Call now for a free consultation.
Avvo Rating |
Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer
Contributor level 7 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Areas |
|
||||||
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Contingent (25%-45%), Fixed (Sometimes), Free Consultation (30 minutes), Hourly ($150-$350/hour), Pro Bono (5%), Retainer (Sometimes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||||
Contact Information |
|
||||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||||
About MePhotos (0)Videos (5) |
I have enjoyed practicing law and mediating disputes for the past 40 years. It is very rewarding to be able to advise people about the law and to assist them... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“You will NOT find a better attorney then Jac Knust”Posted by: a Child Custody client, about 2 years ago.
Client Review:
Jac Knust is by far the best attorney you could ever have the pleasure of working with. He is fair, honest, and hardworking. Jac represented me in a...
more
Flag
“THE BEST”Posted by: NANCY, over 2 years ago.
Client Review:
MR KNUST TOOK CARE OF BOTH MY WILL AND A TRUST FOR MY SON AND I WAS VERY PLEASED HE ALSO HAS BEEN WILLING TO GIVE ME GOOD RECCOMENDATIONS FOR...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
I endorse this lawyer. I have referred my litigation clients to Mr. Knust for mediation and they have been very happy with his services. He is very... more Endorsement from lawyer: Beth Rogers , Columbia (MD), 5 months agoI have known Jac for many years. I endorse this lawyer. Endorsement from lawyer: Steven Scheinin , Towson (MD), 6 months ago |
License |
41 years since Jac E Knust was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 7
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and found him not guilty, finding that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had driven the vehicle.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|