John Patrick Mahoney

PRO

John Patrick Mahoney

also known as John P. Mahoney

4.8
64 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 32 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Government

Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC

Virtual Consultation Available

About John

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 50%

50%
Government 50%

50%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2023 2022 2021
...
+ 1
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 31 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1994

Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2016

Licensed in Maryland for 32 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1993

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2024

Location

John P. Mahoney, Esq., Attorney at Law

Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, 20004

attorneymahoney.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find John online.

John Patrick Mahoney's Reviews

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Military Law

Posted by anonymous | March 27, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Military Law

Revoked Security Clearance

I did not initially have the funds to afford a lawyer when my security clearance was revoked. After a few weeks, I was able to scrape up enough money to hire Attorney Mahoney's services. The downside is, by the time I was able to get an attorney there was only 3 weeks left before my case had to be su...bmitted. Attorney Mierau, who worked my case, gave me the guidance I needed to get the documentation that would assist my case. His guidance along with his arguments helped me to win my security clearance back. They say these things are made for the average person to understand, but they're not. They are very complicated, and it is difficult to understand what is important and what is not important when it comes to responding to the case. Thankfully, Attorney Mierau made it very clear what needed to be done. And because of that, I get to keep my job.

Posted by anonymous | May 12, 2022 | Military Law

Sour Experience

Conversation was immediately short, met with immense irritable mannerisms, and unprofessional. Arriving back from a VA appointment in which I responded with a call back within the given 15 minute window only to be met with the response; "no wonder your were terminated". I missed our initial consultat...ion as my phone blocked the number and sent it to voicemail as I was expecting a return call from the number I called on the website; my bad; but I'm good. I'm sure the firm has served other clients in a better capacity in which I don't want to negate their efforts and accomplishments; as the only focal point of my conversation rotated around fees and "pounding sand" without a thorough consultation towards a resolution in regards to my circumstance; as if there was no winning strategy developed as the barrier was already put up from the second call back attempt. It just wasn't for me. No harsh feelings though, just my personal experience.

John Mahoney

Replied last June 08, 2022

I'm sorry you feel you didn't have a good experience during your initial consultation with me. I always strive to provide potential new clients substantive, accurate, and effective legal advice during our initial consultations, regardless of the merits of their legal matter. As I recall, our consultation was a number of years ago, certainly not recently. So, I'm not sure why you just submitted your review in May of 2022. According to your review, you were terminated. I'm sure you clearly understood my reference to "pounding sand". However, I'm not at liberty to explain it again here. Moreover, contrary to your review, you have never been a client of this law firm. If you still have a pending case and would like our help to try to get your get your termination reversed with backpay, benefits, interest, proven compensatory damages, and attorneys fees, feel free to contact us at 202-759-7780 to schedule a new consultation. Either way, good luck with your federal career.

See All Client Reviews

John Patrick Mahoney's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John
Melissa L. Z. Lolotai headshot
Melissa Lolotai

Employment and labor lawyer | Mar 31

Relationship: Co-worker

"John is an expert in this field and highly respected among peers."

Michael Denis Mierau Jr. headshot
Michael Mierau

Employment and labor lawyer | May 08

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. John Mahoney is a leading expert in employment law. He cares deeply about the needs of his clients and uses his expertise to ensure the best possible outcome for them."

Letha Ann Miller headshot
Letha Miller

Employment and labor lawyer | Apr 29

Relationship: Co-worker

"John is a great attorney and wealth of information on federal employment legal matters."

View All Endorsements
Steven L. Herrick headshot
Steven Herrick

Employment and labor lawyer

Mathew B Tully headshot
Mathew Tully

Military law lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024.

Reciprocal - Suspension issued in MD, 2024

updated on 05/13/2025

This means that the attorney's misconduct in another state, or jurisdiction, also violated the rules for practicing law in Maryland.

Informal Admonition issued in DC, 2016

updated on 09/14/2016

An admonition means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar gives the lawyer an admonition in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Honors

2021

Federal Employment Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Corporate INTL

2021

Federal Employment Law - Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Global Law Experts

2021

Featured Attorney, Lawyers of Distinction

2021

Top Attorneys, National Law Journal

2021

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2021

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2020

Client’s Choice Award, Avvo

2020

Federal Employment Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Corporate INTL

2020

Federal Employment Law - Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Global Law Experts

2020

Top 100 Attorney, America's Top 100 Attorneys

2020

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2020

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2019

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2019

Top Attorneys, National Law Journal

2019

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2018

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2018

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2017

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2016

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2015

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2011

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2010

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2009

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2008

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2007

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2006

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2005

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2004

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2003

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Principal, The Law Firm of John P. Mahoney, Esq., Attorneys at Law

2009 - 2014

Partner, Tully Rinckey, PLLC

2009 - 2014

Chairman of the Labor & Employment Law Practice Group, Tully Rinckey, PLLC

2003 - 2008

Managing Partner, Mahoney & Mahoney, LLP

2000 - 2003

Senior Associate, Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & Roth

1992 - 1999

Attorney, Passman & Kaplan, PC

Associations

American Bar Association

Member

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

2009 - 2014

District of Columbia Bar, Labor and Employment Law

Co-chair

2003 - 2004

District of Columbia Bar, Labor and Employment Law

Past Chair

Sample of Legal Cases

UK v. Secretary, Dep’t of the Army, EEOC Case No. 531-2011-00095X (Shubow, Admin. J. Mar. 31, 2015)

ATTORNEY MAHONEY'S CLIENT AWARDED NEARLY $330,000 BY THE EEOC:

Cohen v. Department of Homeland Security (ICE), MSPB Docket No. SF-0752-12-0427-I-1 (Jun. 19, 2014)(nonprecedential)

MSPB Mitigated Client's Removal to 90-day suspension with backpay, benefits, & fees

Hamilton v. Donley, Sec'y, Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 0520130469 (Dec. 20, 2013)(Settled May 14, 2012)

Attorney Mahoney's Client Awarded Approximately $1,000,000, plus removal canceled and returned to LEO duty with a promotion.

O'Keefe v. Donahoe, Postmaster Gen., United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), EEOC Appeal No. 0120130848 (Jun. 11, 2013)

EEOC Ruled Attorney Mahoney's client was discriminated against and ordered status quo anti relief, compensatory damages and fees..

Hussey v. United States Department of Agriculture, MSPB Docket No. DA-0752-10-0130-A-1 (Jan. 6, 2011).

Attorney Mahoney's Client's Removal Appeal Settled $45,000 in reasonable attorneys’ fees based upon the successfully enforced settlement.

Farrell v. Dep't of Treasury, EEOC Petition No. 0420070019 (Oct. 24, 2008)

Attorney Mahoney's Petition to Enforce Previous EEOC Decision Granted in successful SES nonselection EEOC case

Johnson v. Johanns, Sec'y, USDA, EEOC CASE No. 520-2006-00120X (EEOC NYDO, BAO, Default Judgment Sanctions Or. Jan. 22, 2007)

Attorney Mahoney Secured Full-Relief Default Judgment Sanctions/Full Relied in Novel Removal EEOC Case

See The Washington Post, Mar. 8, 2006, The Federal Page.

Settled Client's claims of sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliation against FEC

See the Gazette Newspaper June 3, 2005

Attorney Mahoney Settled Client's EEO Disability Discrimination Case v. NIH, NCI

Cornyn v. Department of the Treasury, MSPB Docket No. DC-0351-02-0576-I-1 (Sep. 30, 2003)

Attorney Mahoney Successfully Represents the U.S. Department of the Treasury in MSPB RIF Appeal

Farrell v. Snow, Sec'y, Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 07A20043 (May 5, 2003)

Attorney Mahoney WIns EEOC SES Nonselection Case for Federal Employee

Flythe v. Caldera, Sec'y, Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01972258 (2000)

Attorney Mahoney won a finding of discrimination and an award of full relief, with backpay and compensatory damages in excess of $100,000

VanWersch v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 197 F.3d 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1999)

Attorney Mahoney Wins Novel Due Process MSPB Appeal for Class of Disabled Federal Employees

Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, 943 F. Supp. 69 (D.D.C. 1996)

Attorney Mahoney won this case of first impression as the first case awarding compensatory damages under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a

Wheeler v. District of Columbia (D.D.C. Feb. 10, 1995)

Attorney Mahoney Won a Class Action in D.D.C., receiving a multi-million dollar backpay award for all retired U.S. Park Police

Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, 125 F.3d 877 (D.C. Cir. 1997), reh'g den., No. 96-503 (1997), cert. den., 524 U.S. 922 (1998)

42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-16 amended to cover Smithsonian Institution

See More Legal Cases

Education

1993

Catholic University of America

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

Assumption College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2009

D.C. Bar Association

How to take an effective deposition- CLE Attendee

Publications

2011

National Law Journal What Rights to Privacy Do Federal Employees Have?

N/A

National Employee Rights Institute Federal Employees Legal Survival Guide

Languages

English

Spanish

Portuguese

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution