No Photo

Kevin L. O'Brien

5.0
Rating: 6.7

Licensed for 37 years

Lawyer

About Kevin

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 37 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1989

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kevin L. O'Brien's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

180 Client Reviews

Showing 16 - 20 of 39 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Dave | June 08, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

I highly recommend Mr O'Brien

I hired Kevin about 5 years ago to handle my divorce. From the first time I met with him he was very honest & upfront and easy to work with. One of the things that I liked about him is that he is very realistic but also very professional and levelheaded with dealing with the whole situation I was goi...ng through with my divorce. Kevin and his staff were always available and easy to reach anytime I had a question or was looking to have a meeting. They were also very prompt with getting all the documents back to me and showing up to court on time. They did an excellent job representing me when they were dealing with my ex-wife's lawyer. I have contacted Kevin 5 or 6 times over the past couple years with a couple of quick follow up questions and he always return my calls promptly and took his time to speak with me to answer the questions that I had. I think this is rare -he never charged me for any of those quick 10-15 minute follow up calls. From the first time I spoke to him 5 years ago to the last time I spoke with him a couple weeks ago every time I hung up with him I felt like I was talking to a lawyer who really cared about my situation. If you're looking for a very knowledgeable lawyer with a great personality and who is easy to work with and has a great staff I highly recommend Kevin and his staff.

Posted by Hal | November 25, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Family

Custody and Alienation

Kevin represented me in family court in a custody dispute. A petition was filed against me containing a multitude of untrue allegations asserting I was a threat to the welfare of my children in an attempt to remove me from their lives. Consequently, the judge truncated my parenting time until further... findings were brought forth. Kevin laid out the options we had to disprove the allegations and to prove alienation attempts by my former spouse. He was very forthright in telling me likely outcomes and costs of the various approaches. He was mindful about cost effectiveness. I truly believe Kevin took a personal interest and concern for my situation. We ultimately had my children speak with the judge, had a psychological evaluation performed and drug and alcohol testing and evaluation. Ultimately, after several court appearances the judge agreed that alienation was apparent and dismissed all of the allegations, reinstating my parenting time. I discussed with Kevin the prospect of litigation to gain full custody of my children. He said he would do what I ever I wanted but did not believe it was in my best interest to go to trial, as the cost would be high and the outcome questionable. In summary, I highly recommend Kevin as a matrimonial attorney. He's extremely knowledgeable, he's fair, he's honest and he cares.

Posted by Tim | September 16, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Family Law Professional

If you have the misfortune to need a family court attorney because of divorce or child dependent matter, I would recommend Kevin O'Brien of Albany. This is a scary and difficult area of our culture. Families do break up and there are a lot of emotional and irrational things that happen. Kevin su...cceeded, in my opinion, to give me a precise matter-of-fact counsel to what needed to happen and what the specific Courts/Judges/Magistrates/System would do. You often won't think the process is logical or fair or the gray areas in your "agreement" is acceptable. Kevin cuts through all that quickly and gives you what you should do. He is not one of those guys that pushes the court process for his own self-interest in fees. If necessary, he will be tough and direct to the court and the opposing side. He can do that. He also is good at providing you the straight kind wisdom you are going to need on occasion. My recommendation is get to the point of that agreement on taking care of you & yours interest in a meticulous quick way. Kevin O'Brien is a valued attorney in providing that counsel.

Posted by Eric | September 09, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Divorce case

I was introduced to Kevin O'Brien by a mutual friend after my first attorney retired in the middle of my case. Kevin actually took the first step and called me. Kevin has been first rate returning my phone calls and emails promptly. He certainly pushed for me in all proceedings and court appearances ...and took no ones shenanigans. Kevin always made sure I received a copy of all correspondence pertaining to my case. Kevin strives to make sure that his file and your file matches and I can say that he meet that goal. The case has come to a satisfactory conclusion for me as I was just recently informed that I am divorced. Kevin has been very fair and upfront with me and I would very highly recommend him to anyone in need of a first rate divorce lawyer on their side.

Posted by Al | August 11, 2015 | Divorce & Separation

Attorney Endorsement

Kevin did an excellent job leading his team to manage my divorce. From the initial consultation to preparation for the final meeting with the judge, Kevin was honest, candid, and supportive. I greatly appreciated Kevin's command of the legal terrain, as well as his patience and guidance in getting me... up to speed about what I was in for and would be up against during the divorce process. Three of Kevin's strengths stood out during my case: His careful consideration of options that would achieve the most equitable outcome; his capacity to anticipate and preemptively address issues and problems throughout the process; and his willingness to advocate firmly for me with opposing counsel when the process demanded it, which it eventually did. So often it seems, the only way to manage big personal challenges (like divorce) is through it. I am grateful for Kevin's leadership and counsel to get us through and on to better things and places. Thank you Kevin.

See All Client Reviews

Kevin L. O'Brien's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kevin

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Peter J. Scagnelli headshot
Peter Scagnelli

Divorce and separation lawyer

Michael J. Belsky Sr. headshot
Michael Belsky

Divorce and separation lawyer

Laura M. Hoffman headshot
Laura Hoffman

Divorce and separation lawyer

Joseph P. Drescher headshot
Joseph Drescher

Divorce and separation lawyer

Daniel Seth Ross headshot
Daniel Ross

Divorce and separation lawyer

Kevin Michael Colwell headshot
Kevin Colwell

Divorce and separation lawyer

Carolyn Diane Kersch headshot
Carolyn Kersch

Divorce and separation lawyer

Kelly Marie Curro headshot
Kelly Curro

Family lawyer

Joanne Patricia Monagan headshot
Joanne Monagan

Divorce and separation lawyer

Barrett D. Mack headshot
Barrett Mack

Divorce and separation lawyer

Suzanne Louise Latimer headshot
Suzanne Latimer

Divorce and separation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.7 (Good)

Sample of Legal Cases

ZB v. SS, (New York State Family Court, Chemung County, 2017)

Father granted sole legal and physical custody with Mother getting one weekend of parenting time per month.

In the Matter of T.O. (Albany County 2017-07-11)

The Department did not have sufficient evidence to meet the higher evidentiary burden of proof, therefor the relief sought by Appellant was granted and the indication unfounded.

B. v. B. (New York State Family Court; County of Saratoga, 2015)

After trial, Court granted child's attendance at boarding school. It was in the child's best interest to attend. Father was not credible on direct or indirect testimony. Relocation claim denied as mother's burden for travel.

Shedden v. Shedden (New York State Supreme Court; County of Rensselaer, 2014)

After trial, wife denied any portion of medical practice; wife received reasonable maintenance and attorney's fees.

Bonocoro v. Bonocoro (New York State Supreme Court; Courty of Saratoga, 2013)

After trial, husband received 80% of business, wife received 20% of business; Court found wife was capable of seeking gainful employment, no maintenance, no attorney's fees.

G.F.H. v. K.M.B. (New York State Family Court; County of Tompkins, 2013)

Court held change of circumstances; mother given sole custody of three children. The fourth, a teenager, remained with the father, per her request, and per her strained relationship with the mother.

DeRuzzio v. Ruggles, 88 A.D. 3d 1091 (3rd Dept. 2011)

Court upheld Family Court's dismissal of Petitioner's petition. Providing the minor with a wine cooler on one occasion, while "inexcusable," was an incident in isolation; Petitioner's other arguments were dismissed because they were without merit.

Griffith v. Griffith (New York State Supreme Court; County of Rensselaer, 2011)

After trial, Court denied husband's relief because parties had relations during one-year period prior to his commencement of the divorce action.

T.O. v. R.O. (New York State Family Court; County of Rensselaer, 2011)

The de novo review ordered Mr. O.'s child support be based upon his current annual income - 25% for his two children - from the date of the filing of the petition.

Gasparro v. Edwards, 85 A.D.3d 1222 (3rd Dept. 2011)

Family Court Decision upheld wherein father had proved a sufficient change in circumstances and was awarded primary physical custody, in part due to Respondent's poor judgment, chaotic living situation, mental health concerns, and her work history.

In the Matter of the Appeal of P.G. Pursuant to Section 422 of the Social Services Law (Montgomery County, 2011)

Agency did not prove by a preponderance of evidence Appellant committed acts of child maltreatment. Report amended to unfounded and sealed. Question of whether maltreatment alleged is relevant and reasonably related to childcare need not be addressed.

Griffith v. Griffith (New York State Supreme Court; County of Rensselaer, 2010)

After trial, husband's claim denied because he could not prove allegations that it was unsafe or inappropriate for the parties to continue to reside together.

Gasparro v. Edwards (New York State Family Court; County of Saratoga, 2010)

After a trial, the father was designated primary parent. Best interests of the children demanded same considering each parent's home enviroment, fitness, stability, and ability to provide for the children's intellectual and emotional development.

Warchol v. Warchol (New York State Supreme Court; County of Albany, 2010)

After trial, Defendant's Motion denied; Plaintiff's Motion granted with costs and attorney's feees. Additional factual issues preserved for further proceedings.

Warchol v. Warchol (New York State Family Court; County of Albany, 2009)

After trial, Court held Respondent to pay child support for his daughter. Child support ordered over the cap was justified, in part, due to the reduction in Respondent's expenses paid by the family company. His petition was dismissed.

Murphy v. August (New York State Family Court; County of Albany, 2009)

After trial, change in circumstances was determined, wherein Respondent directed to pay child support. However, strict application not applied due to the circumstances and the financial resources of the parties.

Chopra v. Chopra (New York State Supreme Court; County of Nassau, 2008)

After trial, the Court denied the husband's claim for cruel and inhuman treatment, abandonment, and adultery. The Court held the husband's testimony to be unworthy of belief.

Parnes v. Parnes, 41 A.D.3d 934 (3rd Dept. 2007)

Defendant liable for past-due maintenance arrears; agreement clear and unambiguous; wife was awarded counsel fees because Defendant did not meet his burden of proof. However, no contempt found, as less drastic remedies were not used first.

R. v. R. (New York State Family Court; County of Fulton, 2006)

After 14 days of trial, the father proved change of circumstances. The children of the marriage were placed with him, under severe restrictions for both parents, including, but not limited to, seeking psychiatric counseling.

In the Matter of D.L.B. v. John A. Johnson, as Commissioner, et al., 19 A.D.3d 799 (3rd Dept. 2005)

Court found no merit to the arguments. Record supported removal and affirmed indicated reports.

In the Matter of the Appeal of D.D., Pursuant to Section 422 of the Social Services Law

Since maltreatment was not established by a fair preponderance of the evidence, the indicated report was amended to unfounded, with the records being sealed.

In the Matter of the Appeal of D.B., Pursuant to Sections 400 and 422 of the Social Services Law

Appellant's request to amend the indicated report was denied. Same was relevant and reasonably related to child care issues.

C.F. v. J.F. (New York State Family Court; County of Columbia, 2003)

Court awarded father with sole legal and physical custody of his son; father having proved a change in circumstance based on the mother's alienation.

B.C.B. v. P.N.S. (New York State Family Court; County of Schenectady, 2002)

After several days of trial, the Court held there existed a substantial change of circumstances, and awarded Petitioner sole legal and physical custody of his daughter.

In the Matter of Catherine, 280 A.D.2d 732 (3rd Dept. 2001)

Family Court's decision was affirmed. Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence Respondent's neglect of the child due to his failure to exercise a minimum degree of care.

In the Matter of LEE TT., 87 N.Y.2d 699 (1996)

Standard use by DSS to deny expunction request violated due process. DSS at Fair Hearing must us some credible evidence.

Szot v. Iannone, (New York State Supreme Court; County of Albany, 2009)

After trial, Court granted husband a divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, finding that anger, violence, and disparaging remarks by the wife and her son toward the husband served as a medical nexus to worsen husband's heart condition.

D. v. D. (New York State Family Court; County of Columbia, 2009)

After trial, father's petition was dismissed. The Court found his testimony inconsistent, and held that the mother having supplied alcohol to her 15-year-old on one occasion did not warrant a change in custody.

Williams v. Williams, No.: 514199 (3rd Dept. 2012)

Wife granted long-term maintenance, attorney's fees, and equitable portion of husband's pension, despite his objection to some financial accounts.

Yaghi v. Catalano, 84 A.D.ed 1521 (3rd Dept. 2011)

Husband could not prove he had an interest in the wife's business.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2008

Albany Law School

LL.M - Master of Laws

1987

Western New England University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1982

State University of New York, Albany

Master of Arts

1979

State University of New York, Albany

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution