No Photo

Kevin L. O'Brien

5.0
Rating: 6.7

Licensed for 37 years

Lawyer

About Kevin

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 37 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1989

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kevin L. O'Brien's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

180 Client Reviews

Showing 11 - 15 of 17 reviews | Cost of Services

Posted by Jim | November 05, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Family

Outstanding Attorney

My wife and I retained Kevin to represent us on a family matter regarding our grandchildren that had been ongoing with DSS for nearly two years. From the initial meeting we were very impressed with his willingness to listen coupled with his expertise and experience in this area of law. He advised u...s of our options and what he would recommend, but left the decision up to us. We naturally followed his advise and are very pleased that we did so. More than just giving us advise, he took a personal interest in our matter. It was obvious when we went to court that Kevin is an expert at what he does. He did an outstanding job at representing us and successfully argued points that we could not get anywhere with previously (with legal representation) . He is not afraid to take on a challenge and will give you a realistic opinion on what to expect. We were very impressed with his professionalism both within the courtroom and meeting with him in his office. He is always in control of the situation and you can sense the respect he receives from DSS, the other counsel and the judge. He follows through with what he says he is going to do especially with returning phone calls. It may be in the evening, but he does return your calls. We feel that his fees are very reasonable considering the representation you are receiving and we highly recommend Kevin. I will tell you that I am not one who would normally rave about a lawyer, but I can honestly say that Kevin is an exceptional attorney !

Posted by marc | September 16, 2015 | Hired Attorney

review on kevin o'brienb

seeking legal help can be like going to the dentist -- you know there will likely be pain involved and it will be expensive. Thankfully, that did not prove to be the case with Mr. O'Brien. In fact, my experience with him turned out to be a significant stress reliever. As an attorney, he turned ou...t to be an advocate in the truest sense of the word. There was never a doubt about him acting in my very best interests and he was always accessible and open to discussion. As to the expense...well, you soon find out in the legal field that you get what you pay for and Mr. O'Brien was a very good investment in protecting my interests.

Posted by Tim | September 16, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Family Law Professional

If you have the misfortune to need a family court attorney because of divorce or child dependent matter, I would recommend Kevin O'Brien of Albany. This is a scary and difficult area of our culture. Families do break up and there are a lot of emotional and irrational things that happen. Kevin su...cceeded, in my opinion, to give me a precise matter-of-fact counsel to what needed to happen and what the specific Courts/Judges/Magistrates/System would do. You often won't think the process is logical or fair or the gray areas in your "agreement" is acceptable. Kevin cuts through all that quickly and gives you what you should do. He is not one of those guys that pushes the court process for his own self-interest in fees. If necessary, he will be tough and direct to the court and the opposing side. He can do that. He also is good at providing you the straight kind wisdom you are going to need on occasion. My recommendation is get to the point of that agreement on taking care of you & yours interest in a meticulous quick way. Kevin O'Brien is a valued attorney in providing that counsel.

Posted by anonymous | June 30, 2015

Loyal, trustworthy and in your corner.

Kevin is approachable, loyal, trustworthy and in your corner. From my experience he maintained my privacy while helping me to comprehend where I stand in my case. At each turn Mr. O'Brien has been able to quickly analyze optional solutions to stay steps ahead allowing for choices rather than to sim...ply react in the progression of my situation. I must commend Mr. O'Brien on his communication techniques, never at any time did I feel dodged or put aside, actually the opposite. I was contacted often and given plenty of availability to his time, sometimes with professional insight at no charge. Kevin O'Brian has a great deal of knowledge and integrity And with MY best interest at the forefront. I searched through many attorneys, finding many jack asses who are focused on themselves, billing and personal convenience. Kevin O'Brien focused on me even with my crazy schedule.

Posted by Adell | May 04, 2015 | Divorce & Separation

He was my angel

Mr. O'Brien has served as my attorney for years, providing legal advice and counsel to me through a very difficult divorce. The end of a thirty-five year marriage is never easy, but Kevin really helped me get through that time in my life. I not only consider him to be my attorney, but he has become a... very dear friend. He is professional, honest, conscientious and courteous. While in the Court room, Kevin is highly driven in getting results, but never seems to lose sight of the needs of his clients and is very empathetic when needed. During my tumultuous divorce, there were many times where money became an issue and Kevin worked pro bono to help me obtain what, we felt, what was rightfully owed to a spouse after such a long marriage. I am disabled, and often times was unable, both physically and emotionally, to attend court, yet Kevin would graciously attend on my behalf and later rearrange his schedule to meet with me, after hours and after my doctor appointments, to ensure I had a good understanding of my case. Kevin is confident in his work and knowledgeable of the law. He has a natural gift in reacting to unforeseen circumstances while maintaining his composure and making one feel at ease. I would certainly recommend Kevin for legal counsel and can say with the utmost confidence that he will deliver results and will work hard in ensuring his clients are not only pleased with his services, but are truly "winners" in the end."

See All Client Reviews

Kevin L. O'Brien's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kevin

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Peter J. Scagnelli headshot
Peter Scagnelli

Divorce and separation lawyer

Michael J. Belsky Sr. headshot
Michael Belsky

Divorce and separation lawyer

Laura M. Hoffman headshot
Laura Hoffman

Divorce and separation lawyer

Joseph P. Drescher headshot
Joseph Drescher

Divorce and separation lawyer

Daniel Seth Ross headshot
Daniel Ross

Divorce and separation lawyer

Kevin Michael Colwell headshot
Kevin Colwell

Divorce and separation lawyer

Carolyn Diane Kersch headshot
Carolyn Kersch

Divorce and separation lawyer

Kelly Marie Curro headshot
Kelly Curro

Family lawyer

Joanne Patricia Monagan headshot
Joanne Monagan

Divorce and separation lawyer

Barrett D. Mack headshot
Barrett Mack

Divorce and separation lawyer

Suzanne Louise Latimer headshot
Suzanne Latimer

Divorce and separation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.7 (Good)

Sample of Legal Cases

ZB v. SS, (New York State Family Court, Chemung County, 2017)

Father granted sole legal and physical custody with Mother getting one weekend of parenting time per month.

In the Matter of T.O. (Albany County 2017-07-11)

The Department did not have sufficient evidence to meet the higher evidentiary burden of proof, therefor the relief sought by Appellant was granted and the indication unfounded.

B. v. B. (New York State Family Court; County of Saratoga, 2015)

After trial, Court granted child's attendance at boarding school. It was in the child's best interest to attend. Father was not credible on direct or indirect testimony. Relocation claim denied as mother's burden for travel.

Shedden v. Shedden (New York State Supreme Court; County of Rensselaer, 2014)

After trial, wife denied any portion of medical practice; wife received reasonable maintenance and attorney's fees.

Bonocoro v. Bonocoro (New York State Supreme Court; Courty of Saratoga, 2013)

After trial, husband received 80% of business, wife received 20% of business; Court found wife was capable of seeking gainful employment, no maintenance, no attorney's fees.

G.F.H. v. K.M.B. (New York State Family Court; County of Tompkins, 2013)

Court held change of circumstances; mother given sole custody of three children. The fourth, a teenager, remained with the father, per her request, and per her strained relationship with the mother.

DeRuzzio v. Ruggles, 88 A.D. 3d 1091 (3rd Dept. 2011)

Court upheld Family Court's dismissal of Petitioner's petition. Providing the minor with a wine cooler on one occasion, while "inexcusable," was an incident in isolation; Petitioner's other arguments were dismissed because they were without merit.

Griffith v. Griffith (New York State Supreme Court; County of Rensselaer, 2011)

After trial, Court denied husband's relief because parties had relations during one-year period prior to his commencement of the divorce action.

T.O. v. R.O. (New York State Family Court; County of Rensselaer, 2011)

The de novo review ordered Mr. O.'s child support be based upon his current annual income - 25% for his two children - from the date of the filing of the petition.

Gasparro v. Edwards, 85 A.D.3d 1222 (3rd Dept. 2011)

Family Court Decision upheld wherein father had proved a sufficient change in circumstances and was awarded primary physical custody, in part due to Respondent's poor judgment, chaotic living situation, mental health concerns, and her work history.

In the Matter of the Appeal of P.G. Pursuant to Section 422 of the Social Services Law (Montgomery County, 2011)

Agency did not prove by a preponderance of evidence Appellant committed acts of child maltreatment. Report amended to unfounded and sealed. Question of whether maltreatment alleged is relevant and reasonably related to childcare need not be addressed.

Griffith v. Griffith (New York State Supreme Court; County of Rensselaer, 2010)

After trial, husband's claim denied because he could not prove allegations that it was unsafe or inappropriate for the parties to continue to reside together.

Gasparro v. Edwards (New York State Family Court; County of Saratoga, 2010)

After a trial, the father was designated primary parent. Best interests of the children demanded same considering each parent's home enviroment, fitness, stability, and ability to provide for the children's intellectual and emotional development.

Warchol v. Warchol (New York State Supreme Court; County of Albany, 2010)

After trial, Defendant's Motion denied; Plaintiff's Motion granted with costs and attorney's feees. Additional factual issues preserved for further proceedings.

Warchol v. Warchol (New York State Family Court; County of Albany, 2009)

After trial, Court held Respondent to pay child support for his daughter. Child support ordered over the cap was justified, in part, due to the reduction in Respondent's expenses paid by the family company. His petition was dismissed.

Murphy v. August (New York State Family Court; County of Albany, 2009)

After trial, change in circumstances was determined, wherein Respondent directed to pay child support. However, strict application not applied due to the circumstances and the financial resources of the parties.

Chopra v. Chopra (New York State Supreme Court; County of Nassau, 2008)

After trial, the Court denied the husband's claim for cruel and inhuman treatment, abandonment, and adultery. The Court held the husband's testimony to be unworthy of belief.

Parnes v. Parnes, 41 A.D.3d 934 (3rd Dept. 2007)

Defendant liable for past-due maintenance arrears; agreement clear and unambiguous; wife was awarded counsel fees because Defendant did not meet his burden of proof. However, no contempt found, as less drastic remedies were not used first.

R. v. R. (New York State Family Court; County of Fulton, 2006)

After 14 days of trial, the father proved change of circumstances. The children of the marriage were placed with him, under severe restrictions for both parents, including, but not limited to, seeking psychiatric counseling.

In the Matter of D.L.B. v. John A. Johnson, as Commissioner, et al., 19 A.D.3d 799 (3rd Dept. 2005)

Court found no merit to the arguments. Record supported removal and affirmed indicated reports.

In the Matter of the Appeal of D.D., Pursuant to Section 422 of the Social Services Law

Since maltreatment was not established by a fair preponderance of the evidence, the indicated report was amended to unfounded, with the records being sealed.

In the Matter of the Appeal of D.B., Pursuant to Sections 400 and 422 of the Social Services Law

Appellant's request to amend the indicated report was denied. Same was relevant and reasonably related to child care issues.

C.F. v. J.F. (New York State Family Court; County of Columbia, 2003)

Court awarded father with sole legal and physical custody of his son; father having proved a change in circumstance based on the mother's alienation.

B.C.B. v. P.N.S. (New York State Family Court; County of Schenectady, 2002)

After several days of trial, the Court held there existed a substantial change of circumstances, and awarded Petitioner sole legal and physical custody of his daughter.

In the Matter of Catherine, 280 A.D.2d 732 (3rd Dept. 2001)

Family Court's decision was affirmed. Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence Respondent's neglect of the child due to his failure to exercise a minimum degree of care.

In the Matter of LEE TT., 87 N.Y.2d 699 (1996)

Standard use by DSS to deny expunction request violated due process. DSS at Fair Hearing must us some credible evidence.

Szot v. Iannone, (New York State Supreme Court; County of Albany, 2009)

After trial, Court granted husband a divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, finding that anger, violence, and disparaging remarks by the wife and her son toward the husband served as a medical nexus to worsen husband's heart condition.

D. v. D. (New York State Family Court; County of Columbia, 2009)

After trial, father's petition was dismissed. The Court found his testimony inconsistent, and held that the mother having supplied alcohol to her 15-year-old on one occasion did not warrant a change in custody.

Williams v. Williams, No.: 514199 (3rd Dept. 2012)

Wife granted long-term maintenance, attorney's fees, and equitable portion of husband's pension, despite his objection to some financial accounts.

Yaghi v. Catalano, 84 A.D.ed 1521 (3rd Dept. 2011)

Husband could not prove he had an interest in the wife's business.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2008

Albany Law School

LL.M - Master of Laws

1987

Western New England University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1982

State University of New York, Albany

Master of Arts

1979

State University of New York, Albany

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution