: 2009

Active Member in Good Standing

Licensed in Florida for 20 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 2005

Member in Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2014

Licensed in New York for 28 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1997

Currently Registered

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2015

Location

LaVan & Neidenberg, P.A.

7076 West Broward Blvd., Suite D, Plantation, FL, 33317

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kenneth Lewis LaVan's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.2 /5.0

47 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 9 reviews | 2 stars

Posted by anonymous | January 03, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Disapointed

I signed up with them for help at first they were helpful but then never hearx from them even when i won my case.or had questions for them.2times assigned someone different.i think i could have done this alone.now i get letter i still owe them that it wasnt taken out of check.lets see if i can contac...t them.

Posted by kirk | June 11, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Social Security Disability

Helping Veteran ? Must Read

Lavan & Neidenberg Law Firm will hold on to your entitlement percentage EVEN when they have withdrawn their claim to pursue the Case...... 2014 the Law Firm of Lavan & Neidenber accepted my case for service connected PTSD and Lower back injury. They told me how the would get the judgment on my c...ase. Less then a month or so, they send back my file with my documents. I then was told I did not have enough evidence and they were withdrawing their representation. 2018 After Two other Power of Attorneys representation, Lavan & Neidenber law Firm after years without contact or notification "They Made An Inquiry In to My CASE"!!!!! Without my knowledge and permitting. They denied the documented inquiry. The Law Firm sent their Representative Donnel Beckles In a face to face meeting Mr. Beckles Told me not only did they not have any work hours on my case but they will give me a documents stating withdrawal from representation But Not Entitlement!!!! They would do no work but want to be Payed a percentage. When I visited Mr. Beckles on May 5 He gave me another story that they have no interest in entitlement OR FEES and gave me another document. This document was not only date this year 2017 IT WAS FOR FUTURE ENTITLEMENT!! NOT CURRENT OR PAST!!!! Now they refuse to Call or Talk to me.

Posted by Anita | May 13, 2015 | Social Security Disability

Waiting

I know that it takes awhile for SSD to begin....but I do know some people that was with your firm and started receiving benefits within 3 months...and they did not have to attend a hearing....I chose this firm because I had heard a lot of positive feedback...I must say not in my case...I have spoken ...with my case manager Becky and must say she has been patient as I vent to her about how long it is taking...But from my side if i still have to wait approx. 18-24 months for a hearing, I might as well do it myself...I can get my medical records and just wait it out....I thought getting a lawyer would speed up my time for a hearing...I don't really have anything to negative or positive to say because.... I am just waiting...I submitted my papers with your firm December 17 and I filed with Social Security in February 2014....my doctors are waiting to receive papers from your firm to complete but nothing has been mailed to them yet....looks like everybody is waiting...I must compliment the caseworker Betsy she listens and she does return my calls...,just wish I could my hearing scheduled..

Kenneth LaVan

Replied last May 13, 2015

We appreciate the feedback. Individuals applying for disability often express frustration with the wait time associated with their claims. Every claim is different and claims in the disability process are handled by different people. Unfortunately, this can lead to different results and different processing times even for similarly situated claimants. To make matters worse, every region is comprised of different hearing offices which process claims at varying speeds. We always inform our clients that the disability process can be a long and hard fight. We are successful in our practice because we prepare our clients and their cases for that fight. Indeed, we are in the same boat as our clients: we also have to wait the process out. We do not make hollow promises that our client's claims will be sped up if they obtain representation from our law firm. This is because we know that an expedited hearing is only possible if you meet 1 of 2 legal criteria. First, SSA creates an expedited pathway to a hearing by a process called "dire need". Dire need will be authorized if any of the following can be substantiated by concrete evidence: 1) inability to obtain food or shelter; 2) your condition is terminal; 3) you are a documented danger to your self or others. The other pathway to an expedited claim is if you are 100% service connected veteran of the United States Military. I strongly encourage you to contact the law firm and ask to speak with an attorney who can better explain the process. If the only reason you obtained an attorney is to speed things up, then you are failing to see the complicated bureaucracy against which you are struggling. These cases are much more than simply filing papers and obtaining medical records. We understand your frustration, but candidly, your frustration is misdirected here. I assure you, if we had a mechanism to put you at the front of the waiting line, you would be there.

Posted by sam | March 20, 2015 | Administrative Law

Not happy

I've email and call. Nobody have responded yet. The only way I found out anything about my va claim is through my senators office. My appeal is coming up soon. I had initially agreed to just let the attorney attend the hearing. Not sure anymore. Not sure that I choose the right firm.

Kenneth LaVan

Replied last March 20, 2015

Thank you for this feedback. We always strive to work closely with veterans pursuing the VA benefits to which they are entitled. Unfortunately, the reviewer did not provide enough information for us to be able to investigate the specific issues raised in the context of that person’s case. We have a dedicated team of professionals who respond to our client’s inquiries. We strive to answer every communication within a reasonable time if we are provided enough information to us to identify or contact the client. If you feel we have not done so, please contact us and ask to speak to a supervisor.

Posted by Katherine | February 02, 2015 | Administrative Law

Re: Deceased husband's VA Claim

My husband originally signed on with this firm in 2010. He passed away in November of 2013. Two days before his death, we had a meeting with a BVA judge, with Diane Olson who was our attorney from L&N in attendance also. She didn't even have a "brief" ready for the judge nor did she look like what I ...would expect a successful attorney to look like! About the only thing she did was request for his claim to be expedited, due to his end stage metastatic bladder cancer. After he died, I signed up again with L&N, even though I wasn't happy with their service! My husband had started a blog and met some people through it who were guns ho on the research to bladder cancer approved on the VA Presumptive list for Agent Orange. I met with one that he spoke about the most, and between the two of us, we have come up with lots of evidence!! When I forwarded the website address to Diane's paralegal, she tells me she doesn't 'have access to the internet'!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME????? She must've thought I was pretty stupid!! I have not heard anything from L&N for about 8 months now! I think they're sitting on their hands, waiting for us to do all the "legwork" and taking their 20%! I would love to hear back from L&N and get an update!

Kenneth LaVan

Replied last February 02, 2015

4. Comment by reviewer: “When I forwarded the website address to Diane’s paralegal, she tells me she doesn’t have access to the internet!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? She must’ve thought I was pretty stupid!!” I am unsure who the reviewer is referring to here. Counsel does not have a paralegal who works directly as a paralegal solely for Counsel, so I am unsure who made what comments here. Of course, as an attorney traveling around the United Stated doing hearings in many states for our veterans, I have access to the Internet. I use it every day. I have a virtual office that I log into via the Internet each day; I do VA case law research on the Internet; I do research for my clients’ assertions and claims on the Internet. If the reviewer is referring to a person at our offices stating that she does not have access to the Internet from the office, our staff does have access to the Internet, they often conduct Internet research, and they associate researched documents into client files. As to the reviewer’s statements that her husband had started a blog and she had met some people who were “guns ho” on the research to bladder cancer approved on the VA Presumptive list for Agent Orange, Counsel points out that as of the date of this writing, bladder cancer is not a “presumptive disease” associated with exposure to Agent Orange or other herbicides during military service. See , e.g., VA Public Health documentation on “Veterans’ Diseases Associated with Agent Orange” (http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/), 38 C.F.R. § 3.309. . Notwithstanding that fact, arguments can be made associating a disease or condition to exposure to Agent Orange in service. Such research was done and was considered in this veteran’s claims. Arguments will be asserted again after the substitution form is vetted by VA and the surviving spouse can go forward. 5. Comment by Reviewer: “I have not heard anything from L&N for about 8 months now! I think they are sitting on their hands waiting for us to do all the ’legwork’ and taking their 20%.” Our law firm is committed to serving our veterans and their survivors proactively. Veterans Affairs is an agency that is overwhelmed with cases and appeals. During the month of January 2015, VA received 6,044 claims from surviving spouses. On the average, the number of claims from surviving spouses in 2014 ran up to 5,000-6,000 per month. Each claim must be researched, developed and vetted. VA has not yet vetted the Substitution Form submitted by the survivor. Upon completion by VA of that action, the claim will move forward. Thank you again, AVVO, for notifying me of the comments of the reviewer. I hope this response answers the questions raised and I hope it sheds some light on what happens to a veteran’s claim for compensation for his service-connected disabilities when the claimant deceases prior to the adjudication of the appeal. I appreciate the opportunity to reply to the assertions made. Our firm is here to assist veterans n their appeals, and my success and satisfaction as a successful attorney comes from the privilege given to me by our veterans in representing them in their claims and at their Board hearings. I am proud to represent our veterans and am proud of my successes in representing these veterans. Dianne Olson Attorney at Law

See All Client Reviews

Kenneth Lewis LaVan's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kenneth
Scott Gray Layden Jr. headshot
Scott Layden

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Apr 13

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"While I have worked more closely with his partner Adam Neidenberg, Kenneth is also great to work for. I have been an associate with the firm for two years and look forward to many more."

Lawrence Joseph Disparti headshot
Lawrence Disparti

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Jul 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I highly recommend Ken LaVan. I have known Ken and his firm for the last few years. I can say without question, he is one of the most caring, compassionate, and skilled lawyers I have met. This is all evident from the top down in his office. His staff and attorneys are top notch, and fight hard for their clients. Bottom line, Ken wins, and does so with a client comes first approach."

Adam Scott Neidenberg headshot
Adam Neidenberg

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Jul 14

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have worked with Ken LaVan for over 10 years and he has excelled at both Veterans' disability and Social Security disability. He is one of the most respected SSA and VA practitioners in the US and has provided consulting services to several of the largest disability attorneys in the country. Ken has a great team that works for him and you will receive the service that you deserve."

Kenneth L. Hardison headshot
Kenneth Hardison

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Jul 10

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Ken LaVan is a hard working ,caring and highly intelligent lawyer. He fights tirelessly to protect the rights of his clients. You cant go wrong hiring Ken!!"

Chad F. Brown headshot
Chad Brown

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Nov 23

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Ken LaVan runs one of the best Social Security disability law firms in the country. His firm has a perfect balance between size and professionalism. Many large firms are simply mills where the lawyers are merely concerned with numbers - not clients. Ken's firm has maintained a commitment to practicing ethically and is the gold standard for large Social Security disability law practices in the United States. Do not be misled by a few complaints. All firms have a few clients that are not happy. I am sure you know a few people that are never happy as well. Ken's firm successfully represents 1000s of disability clients each year. His attorneys and staff are highly trained and specialized giving clients the best representation at each step of the process. His firm has helped thousands of people in the past. I gladly endorse him and his firm to help with your Social Security or VA disability case."

Steven J. Schwartzapfel headshot
Steven Schwartzapfel

Unknown lawyer | Nov 07

Relationship: Other

"I highly recommend Kenneth Lavan. He genuinely cares about his clients. He is highly credentialed and well qualified. Without hesitation, I would let Ken represent me, my family and or my friends."

Christopher Michael Davis headshot
Christopher Davis

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Oct 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

James Keith Murphy headshot
James Murphy

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Feb 27

Relationship: Friend

"I recently got to know Ken at a legal group conference. This allowed me to see how well he knows the law and passionately represents his clients and their disability claims. I highly recommend him as an attorney."

View All Endorsements
Lawrence Joseph Disparti headshot
Lawrence Disparti

Social Security & Disability lawyer

Adam Scott Neidenberg headshot
Adam Neidenberg

Social Security & Disability lawyer

Steven J. Schwartzapfel headshot
Steven Schwartzapfel

Car accident lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.0 (Excellent)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2015.

Reciprocal - Discipline issued in NY, 2015

updated on 07/07/2016

This means that the attorney's misconduct in another state, or jurisdiction, also violated the rules for practicing law in New York.

Public Reprimand issued in FL, 2014

updated on 06/30/2015

Public reprimand means the attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar warns the lawyer in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.

Kenneth’s comment:

“What the reprimand does not include is that my managing attorney communicated with our client for 3 months prior to withdrawing from the case informing her that she did not have a valid claim for disability and although we were not going to attend her hearing and could not find another attorney to represent her, we would continue to request her medical records for her free of charge, waiving the cost of her records that we even paid for. Two weeks before the hearing we withdrew as stated.”

Honors

2015

Clients' Choice, Avvo

N/A

Law Review, Hofstra University School of Law

Work Experience

2004 - Present

Co-Founder, LaVan & Neidenberg, P.A.

Associations

United States Court of Veterans Appeals for Veterans Claims

National Organization for Veterans’ Advocates (NOVA)

National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives (NOSSCR)

Sample of Legal Cases

SSDI & SSI Client

$26,128 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,475

Veteran exposed to herbicide awarded VA disability benefits

$15,211.50 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $631

Another SSDI success

$21.339 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,663

Client wins disability benefits for major depressive and anxiety disorders

$16,946.70 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,503

Veteran wins disability benefits claim for TBI

$34,205.20 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $727

Disability case won in 4 months!

$22,689 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,543

Peripheral neuropathy from military service wins veteran's disability case

$198,373.25 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $2,769

Social Security Disability Benefits claim

$24,476 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,766

Disability Widows Insurance Benefits claim denied- we appealed and won!

$19,258 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,154

Environmental exposures grant veteran disability benefits for skin condition

$6,954 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,009

Another SSDI/SSI claim resolved!

$26,529 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,304

Client wins appeal and right to retroactive SSDI/SSI benefits

$31,926 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $779

We fought for retroactive benefits - and won!

$19,762.50 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $531

2 SSDI denials until we helped them win

$90,311 in retroactive benefits and ongoing monthly benefits of $1,081

See More Legal Cases

Education

1996

Hofstra University School of Law

Jurist Doctorate

1991

George Washington University

Bachelors of Accountancy

Speaking Engagements

2015

PILMMA Super Summit

How to Create a Great Law Firm

2015

National Trial Lawyers

Maximizing Your Staff's Productivity While Maintaining Great Client Service and Performance

2015

Case Ghost / PILMMA Event

A-Z Law Practice Management Blueprint

2014

PILMMA Super Summit

Tracking and Converting Leads to Clients

2014

PILMMA Social Security Boot Camp

How to Select Your Clients

2013

National Organization of Veterans Advocates

How To Set Up Your Company's Structure

2012

2010

IBM Midmarket Influencer Forum EZ Claim

2008

National Organization of Veterans Advocates Conference

The Basics of Veterans Law

2008

National Organization for Veterans Advocates

Veterans Disability

Publications

Languages

Spanish

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2015
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution