Alan Lescht

PRO

Alan Lescht

4.2
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 37 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Civil Rights, Discrimination ... +6 more

1050 17th St NW #400, Washington, DC

About Alan

Biography

Described by clients as "exceptional" and a "true lawyers lawyer", put Alan Lescht in your corner.

We represent federal government and private sector employees in all aspects of employment law.

Practice Areas

9

Practice Areas

Appeals 12%

12%
Civil Rights 12%

12%
Contracts and Agreements 12%

12%
Discrimination 12%

12%
Employment and Labor 12%

12%
Litigation 12%

12%
Sexual Harassment 12%

12%
Wrongful Termination 12%

12%
Other 4%

4%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 200-400 per hour

Contingency

33%-40%


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2018 2016 2012
...
+ 2
Distinguished Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 29 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1996

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 31 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1994

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 37 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1988

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 36 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1989

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Alan Lescht & Associates, P.C.

1050 17th St NW #400, Washington, DC, 20036

dcemploymentattorney.com

Alan Lescht & Associates, P.C.

1825 K Street, NW, Suite 750, Washington, DC, 20006

dcemploymentattorney.com

Alan Lescht's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.2 /5.0

66 Client Reviews

Showing 21 - 22 of 22 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Esther | August 14, 2015 | Discrimination

Breach of fiduciary duties caused me to lose my discrimination/retaliation case

Mr. Alan Lescht took my case knowing that he was very good friends with opposing counsel and he did not tell me this at the start of our relationship in April 2012. From the outset he did everything to persuade me to take my case which was an excellent discrimination/retaliation case against a large ...government contractor. At the time I hired him, Mr. Lescht he did not tell me that he and the company's in house counsel lived in the same development and were very close friends to the point where Mr. Lescht had given his daughter's baby carriage to opposing counsel. I would not have retained Mr. Lescht had I had this information because I believe it would be a conflict of interest for him. I know that this relationship existed because at my deposition the opposing counsel told, Susan Kruger, who worked for Mr. Lescht these details in my presence. Also, when Mr. Lescht began to threaten to drop me if I did not settle for basically nothing, he himself told me that he was very good friends with opposing counsel and that they lived in the same development and he give his baby carriage to opposing counsel. I was shocked because when I had heard this at my deposition and had questioned Ms. Kruger, Mr. Lescht's attorney working on my case, she had said that she had asked Mr. Lescht about what opposing counsel had said and that Mr. Lescht had denied knowing opposing counsel. This conflict of interest caused Mr. Lescht to drop very strong claims from my case without my knowledge and approval. I have documents prior to the claims being dropped proving that I did not wish these claims dropped. To show how strong my case was, even with those claims dropped, I still survived summary judgement and the case proceeded to court. However, Mr. Lescht then began to threaten to drop me if I did not settle for what he recommended. He told me that at the summary judgment hearing the judge said that my case was weak and that the judge would not be favorable towards me in court if I did not settle for what he (Mr. Lescht) recommended. When I requested the transcript from summary judgment hearing I realized that Mr. Lescht lied about what the judge had said. In addition to threatening to drop me, berate me and accuse me of being greedy, Mr. Lescht tried to get me to mediate in front of a judge who was not assigned to my case. I learned this when I contacted the court and was told that that was not the wrong judge and they made the change to the correct judge. I know Mr. Lescht did this deliberately because he had mentioned the name of the wrong judge numerous times when trying to convince me to mediate and Mr. Lescht's office had communicated with the correct judge numerous times over the five months I had been their client. An example of a strong claim dropped by Mr. Lescht was discrimination with my salary. Documents we got during discovery showed that my salary had been decreased by $5,000 without my knowledge when I became a senior accountant. This means that I worked as a senior accountant for four years but was making a staff accountant salary! The company also blacked out information on the email discussing the decrease in my salary. Mr. Lescht also told me, after the fact, that he had rejected a settlement offer from the company. Numerous other problems occurred with Mr. Lescht's representation. When I expressed my concerns, Mr. Lescht double down on his threat to drop me and eventually did drop me just eight weeks before my case was to go to court. I eventually lost my case because of what Mr. Lescht did to my case. He weakened it by removing its strengths, and when he dropped me I was forced to find another lawyer who could not represent me well due to time constraints.

Alan Lescht

Replied last August 14, 2015

We agreed to represent this client in a lawsuit against her former employer after her first lawyer terminated his representation due to irreconcilable differences. After we defeated the employer's motion for summary judgment, the client rejected our advice and began making accusations similar to the false statements in her review. As a result, we felt that we could no longer represent her and like her first lawyer, we had to withdraw from her case. The client hired another attorney and went to trial approximately three months later after we withdrew from her case. Unfortunately, she lost at trial and lost again on appeal. Based on our success against the employer’s motion for summary judgment, we believe that had this client listened to our advice, we would have been able to obtain a favorable settlement for her. As is evident from the other reviews on this site, clients who follow our advice are happy with the results.

Posted by anonymous | July 09, 2015

Very unsatisfied

Paid for a full hour but sat with him for few minutes. Nothing went pleasant. I had better conversation with others by phone than face to face with him. From minute one, he was trying to get rid of me. He did not listen what i should say. It was really really a strange experience for me. Will never e...ver go back to him even for free. Something really strange with him from minute one. Zero consultation.

See All Client Reviews

Alan Lescht's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Alan
Ari M Wilkenfeld headshot
Ari Wilkenfeld

Employment and labor lawyer | Apr 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Justin S Dross headshot
Justin Dross

Employment and labor lawyer | Mar 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I strongly endorse Alan Lescht. He is truly one of the most knowledgeable and accomplished employment attorneys in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area. His clients are extremely fortunate."

Samuel Abraham Dion headshot
Samuel Dion

Employment and labor lawyer | Jan 04

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. I have known Alan Lescht for many years. He is a top attorney in the areas of employment discrimination and employment law. I can vouch that he is an excellent choice for any person who has a potential legal matter involving employment."

Stanley A. Chinitz headshot
Stanley Chinitz

Employment and labor lawyer | Oct 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I have known Alan Lescht well as an attorney for over 20 years. Attorney Lescht and I were both associated with a law firm with offices in New York and the District of Columbia for several years. Thereafter, I have occasionally acted as co-counsel with attorney Lescht. Based upon my personal and professional knowledge of Mr. Lescht I state that he is a highly skilled lawyer of the highest integrity."

View All Endorsements
Justin S Dross headshot
Justin Dross

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

BV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

BV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Selected as Super Lawyer in Employment Litigation, Super Lawyers

2010

Named One of Top Ten Employment Lawyers In DC, Ten Leaders Program

2004

Top Lawyer, Washingtonian Magazine

N/A

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1996 - Present

Managing Partner, Alan Leschts and Associates, PC

1900 - Present

Shareholder, Alan Lescht & Associates, P.C.

1989 - 1996

Attorney, Reid & Priest

1988 - 1989

Associate, Dreyer and Traub

1987 - 1988

Associate, Goetz, Fitzpatrick & Flynn

1986 - 1986

Summer Associate, Goetz, Fitzpatrick & Flynn

1985 - 1985

Summer Associate, Wingate and Cullen

Associations

2000 - Present

National Employment Lawyers Association

2000 - Present

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association

New York State Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association

Member

District of Columbia Bar

Member

Florida Bar

Member

Maryland State Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Chadwick v. DC

Verdict to Plaintiff.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1987

St. John's University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1984

George Washington University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

Publications

2017

American Bar Association Journal Pregnancy Law

2011

Federal Employees News Digest Staub v. Proctor: A key victory for employees' rights

2011

FederalDaily.com Dual role of caregiver and employee: Know your rights

Languages

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution