Nicholas W. Woodfield

Nicholas W. Woodfield

4.7
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 30 years

Litigation Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Litigation, Employment & Labor, Discrimination ... +2 more

1717 K St. NW, Ste 1110, Washington, DC

About Nicholas

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 22 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 2003

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 23 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 2002

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 24 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2001

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Alabama for 30 years

State: Alabama

Acquired: 1995

Special Member

No misconduct found

Location

The Employment Law Group, P.C.

1717 K St. NW, Ste 1110, Washington, DC, 20006

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Nicholas W. Woodfield's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

14 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (14) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 14 reviews

Posted by anonymous | April 13, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Not a great lawyer!

Nick Woodfield mishandled my employment case and mislead me to sign a release agreement with a lot of holes in it. Mr Woodfield was assigned to my case by his firm and I did not have any say in him leading the case. Once I decided to settle, I clearly provided Mr Woodfield with a list of key provisio...ns that need to be included in the settlement, but he was not able to achieve any of the key ones. He initially presented himself as the best in the industry suggesting he would do a great job, but his results were terrible. Mr Woodfield made many mistakes along the way, including process mistakes, that hurt the case much. Mr Woodfield did not even clearly update me on his lack of success in getting concession from the other side. I would find his failure to achieve the set objectives while going through latest versions of the settlement agreement. There were material differences between him and the lawyer representing the other side. Based on the email exchanges I saw, the lawyer for the other side would say "my client needs xyz" in a very caring manner while Mr Woodfield would say "my client demanded xyz" presenting it as if it was an extra unnecessary demand. Mr Woodfield is also a rough communicator. In an effort to cover up his mistakes and weaknesses, Mr Woodfield would sometimes raise his voice and communicate in a very nasty manner On the positive side, he was available to chat whenever needed and respected our schedule and would show up for meetings consistently. Overall, I was highly dissatisfied with Mr Woodfield's handling of my case and both his process and result were NOT great.

Posted by Matthew | December 07, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Exceptional Experience In Employment Law!!

I retained Nicholas regarding an employment law matter that was very tricky! Needless to say, 99.99% of the cases in this area result in an unfavorable outcome. Nicholas quickly guided us to a successful outcome and we ended up in the 0.01% that have a positive outcome! I am incredibly impressed! He ...had substantial experience in the area, attended conferences where it was discussed, and had discussed the matter with attorneys on various sides of the matter so he knew how every side would view it. He did not need to research the matter and knew the law in great detail! Additionally, we were constrained on time, so we needed his assistance several times within a constrained window. Nicholas and his team went way out of their way to help us, explain how everything works, and help us navigate through the issue to a successful outcome! I will use him and his team again! I recommend him to others as well! Exceptional experience! He made a very stressful experience so much better!

Posted by frank | November 27, 2018 | Employment & Labor

fantastic and knowledgeable lawyer

Great and Knowledgeable attorney I had a phone consultation with him and he gave me fantastic advice and brought up points that nobody mentioned. It was regarding federal employment and EEO.

Posted by anonymous | July 14, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Libel & Slander

If the firm didn't lie under oath, we would have won.

Mr. Woodfield assisted me in a defamation case against one of the largest banks in the U.S. Although, we did not initially prevail, there was a reason. The NY Times and other media outlets have written multiple articles regarding the matter. According to clients directly involved, the bank's emplo...yee(s) made verifiable false statements under oath. After arbitration, the SEC and the CFTC assessed fines and a disgorgement of $367 million dollars. Must prove I have been right all along. The saga continues. Thanks for all of your assistance Nick.

Posted by Matthew Drake | December 12, 2010 | Employment & Labor

When you need the best, call Nick.

Mr. Woodfield, Mr. R. Scott Oswald and the Employment Law Group successfully represented me in a five year whistleblower/employment case against my employer, a U.S. Government Agency. Attorneys are like physicians in that when you need a specialist, you want the best. Nick and the ELG may be expen...sive, but I have found that you get what you pay for when it comes to representation. Our case took five years to litigate against the Agency and the Merit Systems Protection Board. Ultimately, my case went before the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Thanks to Nick and the ELG, we won a precedent setting decision and increased protections for federal workers. This was clearly attributable to Mr. Woodfield's knowledge, his outstanding writing skills, and his hard work. From the first time I met with the ELG, I was presented with a well thought out plan of handling the case. I agree with those who complimented Mr. Woodfield on his outstanding performance in a trial setting. I would not want to go into a hearing without Mr. Woodfield and his team. I also agree that he gave me the right answers, not just the answers that I wanted to hear on many occasions. I recommend Mr. Woodfield and the ELG to everyone I know would not hesitate to use them again myself.

See All Client Reviews

Nicholas W. Woodfield's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Nicholas

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

David R Cashdan headshot
David Cashdan

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Work Experience

2002 - Present

Principal, The Employment Law Group , P.C.

2001 - 2003

Principal, Hughes & Bentzen Pllc

2000 - 2001

Associate, Watson & Renner

1996 - 1999

Associate, Janecky Newell, PC

1995 - 1996

Law Clerk, State of Alabama, Judicial Law Clerk

Associations

2005 - Present

United States Supreme Court Bar

Member

2003 - Present

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

2003 - Present

Maryland State Bar Association

Member

2003 - Present

National Employment Lawyers Association

VA Advisory Rep., Judicial Nominations Comm.

2002 - Present

Virginia State Bar

Member

2000 - Present

District of Columbia Bar

Member

1996 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1996 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1995 - Present

Alabama State Bar

Member

2009 - 2011

Virginia Employment Lawyers Association

President

Sample of Legal Cases

Randolph v. ADT Security Services, Inc., ___ F.Supp.2d ____, 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1811 (D. Md. 2010).

Motion to Dismiss Denied

Kennedy v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, 2009 WL 1321691, 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43, 616 (W.D. Va. 2009).

Motion to Dismiss Denied

Kalkunte v. DVI, et al., 2004-SOX-56, 2005 WL 2822926 (Dept. of Labor, A.L.J. July 18, 2005).

SOX judgment for former employee whistleblower

Drake v. Agency for International Development, 543 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

Complete victory for federal whistleblower

See More Legal Cases

Education

2000

Oxford University

1995

Samford University, Cumberland School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

Washington and Lee University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2013

Virginia CLE Employment Law Update

FLSA Litigation Strategy

2013

The Federal Circuit Bar Association's 2013 Merit Systems Protection Board Forum

Impact of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act on Litigation

2012

District of Columbia Bar

FLSA: Current Issues

2012

Changing Currents in Employment Law

New Wage and Hour Protections to Home Healthcare Workers and New Retaliation Protections Pursuant to the U.S. Supereme Court Kasden Decision and 4th Circuit Decisions

2011

WCL Labor & Employment Law Forum

Problems with FLSA: Classifications, Blackberries and Overtime Considerations

2011

Securing Wages, Protecting Hours: Representing Workers Under the FLSA

Maximizing the Value of Your Case

2011

Judicial Externship Guest Speaker

Practicing Law from a Plaintiff's Lawyer's Perspective

2011

Judicial Externship Guest Speaker

Employment Law from a Plaintiff's Lawyer's Perspective

2011

Changing Currents in Employment Law 2011: Recent Trends and Developments

Recent Trends and Developments in Employment Law

2010

Changing Currents in Employment Law 2010

The Proliferation of Misclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors

2008

MWELA 2008 Annual Conference

FLSA & Qui Tam Law

Publications

2010

Maryland State Bar Association Fall Newsletter DMD Extends FLSA’s Prohibition of Retaliation to Mistaken but Good Faith Complaints to a State Agency

2010

Maryland State Bar Association Fall Newsletter Maryland Workplace Fraud Act and the Misclassification of Construction and Landscaping Employees

2008

DC Bar Publications Wage-Hour Practice, a chapter in the DC Practice Manual

1996

The Alabama Lawyer "A Practitioner's Guide to Alabama's Tort of Bad Faith", 57 Ala. Law. 277, 1996

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution