John Patrick Mahoney

PRO

John Patrick Mahoney

also known as John P. Mahoney

4.8
64 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 32 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Government

Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC

Virtual Consultation Available

About John

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 50%

50%
Government 50%

50%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2023 2022 2021
...
+ 1
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 31 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1994

Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2016

Licensed in Maryland for 32 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1993

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2024

Location

John P. Mahoney, Esq., Attorney at Law

Ronald Reagan Building & International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, 20004

attorneymahoney.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find John online.

John Patrick Mahoney's Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 7 reviews | Discrimination

Posted by James | December 08, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Discrimination

Experienced, Knowledgeable, and Responsive…

I sought legal representation from multiple firms for a complicated clearance revocation, whistleblower, and EEO case. My research revealed that few attorneys in the DC area have successfully handled cases with such complexities. My initial consultation with Mr. Mahoney reassured me that he had the... experience and expertise I needed. No federal civil servant wants to face such matters, especially at the end of their career. But if you do, it’s critically important to have the best legal guidance and support. I’m confident that Mr. Mahoney is the best choice for me.

Posted by Lisa | August 09, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Discrimination

Impressive!

Talking with John Mahoney was more impressive than I had imagined it could be. My consultation felt as though I had found the perfect fit for my EEO case and none of the previous consultations I had with other firms felt that way. He is a compassionate professional that knows the law. I learned far m...ore from him than I had from 3 other attorneys combined. I knew he was who I needed and was meant to represent me. I am so inspired and grateful.

Posted by anonymous | October 17, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Discrimination

Hired after our consultation

Mr. Mahoney was very thorough and prompt. During my consultation he gave me some pointers and didn’t waste any time talking with me. I’ve been harassed by management and denied FMLA leave and discriminated against my disability and denied temporary accommodation. I shouldn’t be harassed on a daily ...basis and the agency allows this type of behavior. I can’t wait to be able to work in a peaceful work environment and be treated fairly. I am confident Mr. Mahoney & his team will be able to settle this issue in a timely manner.

Posted by Duane | February 09, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Discrimination

Appreciation

I want to thank you so much for your availability, follow-up, and especially the attentive and prompt replies have been invaluable, John Mahoney. He listened carefully as I laid out my situation, provided me an initial assessment of my case, and reassured me that I have a lot of protections in place ...under Federal law and policy. Having never experienced on going, everyday discrimination in the workplace, which has, been affecting my health, well-being. and exacerbated my PTSD.I had no idea how to handle discrimination claim, and the feeling of going into it alone was very intimidating I reached out to a number of law firms, and consulted with an attorney in a different firms who just said, "file an EEO complaint," or talk to your union and they did not seem in the least bit interested in taking on my case. He described the way ahead clearly. I cannot describe the feeling of relief that I have, knowing that I have experienced Federal Labor law Attorney to help me navigate the process. I am no longer all alone in fighting an extremely stressful and emotionally draining situation. I want the discrimination to stop, and the situation to be resolved fairly and quickly, and John Mahoney gives me every confidence that outcome will transpire.

John Mahoney

Replied last February 09, 2021

Thank you so much for your kind words! It is a true pleasure to represent you. We take pride in going to battle for our clients.

Posted by George | May 23, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Discrimination

Candid, Knowledgeable Counsel

I've never had any trouble in my federal service until I transferred to an organization with mediocre leadership and arbitrary performance standards. I was rather shocked to receive a Notice of Proposed Removal via mail when I was hospitalized for a medical condition incurred during military service.... I knew I needed an attorney with experience in federal employment law due to the complexity and differences between private sector and government employment. I had searched for representation and tried to tell my side of the story to other law firms only to be met with indifference and told I needed to pay an $8000 retainer to have them even consider taking my case. I was very fortunate to find Mr. Mahoney's firm. I was given a free consultation from Mr. Mahoney himself (rather than an office manager) and he took the time to listen and consider the merits of my case. Like many federal employees, I'm not wealthy and was relieved to hear that the firm's initial retainer fee was around $3000 which was less than half of what other firms wanted and gave me the comfort to know I could at least be able to afford some representation. Mr. Mahoney's firm was able to prevent my Agency from illegally firing me, force the Agency to hold the supervisor accountable for their actions, and minimize their attempts to retaliate against me for exposing a supervisor's malfeasance." Firm Partner Melissa Lolotai exemplifies the term 'Counsel' in the highest and noblest sense of the word. Ms. Lolotai was able to expertly cut through my Agency's falsifications and gross inconsistencies and explain the legalities of every aspect and phase of my case. I was able to take comfort in the fact that I had a highly experienced and sharp attorney to speak on my behalf so I could focus on trying to get healthy and not worrying about being subject to an illegal Notice of Proposed Removal and later was able to shield me from almost all of my Agency's brutal attempts to retaliate against me, to include a Proposed 30 Day Suspension for exposing Agency malfeasance. Ms. Lolotai's arguments were so strong that Agency's Attorney was in the words of the Agency, "unresponsive for requests for information" for well over 3 months and the GS-15 Deciding Official opting to retire and send the decision higher rather than issuing a decision. Ms. Lolotai was extremely caring and compassionate and helped me keep my sanity even as the Agency attempted to gaslight me for several months and retaliate. Ms. Lolotai was able to also keep my Agency's EEO office honest when I filed my EEO complaint and helped me expose my senior leadership's retaliatory animus and deceptions.

See All Client Reviews

John Patrick Mahoney's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John
Melissa L. Z. Lolotai headshot
Melissa Lolotai

Employment and labor lawyer | Mar 31

Relationship: Co-worker

"John is an expert in this field and highly respected among peers."

Michael Denis Mierau Jr. headshot
Michael Mierau

Employment and labor lawyer | May 08

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. John Mahoney is a leading expert in employment law. He cares deeply about the needs of his clients and uses his expertise to ensure the best possible outcome for them."

Letha Ann Miller headshot
Letha Miller

Employment and labor lawyer | Apr 29

Relationship: Co-worker

"John is a great attorney and wealth of information on federal employment legal matters."

View All Endorsements
Steven L. Herrick headshot
Steven Herrick

Employment and labor lawyer

Mathew B Tully headshot
Mathew Tully

Military law lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024.

Reciprocal - Suspension issued in MD, 2024

updated on 05/13/2025

This means that the attorney's misconduct in another state, or jurisdiction, also violated the rules for practicing law in Maryland.

Informal Admonition issued in DC, 2016

updated on 09/14/2016

An admonition means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar gives the lawyer an admonition in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Honors

2021

Federal Employment Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Corporate INTL

2021

Federal Employment Law - Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Global Law Experts

2021

Featured Attorney, Lawyers of Distinction

2021

Top Attorneys, National Law Journal

2021

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2021

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2020

Client’s Choice Award, Avvo

2020

Federal Employment Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Corporate INTL

2020

Federal Employment Law - Lawyer of the Year in Washington D.C., Global Law Experts

2020

Top 100 Attorney, America's Top 100 Attorneys

2020

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2020

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2019

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2019

Top Attorneys, National Law Journal

2019

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2018

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2018

Top Lawyer, American Lawyer

2017

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2016

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2015

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2011

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2010

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2009

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2008

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2007

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2006

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2005

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2004

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2003

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Principal, The Law Firm of John P. Mahoney, Esq., Attorneys at Law

2009 - 2014

Partner, Tully Rinckey, PLLC

2009 - 2014

Chairman of the Labor & Employment Law Practice Group, Tully Rinckey, PLLC

2003 - 2008

Managing Partner, Mahoney & Mahoney, LLP

2000 - 2003

Senior Associate, Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & Roth

1992 - 1999

Attorney, Passman & Kaplan, PC

Associations

American Bar Association

Member

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

2009 - 2014

District of Columbia Bar, Labor and Employment Law

Co-chair

2003 - 2004

District of Columbia Bar, Labor and Employment Law

Past Chair

Sample of Legal Cases

UK v. Secretary, Dep’t of the Army, EEOC Case No. 531-2011-00095X (Shubow, Admin. J. Mar. 31, 2015)

ATTORNEY MAHONEY'S CLIENT AWARDED NEARLY $330,000 BY THE EEOC:

Cohen v. Department of Homeland Security (ICE), MSPB Docket No. SF-0752-12-0427-I-1 (Jun. 19, 2014)(nonprecedential)

MSPB Mitigated Client's Removal to 90-day suspension with backpay, benefits, & fees

Hamilton v. Donley, Sec'y, Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 0520130469 (Dec. 20, 2013)(Settled May 14, 2012)

Attorney Mahoney's Client Awarded Approximately $1,000,000, plus removal canceled and returned to LEO duty with a promotion.

O'Keefe v. Donahoe, Postmaster Gen., United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), EEOC Appeal No. 0120130848 (Jun. 11, 2013)

EEOC Ruled Attorney Mahoney's client was discriminated against and ordered status quo anti relief, compensatory damages and fees..

Hussey v. United States Department of Agriculture, MSPB Docket No. DA-0752-10-0130-A-1 (Jan. 6, 2011).

Attorney Mahoney's Client's Removal Appeal Settled $45,000 in reasonable attorneys’ fees based upon the successfully enforced settlement.

Farrell v. Dep't of Treasury, EEOC Petition No. 0420070019 (Oct. 24, 2008)

Attorney Mahoney's Petition to Enforce Previous EEOC Decision Granted in successful SES nonselection EEOC case

Johnson v. Johanns, Sec'y, USDA, EEOC CASE No. 520-2006-00120X (EEOC NYDO, BAO, Default Judgment Sanctions Or. Jan. 22, 2007)

Attorney Mahoney Secured Full-Relief Default Judgment Sanctions/Full Relied in Novel Removal EEOC Case

See The Washington Post, Mar. 8, 2006, The Federal Page.

Settled Client's claims of sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliation against FEC

See the Gazette Newspaper June 3, 2005

Attorney Mahoney Settled Client's EEO Disability Discrimination Case v. NIH, NCI

Cornyn v. Department of the Treasury, MSPB Docket No. DC-0351-02-0576-I-1 (Sep. 30, 2003)

Attorney Mahoney Successfully Represents the U.S. Department of the Treasury in MSPB RIF Appeal

Farrell v. Snow, Sec'y, Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 07A20043 (May 5, 2003)

Attorney Mahoney WIns EEOC SES Nonselection Case for Federal Employee

Flythe v. Caldera, Sec'y, Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01972258 (2000)

Attorney Mahoney won a finding of discrimination and an award of full relief, with backpay and compensatory damages in excess of $100,000

VanWersch v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 197 F.3d 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1999)

Attorney Mahoney Wins Novel Due Process MSPB Appeal for Class of Disabled Federal Employees

Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, 943 F. Supp. 69 (D.D.C. 1996)

Attorney Mahoney won this case of first impression as the first case awarding compensatory damages under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a

Wheeler v. District of Columbia (D.D.C. Feb. 10, 1995)

Attorney Mahoney Won a Class Action in D.D.C., receiving a multi-million dollar backpay award for all retired U.S. Park Police

Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, 125 F.3d 877 (D.C. Cir. 1997), reh'g den., No. 96-503 (1997), cert. den., 524 U.S. 922 (1998)

42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-16 amended to cover Smithsonian Institution

See More Legal Cases

Education

1993

Catholic University of America

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

Assumption College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2009

D.C. Bar Association

How to take an effective deposition- CLE Attendee

Publications

2011

National Law Journal What Rights to Privacy Do Federal Employees Have?

N/A

National Employee Rights Institute Federal Employees Legal Survival Guide

Languages

English

Spanish

Portuguese

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution