John Patrick Mahoney

PRO

John Patrick Mahoney

also known as John P. Mahoney

4.8
64 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 32 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Government

Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC

Virtual Consultation Available

About John

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 50%

50%
Government 50%

50%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2023 2022 2021
...
+ 1
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 31 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1994

Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2016

Licensed in Maryland for 32 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1993

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2024

Location

John P. Mahoney, Esq., Attorney at Law

Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, 20004

attorneymahoney.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find John online.

John Patrick Mahoney's Reviews

Showing 6 - 10 of 27 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Lorraine | March 02, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Thank you

I had almost given up on my EEOC case until I reached out to Attorney Mahoney, and he promptly responded to my consult request at 8 p.m. He thanked me for my service to our country. He said his firm would be honored to represent me. I could not believe it. My discovery was ending in approximately 2... weeks, yet he was still willing to consult on my case. During our consultation, Attorney Mahoney was more than generous with his time. His consultation was well over an hour and a half with no mention of additional fees for going over my case. He was personable, empathetic and had a unique way of making me relax under such stressful circumstances. He presented my options and was forthcoming. He was willing to step into a case that was so poorly handled and unsure if it was even salvageable. I appreciated his honesty and knew this firm was my last hope. All I can say is if you need help with a federal agency case, please do not waste your time or money on any other attorney. You must call this firm. Attorney McEntire and Attorney Mahoney are well versed in federal employment law. Attorney McEntire has remained focused on meeting discovery deadlines and filing motions. I am confident that they are looking out for my best interests and cannot thank them enough for guiding me through this difficult process. Although I do not have a conclusion to my case, I am now confident that I have two attorneys who are looking out for my best interest.

Posted by Oluseyi | February 02, 2023 | Employment & Labor

Review

Attorney John is very knowledgeable in Federal employees matters. He was able to assess my case.

Posted by anonymous | January 12, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

JP Mahoney Law Firm. Mr. Matthew Estes

Mr. Matthew Estes was a is an accomplished attorney. He is knowledgeable as a legal counsel on federal labor laws. He was able to guide me through each step of the legal process regarding my case. I especially want to point out that Matthew showed both empathy and sympathy through the entire proc...ess. He was professional and invested the entire time, which is a major plus for me. Thank you, to Mr. Matthew Estes and JP Mahoney Law Firm.

John Mahoney

Replied last January 13, 2023

Thank you so much for your kind words! We are grateful for the opportunity to represent you.

Posted by Lisa | August 09, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Impressive!

Talking with John Mahoney was more impressive than I had imagined it could be. My consultation felt as though I had found the perfect fit for my EEO case and none of the previous consultations I had with other firms felt that way. He is a compassionate professional that knows the law. I learned far m...ore from him than I had from 3 other attorneys combined. I knew he was who I needed and was meant to represent me. I am so inspired and grateful.

Posted by anonymous | February 21, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Employment & Labor

Initial Consultation Feedback

Attorney Mahoney prepared extremely well for the call and gave me the full confidence it was worth my investment to ask his firm to represent me in filing an EEO complaint. He was honest about my chances of success. He focused on asking specific questions that would support my claim applying his expe...rience in dealing with the administrative judges who would decide my case. We discussed specific Govt individuals’ backgrounds and motives and other key context to give him a full picture of the complexity of my situation. A former colleague and sitting US judge recommended Attorney Mahoney to me. I am pleased with this referral. I have already been assigned a partner who will work with Attorney Mahoney to proceed with my case. I am resting easier knowing I will not carry this burden by myself. I am very pleased with my initial consultation and look forward to a successful outcome.

John Mahoney

Replied last February 23, 2022

Thank you so much for leaving a review - we love to hear feedback like this! We work really hard to provide for a good experience and it is encouraging to see that reflected in your experience. Thanks, again!

See All Client Reviews

John Patrick Mahoney's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John
Melissa L. Z. Lolotai headshot
Melissa Lolotai

Employment and labor lawyer | Mar 31

Relationship: Co-worker

"John is an expert in this field and highly respected among peers."

Michael Denis Mierau Jr. headshot
Michael Mierau

Employment and labor lawyer | May 08

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. John Mahoney is a leading expert in employment law. He cares deeply about the needs of his clients and uses his expertise to ensure the best possible outcome for them."

Letha Ann Miller headshot
Letha Miller

Employment and labor lawyer | Apr 29

Relationship: Co-worker

"John is a great attorney and wealth of information on federal employment legal matters."

View All Endorsements
Steven L. Herrick headshot
Steven Herrick

Employment and labor lawyer

Mathew B Tully headshot
Mathew Tully

Military law lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024.

Reciprocal - Suspension issued in MD, 2024

updated on 05/13/2025

This means that the attorney's misconduct in another state, or jurisdiction, also violated the rules for practicing law in Maryland.

Informal Admonition issued in DC, 2016

updated on 09/14/2016

An admonition means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar gives the lawyer an admonition in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Honors

2021

Federal Employment Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Corporate INTL

2021

Federal Employment Law - Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Global Law Experts

2021

Featured Attorney, Lawyers of Distinction

2021

Top Attorneys, National Law Journal

2021

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2021

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2020

Client’s Choice Award, Avvo

2020

Federal Employment Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Corporate INTL

2020

Federal Employment Law - Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Global Law Experts

2020

Top 100 Attorney, America's Top 100 Attorneys

2020

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2020

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2019

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2019

Top Attorneys, National Law Journal

2019

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2018

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2018

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2017

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2016

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2015

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2011

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2010

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2009

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2008

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2007

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2006

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2005

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2004

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2003

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Principal, The Law Firm of John P. Mahoney, Esq., Attorneys at Law

2009 - 2014

Partner, Tully Rinckey, PLLC

2009 - 2014

Chairman of the Labor & Employment Law Practice Group, Tully Rinckey, PLLC

2003 - 2008

Managing Partner, Mahoney & Mahoney, LLP

2000 - 2003

Senior Associate, Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & Roth

1992 - 1999

Attorney, Passman & Kaplan, PC

Associations

American Bar Association

Member

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

2009 - 2014

District of Columbia Bar, Labor and Employment Law

Co-chair

2003 - 2004

District of Columbia Bar, Labor and Employment Law

Past Chair

Sample of Legal Cases

UK v. Secretary, Dep’t of the Army, EEOC Case No. 531-2011-00095X (Shubow, Admin. J. Mar. 31, 2015)

ATTORNEY MAHONEY'S CLIENT AWARDED NEARLY $330,000 BY THE EEOC:

Cohen v. Department of Homeland Security (ICE), MSPB Docket No. SF-0752-12-0427-I-1 (Jun. 19, 2014)(nonprecedential)

MSPB Mitigated Client's Removal to 90-day suspension with backpay, benefits, & fees

Hamilton v. Donley, Sec'y, Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 0520130469 (Dec. 20, 2013)(Settled May 14, 2012)

Attorney Mahoney's Client Awarded Approximately $1,000,000, plus removal canceled and returned to LEO duty with a promotion.

O'Keefe v. Donahoe, Postmaster Gen., United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), EEOC Appeal No. 0120130848 (Jun. 11, 2013)

EEOC Ruled Attorney Mahoney's client was discriminated against and ordered status quo anti relief, compensatory damages and fees..

Hussey v. United States Department of Agriculture, MSPB Docket No. DA-0752-10-0130-A-1 (Jan. 6, 2011).

Attorney Mahoney's Client's Removal Appeal Settled $45,000 in reasonable attorneys’ fees based upon the successfully enforced settlement.

Farrell v. Dep't of Treasury, EEOC Petition No. 0420070019 (Oct. 24, 2008)

Attorney Mahoney's Petition to Enforce Previous EEOC Decision Granted in successful SES nonselection EEOC case

Johnson v. Johanns, Sec'y, USDA, EEOC CASE No. 520-2006-00120X (EEOC NYDO, BAO, Default Judgment Sanctions Or. Jan. 22, 2007)

Attorney Mahoney Secured Full-Relief Default Judgment Sanctions/Full Relied in Novel Removal EEOC Case

See The Washington Post, Mar. 8, 2006, The Federal Page.

Settled Client's claims of sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliation against FEC

See the Gazette Newspaper June 3, 2005

Attorney Mahoney Settled Client's EEO Disability Discrimination Case v. NIH, NCI

Cornyn v. Department of the Treasury, MSPB Docket No. DC-0351-02-0576-I-1 (Sep. 30, 2003)

Attorney Mahoney Successfully Represents the U.S. Department of the Treasury in MSPB RIF Appeal

Farrell v. Snow, Sec'y, Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 07A20043 (May 5, 2003)

Attorney Mahoney WIns EEOC SES Nonselection Case for Federal Employee

Flythe v. Caldera, Sec'y, Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01972258 (2000)

Attorney Mahoney won a finding of discrimination and an award of full relief, with backpay and compensatory damages in excess of $100,000

VanWersch v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 197 F.3d 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1999)

Attorney Mahoney Wins Novel Due Process MSPB Appeal for Class of Disabled Federal Employees

Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, 943 F. Supp. 69 (D.D.C. 1996)

Attorney Mahoney won this case of first impression as the first case awarding compensatory damages under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a

Wheeler v. District of Columbia (D.D.C. Feb. 10, 1995)

Attorney Mahoney Won a Class Action in D.D.C., receiving a multi-million dollar backpay award for all retired U.S. Park Police

Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, 125 F.3d 877 (D.C. Cir. 1997), reh'g den., No. 96-503 (1997), cert. den., 524 U.S. 922 (1998)

42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-16 amended to cover Smithsonian Institution

See More Legal Cases

Education

1993

Catholic University of America

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

Assumption College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2009

D.C. Bar Association

How to take an effective deposition- CLE Attendee

Publications

2011

National Law Journal What Rights to Privacy Do Federal Employees Have?

N/A

National Employee Rights Institute Federal Employees Legal Survival Guide

Languages

English

Spanish

Portuguese

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution